Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 9477519  CAS number: 
 Life Cycle description
 Uses advised against
 Endpoint summary
 Appearance / physical state / colour
 Melting point / freezing point
 Boiling point
 Density
 Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
 Vapour pressure
 Partition coefficient
 Water solubility
 Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
 Surface tension
 Flash point
 Auto flammability
 Flammability
 Explosiveness
 Oxidising properties
 Oxidation reduction potential
 Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
 Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
 Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
 pH
 Dissociation constant
 Viscosity
 Additional physicochemical information
 Additional physicochemical properties of nanomaterials
 Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
 Nanomaterial crystalline phase
 Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
 Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
 Nanomaterial specific surface area
 Nanomaterial Zeta potential
 Nanomaterial surface chemistry
 Nanomaterial dustiness
 Nanomaterial porosity
 Nanomaterial pour density
 Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
 Nanomaterial radical formation potential
 Nanomaterial catalytic activity
 Endpoint summary
 Stability
 Biodegradation
 Bioaccumulation
 Transport and distribution
 Environmental data
 Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
 Ecotoxicological Summary
 Aquatic toxicity
 Endpoint summary
 Shortterm toxicity to fish
 Longterm toxicity to fish
 Shortterm toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
 Longterm toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
 Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
 Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
 Toxicity to microorganisms
 Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
 Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
 Sediment toxicity
 Terrestrial toxicity
 Biological effects monitoring
 Biotransformation and kinetics
 Additional ecotoxological information
 Toxicological Summary
 Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
 Acute Toxicity
 Irritation / corrosion
 Sensitisation
 Repeated dose toxicity
 Genetic toxicity
 Carcinogenicity
 Toxicity to reproduction
 Specific investigations
 Exposure related observations in humans
 Toxic effects on livestock and pets
 Additional toxicological data
Adsorption / desorption
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
 Endpoint:
 adsorption / desorption: screening
 Type of information:
 calculation (if not (Q)SAR)
 Adequacy of study:
 key study
 Reliability:
 2 (reliable with restrictions)
 Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
 accepted calculation method
 Justification for type of information:
 Log Koc of the test substance was calculated using regression model equations for general, ester class and ionisable compounds. See below under 'methods' for applicability domain.
 Principles of method if other than guideline:
 The soil adsorption coefficient (Koc) value for the test substance was estimated using the log Pow (Partition coefficient) correlation approach of the Log Koc regression models equations for general, ester class and ionisable compounds.
 Key result
 Type:
 log Koc
 Value:
 ca. 1.99 dimensionless
 Remarks on result:
 other: Koc: 97.72 L/kg; calculated using log Kow based regression equation for ionisable compounds
 Key result
 Type:
 log Koc
 Value:
 >= 2.36  <= 2.37 dimensionless
 Remarks on result:
 other: Koc: 229.09234.42 L/kg; calculated using 'ester class' specific log Kow based regression equations
 Key result
 Type:
 log Koc
 Value:
 >= 2.29  <= 2.85 dimensionless
 Remarks on result:
 other: Koc: 194.98707.95 L/kg; calculated using 'general' log Kow based regression equations
 Validity criteria fulfilled:
 not applicable
 Conclusions:
 Using the Log Koc regression models equations (general and ionisable compounds) based on partition coefficient value, the estimated Koc of the test substance was determined to be 97.72 L/kg (i.e., equivalent to log Koc 1.99).
 Executive summary:
The soil adsorption coefficient (Koc) value for the test substance, ' mono and di C16 PSE, K+ and C16OH and isostearyl isostearate', was determined using the wellknown log Kow based log Koc regression models equations. To calculate a more reliable value and to reduce the overall uncertainty, multiple equations, which could be categorised as general, classspecific (i.e., ester) (Doucette WJ, 2000) and ionisable compound based (Franco and Trapp, 2008), were used for the calculations. The log Koc was calculated from the equations using the log Kow value of 2.7 determined for the test substance (based on individual solubility ratio) and a maximum фn of 0.1 and a minimum фion of 0.9, for the Franco et al., equation. The log Koc values were calculated to range from 2.29 to 2.85, using general equations, 2.36 to 2.37, using ‘ester class’ specific equations, and was 1.99 using the ionisable compound based equation. This range of Koc indicates low to moderate sorption to soil / sediment and moderate to slow migration potential to ground water (US EPA, 2012). Given that the test substance is ionic, the prediction of log Koc by treating neutral and ionic fractions separately is considered superior to methods that merge both fractions without considering the differences between neutral compounds and ions (Franco and Trap, 2008). Therefore, the log Koc of 1.99 (i.e., equivalent to Koc of 97.72 L/kg) calculated from Franco and Trapp (2008) equation has been selected as key value for this endpoint.
Reference
Results
Koc was calculated using range of regression equations, i.e., ester class specific, general wide variety and ionisable coumpound specific. The test substance is a phosphate ester, therefore the equations related to ester class have been selected as one the criteria to generate the Koc value for the test substance. Apart from chemical class specific equations, general equations also have selected due to their well documented development and large data sets of Koc values. As the test substance is ionisable substance, the regression equation for ionisable compound also used to calculate the Koc. Prediction of log Koc can be improved by treating neutral and ionic fractions separately and therefore probably is superior to methods that merge both fractions without considering the differences between neutral compounds and ions. pKa values of the PSEs are expected to be between 1.5 and 3, the monoesters will have lower pKas (i.e. higher acidity), the diesters higher ones. The interval with a maximum фn = 0.1 and a minimum фion = 0.9 is therefore likely to comprise all PSEs having an acidic OHGroup (mono and diesters).
Table 1: Calculations of Koc based on regression models equations (General and Ionisable Compound)
Regression Models Used to Estimate Log Koc from Log Kow 


Ǿneutral fraction 
0.1 

Ǿionic fraction 
0.9 
Equation Number 
Log Kow 

2.7 


(I) 
EPISuite (Doucette, 2000) 
Log Koc = 0.8679 Log Kow  0.0004 

Log Koc 
2.34 
(II) 
Variety, mostly pesticides (Kenaga and Goring, 1980) 
log Koc = = 1.377 + 0.544 log Kow 

Log Koc 
2.85 
(III) 
Ester Class specific (Sabljic et al 1995) 
log Koc = 0.47 log Kow + 1.09 

Log Koc 
2.36 
(IV) 
Wide variety (Gerstl, 1990) 
log Koc = 0.679 log Kow + 0.663 

Log Koc 
2.50 
(V) 
Hydrophobics (Sabljic et al 1995) 
log Koc = 0.81 log Kow + 0.10 

Log Koc 
2.29 
(VI) 
Wide variety (Baker et al 1997) 
log Koc = 0.903 log Kow + 0.094 

Log Koc 
2.53 
(VII) 
Franco and Trapp (2008) 
Log Koc = Log (Ǿn*10^(0.54 log Kow + 1.11) + Ǿion*10^(0.11 log Kow + 1.54)) 

Log Koc 
1.99 
(VIII) 
Esters class specific (EC, 2003) 
Log Koc = 0.49 log Kow + 1.05 

Log Koc 
2.37 
Franco and Trapp 2008 
Equa. (VII) 
1.99 
Average of all log Koc values 
Equa. (I) + (II) + (III) + (IV) + (V) + (VI) + (VIII) 
2.46 
Selected Log Koc value 

1.99 

KOC 
97.72 
As the test substance is a weak acid with ionisable property, the Koc value of 97.72 L/kg (Log Koc value of 1.99) calculated from Franco and Trapp (2008) equation has been selected as key value for this endpoint.
Description of key information
The log Koc of 1.99 (i.e., equivalent to Koc of 97.72 L/kg) calculated from Franco and Trapp (2008) equation has been selected as key value for soil adsorption endpoint.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
 Koc at 20 °C:
 97.72
Additional information
Given the limitation of the publicly available QSAR models for log Koc estimation of ionic compounds, the endpoint has been assessed using log Kow based log Koc regression equations proposed for ionisable compounds, along with other general and class specific equations, as a comparison.
The soil adsorption coefficient (Koc) value for the test substance, ' mono and di C16 PSE, K+ and C16OH and isostearyl isostearate', was determined using the wellknown log Kow based log Koc regression models equations. To calculate a more reliable value and to reduce the overall uncertainty, multiple equations, which could be categorised as general, classspecific (i.e., ester) (Doucette WJ, 2000) and ionisable compound based (Franco and Trapp, 2008), were used for the calculations. The log Koc was calculated from the equations using the log Kow value of 2.7 determined for the test substance (based on individual solubility ratio) and a maximum фn of 0.1 and a minimum фion of 0.9, for the Franco et al., equation. The log Koc values were calculated to range from 2.29 to 2.85, using general equations, 2.36 to 2.37, using ‘ester class’ specific equations, and was 1.99 using the ionisable compound based equation. This range of Koc indicates low to moderate sorption to soil / sediment and moderate to slow migration potential to ground water (US EPA, 2012). Given that the test substance is ionic, the prediction of log Koc by treating neutral and ionic fractions separately is considered superior to methods that merge both fractions without considering the differences between neutral compounds and ions (Franco and Trap, 2008). Therefore, the log Koc of 1.99 (i.e., equivalent to Koc of 97.72 L/kg) calculated from Franco and Trapp (2008) equation has been selected as key value for this endpoint.
Possible processes behind the sorption of organic chemicals to soil and sediment are ion bonding or ligand exchange, chemiosorption (formation of a bond, usually covalent, with the soil molecular structure), ion–dipole and dipole–dipole interactions, charge transfer, hydrogen bonding, and hydrophobic bonding (Van der Waals forces). The most chemically active component of the soil is the colloidal fraction, which consists of organic matter and inorganic clay minerals. Both components display a negative electrical charge at the surface. The effect of this charge can be measured by the cationic exchange capacity, which on average is 50 meq/100 g for clays and 290 meq/100 g for humic acids. Electrical forces involving charge transfer (40 kJ/mol) are stronger than hydrophobic bonding (4 kJ/mol) so that they dominate when present. Thus, a different degree of sorption of anions, cations, and neutral molecules can be expected, with cations showing the highest potential for sorption, due to electrical attraction (Franco and Trapp, 2008).
Therefore, considering that the test substance is an anionic surfactant, its sorption potential can be expected to be much lesser than other known cationic surfactants, which is in line with the calculated log Koc derived based on Franco and Trapp, 2008 proposed equation for ionisable compounds.
[LogKoc: 1.99]
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.