Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
Reaction mass of [(2S,3R,4S,5S,6R)-6-[[(2R,3R,4R,5S,6R)-3,4-dihydroxy-6-(hydroxymethyl)-5-[(2S,3R,4R,5R,6S)-3,4,5-trihydroxy-6-methyloxan-2-yl]oxyoxan-2-yl]oxymethyl]-3,4,5-trihydroxyoxan-2-yl] (1S,2R,4aS,6aR,6aR,6bR,8R,8aR,9R,10R,11R,12aR,14bS)-8,10,11-trihydroxy-9-(hydroxymethyl)-1,2,6a,6b,9,12a-hexamethyl-2,3,4,5,6,6a,7,8,8a,10,11,12,13,14b-tetradecahydro-1H-picene-4a-carboxylate and [(2S,3R,4S,5S,6R)-6-[[(2R,3R,4R,5S,6R)-3,4-dihydroxy-6-(hydroxymethyl)-5-[(2S,3R,4R,5R,6S)-3,4,5-trihydroxy-6-methyloxan-2-yl]oxyoxan-2-yl]oxymethyl]-3,4,5-trihydroxyoxan-2-yl] (4aS,6aR,6aS,6bR,8R,8aR,9R,10R,11R,12aR,14bS)-8,10,11-trihydroxy-9-(hydroxymethyl)-2,2,6a,6b,9,12a-hexamethyl-1,3,4,5,6,6a,7,8,8a,10,11,12,13,14b-tetradecahydropicene-4a-carboxylate
EC number: 953-451-9 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Water solubility
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- water solubility
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- From 27 november 2020 to 16 december 2020
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 105 (Water Solubility)
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of method:
- flask method
- Key result
- Water solubility:
- >= 676.5 - <= 677.5 g/L
- Temp.:
- 20 °C
- pH:
- ca. 8
- Conclusions:
- In conclusion, the water solubility of the test item “Reaction mass of Madecassoside and Terminoloside ” was determined to be 677 g/L at 20 ± 0.5°C.
- Executive summary:
The aim of this study was to determine experimentally the water solubility on the test item ” Reaction de mass of Madecassoside and Terminoloside “ according to the OECD 105 guideline using the flask method.
The study was carried out in accordance with the study plan No.20/1171F/a dated November 26, 2020.
There were three deviations and no amendment during this study.
The results of this study are summarized below:
Four flasks were used to mix 5 x 5 g of the test item with 5 mL of water. Flasks were placed in a temperature controlled incubator at 30°C (monitored and recorded) and under stirring at 180 rpm. After 24 hours, one flask was removed and placed in another temperature controlled oven at 20 +/- 0.5°C during 24 hours. After sampling in the aqueous phase, the concentration of the test item was then determined following the analytical method HPLC/UV. The other flasks were
treated similarly after initial equilibration at 30°C for 2, 3, 4 and 5 days respectively. The pH of samples was measured at 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours 96 hours and 120 hours. The temperature was monitored and recorded during the test and the temperature was well maintained at 20 +/- 0.5°C.
Water solubility results for each replicate are presented below:
- T24 hours: Test item concentration : 707 g/L ; pH strip: 8
- T48 hours: Test item concentration : 623 g/L ; pH strip: 8
- T72 hours: Test item concentration: see comments § 10.3.4 ; pH strip: 8
- T96 hours: Test item concentration: 669 g/L ; pH strip: 8
- T120 hours: Test item concentration: 708g/L ; pH strip: 8
As required by the guideline, the concentration measured in the last vessels do not differ by more than 15 %. Thus, as shown by these results, the water solubility of the test item is 677 g/L.Conclusion:
In conclusion, the water solubility of the test item “Reaction mass of Madecassoside and Terminoloside ” was determined to be 677 g/L at 20 ± 0.5°C.
Reference
RESULTS
1 Preliminary estimation
A weight of 0.1 g of test item was shaken at room temperature with increasing volumes of water in a stepwise manner.
After each addition of an amount of water, the mixture was shaken for 10 minutes and the dissolution was assessed visually In order to estimate the solubility of the test item. At the request of the sponsor, additional evaluations were performed.
Test temperature: 19.9C
Amount test item weighed (g) | 0.101 | 0.101 | 0.101 | 0.101 | 0.101 | 0.101 | 0.101 |
mL of water for 0.1 g soluble | 0.1 | 0.5 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 100 | > 100 |
Approximative solubility g/L | > 1,000 | 1,000 to 200 | 200 to 100 | 100 to 50 | 50 to 10 | 10 to 1 | < 1 |
Result (Yes or No) | Not soluble | soluble | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
Taking the visual observations into account, the preliminary test shows that the solubility of the test item was obtained at 200 g/L.
The solubility estimated of the test item “Reaction mass of Madecassoside and Terminoloside ” in water at ambient temperature was comprised between 1,000 g/L and 200 g/L.
2 Analytical validation
2.1 Used analytical equipment
Material (FCBA reference) | Detection (FCBA reference) | Manufacturer |
HPLC/UV (HPLC 1003) | PDA 2998 Waters (DETE 1008) | Waters |
HPLC conditions for the determination of benfluralin
Data handling system: Empower 3
Columns: Ascentis express C18 (10 cm * 4.6 mm internal diameter – 5 μm)
Pre-column: Security guard 4 x 3 mm
Column temperature: 40°C
Mobile phase composition: Gradient elution
Time (minutes) | %A | %B |
0.0 | 85 | 15 |
1 | 85 | 15 |
20 | 50 | 50 |
25 | 50 | 50 |
Mobile phase A: Ammonium phosphate buffer (1.15g/L)
Mobile phase B: Acetonitrile/Methanol (70/30)
Flow rate: 1.4mL/min
Injection volume: 10 μL
Detector: UV set at 204 nm
Retention time:
Approximatively 9.8 minutes for Madecassoside
2.2 Preparation of interference solution (specificity)
The aqueous phase was analysed directly by HPLC/UV.
2.3 Preparation of accuracy samples
The matrix distilled water was fortified with the reference item at 2 fortification levels (40 mg/L and 200 mg/L) in order to assess the performance of the method according to the criteria described in the paragraph 9.3. Three independent
samples were prepared for each level of spiking.The spiked samples were analysed directly by HPLC/UV.
2.4 Specificity
Specificity was studied by carrying out once an analysis of the matrix (distilled water). The specificity was assessed by checking for any interference in HPLC/UV at the retention time of Madecassoside (identified with the reference item).
No interference showed at retention time of compound: Madecassoside.
The results obtained for the specificity were compared to the acceptance criteria:
Active substance to quantify | Criteria of acceptance | Conformity |
Reaction mass of Madecassoside and Terminoloside” | No interference or blank values (non-fortified) should not exceed 30% of the LOQ. If this exceeded, detailed justification is required. | Yes |
On the basis of these results, the applied method to quantify the test item “Reaction mass of Madecassoside and Terminoloside” in the distilled water is considered as specific.
2.5 Linearity
Linearity (response function) was examined in order to check the linearity of the response for the four compounds.
Calibration solutions in the range of 28 mg/L to 220 mg/L on seven calibration spots with single determination (28 mg/L - 40 mg/L – 60 mg/L – 100 mg/L – 150 mg/L – 200 mg/L and 220 mg/L (10 % highest point) were prepared within blank matrix samples (evaporated extract). A linear regression and its correlation coefficient were calculated.
Calibration range in mg/L | Regression line - equation (Y = peak area, X = concentration in mg/L) | Regression line – correlation coefficient r |
28 to 220 mg/L with single determination at 7 concentrations | Y = 1.781604*103*X – 2.352909*102 | 0.999533 |
The calibration was found to be linear, with the correlation coefficient 0.999533, (r > 0.99).
The results obtained for the linearity were compared to the acceptance criteria:
Acceptance criteria | Active substances to quantify | Criteria of acceptance | Conformity |
SOP PRQ 2934 [6] | Madecassoside | The equation of the calibration line and the correlation coefficient (r) must be reported and a typical calibration plot submitted. Correlation coefficient r should be > 0.99. | Yes |
On the basis of these results, the applied method to quantify “Madecassoside” is considered to be linear on the concentration range 24.5 mg/L to 60.5 mg/L corresponds to 28 mg/L to 220 mg/L in aqueous phase.
On the basis of these results, the applied method to quantify the test item “Reaction mass of Madecassoside and Terminoloside” in the aqueous phase is considered linear on the concentration range 28- 220 mg/L corresponding to 28
mg/L to 220 mg/L in the aqueous phase.
2.6 Precision and Accuracy
Precision and accuracy were carried out by one operator and on one analytical serie. The validation conditions were obtained by using the same method and the same equipment.
Precision was expressed by a relative standard deviation of repeatability RSDr (%).
For the levels of concentration, the recovery rate was calculated by comparison between the theoretical "target value" and the average determined value of the 3 samples of spiked ultra-pure water. Accuracy was assessed through recovery
rate calculations.
Precision and recovery rate at 40 mg/L
Sample ID | Concentration in aqueous phase (mg/L) | Recovery rate (%) |
20/1171F/1/a/1/a/Dop1 40mg/L | 41.08 | 102.70 |
20/1171F/1/a/2/a/Dop2 40mg/L | 41.06 | 102.65 |
20/1171F/1/a/3/a/Dop3 40mg/L | 40.73 | 101.83 |
Average (%) | --- | 102.4 |
Standard deviation (%) | --- | 0.489 |
RSDr (%)* | --- | 0.5 |
*Relative standard deviation of repeatability calculated from rounded values of the mean and the standard deviation.
The result obtained for the precision was compared to the acceptance criteria according to SOP PRQ 2934 [6]
Active substance to quantify | Criteria of acceptance Validation criteria | Results | Conformity |
Madecassoside | The precision of the method must be reported as repeatability of recovery at each fortification level. The RSD should be ≤ 20% per level. In certain justified cases higher variability may be accepted. | RSDr = 0.5 % (n=3) | Yes |
The result obtained for the accuracy was compared to the acceptance criteria according to SOP PRQ 2934 [6].
Active substance to quantify | Criteria of acceptance Validation criteria | Results | Conformity |
Madecassoside | The accuracy of the method should be reported as mean recovery. Mean recoveries for each level should be in the range 70-110%. Lower recoveries may be acceptable for difficult analytes, providing precision data are acceptable.recoveries may be acceptable for difficult analytes, providing precision data are acceptable. | Mean recovery = 102.4% (n=3) Within 70-110% | Yes |
On the basis of these results, the applied method to quantify the Madecassoside is considered precise and accurate at 40 mg/L in the aqueous phase. All acceptance criteria have been satisfied.
Precision and recovery rate at 200 mg/L
Sample ID | Concentration in aqueous phase (mg/L) | Recovery rate (%) |
20/1171F/1/a/4/ Dop1 200mg/L | 191.92 | 95.96 |
20/1171F/1/a/4/ Dop2 200mg/L | 193.31 | 96.65 |
20/1171F/1/a/4/ Dop3 200mg/L | 197.06 | 98.53 |
Average (%) | --- | 97.0 |
Standard deviation (%) | --- | 1.330 |
RSDr (%)* | --- | 1.4 |
*Relative standard deviation of repeatability calculated from rounded values of the mean and the standard deviation
The result obtained for the precision was compared to the acceptance criteria according to SOP PRQ 2934 [6].
Active substance to quantify | Criteria of acceptance Validation criteria | Results | Conformity |
Madecassoside | The precision of the method must be reported as repeatability of recovery at each fortification level. The RSD should be ≤ 20% per level. In certain justified cases higher variability may be accepted. | RSDr = 1.4 % (n=3) | Yes |
The result obtained for the accuracy was compared to the acceptance criteria according to SOP PRQ 2934 [6] .
Active substance to quantify | Criteria of acceptance Validation criteria | Results | Conformity |
Madecassoside | The accuracy of the method should be reported as mean recovery. Mean recoveries for each level should be in the range 70-110%. Lower recoveries may be acceptable for difficult analytes, providing precision data are acceptable. recoveries may be acceptable for difficult analytes, providing precision data are acceptable. | Mean recovery = 97.0% (n=5) Within 70-110% | Yes |
On the basis of these results, the applied method to quantify the Madecassoside is considered precise and accurate at 55 mg/L in the aqueous phase. All acceptance criteria have been satisfied.
2.7 Validation criteria
Results obtained for the Unknown Standards were compared to the acceptance criteria:
Date of analysis | Sample ID | Nominal value | Measured value (mg/L) | Deviation (%) | Conformity +/- 15% / nominal value |
November 30, 2020 | 20/1171a 100 mg/L 8/271120/6 | 100 mg/L | 99.16 | -0.8 | Yes |
November 30, 2020 | 20/1171a 100 mg/L 8/271120/6 | 100 mg/L | 99.74 | -0.3 | Yes |
Results obtained for the Quality Control (QC) were compared to the acceptance criteria:
Date of analysis | Sample ID | Nominal value | Measured value (mg/L) | Deviation (%) | Conformity +/- 15% / nominal value |
November 30, 2020 | 20/1171Fa QC 100 mg/L 8/271120/10 | 100 mg/L | 96.83 | - 3.2 | Yes |
November 30, 2020 | 20/1171Fa QC 100 mg/L 8/271120/10 | 100 mg/L | 96.66 | - 3.3 | Yes |
The unknown standards and the Quality controls (QCs) are well within 85 mg/L and 115 mg/L.
2.8 Conclusion
In accordance with results of the analytical method validation, all acceptance criteria were satisfied: the applied method is consistent with the requirements of the validation for the quantitative analysis of Madecassoside in aqueous phase
samples.
The validation results are summarised as follows:
Parameter | ”Madecassoside |
Calibration range Correlation coefficient (r) | 28 mg/L to 220 mg/L > 0.99 or greater |
Precision | RSDr = 0.5% at 40 mg/L RSDr = 1.4 % at 200 mg/L |
Accuracy | Recovery = 102.4 % at 40 mg/L Recovery = 97.0 % at 200 mg/L |
After this validation step, the analytical protocol was revised for the quantitative analysis of Madecassoside in aqueous phase samples.
This analytical method for determination of the test item “Reaction mass of Madecassoside and Terminoloside”in the aqueous solutions was successfully validated and was fit to purpose.
After this validation step, the analytical protocol was revised for the quantitative analysis of the test item Reaction mass of Madecassoside and Terminolosid” in aqueous phase:
- Analytical protocol FCBA Chemistry No.484-e version 2: Method for the chemical analysis of “Reaction de
mass of Madecassoside and Terminoloside” in water samples from OECD 105 testing by HPLC/UV. (annex 1)
This document describes the following information: range, preparation conditions and analytical conditions by HPLC/UV, statistical results (specificity, precision, and accuracy).
Examples:
- Annex 2-1: Calibration curve
- Annex 2-2: Chromatogram of an analytical standard at 100 mg/L
- Annex 2-3: Chromatogram of a water spiked at 40 mg/L
- Annex 2-4: Chromatogram of a water spiked at 200 mg/L
3 Main test: Flask method
3.1 Preparation for the saturation
The weight, the used volume and the temperatures are presented in the table below:
Assay 24 hours | Assay 48 hours | Assay 72 hours | Assay 96 hours | Assay 96 hours | |
Weight of the test item (g) | 5.053 | 5.040 | 5.032 | 5.019 | 5.020 |
Volume of water (mL) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
Temperature: start of the testing (°C) | 30.0 +/- 1 | 30.0 +/- 1 | 30.0 +/- 1 | 30.0 +/- 1 | 30.0 +/- 1 |
Temperature after equilibration time (°C) | 20+/- 0.5 | 20+/- 0.5 | 20+/- 0.5 | 20+/- 0.5 | 20+/- 0.5 |
Strip pH | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 |
3.2 Formula for the calculations
C = (AR∗Vf∗Vd∗D) / (Vext∗1000)
Where:
C = Concentration of the compound in aqueous phase (g/L)
AR = concentration measured by HPLC/UV (mg/L)
Vff = Final volume (first dilution) (10 mL)
Vif= Initial volume (first dilution) (0.1 mL)
Vfs = Final volume (second dilution) (5 mL)
Vis= Initial volume (second dilution) (0.1 mL)
3.3 Results after equilibration time
Linearity (response function) was examined in order to check the linearity of the response.
Date | Calibration range in mg/L | Regression line - equation (Y = peak area, X = concentration in mg/L) | Regression line – correlation coefficient r |
02.DEC.20 | 40 to 200 mg/L with single determination at 5 concentrations | Y = 1.750344*103*X + 6.653046*102 | 0.999994 |
03.DEC.20 | 40 to 200 mg/L with single determination at 5 concentrations | Y = 1.758130*103*X + 1.48812*103 | 0.999977 |
08.DEC.20 | 40 to 200 mg/L with single determination at 5 concentrations | Y = 1.747340*103*X + 4.343242*102 | 0.999998 |
15.DEC.20 | 40 to 200 mg/L with single determination at 5 concentrations | Y = 1.732227*103*X + 1.689378*103 | 0.999983 |
15.DEC.20 | 40 to 200 mg/L with single determination at 5 concentrations | Y = 1.729108*103*X + 2.777412*102 | 0.999995 |
3.4 Results
The results of the hydrosolubility determination are indicated in the following tables.
Exposure time (hour) | 24 | 48 | 72 | 96 | 120 |
Sample ID | 20/1171F/1/a/T24h | 20/1171F/1/a/T48h | 20/1171F/1/a/T72h | 20/1171F/1/a/T96h | 20/1171F/1/a/T120h |
Result (mg/L) | 141.33 | 124.61 | 112.13 | 133.84 | 141.62 |
First dilution - Initial volume of dilution (mL) | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
First dilution - Final volume of dilution (mL) | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
Second dilution - Initial volume of dilution (mL) | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
Second dilution - Final volume of dilution (mL) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
Solubility of the test item (g/L) | 707 | 623 | 561* | 669 | 708 |
* According to the Dixon’s statistical test, this value is NOT considered to be an outlier value. See comments below.
A summary is presented in the following table:
The test is considered as satisfactory if the concentrations measured in the last vessels not differ more than 15 %.
Assay 24 hours | Assay 48 hours | Assay 72 hours | |
Results (g/L) | 707 | 623 | 561 |
Deviation T48hrs/T72Hrs | --- | --- | - 10% |
As required by the OECD 105 guideline, the concentrations measured in the two last vessels differ less than 15 % (+10 %), the test was considered to be satisfactory.
The maximum of difference observed on the three last sample is: 707-561 = 146 g/L.
The mean of the minimum and the maximum values is (707+561)/2 = 634 g/L. The relative difference, corresponding to the ratio of the maximum difference and the mean of the minimum and the maximum values is: (146/634)* 100 = 23.0%.
The concentrations measured in the three vessels differ more than 15 % (23%) and consequently, two additional samples were prepared for 96 hours and 120 hours.
Assay 24 hours | Assay 48 hours | Assay 72 hours | Assay 96 hours | Assay 120 hours | |
Results (g/L) | 707 | 623 | 561* | 669 | 708 |
Average (g/L) | 677 | 677 | 677 | 677 | 677 |
Deviation T72hrs/T96Hrs | --- | --- | --- | --- | + 5.8 |
* According to the Dixon’s statistical test, this value is NOT considered to be an outlier value. In the following calculation, the measured value at 72 hours was not taken into account in the firstly.
As required by the OECD 105 guideline, the concentrations measured in the two last vessels differ less than 15 %
(+5.8 %), the test was considered to be satisfactory.
The maximum of difference observed on the four samples is: 708 -623 = 85 g/L.
The mean of the minimum and the maximum values is (708+623)/2 = 665.5 g/L. The relative difference, corresponding to the ratio of the maximum difference and the mean of the minimum and the maximum values is: (85/665.5)* 100 = 12.8%.
The concentrations measured in the four vessels differ less than 15 % (12.8%) and consequently, the water solubility was determined using the mean of the four samples, the water solubility has been determined to 677 g/L.
If the measured value at 72 hours is taken into account in the calculation, water solubility is as follows
Assay 24 hours | Assay 48 hours | Assay 72 hours | Assay 96 hours | Assay 120 hours | |
Results (g/L) | 707 | 623 | 561* | 669 | 708 |
Average (g/L) | 654 | 654 | 654 | 654 | 654 |
Deviation T72hrs/T96Hrs | --- | --- | --- | --- | + 5.8 |
* According to the Dixon’s statistical test, this value is NOT considered to be an outlier value. In the following calculation, the measured value at 72 hours was not taken into account in the firstly.
As required by the OECD 105 guideline, the concentrations measured in the two last vessels differ less than 15 % (+4.6 %), the test was considered to be satisfactory.
The maximum of difference observed on the five samples is: 708-561 = 147 g/L.
The mean of the minimum and the maximum values is (708+561)/2 = 634.5 g/L. The relative difference, corresponding to the ratio of the maximum difference and the mean of the minimum and the maximum values is: (147/634.5)* 100 = 23.2%.
The concentrations measured in the five vessels differ more than 15 % (23.2%), the obtained deviation was not compliant according to the acceptance criteria and for information, the water solubility was determined using the mean of
the five last samples, the water solubility has been determined to 654 g/L.
The difference observed on both water solubility is 677-654 = 23 g/L which represents a deviation of -3.4 % [(654-677)*100]/677 = - 3.4%. This deviation was considered as low.
Consequently, the water solubility of the test item has been determined to 677 g/L.
3.5 Validation criteria
Results obtained for the Unknown Standards were compared to the acceptance criteria:
Date of analysis | Sample ID | Nominal value | Measured value (mg/L) | Deviation (%) | Conformity +/- 15% / nominal value |
02.12.20 | 20/1171a 100 mg/L 8/271120/6 | 100 mg/L | 100.44 | + 0.4 | Yes |
100.12 | +0.1 | Yes | |||
03.12.20 | 20/1171a 100 mg/L 8/271120/6 | 100 mg/L | 99.73 | - 0.3 | Yes |
99.11 | - 0.9 | Yes | |||
08.12.20 | 20/1171a 100 mg/L 8/271120/6 | 100 mg/L | 99.86 | - 0.1 | Yes |
100.08 | + 0.1 | Yes | |||
15.12.20 | 20/1171a 100 mg/L 8/271120/6 | 100 mg/L | 98.51 | - 1.5 | Yes |
97.73 | - 2.3 | Yes | |||
15.12.20 | 20/1171a 100 mg/L 8/271120/6 | 100 mg/L | 100.28 | + 0.3 | Yes |
100.02 | 0.0 | Yes |
Results obtained for the Quality Control (QC) were compared to the acceptance criteria:
Date of analysis | Sample ID | Nominal value | Measured value (mg/L) | Deviation (%) | Conformity +/- 15% / nominal value |
02.12.20 | 20/1171Fa QC 100 mg/L 8/271120/10 | 100 mg/L | 105.59 | + 5.6 | Yes |
105.35 | + 5.4 | Yes | |||
03.12.20 | 20/1171Fa QC 100 mg/L 8/271120/10 | 100 mg/L | 96.55 | - 3.5 | Yes |
96.83 | - 3.2 | Yes | |||
08.12.20 | 20/1171Fa QC 100 mg/L 8/271120/10 | 100 mg/L | 96.78 | - 3.2 | Yes |
97.38 | - 2.6 | Yes | |||
15.12.20 | 20/1171Fa QC 100 mg/L 8/271120/10 | 100 mg/L | 95.93 | - 4.1 | Yes |
95.59 | - 4.4 | Yes | |||
15.12.20 | 20/1171Fa QC 100 mg/L 8/271120/10 | 100 mg/L | 97.80 | - 2.2 | Yes |
97.85 | - 2.2 | Yes |
The unknown standards and the Quality controls (QCs) are well within 85 mg/L and 115 mg/L
Example:
- Annex 2-7: Chromatograms of test item at 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours ,96 hours and 120 hours
3.6 Conclusion
In conclusion, the water solubility of the test item “Reaction mass of Madecassoside and Terminoloside ” was determined to be 677 g/L at 20+ +/- 0.5°C.
Description of key information
In conclusion, the water solubility of the test item “Reaction mass of Madecassoside and Terminoloside ” was determined to be 677 g/L at 20 ± 0.5°C.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- Water solubility:
- 677 g/L
- at the temperature of:
- 20 °C
Additional information
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
