Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 302-853-7 | CAS number: 94134-83-5
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Skin irritation / corrosion
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- September 08, 2018 - Septembre 15, 2018
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Remarks:
- OECD 439
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 018
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 439 (In Vitro Skin Irritation: Reconstructed Human Epidermis Test Method)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 11-methyldodecyl laurate
- EC Number:
- 302-853-7
- EC Name:
- 11-methyldodecyl laurate
- Cas Number:
- 94134-83-5
- Molecular formula:
- C25H50O2
- IUPAC Name:
- 11-methyldodecyl dodecanoate
- Test material form:
- liquid
Constituent 1
In vitro test system
- Test system:
- human skin model
- Source species:
- human
- Cell type:
- non-transformed keratinocytes
- Justification for test system used:
- The test item is applied topically to a three-dimensional RhE model, comprised of non-transformed, human-derived epidermal keratinocytes, which have been cultured to form a multi-layered, highly differentiated model of the human epidermis.
The RhE test method is based on the premise that irritant chemicals are able to penetrate the stratum corneum and damage the underlying layers of keratinocytes and other skin cells. Cell viability is measured by enzymatic conversion of the vital dye MTT [3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide, Thiazolyl blue], into a blue formazan salt that is quantitatively measured after extraction from tissues.
Irritant chemicals are identified by their ability to decrease cell viability below defined threshold levels. - Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Details on test system:
- The test system used for the in vitro skin irritation test was reconstructed human epidermis (SkinEthicTM RHE) as recommended by the OECD 439 guideline. The SkinEthicTM RHE model consists of normal human keratinocytes cultured for 17-days on an insert of 0.5 cm2 polycarbonate filter at the air-liquid interface in a chemically defined growth medium. The cells form a multilayered, highly differentiated and stratified epidermis model of the human epidermis that consists of main basal, supra basal, spinous and granular layers and a functional stratum corneum.
- Control samples:
- yes, concurrent negative control
- yes, concurrent positive control
- Amount/concentration applied:
- For the treatment of 11-Methyldodecyl Laurate, negative control tissues and positive control tissues, 16 µL/0.5 cm2 of test item, 16 µL/0.5 cm2 of sterile dulbecco’s phosphate buffered saline (DPBS) and 16 µL/0.5 cm2 of 5% sodium dodecyl sulphate (5% aq.) were applied for 42 minutes at room temperature, respectively. Nylon mesh was used for uniform spreading of liquid materials.
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Tissues were exposed to 11-Methyldodecyl Laurate, negative and positive control for 42 minutes.
- Duration of post-treatment incubation (if applicable):
- After washing and drying, tissues were incubated in 6-well plate containing 2 mL growth medium at 37± 1°C in 5± 1% CO2 in a humidified incubator for 42 hours.
- Number of replicates:
- Three replicates were used for the test item, positive control and negative control.
Results and discussion
In vitro
Resultsopen allclose all
- Irritation / corrosion parameter:
- % tissue viability
- Run / experiment:
- Experiment 1
- Value:
- 95.13
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Irritation / corrosion parameter:
- % tissue viability
- Run / experiment:
- Experiment 2
- Value:
- 94.28
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Irritation / corrosion parameter:
- % tissue viability
- Run / experiment:
- Experiment 3
- Value:
- 94.35
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Irritation / corrosion parameter:
- % tissue viability
- Run / experiment:
- Mean
- Value:
- 94.59
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- not valid
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Other effects / acceptance of results:
- The negative and positive controls gave acceptable results and the study was accepted as valid.
Any other information on results incl. tables
TABLE1: Data Summary of Percent Viability
Treatment |
Tissue Replicate |
O.D. at 570 nm |
Blank Corrected O.D. |
Mean of Corrected O.D. |
Mean O.D. of Three Tissues |
% Viability/ Tissue |
Mean % Viability |
S.D. of % Viability |
C.V. of % Viability |
Corrosivity Class |
Negative Control (Dulbecco’s Phosphate Buffered Saline (DPBS)) |
1 |
1.346 |
1.302 |
1.296 |
1.293 |
100 |
100 |
0.01 |
0.77 |
NA |
1.329 |
1.285 |
|||||||||
1.346 |
1.302 |
|||||||||
2 |
1.332 |
1.288 |
1.296 |
|||||||
1.346 |
1.302 |
|||||||||
1.342 |
1.298 |
|||||||||
3 |
1.318 |
1.274 |
1.287 |
|||||||
1.325 |
1.281 |
|||||||||
1.349 |
1.305 |
|||||||||
11-Methyldodecyl Laurate |
1 |
1.293 |
1.250 |
1.23 |
1.223 |
95.13 |
94.59 |
0.47 |
0.50 |
No Category |
1.266 |
1.223 |
|||||||||
1.260 |
1.217 |
|||||||||
2 |
1.259 |
1.216 |
1.219 |
94.28 |
||||||
1.265 |
1.222 |
|||||||||
1.262 |
1.219 |
|||||||||
3 |
1.257 |
1.214 |
1.22 |
94.35 |
||||||
1.262 |
1.219 |
|||||||||
1.269 |
1.226 |
|||||||||
Positive control (Sodium dodecyl sulphate (5% aq.)) |
1 |
0.064 |
0.020 |
0.019 |
0.02 |
1.47 |
1.52 |
0.09 |
5.92 |
Category 2 |
0.063 |
0.019 |
|||||||||
0.063 |
0.019 |
|||||||||
2 |
0.065 |
0.021 |
0.021 |
1.62 |
||||||
0.064 |
0.020 |
|||||||||
0.066 |
0.022 |
|||||||||
3 |
0.062 |
0.018 |
0.019 |
1.47 |
||||||
0.064 |
0.020 |
|||||||||
0.064 |
0.020 |
Key : O.D. = Optical Density, S.D. = Standard Deviation, C.V. = Coefficient of Variation, NA = Not Applicable.
Note : For Negative control, SD and CV of % viability was calculated using corrected OD at 570 nm; For the test item and positive control SD and CV of % viability was calculated using % viability/tissue.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- The negative and positive controls gave acceptable results and the study was accepted as valid. Based on the results obtained, the test item 11-Methyldodecyl Laurate is classified as non-irritant to skin (UN GHS No Category).
- Executive summary:
This study was performed to evaluate the non-irritant and irritant potential of 11-Methyldodecyl Laurate using reconstructed human epidermis (RHE) tissue in accordance with the United Nations Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (UN GHS).
Tissues were exposed tothenegative control (Dulbecco’s Phosphate Buffered Saline (DPBS)), positive control (sodium dodecyl sulfate,5% aqueous (SDS)) and11-Methyldodecyl Lauratein triplicate for 42 minutes at room temperature.
The mean cell viability in tissues treated with the test item was 94.59% after 42 minutes exposure. A significant reduction in percent cell viability was not observed in treated tissues when compared with that of the concurrent negative control.
The Optical density (OD) values for the negative control replicates were between 1.274 and 1.305, against the guideline requirement of ≥ 0.8 and ≤ 3.0 (≥ 1.2 as per SkinEthic SOP). The OD of the blankwasbetween0.042and0.053which met the guideline requirement of OD< 0.1.The positive control showed a 1.52% cell viability, against the acceptance criteria of <40% for the SkinEthic RHE model, when compared with that of the concurrent negative control. Variation between tissue replicates (i.e., CV% value) was 0.50% for the test item group, 5.92% for positive control and 0.77% for negative control against the guideline requirement of ≤ 18%, which demonstrate the efficiency of the test system, SkinEthicTMRHE model. All criteria for a valid study were met as describe in the study plan.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.