Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin sensitisation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vitro
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
7 March 2018 (Seeding of the cells,1st experiment) - 12 April 2018 (Experimental completion date)
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2018
Report date:
2018

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: OECD Guideline 442E (In Vitro Skin Sensitisation: human Cell Line Activation Test (h-CLAT))
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of study:
activation of dendritic cells
Justification for non-LLNA method:
The OECD TG 442 E may be used as part of an integrated approach to testing and assessment (IATA) to support the discrimination between skin sensitisers and non-sensitisers for the purpose of hazard classification and labelling.

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
[2-[ethyl[3-methyl-4-[(3-phenyl-1,2,4-thiadiazol-5-yl)azo]phenyl]amino]ethyl]trimethylammonium methyl sulphate
EC Number:
248-957-5
EC Name:
[2-[ethyl[3-methyl-4-[(3-phenyl-1,2,4-thiadiazol-5-yl)azo]phenyl]amino]ethyl]trimethylammonium methyl sulphate
Cas Number:
28313-51-1
Molecular formula:
C22H29N6S.CH3O4S
IUPAC Name:
{2-[ethyl({3-methyl-4-[(E)-2-(3-phenyl-1,2,4-thiadiazol-5-yl)diazen-1-yl]phenyl})amino]ethyl}trimethylazanium methyl sulfate
Constituent 2
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
[2-[ethyl[3-methyl-4-[(3-phenyl-1,2,4-thiadiazol-5-yl)azo]phenyl]amino]ethyl]trimethylammonium sulphate
EC Number:
286-603-1
EC Name:
[2-[ethyl[3-methyl-4-[(3-phenyl-1,2,4-thiadiazol-5-yl)azo]phenyl]amino]ethyl]trimethylammonium sulphate
Cas Number:
85283-76-7
Molecular formula:
C22H29N6S.1/2O4S
IUPAC Name:
bis[2-(ethyl{3-methyl-4-[(3-phenyl-1,2,4-thiadiazol-5-yl)diazenyl]phenyl}amino)-N,N,N-trimethylethanaminium] sulfate
Test material form:
solid: particulate/powder
Remarks:
Grey
Specific details on test material used for the study:
SOURCE OF TEST MATERIAL
- Test-substance No.: 17/0373-1

STABILITY AND STORAGE CONDITIONS OF TEST MATERIAL
- Storage conditions: ambient, under light exclusion
- Storage stability: the stability under storage conditions over the exposure period was guaranteed by the sponsor, and the sponsor hold this responsibility.

TREATMENT OF TEST MATERIAL PRIOR TO TESTING
- The test substance was weighed and topped up with the chosen vehicle (culture medium) to achieve the required 2x concentration of the highest concentration (stock solution).
- Culture medium was chosen as the vehicle, since good homogeneity of the preparation was achieved.
- Further concentrations were prepared as 2x concentrations by serial 1:1.2 dilution according to the planned concentrations in culture medium.
- The test-substance preparations were prepared by stirring and ultra-sonication.
- Visual inspection of each dilution step was performed

In vitro test system

Details on the study design:
Cell line: THP-1 cells
The human monocytic leukemia cell line was obtained from “American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, USA” (ATCC, TIB202).

Historical control data:
- A reactivity check is performed with each new-thawed cells prior to the use of the cells for a study, as proposed in the OECD test guideline, using nickel (II) sulphate hexahydrate as well as lactic acid and 1-chloro-2, 4-dinitrobenzene.

Results and discussion

Positive control results:
The positive control used was 1- chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene (DNCB, CAS no.: 97-00-7), 4.0 µg/mL in 0.2% DMSO in culture medium. The positive and negative and vehicle control data is comparable to the historical data (attached below). The results can be seen in Table 3.

In vitro / in chemico

Resultsopen allclose all
Key result
Run / experiment:
other: Experiment 1
Parameter:
other: Relative fluorescence intensity (RFI) %
Remarks:
RFI CD86
Value:
150
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
other: No activation of dendritic cells according to OECD 442E at any of the concentrations tested (RFI <150%)
Key result
Run / experiment:
other: Experiment 1
Parameter:
other: Relative fluorescence intensity (RFI) %
Remarks:
RFI CD54
Value:
200
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
other: Activation of dendritic cells positive according to OECD 442E at concentrations of 1.7-5.1 µg/mL
Remarks:
viability ≥50%
Key result
Run / experiment:
other: Experiment 2
Parameter:
other: Relative fluorescence intensity (RFI) %
Remarks:
RDI CD86
Value:
150
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
other: Activation of dendritic cells positive according to OECD 442E at concentrations of 0.8-1.2 µg/mL
Remarks:
viability ≥50%
Key result
Run / experiment:
other: Experiment 2
Parameter:
other: Relative fluorescence intensity (RFI) %
Remarks:
RFI CD54
Value:
200
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
other: Activation of dendritic cells positive according to OECD 442E at concentrations - RFI >200% at 0.8-1.7 µg/mL and 2.5 µg/mL.
Remarks:
viability ≥50%
Other effects / acceptance of results:
DEMONSTRATION OF TECHNICAL PROFICIENCY:
Acceptance criteria
- A tested concentration is not to be further evaluated when relative viability is less than 50%.
- Cell viability of vehicle control cells must yield at least 90%.
- In the positive control (DNCB), RFI values of both CD86 and CD54 should be over the positive criteria (CD86≥ 150% and CD54 ≥ 200%) and cell viability should be ≥ 50%.
- In the negative control (LA), RFI values of both CD86 and CD54 should not exceed the positive criteria (RFI CD86< 150% and RFI CD54 < 200%) and cell viability should be ≥ 50%.
- For all vehicle controls, the MFI ratio of both CD86 and CD54 to isotype controls should be ≥ 105%.  
- The reactivity check of new thawed cells should produce the following result: - Positive response in CD86 and CD54 for NiSO4 and DNCB - Negative response in CD86 and CD54 for LA.
- In addition, positive, negative and vehicle control data should lie within the range of the historic data

Evaluation of results
- A test substance is predicted to activate monocytic THP-1 cells when CD86 expression is increased ≥ 150% and/or CD54 expression increased ≥ 200% at any concentration in relation to vehicle control that do not reduce viability below 50% and reproduced in the same cell surface marker in at least two independent experiments.
- A test substance is considered to be negative when the criteria mentioned above are not met up to the maximum concentration (= 5000 µg/mL for the vehicle culture medium or 1000 µg/mL for 0.2% DMSO in culture medium) or up to the cytotoxicity limit (viability less than 90% at the highest concentration tested).  
- To be relevant for evaluation, the cell viability must be more than 50% in at least four tested concentrations of an experiment.


ACCEPTANCE OF RESULTS:
- Acceptance criteria met for negative control: Yes
- Acceptance criteria met for positive control: Yes
- Acceptance criteria met for variability between replicate measurements: Yes
- Range of historical values if different from the ones specified in the test guideline: Please refer to the historical control data in the 'Attached background material' section

Any other information on results incl. tables

Preliminary cytotoxicity assessment

Table 2: h-CLAT. Results of preliminary cytotoxicity assessment

Concentration (final test substance [µg/mL])

Concentration (test substance [µg/mL])

% PI negative cells

Replicate 1

% P1 negative cells

Replicate 2

Mean viability of duplicates

Relative viability mean [%]

VC

VC

95

95

95

100

3.9

4.4

82

76

79

83

7.8

8.8

51

53

52

55

16

18

34

32

33

35

31

35

-

-

-

-

63

71

-

-

-

-

125

142

-

-

-

-

250

283

-

-

-

-

500

566

-

-

-

-

1000

1133

-

-

-

-

2500

2831

-

-

-

-

5000

5663

-

-

-

-

- = Due to insolubility of the test substance, no measurement is available.

The final test substance concentrations were calculated considering the purity/contents of 88.3%.

- A positive response (CD54 ≥ 200%) was observed in all non-cytotoxic concentrations (6 of 8 concentrations), but the relative viability at the lowest concentration was 73%.

- In order to confirm the results of the 1st experiment and to achieve a concentration with higher viability, another experiment was conducted using lower concentrations.

- The CV75 value was determined by linear regression from the concentration-response curve to be 5.1 µg/mL^3.

Main Experiments

Table 3: Summary of h-CLAT Main Experiments: mean values of RFI CD86, RFI CD54 and relative viability.

Experiment 1

Experiment 2

Concentration (test substance)

 

[µg/mL)

RFI CD86

 

Mean

[%]

RFI CD54

 

Mean

[%]

Viability

 

Relative viability [%]

Concentration (test substance)

 

[µg/mL)

RFI CD86

 

Mean

 [%]

RFI CD54

 

Mean

[%]

Viability

 

Relative viability [%]

1.7

142

243

73

0.8

189

270

82

2.0

104

214

65

1.0

174

221

75

2.5

104

236

60

1.2

180

235

63

2.9

78

211

69

1.4

139

220

61

3.5

80

224

74

1.7

117

226

64

4.2

76

273

66

2.0

106

179

59

5.1

65

252

50

2.5

92

217

56

6.1

55

254

39

2.9

79

163

57

VC

100

100

100

VC

100

100

100

LA 1000 µg/mL

78

100

100

LA 1000 µg/mL

81

100

100

DNCB 4 µG/mL

292

1255

80

DNCB 4 µG/mL

317

1443

77

RFI above 150% (CD86) or 200% (CD54) with relative viability ≥50% are indicated in bold.

VC: vehicle (culture medium); LA : lactic acid, negative control; DNCB : 1 -chloro-2, 4 -dinitrobenzene, positive control

In Experiment 1, the h-CLAT CD86 met the ''borderline'' criteria, but the results of both h-CLAT experiments produced unambiguous positive results.

Experiment 1

Calculation of an EC150% (the concentration resulting in a RFI of 150% for CD86 was not applicable as positive criteria were not met and an EC200% (the concentration resulting in a RF1 of 200%) for CD54 was not applicable as fold inductions above 200% were observed at the lowest concentration.

Experiment 2

Calculation of an EC150% (the concentration resulting in a RFI of 150%) for CD86 and an EC200% (the concentration resulting in a RFI of 200%) for CD54 was not applicable as fold inductions above 200% were observed at the lowest concentration.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
other: positive prediction of skin sensitisation in h-CLAT assay
Conclusions:
Based on the observed results and applying the evaluation criteria in accordance with OECD Guideline 422 E, Basic Red 23 induces dendritic cell activation and is predicted to be a skin sensitiser.
Executive summary:

The skin sensitising potential of the test substance, Basic Red 29, was determined via the in vitro Human Cell Line Activation Test (h-CLAT) that evaluates that ability of Basic Red 23 to induce the expression of cell membrane markers (CD86 and CD54) and thus activate dendritic cells. The study was conducted following the OECD Guideline for Testing of Chemicals TG. 442E, adopted July 2016 (‘In vitro Skin Sensitisation: human Cell Line Activation Test (h-CLAT)’)

 

Main Assay

The test substance, Basic Red 23 was weighed and topped up with culture medium to achieve the required 2x concentration of the high concentration, Further concentrations were prepared as 2x concentrations by serial 1:1.2 dilution. The test substance was incubated with human monocytic leukemia cell line THP-1 for ca. 24 hours at 37°C and membrane marker expression (CD86 / CD54) was measured by flow cytometry. 

In order to determine the concentrations suitable for the main experiment, a pre-test (non-GLP) were performed. Cells were exposed to several concentrations of the test substance and cytotoxicity was determined thereafter by propidium iodide (PI) intercalation into the DNA. The CV75 was determined via linear regression from the concentration-response curve to be 5.1 µg/mL3.

 

In the main test after 24-hour exposure THP-1 cells were stained with FITC labeled anti-humanCD86/ anti-human-CD54 antibody and propidium iodide and the fluorescence intensity was analyzed using flow cytometry. A total of 2 valid and evaluable experiments were performed. At concentrations used in the main experiment the test substance was soluble in culture medium (2 x stock preparations and final concentrations) and no precipitates were observed at any concentration after 24 hours.

A concentration range of 1.7 -6.1 µg/mL was employed based on the pre-test. In Experiment 1, the calculation of an EC150% (the concentration resulting in a RFI of 150% for CD86 was not applicable as positive criteria were not met and an EC200% (the concentration resulting in a RF1 of 200%) for CD54 was not applicable as fold inductions above 200% were observed at the lowest concentration. In Experiment 2, the calculation of an EC150% (the concentration resulting in a RFI of 150%) for CD86 and an EC200% (the concentration resulting in a RFI of 200%) for CD54 was not applicable as fold inductions above 200% were observed at the lowest concentration. In Experiment 1, the h-CLAT CD86 met the ''borderline'' criteria, but the results of both h-CLAT experiments produced unambiguous positive results. The acceptance criteria were met in all experiments and the results for the positive, negative and vehicle controls are comparable with historic data.

 

Conclusion

Based on the observed results and taking into account the evaluation criteria, it can be concluded that after 24 hours of exposure to the test substance, Basic Red 23, CD86 and CD54 expression was induced in THP-1 cells with at least 50% viability in at least two independent experiments. Therefore, it can be concluded that Basic Red 23 induces dendritic cell activation and is predicted to be a skin sensitiser.