Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 701-316-8 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Vapour pressure
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- vapour pressure
- Type of information:
- calculation (if not (Q)SAR)
- Remarks:
- Modified Watson Correlation
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- accepted calculation method
- Justification for type of information:
- This endpoint study record is part of a Weight of Evidence approach comprising a calculation (this study) and QSAR predictions and experimental values of the UVCB constituents. All data sources agree in the estimated range for vapour pressure and are sufficient to fulfil the information requirements as further explained in the provided endpoint summary.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to other study
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 104 (Vapour Pressure Curve)
- Version / remarks:
- Estimation by use of the modified Watson correlation
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Key result
- Temp.:
- 25 °C
- Vapour pressure:
- 0.386 kPa
- Remarks on result:
- other: Based on a boiling point of 405.15K
- Conclusions:
- The vapour pressure is predicted to be 0.386 kPa at 25 °C
- Executive summary:
The vapour pressure is predicted to be 0.386 kPa at 25 °C
- Endpoint:
- vapour pressure
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- data from handbook or collection of data
- Justification for type of information:
- This endpoint study record is part of a Weight of Evidence approach comprising an experimental value of one of the UVCB constituents (this study), a calculation based on the boiling point and QSAR predictions of the UVCB constituents. All data sources agree in the estimated range for vapour pressure and are sufficient to fulfil the information requirements as further explained in the provided endpoint summary.
- Guideline:
- other: Reference value; no method reported
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of method:
- other: Not specified
- Temp.:
- 25 °C
- Vapour pressure:
- 0.022 Pa
- Conclusions:
- The experimental value for main constituent number 1 reported by MPBPWIN is 0.0224 Pa at 25 °C.
- Executive summary:
The experimental value for main constituent number 1 reported by MPBPWIN is 0.0224 Pa at 25 °C.
- Endpoint:
- vapour pressure
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with adequate and reliable documentation / justification
- Justification for type of information:
- This endpoint study record is part of a Weight of Evidence approach comprising an experimental value of one of the UVCB constituents, a calculation based on the boiling point and QSAR predictions of the UVCB constituents (this record). All data sources agree in the estimated range for vapour pressure and are sufficient to fulfil the information requirements as further explained in the provided endpoint summary.
1. SOFTWARE : EPI Suite
2. MODEL: MPBPWIN v1.43
3. SMILES: O=COCC(O)CO
4. SCIENTIFIC VALIDITY OF THE (Q)SAR MODEL
- Defined endpoint: reports a specific vapour pressure
- Unambiguous algorithm: unambiguous algorithms are reported in User's Guide
- Defined domain of applicability: Yes, reported in User's Guide
- Appropriate measures of goodness-of-fit and robustness and predictivity: Yes, reported in User's Guide (r squared = 0.949)
- Mechanistic interpretation: Yes, boiling point is correlated to vapour pressure
5. APPLICABILITY DOMAIN
[Explain how the substance falls within the applicability domain of the model]
- Descriptor domain: Based on molecule weight (min: 16.04; max: 943.17): molecule weight = 120.11
- Similarity with analogues in the training set: Yes, similar to other substances within the training set
6. ADEQUACY OF THE RESULT
This endpoint study record is part of a Weight of Evidence approach comprising QSAR predictions of one of the UVCB constituents (this study), a calculation based on the boiling point and QSAR predictions and an experimental value of the UVCB constituents. All data sources agree in the estimated range for vapour pressure and are sufficient to fulfil the information requirements as further explained in the provided endpoint summary. - Guideline:
- other: MPBPWIN (Q)SAR
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- - Software tool(s) used including version:
EPI Suite
- Model(s) used: MPBPWIN v1.43
- Model description: see field 'Justification for non-standard information',
- Justification of QSAR prediction: see field 'Justification for type of information'' - GLP compliance:
- no
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- SMILES: O=COCC(O)CO
- Temp.:
- 25 °C
- Vapour pressure:
- 1.56 Pa
- Remarks on result:
- other: Mean of Antoine & Grain methods
- Conclusions:
- Predicted vapour pressure is 1.56 Pa (mean of Antoine & Grain methods)
- Executive summary:
Predicted vapour pressure is 1.56 Pa (mean of Antoine & Grain methods)
- Endpoint:
- vapour pressure
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with adequate and reliable documentation / justification
- Justification for type of information:
- This endpoint study record is part of a Weight of Evidence approach comprising an experimental value of one of the UVCB constituents, a calculation based on the boiling point and QSAR predictions of the UVCB constituents (this record). All data sources agree in the estimated range for vapour pressure and are sufficient to fulfil the information requirements as further explained in the provided endpoint summary.
1. SOFTWARE : EPI Suite
2. MODEL: MPBPWIN v1.43
3. SMILES: O=COC(CO)CO
4. SCIENTIFIC VALIDITY OF THE (Q)SAR MODEL
- Defined endpoint: reports a specific vapour pressure
- Unambiguous algorithm: unambiguous algorithms are reported in User's Guide
- Defined domain of applicability: Yes, reported in User's Guide
- Appropriate measures of goodness-of-fit and robustness and predictivity: Yes, reported in User's Guide (r squared = 0.949)
- Mechanistic interpretation: Yes, boiling point is correlated to vapour pressure
5. APPLICABILITY DOMAIN
[Explain how the substance falls within the applicability domain of the model]
- Descriptor domain: Based on molecule weight (min: 16.04; max: 943.17): molecule weight = 120.11
- Similarity with analogues in the training set: Yes, similar to other substances within the training set
6. ADEQUACY OF THE RESULT
This endpoint study record is part of a Weight of Evidence approach comprising QSAR predictions of one of the UVCB constituents (this study), a calculation based on the boiling point and QSAR predictions and an experimental value of the UVCB constituents. All data sources agree in the estimated range for vapour pressure and are sufficient to fulfil the information requirements as further explained in the provided endpoint summary. - Guideline:
- other: MPBPWIN (Q)SAR
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- - Software tool(s) used including version:
EPI Suite
- Model(s) used: MPBPWIN v1.43
- Model description: see field 'Justification for non-standard information',
- Justification of QSAR prediction: see field 'Justification for type of information'' - GLP compliance:
- no
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- SMILES: O=COC(CO)CO
- Temp.:
- 25 °C
- Vapour pressure:
- 1.05 Pa
- Remarks on result:
- other: Mean of Antoine & Grain methods
- Conclusions:
- Predicted vapour pressure is 1.05 Pa (mean of Antoine & Grain methods)
- Executive summary:
Predicted vapour pressure is 1.05 Pa (mean of Antoine & Grain methods)
- Endpoint:
- vapour pressure
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with adequate and reliable documentation / justification
- Justification for type of information:
- This endpoint study record is part of a Weight of Evidence approach comprising an experimental value of one of the UVCB constituents, a calculation based on the boiling point and QSAR predictions of the UVCB constituents (this record). All data sources agree in the estimated range for vapour pressure and are sufficient to fulfil the information requirements as further explained in the provided endpoint summary.
1. SOFTWARE : EPI Suite
2. MODEL: MPBPWIN v1.43
3. SMILES: O=COCC(O)COC=O
4. SCIENTIFIC VALIDITY OF THE (Q)SAR MODEL
- Defined endpoint: reports a specific vapour pressure
- Unambiguous algorithm: unambiguous algorithms are reported in User's Guide
- Defined domain of applicability: Yes, reported in User's Guide
- Appropriate measures of goodness-of-fit and robustness and predictivity: Yes, reported in User's Guide (r squared = 0.949)
- Mechanistic interpretation: Yes, boiling point is correlated to vapour pressure
5. APPLICABILITY DOMAIN
[Explain how the substance falls within the applicability domain of the model]
- Descriptor domain: Based on molecule weight (min: 16.04; max: 943.17): molecule weight = 148.12
- Similarity with analogues in the training set: Yes, similar to other substances within the training set
6. ADEQUACY OF THE RESULT
This endpoint study record is part of a Weight of Evidence approach comprising QSAR predictions of one of the UVCB constituents (this study), a calculation based on the boiling point and QSAR predictions and an experimental value of the UVCB constituents. All data sources agree in the estimated range for vapour pressure and are sufficient to fulfil the information requirements as further explained in the provided endpoint summary. - Guideline:
- other: MPBPWIN (Q)SAR
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- - Software tool(s) used including version:
EPI Suite
- Model(s) used: MPBPWIN v1.43
- Model description: see field 'Justification for non-standard information',
- Justification of QSAR prediction: see field 'Justification for type of information'' - GLP compliance:
- no
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- SMILES: O=COCC(O)COC=O
- Temp.:
- 25 °C
- Vapour pressure:
- 21.3 Pa
- Remarks on result:
- other: Mean of Antoine & Grain methods
- Conclusions:
- Predicted vapour pressure is 21.3 Pa (mean of Antoine & Grain methods)
- Executive summary:
Predicted vapour pressure is 21.3 Pa (mean of Antoine & Grain methods)
- Endpoint:
- vapour pressure
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with adequate and reliable documentation / justification
- Justification for type of information:
- This endpoint study record is part of a Weight of Evidence approach comprising an experimental value of one of the UVCB constituents, a calculation based on the boiling point and QSAR predictions of the UVCB constituents (this record). All data sources agree in the estimated range for vapour pressure and are sufficient to fulfil the information requirements as further explained in the provided endpoint summary.
1. SOFTWARE : EPI Suite
2. MODEL: MPBPWIN v1.43
3. SMILES: O=COCC(OC(=O))CO
4. SCIENTIFIC VALIDITY OF THE (Q)SAR MODEL
- Defined endpoint: reports a specific vapour pressure
- Unambiguous algorithm: unambiguous algorithms are reported in User's Guide
- Defined domain of applicability: Yes, reported in User's Guide
- Appropriate measures of goodness-of-fit and robustness and predictivity: Yes, reported in User's Guide (r squared = 0.949)
- Mechanistic interpretation: Yes, boiling point is correlated to vapour pressure
5. APPLICABILITY DOMAIN
[Explain how the substance falls within the applicability domain of the model]
- Descriptor domain: Based on molecule weight (min: 16.04; max: 943.17): molecule weight = 148.12
- Similarity with analogues in the training set: Yes, similar to other substances within the training set
6. ADEQUACY OF THE RESULT
This endpoint study record is part of a Weight of Evidence approach comprising QSAR predictions of one of the UVCB constituents (this study), a calculation based on the boiling point and QSAR predictions and an experimental value of the UVCB constituents. All data sources agree in the estimated range for vapour pressure and are sufficient to fulfil the information requirements as further explained in the provided endpoint summary. - Guideline:
- other: MPBPWIN (Q)SAR
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- - Software tool(s) used including version:
EPI Suite
- Model(s) used: MPBPWIN v1.43
- Model description: see field 'Justification for non-standard information',
- Justification of QSAR prediction: see field 'Justification for type of information'' - GLP compliance:
- no
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- SMILES: O=COCC(OC(=O))CO
- Temp.:
- 25 °C
- Vapour pressure:
- 487 Pa
- Remarks on result:
- other: Mean of Antoine & Grain methods
- Conclusions:
- Predicted vapour pressure is 487 Pa (mean of Antoine & Grain methods)
- Executive summary:
Predicted vapour pressure is 487 Pa (mean of Antoine & Grain methods)
- Endpoint:
- vapour pressure
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with adequate and reliable documentation / justification
- Justification for type of information:
- This endpoint study record is part of a Weight of Evidence approach comprising an experimental value of one of the UVCB constituents, a calculation based on the boiling point and QSAR predictions of the UVCB constituents (this record). All data sources agree in the estimated range for vapour pressure and are sufficient to fulfil the information requirements as further explained in the provided endpoint summary.
1. SOFTWARE : EPI Suite
2. MODEL: MPBPWIN v1.43
3. SMILES: O=COCC(COC(=O))OC=O
4. SCIENTIFIC VALIDITY OF THE (Q)SAR MODEL
- Defined endpoint: reports a specific vapour pressure
- Unambiguous algorithm: unambiguous algorithms are reported in User's Guide
- Defined domain of applicability: Yes, reported in User's Guide
- Appropriate measures of goodness-of-fit and robustness and predictivity: Yes, reported in User's Guide (r squared = 0.949)
- Mechanistic interpretation: Yes, boiling point is correlated to vapour pressure
5. APPLICABILITY DOMAIN
[Explain how the substance falls within the applicability domain of the model]
- Descriptor domain: Based on molecule weight (min: 16.04; max: 943.17): molecule weight = 176.13
- Similarity with analogues in the training set: Yes, similar to other substances within the training set
6. ADEQUACY OF THE RESULT
This endpoint study record is part of a Weight of Evidence approach comprising QSAR predictions of one of the UVCB constituents (this study), a calculation based on the boiling point and QSAR predictions and an experimental value of the UVCB constituents. All data sources agree in the estimated range for vapour pressure and are sufficient to fulfil the information requirements as further explained in the provided endpoint summary. - Guideline:
- other: MPBPWIN (Q)SAR
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- - Software tool(s) used including version:
EPI Suite
- Model(s) used: MPBPWIN v1.43
- Model description: see field 'Justification for non-standard information',
- Justification of QSAR prediction: see field 'Justification for type of information'' - GLP compliance:
- no
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- SMILES: O=COCC(COC(=O))OC=O
- Temp.:
- 25 °C
- Vapour pressure:
- 98.3 Pa
- Remarks on result:
- other: Mean of Antoine & Grain methods
- Conclusions:
- Predicted vapour pressure is 98.3 Pa (mean of Antoine & Grain methods)
- Executive summary:
Predicted vapour pressure is 98.3 Pa (mean of Antoine & Grain methods)
Referenceopen allclose all
Tb = normal boiling point (Kelvin) = 405.15K
Kf = empirical factor considering the polarity of the substance = 1.33 (values for diols containing 4 and 5 carbon atoms)
m = empirical factor depending on the physical state at the temperature of interest = 0.19 (value for all liquids)
Description of key information
A measured vapour pressure is not available for the test substance (701-316-8). The vapour pressure has been estimated to be 0.386 kPa at 25 °C based on the modified Waston correlation as outlined in OECD TG 104. This value is supported by the (Q)SAR estimated values for the individual UVCB constituents of the test substance; values range from 0.000024 to 0.487 kPa at 25 °C.
As the vapour calculated based on the modified Waston correlation, as outlined in OECD TG 104, was determined based on a measured boiling point, this value of 0.386 kPa at 25 °C will be reported as the key value for the chemical safety assessment.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- Vapour pressure:
- 386 Pa
- at the temperature of:
- 25 °C
Additional information
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
