Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 200-854-6 | CAS number: 75-25-2
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- Experimental Phase:12 January 2018 to 23 July 2018. Report Issued: 07 November 2018.
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 201 (Freshwater Alga and Cyanobacteria, Growth Inhibition Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Details on sampling:
- Samples were taken from the control and each test group from the bulk test preparation at 0 hours and from the pooled replicates at 72 hours for immediate quantitative analysis. Duplicate samples were taken at 0 and 72 hours and stored frozen for further analysis if necessary.
- Vehicle:
- no
- Test organisms (species):
- Raphidocelis subcapitata (previous names: Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata, Selenastrum capricornutum)
- Details on test organisms:
- TEST ORGANISM
- Common name: Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata
- Strain: CCAP 278/4
- Source: Culture Collection of Algae and Protozoa (CCAP), SAMS Research Services Ltd, Scottish Marine Institute, Oban, Argyll, Scotland.
- Method of cultivation: Master cultures were maintained in the laboratory by the periodic replenishment of culture medium. The master cultures were maintained in the laboratory under constant aeration and constant illumination at 24 ± 1 °C. - Test type:
- static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 72 h
- Test temperature:
- 24 ±1 °C
- pH:
- The pH value of the control cultures was observed to increase from pH 7.9 at 0 hours to pH 10.2 at 72 hours. This increase was considered to be due to the amount of carbon dioxide required by the large number of algal cells in the log phase of growth exceeding the transfer rate of CO2 from the gaseous phase to the aqueous phase. In this situation CO2 required for photosynthesis and growth would be derived from bicarbonate in solution which results in an increase in the pH of the culture. The increase in pH after 72 hours was in excess of that recommended in the Test Guidelines (1.5 pH units after 72 hours). This was considered to have had no adverse effect on the results of the study given that the increase in cell concentration in the control cultures exceeded the validation criterion given in the Test Guidelines.
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- Analysis of the test preparations at 0 hours showed measured test concentrations to range from 0.26 to 34 mg/L (26% to 55% of the nominal test concentrations). Analysis of the test preparations at 72 hours showed measured test concentrations to range from 0.25 to 36 mg/L (91% to 108% of the 0-Hour measured test concentrations) and as such it was considered appropriate to calculate the results based on the 0-Hour measured test concentrations.
It was considered likely that the failure to obtain near nominal concentrations in the 0-Hour test preparations was due to losses through volatilisation during the time taken to prepare and sample the test solutions. Failure to achieve near nominal concentrations was considered to have had no impact on the outcome of the test given that a concentration dose response was observed allowing the calculation of both EC50 and NOEC values at the concentrations achieved. - Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM (DEFINITIVE TEST)
- Test vessel: 250mL glasss conical flasks
- Type (delete if not applicable): closed - flasks were sealed with ground glass stoppers
- Fill volume: completely filled
- Aeration: Oribital shaker (100 - 150 rpm)
- Renewal rate of test solution (frequency/flow rate): none (Static test)
- Initial cells density: 5,000 cells/mL
- Control end cells density: 625,00 cells/mL at 72 hours
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates): 3
- No. of vessels per control (replicates): 6
GROWTH MEDIUM
- Standard medium used: yes - The culture medium was prepared using reverse osmosis purified deionised water and the pH adjusted to 7.5 with 0.1N NaOH or HCl. For the purposes of the range-finding test, initial experiments and definitive test, additional sodium bicarbonate (250 mg/L) was added to the prepared culture medium prior to use.
OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Sterile test conditions: no
- Adjustment of pH: Yes, for culture medium
- Photoperiod: Cultures were continuously illuminated
- Light intensity and quality: warm whirte light (380 - 730 nm) at approximately 7000 lux.
EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED (with observation intervals if applicable)
- Determination of cell concentrations: Electronic particle counter
TEST CONCENTRATIONS
- Range finding study
- Test concentrations: 0.1, 1, 10 and 100 mg/L.
- Results used to determine the conditions for the definitive study: Yes
- Definitive Test
- Test concentrations:1.0, 3.2, 10, 32 and 100 mg/L. - Reference substance (positive control):
- yes
- Remarks:
- Potassium Dichromate run as a separate study for laboratory validation.
- Key result
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- 13 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- act. ingr.
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Key result
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- 12 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- act. ingr.
- Basis for effect:
- biomass
- Key result
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 2.8 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- act. ingr.
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Key result
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 2.8 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- act. ingr.
- Basis for effect:
- biomass
- Key result
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- LOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 18 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- act. ingr.
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Key result
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- LOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 18 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- act. ingr.
- Basis for effect:
- biomass
- Details on results:
- All test and control cultures were inspected microscopically at 72 hours. After 72 hours there were no abnormalities detected in the control or test cultures at 0.26, 1.7 and 2.8 mg/L, however cell debris was observed to be present in the test cultures at 18 and 34 mg/L.
- Results with reference substance (positive control):
- The positive control (run as separate study), potassium dichromate, gave an ErC50 (0 to 72 hrs) = 1.6 mg/L which is within the normal range for the laboratory.
- Reported statistics and error estimates:
- One way analysis of variance incorporating Bartlett's test for homogeneity of variance (Sokal and Rohlf, 1981) and Dunnett's multiple comparison procedure for comparing several treatments with a control (Dunnett, 1955) was carried out on the growth rate and yield data after 72 hours for the control and all test concentrations to determine any statistically significant differences between the test and control groups. All statistical analyses were performed using the SAS computer software package (SAS, 1999 - 2001).
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- The test substance algae 72-hour ECr50 value was 13 mg/L and the NOEC was 2.8 mg/L.
- Executive summary:
Introduction
The study was performed to assess the effect of the test item on the growth of the green alga Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata. The method followed was designed to be compatible with the OECD Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals (2006) No 201, "Freshwater Alga and Cyanobacteria, Growth Inhibition Test".
Method
Following preliminary range-finding test Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata was exposed to an aqueous solution of the test item at nominal concentrations of 1.0, 3.2, 10, 32 and 100 mg/L (three replicate flasks per concentration) for 72 hours, under constant illumination and shaking at a temperature of 24 ±1 °C.
Due to the volatile nature of the test item, testing was conducted in completely filled, stoppered test vessels in order to minimise possible losses due to volatilisation. In order to prevent inhibition of growth due to the restriction of gaseous exchange, additional sodium bicarbonate was added to the culture medium to provide a source of carbon dioxide for algal growth.
Samples of the algal populations were removed daily and cell concentrations determined for each control and treatment group, using a Coulter® Multisizer Particle Counter.
Results
Analysis of the test preparations at 0 hours showed measured test concentrations to range from 0.26 to 34 mg/L (26% to 55% of the nominal test concentrations). Analysis of the test preparations at 72 hours showed measured test concentrations to range from 0.25 to 36 mg/L (91% to 108% of the 0-Hour measured test concentrations) and as such it was considered appropriate to calculate the results based on the 0-Hour measured test concentrations.
It was considered likely that the failure to obtain near nominal concentrations in the 0-Hour test preparations was due to losses through volatilisation during the time taken to prepare and sample the test solutions. Failure to achieve near nominal concentrations was considered to have had no impact on the outcome of the test given that a concentration dose response was observed allowing the calculation of both EC50 and NOEC values at the concentrations achieved.
Exposure of Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata to the test item gave the following results based on the 0-Hour measured test concentrations:
Response Variable EC50
(mg/L)
95% Confidence Limits
(mg/L)
No Observed Concentration
(NOEC)
(mg/L)
Lowest Observed Effect Concentration
(LOEC)
(mg/L)
Growth Rate 13 11 - 16 2.8 18 Yield 12 - 2.8 18
Reference
Observations on Test Item Solubility
At the start of the test all control and test cultures were observed to be clear colourless solutions. After the 72-Hour test period all control, 0.26, 1.7 and 2.8 mg/L test cultures were observed to be green dispersions whilst the 18 and 34 mg/L test cultures were observed to be clear colourless solutions.
Description of key information
Toxicity of the test substance to freshwater algae based on growth rate.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- EC50 for freshwater algae:
- 13 mg/L
- EC10 or NOEC for freshwater algae:
- 2.8 mg/L
Additional information
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.