Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 268-594-6 | CAS number: 68130-51-8
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Water solubility
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- water solubility
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 02. Nov. 2017 to 13. Nov. 2017
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 105 (Water Solubility)
- Version / remarks:
- OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Method No. 105, adopted 27. Jul. 1995: “Water Solubility “
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method A.6 (Water Solubility)
- Version / remarks:
- Commission Regulation (EU) No 260/2014 amending Regulation (EC) No 440/2008: Method A.6: “Water solubility, adopted 24 January 2014.
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of method:
- flask method
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- No further details specified in the study report.
- Key result
- Water solubility:
- 0.51 mg/L
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Temp.:
- 20 °C
- Remarks on result:
- other: pH not specified
- Details on results:
- Measurements during Equilibration
All solutions were measured in triplicate.
The carbon content in the test item 64.0 % was used in the calculation of the test item concentration from the measured DOC concentration. After the analysis of the sample of day 6, the plateau was considered as reached.
The measured value in the blank flask lay below the LOQ of TOC (< 0.1 mg/L) on days 3 and 6.
Measurements at Plateau
Due to a strong difference in the measured concentrations from the flasks 3 and 5 in comparison to the flasks 2, 4 and 6, the determination from the flasks 3 and 5 was repeated but nearly the same values were measured. Therefore, these values were not stated in the final report.
Results
The measurements from the flasks 1A – 1C, 2 – 4 and 6 were included in the calculation of the mean, as the value from the flaks 5 was stated as an outlier (Grubb’ test for outliers).
Mean at the plateau is 0.51 ± 0.13 mg/L.
No dependency of solubility on amount of the test item (nominal load) was perceived. - Conclusions:
- The solubility of Hatcol 1570 in water was determined from the measured concentrations of DOC in the filtrated test solutions.
All replicates except the flask 5 showed good correspondence. The value from the flask 5 was stated as an outlier (Grubb’ test for outliers) and was not used in the calculation of the mean. The water solubility of the test item was stated as 0.51 ± 0.13 mg/L, correspond-ing to a relative standard deviation of 25.6 %. The measurement in a low range of DOC concentrations is a reason for a high RSD.
No observations arousing doubts concerning the accuracy of the results and the validity of the study were made. - Executive summary:
Title of Study: Determination of the solubility in water of Hatcol 1570 according to OECD 105 resp. EU A.6
Findings and Results:
The solubility of the test item Hatcol 1570 in water was determined by measurement of DOC concentration in the filtrated test solutions using TOC analyser.
In the pre-test, flasks with nominal concentrations 10 mg/L and 1000 mg/L were shaken at room temperature for 100 hours (approx. 4 days) and measured for DOC after membrane filtration (0.45 µm, PTFE). The measured DOC concentration was < 0.1 mg/L and 0.24 mg/L in the flasks with the nominal concentrations 10.0 mg/L and 1004 mg/L, respectively.
As dependency of the water solubility on the amount of the test item added was perceived, different loading rates were used in the main test. According to the guideline the slow-stirring flask method was used for the determination of the solubility of the test item in water.
In the main test, six different loading rates of the test item were chosen to study the effect of the loading rate on the measured water solubility: 1, 3, 5, 6, 8 and 10 g/L (nominal). Three flasks 1A - C with the same loading rate (5 g/L) were used during equilibration. Seven vessels (flasks blank, 1C (for the sampling point 72 h) and 2 – 6) were set onto the shaking apparatus (at 100 rpm) immediately. After 24 ± 2 hours, flask 1B (for the sampling point 48 h) and after 48 ± 2 hours, flask 1A (for the sampling point 24 h) were set on the shaker and all flasks were shaken for further 24 ± 2 hours at room temperature (20.0 ± 0.5 °C). Then, flasks 1A - 1C were taken from the shaker, samples were taken, membrane filtered and analysed for DOC via TOC analyser. Because of an upward tendency in the three values, the test was prolonged and the flasks 1A-C were measured on days 4 – 6. Due to a difference of less than 15 % in the concentrations on days 5 and 6 and no upward tendency, the test was finished on day 6. The final measurement was performed on day 6 as determination from flasks 2 – 6.
No Tyndall effect (i.e. a laser beam was not scattered when transmitted through the liquid) could be observed indicating that no colloidal dispersed particles or micells are present.
Dependency of solubility on amount of the test item (nominal load) was not perceived in the main test. The value from the flask 5 was stated as an outlier (Grubb’ test for outliers) and was not used in the calculation of the mean.
At the plateau, the concentration of Hatcol 1570 in water had reached:
0.51 ± 0.13 mg/L at 20.0 ± 0.5 °C
= 0.51 ± 0.13 * 10-3 kg/m3 (SI units)
(mean value ± standard deviation of five individual vessels)
As the DOC method measures the sum of all dissolved parts of the test item, this study doesn’t provide any insights on the stability of the test item in aqueous medium.
Reference
Equilibration
Day |
Temperature [°C] |
pH* |
Measured Area |
Mean Concentration DOC |
Mean Concentration test item |
Difference to previous sample [%] |
1 |
20.0 |
5-6 |
422 506 446 |
0.25 |
0.40 |
- |
2 |
20.0 |
5-6 |
484 503 491 |
0.28 |
0.44 |
+12.0 |
3 |
20.0 |
5-6 |
613 591 609 |
0.38 |
0.60 |
+34.6 |
4 |
19.5 |
5-6 |
577 558 599 |
0.36 |
0.56 |
-6.1 |
5 |
20.0 |
5-6 |
465 449 446 |
0.25 |
0.39 |
-30.6 |
6 |
20.0 |
5-6 |
469 453 464 |
0.26 |
0.40 |
+3.1 |
Plateau
Flask # |
Temperature [°C] |
pH* |
Measured Area |
Mean Concentration DOC [mg/L] |
Mean Concentration test item [mg/L] |
2 |
20.0 |
6.33 |
612 625 634 |
0.40 |
0.62 |
3 |
20.0 |
6.73 |
406 414 411 |
0.21 |
0.33 |
4 |
20.0 |
6.36 |
629 645 663 |
0.42 |
0.65 |
5 |
20.0 |
6.33 |
1096 1094 1112 |
0.82 |
1.28 |
6 |
20.0 |
6.38 |
653 698 662 |
0.44 |
0.69 |
Measurements used for Calculation of Solubility
Day |
Flask |
Concentration Test Item [mg/L] |
Total Mean [mg/L] |
Total Standard Deviation [mg/L] (RSD* [%]) |
1 |
1A |
0.40 |
0.51 |
0.13 (25.6 %) |
2 |
1B |
0.44 |
||
3 |
1C |
0.60 |
||
4 |
1A |
0.56 |
||
5 |
1B |
0.39 |
||
6 |
1C |
0.40 |
||
6 |
2 |
0.62 |
||
6 |
3 |
0.33 |
||
6 |
4 |
0.65 |
||
6 |
5 |
1.28** |
||
6 |
6 |
0.69 |
*RSD = relative standard deviation
**outlier
Description of key information
The water solubility of the test item was stated as 0.51 ± 0.13 mg/L
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- Water solubility:
- 0.51 mg/L
- at the temperature of:
- 20 °C
Additional information
The solubility of the test item Hatcol 1570 in water was determined by measurement of DOC concentration in the filtrated test solutions using TOC analyser.
In the pre-test, flasks with nominal concentrations 10 mg/L and 1000 mg/L were shaken at room temperature for 100 hours (approx. 4 days) and measured for DOC after membrane filtration (0.45 µm, PTFE). The measured DOC concentration was < 0.1 mg/L and 0.24 mg/L in the flasks with the nominal concentrations 10.0 mg/L and 1004 mg/L, respectively.
As dependency of the water solubility on the amount of the test item added was perceived, different loading rates were used in the main test. According to the guideline the slow-stirring flask method was used for the determination of the solubility of the test item in water.
In the main test, six different loading rates of the test item were chosen to study the effect of the loading rate on the measured water solubility: 1, 3, 5, 6, 8 and 10 g/L (nominal). Three flasks 1A - C with the same loading rate (5 g/L) were used during equilibration. Seven vessels (flasks blank, 1C (for the sampling point 72 h) and 2 – 6) were set onto the shaking apparatus (at 100 rpm) immediately. After 24 ± 2 hours, flask 1B (for the sampling point 48 h) and after 48 ± 2 hours, flask 1A (for the sampling point 24 h) were set on the shaker and all flasks were shaken for further 24 ± 2 hours at room temperature (20.0 ± 0.5 °C). Then, flasks 1A - 1C were taken from the shaker, samples were taken, membrane filtered and analysed for DOC via TOC analyser. Because of an upward tendency in the three values, the test was prolonged and the flasks 1A-C were measured on days 4 – 6. Due to a difference of less than 15 % in the concentrations on days 5 and 6 and no upward tendency, the test was finished on day 6. The final measurement was performed on day 6 as determination from flasks 2 – 6.
No Tyndall effect (i.e. a laser beam was not scattered when transmitted through the liquid) could be observed indicating that no colloidal dispersed particles or micells are present.
Dependency of solubility on amount of the test item (nominal load) was not perceived in the main test. The value from the flask 5 was stated as an outlier (Grubb’ test for outliers) and was not used in the calculation of the mean.
At the plateau, the concentration of Hatcol 1570 in water had reached:
0.51 ± 0.13 mg/L at 20.0 ± 0.5 °C
= 0.51 ± 0.13 * 10-3 kg/m3 (SI units)
(mean value ± standard deviation of five individual vessels)
As the DOC method measures the sum of all dissolved parts of the test item, this study doesn’t provide any insights on the stability of the test item in aqueous medium.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.