Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 478-330-3 | CAS number: 95851-08-4
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
negative, in vitro bacterial reverse mutation (with and without S-9 activation), OECD TG 471, 2007
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 21-02-2007 to 16-03-2007
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Guideline study performed under GLP. All relevant validity criteria were met.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- JAPAN: Guidelines for Screening Mutagenicity Testing Of Chemicals
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.5100 - Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test (August 1998)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- inspected: August 2005 ; signature: November 2005
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Target gene:
- histidine or tryptophan locus
- Species / strain / cell type:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not applicable
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not applicable
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Rat liver S9
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Preliminary toxicity test (TA100 and WP2urvA): 0, 0.15, 0.5, 1.5, 5, 15, 50, 150, 500, 1500 and 5000 µg/plate
Experiment 1 (plate incorporation method): All strains: 0, 50, 150, 500, 1500, 5000 µg/plate
Experiment 2 (plate incorporation method): All strains: 0, 50, 150, 500, 1500, 5000 µg/plate - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: The test item was immiscible in sterile distilled water at 50 mg/mL but was fully miscible in DMSO at the same concentration in solubility checks performed. DMSO was selected as the vehicle. - Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide
- 9-aminoacridine
- N-ethyl-N-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine
- benzo(a)pyrene
- other: 2-Aminoanthracene
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: Experiment 1. in medium; in agar (plate incorporation) ; Experiment 2. in medium; in agar (plate incorporation)
DURATION
- Exposure duration:
Experiment 1. All of the plates were incubated at 37 ± 3 ºC for approximately 48 hours and scored for the presence of revertant colonies using an automated colony counting system. The plates were viewed microscopically for evidence of thinning (toxicity).
Experiment 2. All of the plates were incubated at 37 ± 3 ºC for approximately 48 hours and scored for the presence of revertant colonies using an automated colony counting system. The plates were viewed microscopically for evidence of thinning (toxicity).
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 3
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: relative total growth - Evaluation criteria:
- There are several criteria for determining a positive result. Any, one, or all of the following can be used to determine the overall result of the study:
1. A dose-related increase in mutant frequency over the dose range tested (De Serres and Shelby, 1979).
2. A reproducible increase at one or more concentrations.
3. Biological relevance against in-house historical control ranges.
4. Statistical analysis of data as determined by UKEMS (Mahon et al., 1989).
A test item is considered non-mutagenic (negative) in the test system if the above criteria are not met.
In instances of data prohibiting definitive judgement about test item activity are reported as equivocal. - Statistics:
- Statistical methods (Mahon, et al.); as recommended by the UKEMS Subcommittee on Guidelines for Mutagenicity Testing, Report - Part III (1989).
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
- Remarks:
- See table 1 and 2
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
- Remarks:
- See table 1 and 2
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
- Remarks:
- See table 1 and 2
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
- Remarks:
- See table 1 and 2
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
- Remarks:
- See table 1 and 2
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA (with ranges, means and standard deviation and confidence interval (e.g. 95%)
- Positive historical control data: The current Positive HCD dataset is presented in the full study report.
- Negative (solvent/vehicle) historical control data: The current background spontaneous revertant counts in concurrent untreated controls and/or or vehicle controls ; historic negative controls are presented in the full study report. - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results:
Negative
Under the conditions of this study the test item was considered to be non-mutagenic in the presence and absence of S9 activation. - Executive summary:
The study was performed to the requirements of OECD Guideline 471, EU Method B.13/14, US EPA OCSPP 870.5100 and Japanese guidelines for bacterial mutagenicity testing under GLP, to evaluate the potential mutagenicity of the test item in a bacterial reverse mutation assay using S.typhimurium strains TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537 and E.coli strain WP2uvrA- in both the presence and absence of S-9 mix. The test strains were treated with the test item the Ames plate incorporation method at up to five dose levels, in triplicate, both with and without the addition of a rat liver homogenate metabolizing system (10% liver S9 in standard co-factors). The dose range for Experiment 1 was predetermined based on the results of a preliminary toxicity assay. The dose levels were 50 to 5000 µg/plate for all Salmonella strains: TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537 and for E.coli strain WP2uvrA-. The experiment was repeated on a separate day using the same dose range as Experiment 1, fresh cultures of the bacterial strains and fresh test item formulations. The vehicle (DMSO) control plates gave counts of revertant colonies within the normal range. All of the positive control chemicals used in the test induced marked increases in the frequency of revertant colonies, both with or without metabolic activation. Thus, the sensitivity of the assay and the efficacy of the S9-mix were validated. The maximum dose level of the test item in the first experiment was selected as the maximum recommended dose level of 5000 μg/plate or based on absence of cytotoxicity (reduction in growth of the bacterial background law) in all tester strains. A item item (oily in appearance) precipitate was observed on the plates at 5000 μg/plate. This did not prevent scoring of the revertant colonies. There were no significant increases in the frequency of revertant colonies recorded for any of the bacterial strains, with any dose of the test item, either with or without metabolic activation (S9 mix). It was concluded that, under the conditions of this assay, the test item gave a negative, i.e. non-mutagenic response in S.typhimurium strains TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537 and E.coli strain WP2uvrA- in the presence and absence of S-9 mix.
Reference
Table 1 : Test Results: Experiment 1: with and without metabolic activation and results of concurrent positive controls
S9-Mix (-) |
Dose Level Per Plate |
Number of revertants (mean) +/- SD |
|||||||||
Base-pair substitution strains |
Frameshift strains |
||||||||||
TA100 |
TA1535 |
WP2uvrA |
TA98 |
TA1537 |
|||||||
Solvent Control (DMSO) |
96 101 86 |
(96) 4.5# |
18 23 20 |
(20) 2.5 |
26 18 30 |
(25) 6.1 |
24 18 32 |
(25) 7.0 |
8 17 8 |
(11) 5.2 |
|
50 µg |
93 85 81 |
(86) 6.1 |
17 22 21 |
(20) 2.6 |
21 19 23 |
(21) 2.0 |
20 13 23 |
(19) 5.1 |
9 10 14 |
(11) 2.6 |
|
150 µg |
116 91 73 |
(93) 21.6 |
19 22 18 |
(20) 2.1 |
21 17 23 |
(20) 3.1 |
8 20 18 |
(15) 6.4 |
18 10 11 |
(13) 4.4 |
|
500 µg |
85 76 82 |
(81) 4.6 |
24 19 18 |
(20) 3.2 |
21 17 23 |
(22) 5.5 |
19 25 20 |
(21) 3.2 |
8 11 7 |
(9) 2.1 |
|
1500 µg |
81 91 82 |
(85) 5.5 |
15 20 9 |
(15) 5.5 |
24 20 21 |
(22) 2.1 |
23 18 23 |
(21) 2.9 |
7 2 13 |
(7) 6.0 |
|
5000 µg |
81 P 54 P 85 P |
(73) 16.9 |
18 P 14 P 14 P |
(15) 2.3 |
21 P 18 P 16 P |
(18) 2.5 |
28 P 24 P 23 P |
(25) 2.6 |
14 P 14 P 10 P |
(13) 2.3 |
|
Positive controls S9-Mix (-) |
Name Dose Level No. of Revertants |
ENNG |
ENNG |
ENNG |
4NQO |
9AA |
|||||
3 µg |
5 µg |
2 µg |
0.2 µg |
80 µg |
|||||||
796 786 792 |
(791) 5.0 |
373 348 344 |
(355) 15.7 |
382 430 417 |
(410) 24.8 |
250 269 259 |
(259) 9.5 |
653 933 845 |
(810) 143.2 |
||
S9-Mix (+) |
Dose Level Per Plate |
Number of revertants (mean) +/- SD |
|||||||||
Base-pair substitution strains |
Frameshift strains |
||||||||||
TA100 |
TA1535 |
WP2uvrA |
TA98 |
TA1537 |
|||||||
Solvent Control (DMSO) |
91 90 85 |
(89) 3.2# |
8 16 10 |
(11) 3.8 |
27 29 23 |
(26) 3.1 |
25 28 30 |
(28) 2.5 |
14 7 8 |
(12) 2.3 |
|
50 µg |
104 84 102 |
(97) 11.0 |
15 10 10 |
(12) 2.9 |
25 31 25 |
(27) 3.5 |
19 29 30 |
(26) 6.1 |
6 4 13 |
(8) 4.7 |
|
150 µg |
96 108 96 |
(100) 6.9 |
10 11 10 |
(10) 0.6 |
25 23 24 |
(24) 1.0 |
21 15 26 |
(21) 5.5 |
13 10 9 |
(11) 2.1 |
|
500 µg |
99 90 89 |
(93) 5.5 |
14 11 11 |
(12) 1.7 |
29 24 28 |
(27) 2.6 |
15 21 17 |
(18) 3.1 |
6 8 7 |
(7) 1.0 |
|
1500 µg |
73 86 66 |
(75) 10.1 |
8 8 11 |
(9) 1.7 |
25 20 24 |
(23) 2.6 |
13 29 22 |
(21) 8.0 |
9 7 9 |
(8) 1.2 |
|
5000 µg |
82 P 82 P 87 P |
(84) 2.9 |
9 P 9 P 13 P |
(10) 2.3 |
25 P 16 P 25 P |
(22) 5.2 |
24 P 22 P 16 P |
(21) 4.2 |
5 P 6 P 5 P |
(5) 0.6 |
|
Positive controls S9-Mix (+) |
Name Dose Level No. of Revertants |
2AA |
2AA |
2AA |
BP |
2AA |
|||||
1 µg |
2 µg |
10 µg |
5 µg |
2 µg |
|||||||
1585 1479 1661 |
(1575) 91.4 |
180 179 193 |
(184) 7.8 |
542 576 588 |
(569) 23.9 |
113 104 155 |
(124) 27.2 |
349 375 313 |
(346) 31.1 |
Table 2 : Test Results: Experiment 2: with and without metabolic activation and results of concurrent positive controls
S9-Mix (-) |
Dose Level Per Plate |
Number of revertants (mean) +/- SD |
|||||||||
Base-pair substitution strains |
Frameshift strains |
||||||||||
TA100 |
TA1535 |
WP2uvrA |
TA98 |
TA1537 |
|||||||
Solvent Control (DMSO) |
127 110 138 |
(125) 14.1# |
17 21 14 |
(17) 3.5 |
26 25 22 |
(24) 2.1 |
33 33 28 |
(21) 4.7 |
7 14 7 |
(9) 4.0 |
|
50 µg |
115 105 124 |
(115) 9.5 |
17 13 21 |
(17) 4.0 |
29 13 29 |
(24) 9.2 |
32 26 24 |
(24) 7.6 |
8 5 6 |
(6) 1.5 |
|
150 µg |
98 104 99 |
(100) 3.2 |
9 24 15 |
(16) 7.5 |
10 24 22 |
(19) 7.6 |
37 24 28 |
(17) 5.7 |
7 5 6 |
(6) 1.0 |
|
500 µg |
129 136 158 |
(141) 15.1 |
10 14 15 |
(13) 2.6 |
18 13 18 |
(16) 2.9 |
16 28 24 |
(19) 5.5 |
7 8 4 |
(6) 2.1 |
|
1500 µg |
95 78 75 |
(83) 10.8 |
10 18 15 |
(14) 4.0 |
23 28 8 |
(20) 10.4 |
26 29 27 |
(20) 5.6 |
7 3 8 |
(6) 2.6 |
|
5000 µg |
79 P 80 P 74 P |
(78) 3.2 |
16 P 13 P 19 P |
(16) 3.0 |
19 P 18 P 18 P |
(18) 0.6 |
17 P 26 P 27 P |
(21) 4.2 |
2 P 5 P 9 P |
(5) 3.5 |
|
Positive controls S9-Mix (-) |
Name Dose Level No. of Revertants |
ENNG |
ENNG |
ENNG |
4NQO |
9AA |
|||||
3 µg |
5 µg |
2 µg |
0.2 µg |
80 µg |
|||||||
416 447 471 |
(445) 27.6 |
267 266 367 |
(300) 58.0 |
235 357 331 |
(308) 64.3 |
425 330 306 |
(364) 62.9 |
1338 1402 1382 |
(1374) 32.7 |
||
S9-Mix (+) |
Dose Level Per Plate |
Number of revertants (mean) +/- SD |
|||||||||
Base-pair substitution strains |
Frameshift strains |
||||||||||
TA100 |
TA1535 |
WP2uvrA |
TA98 |
TA1537 |
|||||||
Solvent Control (DMSO) |
65 74 94 |
(78) 14.8# |
10 9 10 |
(10) 0.6 |
21 22 23 |
(22) 1.0 |
29 34 22 |
(28) 6.0 |
9 10 8 |
(9) 1.0 |
|
50 µg |
69 64 81 |
(71) 8.7 |
9 10 9 |
(9) 0.6 |
16 16 23 |
(18) 4.0 |
28 29 32 |
(30) 2.1 |
2 8 5 |
(5) 3.0 |
|
150 µg |
78 97 76 |
(84) 11.6 |
8 8 10 |
(9) 1.2 |
23 29 24 |
(25) 3.2 |
25 25 22 |
(24) 1.7 |
8 6 5 |
(6) 1.5 |
|
500 µg |
73 71 77 |
(74) 3.1 |
8 9 9 |
(9) 0.6 |
24 17 24 |
(22) 4.0 |
14 14 15 |
(14) 0.6 |
6 3 3 |
(4) 1.7 |
|
1500 µg |
66 73 76 |
(72) 5.1 |
8 9 8 |
(8) 0.6 |
17 28 21 |
(22) 5.6 |
17 19 20 |
(19) 1.5 |
2 2 4 |
(3) 1.2 |
|
5000 µg |
61 P 70 P 73 P |
(68) 6.2 |
8 P 13 P 9 P |
(10) 2.6 |
21 P 23 P 19 P |
(21) 2.0 |
14 P 24 P 20 P |
(19) 5.0 |
7 P 8 P 11 P |
(9) 2.1 |
|
Positive controls S9-Mix (+) |
Name Dose Level No. of Revertants |
2AA |
2AA |
2AA |
BP |
2AA |
|||||
1 µg |
2 µg |
10 µg |
5 µg |
2 µg |
|||||||
1879 2004 1965 |
(1949) 64.0 |
328 296 340 |
(321) 22.7 |
527 503 541 |
(524) 19.2 |
371 643 903 |
(639) 266.0 |
424 518 310 |
(417) 104.2 |
ENNG: N-ethyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine
4NQO: 4-Nitroquinoline-1-oxide
9AA: 9-Aminoacridine
BP: Benzo(a)pyrene
2AA: 2-Aminoanthracene
N/T: Not tested at this dose level
S: partial absence of bacterial background lawn
P : precipitate
#: Standard deviation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Key study: OECD TG 471, 2007 : The study was performed to the requirements of OECD Guideline 471, EU Method B.13/14, US EPA OCSPP 870.5100 and Japanese guidelines for bacterial mutagenicity testing under GLP, to evaluate the potential mutagenicity of the test item in a bacterial reverse mutation assay using S.typhimurium strains TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537 and E.coli strain WP2uvrA- in both the presence and absence of S-9 mix. The test strains were treated with the test item the Ames plate incorporation method at up to five dose levels, in triplicate, both with and without the addition of a rat liver homogenate metabolizing system (10% liver S9 in standard co-factors). The dose range for Experiment 1 was predetermined based on the results of a preliminary toxicity assay. The dose levels were 50 to 5000 µg/plate for all Salmonella strains: TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537 and for E.coli strain WP2uvrA-. The experiment was repeated on a separate day using the same dose range as Experiment 1, fresh cultures of the bacterial strains and fresh test item formulations. The vehicle (DMSO) control plates gave counts of revertant colonies within the normal range. All of the positive control chemicals used in the test induced marked increases in the frequency of revertant colonies, both with or without metabolic activation. Thus, the sensitivity of the assay and the efficacy of the S9-mix were validated. The maximum dose level of the test item in the first experiment was selected as the maximum recommended dose level of 5000 μg/plate or based on absence of cytotoxicity (reduction in growth of the bacterial background law) in all tester strains. A item item (oily in appearance) precipitate was observed on the plates at 5000 μg/plate. This did not prevent scoring of the revertant colonies. There were no significant increases in the frequency of revertant colonies recorded for any of the bacterial strains, with any dose of the test item, either with or without metabolic activation (S9 mix). It was concluded that, under the conditions of this assay, the test item gave a negative, i.e. non-mutagenic response in S.typhimurium strains TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537 and E.coli strain WP2uvrA- in the presence and absence of S-9 mix.
Justification for classification or non-classification
The substance does not meet classification criteria under Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 for mutagenicity
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.