Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 485-430-0 | CAS number: 923954-49-8
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- test procedure in accordance with generally accepted scientific standards and described in sufficient detail
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 008
- Report date:
- 2008
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.10 (Mutagenicity - In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.5375 - In vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- Experimental Toxicology and Ecology, BASF SE
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- -
- EC Number:
- 485-430-0
- EC Name:
- -
- Cas Number:
- 923954-49-8
- Molecular formula:
- SnxZnyTi2Oz with x = 0,5 – 1,7 y = 0,5 – 1,7 z = 5,5 – 7,5
- IUPAC Name:
- oxygen titanium zinc λ²-stannane
- Details on test material:
- Test substance No.: 07/0285-1
- Substance type: solid, orange
- Analytical purity: 99.61 g/100 g (see analytical report, study code 07L00144):
- Lot/batch No.: GV 33900-66
- Storage condition of test material: room temperature
Constituent 1
Method
- Target gene:
- not applicable
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Type and identity of media: MEM (minimal essential medium with Earle's salts) containing a L-glutamine source supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal calf serum (FCS), 1% (v/v) penicillin/streptomycin (10 000 IU / 10 000 μg/mL), 1% (v/v) amphotericin B (250 μg/mL). During exposure to the test substance (only 4-hour treatment), MEM medium was used without FCS supplementation.
- Properly maintained: yes
- Periodically checked for Mycoplasma contamination: yes
- Periodically checked for karyotype stability: yes
- Periodically "cleansed" against high spontaneous background: yes - Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not applicable
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Aroclor 1254-induced rat liver S-9 mix
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8 µg/ml
- Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO; 1% (v/v)
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: Due to the insolubility of the test substance in the commonly used solvents, a homogeneous dispersion in DMSO was used in this study. It had been demonstrated that the vehicle DMSO is suitable in several mutagenicity test methods including the V79 in vitro cytogenetic test and for which historical control data are available.
Controlsopen allclose all
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- ethylmethanesulphonate
- Remarks:
- Without metabolic activation Migrated to IUCLID6: 500 μg/ml dissolved in MEM without FCS (2.5 mg/mL)
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- Remarks:
- With metabolic activation Migrated to IUCLID6: 0.5 μg/ml dissolved in MEM without FCS (2.5 μg/mL)
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
DURATION
- Exposure duration: 4, 18 h
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 10, 14, 24 h
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): 2 - 3 hours
SPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays): 100 μL colcemid
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): 7.5% (v/v) Giemsa/Titrisol solution pH 7.2 for 10 minutes.
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS:
- experiment 1: 4h exposure, 18h sampling time, with and without metabolic activation
- experiment 2: 18h exposure, 18h sampling time, without metabolic activation; 18 h exposure, 28 hours sampling time, without metabolic activation; 4 hours exposure, 28 hours sampling time, with metabolic activation
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: 100 consecutive well-spread metaphases of each culture were counted for all test groups
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: mitotic index (1 000 cells, incl. mitotic cells, were counted per culture) - Evaluation criteria:
- As a rule, the first 100 consecutive well-spread metaphases of each culture were counted for all test groups, and if cells had 20 - 22 chromosomes, they were analyzed for structural chromosome aberrations. In the case of clearly increased aberration rates, the number of metaphases to be analyzed for this test group can be reduced to at least 50 metaphases per culture.
In addition, numerical chromosome aberrations were scored and recorded. - Statistics:
- The statistical evaluation of the data was carried out using the MUCHAN program system (BASF SE). The proportion of metaphases with structural aberrations was calculated for each group. A comparison of each dose group with the negative control group was carried out using Fisher's exact test for the hypothesis of equal proportions. This test was Bonferroni-Holm corrected versus the dose groups separately for each time and was performed one-sided. If the results of this test were statistically significant compared with the respective negative control, labels are printed in the tables.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Effects of pH: was not influenced by test substance treatment
- Effects of osmolality: was not influenced by test substance treatment
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES:
In the pretests for toxicity 5 000 μg/mL test substance was used as top concentration. The cells were prepared at a sampling time of 18 hours (about 1.5-fold cell cycle time) after 4 and 18 hours exposure time without S9 mix and after 4 hours exposure time with S9 mix.
The pretests were performed following the method described for the main experiment. As indication of test substance toxicity mitotic index, cell count, cell attachment (morphology) and quality of the slides were determined for dose selection.
In the pretests the parameters pH value and osmolarity were not relevant influenced by the addition of the test substance preparation to the culture medium at the concentrations measured.
Regarding the toxicity of the test substance reduced cell numbers of below 50% of control were observed at 5 000 μg/mL after 4 hours treatment in the absence of S9 mix only. No cytotoxicity occurred after 4 hours treatment in the presence of S9 mix or after 18 hours treatment in the absence of S9 mix.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY:
- Mitotic index: In the main experiments, according to the results of the determination of the mitotic index, no suppression of the mitotic activity was observed under all experimental conditions up to the highest applied concentration in the absence and presence of S9 mix.
- Cell counts: According to the results of the determination of the cell count in the main experiments, no growth inhibition was observed under all experimental conditions up to the highest applied concentration in the absence and presence of S9 mix.
- Cell morphology: Cell attachment was not influenced at any dose evaluated for structural chromosomal aberrations in the absence and presence of S9 mix. - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Results:
Genotoxicity | Cytotoxicity | |||||||
Schedule | Test group | S-9 mix | aberrant cells (%) | polyploid cells (%) | ||||
Exposure/Preparation period | incl gaps | excl. Gaps | with exchanges | Cell number (%) | Mitotic index (%) | |||
4/18 h | vehicle | - | 3.5 | 1.5 | 1 | 2 | 100 | 100 |
0.5 µg/ml | - | - | - | - | - | 101.1 | - | |
1 µg/ml | - | 9.5s | 2 | 1 | 0.5 | 121.3 | 124.9 | |
2 µg/ml | - | 9.5s | 5 | 2 | 2 | 105.2 | 104 | |
4 µg/ml | - | 6 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 98.3 | 109 | |
8 µg/ml | - | - | - | - | - | 110.9 | - | |
EMS | - | 22.0s | 20.0s | 11s | 0 | 105.1 | ||
18/18 h | vehicle | - | 5 | 2.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 100 | 100 |
0.5 µg/ml | - | - | - | - | - | 108.5 | - | |
1 µg/ml | - | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0.5 | 110 | 110.3 | |
2 µg/ml | - | 6 | 2 | 1.5 | 0 | 116.6 | 119.3 | |
4 µg/ml | - | 6 | 3 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 117.5 | 104.1 | |
8 µg/ml | - | - | - | - | - | 104.7 | - | |
EMS | - | 29.0s | 24.0s | 15.0s | 0 | 81.4 | ||
18/28 h | vehicle | - | 4.5 | 3 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 100 | 100 |
2 µg/ml | - | - | - | - | - | 100.6 | - | |
4 µg/ml | - | 5 | 4 | 2.5 | 0 | 83.1 | 101.4 | |
8 µg/ml | - | - | - | - | - | 73.9 | - | |
EMS | 23.0s | 22.0s | 19.0s | 0 | 90.8 | |||
4/18 h | vehicle | + | 7.5 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 1.9 | 100 | 100 |
0.5 µg/ml | + | - | - | - | - | 80.8 | - | |
1 µg/ml | + | 8.5 | 2.5 | 1 | 2.9 | 81.2 | 90.4 | |
2 µg/ml | + | 11.5 | 3.5 | 1.5 | 3.4 | 76.6 | 105.7 | |
4 µg/ml | + | 9 | 3 | 2 | 1.9 | 79.5 | 79.7 | |
8 µg/ml | + | - | - | - | - | 83.3 | - | |
CPP | + | 22.0s | 19.0s | 14.0s | 0 | 81.2 | ||
4/28 h | vehicle | + | 9.5 | 4 | 1 | 0.5 | 100 | 100 |
0.5 µg/ml | + | - | - | - | - | 11.6 | - | |
1 µg/ml | + | 3.5 | 1 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 114.9 | 115.9 | |
2 µg/ml | + | 3 | 2.5 | 0 | 0.5 | 101.8 | 1117.7 | |
4 µg/ml | + | 8.5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 103.5 | 86.8 | |
8 µg/ml | + | - | - | - | - | 111.4 | - | |
CPP | + | 15 | 15.0s | 9.0s | 1 | 129.1 |
s: aberration frequency statistically significant higher than corresponding control values
Applicant's summary and conclusion
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.