Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Physical & Chemical properties

Vapour pressure

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Reference
Endpoint:
vapour pressure
Type of information:
read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
data from handbook or collection of data
Justification for type of information:
JUSTIFICATION FOR READING ACROSS INFORMATION FOR VAPOUR PRESSURE
The vapour pressure of a substance is defined as the saturation pressure above a solid or liquid substance. In EU method A.4, seven different measuring methods are listed for the measurement of the vapour pressure of solids and liquids. However, the vapour pressure does not need to be measured due to technical reasons if calculations indicate that the value is significantly less than 10^-5 Pa. The substance magnesium bis (2-ethylhexanoate) is a solid substance (salts of an organic acid and an inorganic cation) with a melting range of 99 - 104 °C. In view of this, the volatility of this substance can therefore be safely assumed to be negligible, i.e. below the level of relevance (10^-5 Pa).
For purposes of comparison, handbook data (Flick, 1991) stated the experimental determined vapour pressure of 4.00 Pa at 20 °C for the organic acid `2-ethylhexanoic acid´ (CAS# 149-57-5; please refer to the respective study record).
The vapour pressure of a substance depends among others on the chemical structure and decreases with increasing inter- and intramolecular interactions. An ionic compound such as magnesium bis (2-ethylhexanoate) shows a higher strength of attraction, because of the electrostatic interaction between its positive and negative ions. This ionic interaction leads to a higher lattice energy compared with the van-der-Waals interaction of the uncharged organic acid and consequently to a much lower vapour pressure. In conclusion, the conduct of further experimental verification is considered to be neither technically nor scientifically feasible, and for the reasons stated above derogation from testing is hereby applied for.

1. HYPOTHESIS FOR THE ANALOGUE APPROACH
Based on the above, the vapour pressure of magnesium bis (2-ethylhexanoate) is considered to be negligible based on the fact that
(i) the vapour pressure of the corresponding acid is already very low (see above) and
(ii) the vapour pressure of the corresponding ionic species is considered to be magnitudes lower since the ionic bond strength is higher compared to the Van-der-Waals interactions of the uncharged molecule. In consideration of the ionic nature of this compound, it can therefore be anticipated that the vapour pressure of magnesium bis (2-ethylhexanoate) is well below the value for the organic moiety, and thus negligible.

2. SOURCE AND TARGET CHEMICAL(S) (INCLUDING INFORMATION ON PURITY AND IMPURITIES)
Source: 2-ethylhexanoic acid (see source study records; purity is not of relevance for this endpoint)
Target: magnesium bis (2-ethylhexanoate) (purity is not of relevance for this endpoint)

3. ANALOGUE APPROACH JUSTIFICATION
see justification given above

4. DATA MATRIX
not required
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
read-across: supporting information
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
read-across: supporting information
GLP compliance:
not specified
Type of method:
other: not specified
Remarks on result:
other: please refer to the field `Justification for type of information´
Conclusions:
The vapour pressure of a substance is defined as the saturation pressure above a solid or liquid substance. In EU method A.4, seven different measuring methods are listed for the measurement of the vapour pressure of solids and liquids. However, the vapour pressure does not need to be measured due to technical reasons if calculations indicate that the value is significantly less than 10^-5 Pa. The substance magnesium bis (2-ethylhexanoate) is a solid substance (salts of an organic acid and an inorganic cation) with a melting range of 99 - 104 °C. In view of this, the volatility of this substance can therefore be safely assumed to be negligible, i.e. below the level of relevance (10^-5 Pa).

For purposes of comparison, handbook data (Flick, 1991) stated the experimental determined vapour pressure of 4.00 Pa at 20 °C for the organic acid `2-ethylhexanoic acid´ (CAS# 149-57-5; please refer to the respective study record).
The vapour pressure of a substance depends among others on the chemical structure and decreases with increasing inter- and intramolecular interactions. An ionic compound such as magnesium bis (2-ethylhexanoate) shows a higher strength of attraction, because of the electrostatic interaction between its positive and negative ions. This ionic interaction leads to a higher lattice energy compared with the van-der-Waals interaction of the uncharged organic acid and consequently to a much lower vapour pressure. In conclusion, the conduct of further experimental verification is considered to be neither technically nor scientifically feasible, and for the reasons stated above derogation from testing is hereby applied for.

Based on the above, the vapour pressure of magnesium bis (2-ethylhexanoate) is considered to be negligible based on the fact that
(i) the vapour pressure of the corresponding acid is already very low (see above) and
(ii) the vapour pressure of the corresponding ionic species is considered to be magnitudes lower since the ionic bond strength is higher compared to the Van-der-Waals interactions of the uncharged molecule.
In consideration of the ionic nature of this compound, it can therefore be anticipated that the vapour pressure of magnesium bis (2-ethylhexanoate) is well below the value for the organic moiety, and thus negligible.

In conclusion, the conduct of further experimental verification is considered to be neither technically nor scientifically feasible, and for the reasons stated above derogation from testing is hereby applied for.

Description of key information

The volatility of the substance magnesium bis (2-ethylhexanoate) is considered to be negligible.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Additional information

The vapour pressure of a substance is defined as the saturation pressure above a solid or liquid substance. In EU method A.4, seven different measuring methods are listed for the measurement of the vapour pressure of solids and liquids. However, the vapour pressure does not need to be measured due to technical reasons if calculations indicate that the value is significantly less than 10^-5 Pa. The substance magnesium bis (2-ethylhexanoate) is a solid substance (salts of an organic acid and an inorganic cation) with a melting range of 99 - 104 °C. In view of this, the volatility of this substance can therefore be safely assumed to be negligible, i.e. below the level of relevance (10^-5 Pa).

For purposes of comparison, handbook data (Flick, 1991) stated the experimental determined vapour pressure of 4.00 Pa at 20 °C for the organic acid `2-ethylhexanoic acid´ (CAS# 149-57-5; please refer to the respective study record).

The vapour pressure of a substance depends among others on the chemical structure and decreases with increasing inter- and intramolecular interactions. An ionic compound such as magnesium bis (2-ethylhexanoate) shows a higher strength of attraction, because of the electrostatic interaction between its positive and negative ions. This ionic interaction leads to a higher lattice energy compared with the van-der-Waals interaction of the uncharged organic acid and consequently to a much lower vapour pressure. In conclusion, the conduct of further experimental verification is considered to be neither technically nor scientifically feasible, and for the reasons stated above derogation from testing is hereby applied for.

Based on the above, the vapour pressure of magnesium bis (2-ethylhexanoate) is considered to be negligible based on the fact that

(i) the vapour pressure of the corresponding acid is already very low (see above) and

(ii) the vapour pressure of the corresponding ionic species is considered to be magnitudes lower since the ionic bond strength is higher compared to the Van-der-Waals interactions of the uncharged molecule.

In consideration of the ionic nature of this compound, it can therefore be anticipated that the vapour pressure of magnesium bis (2-ethylhexanoate) is well below the value for the organic moiety, and thus negligible.

In conclusion, the conduct of further experimental verification is considered to be neither technically nor scientifically feasible, and for the reasons stated above derogation from testing is hereby applied for.