Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 202-009-7 | CAS number: 90-66-4
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Effects on fertility
Description of key information
Based on these results, a parental, reproduction and developmental No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) of at least 500 mg/kg was derived.
The parental No Observed Effect Level (NOEL) was established at 150 mg/kg based on non-adverse microscopic changes in the thyroids of males at 500 mg/kg.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- screening for reproductive / developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 12 September 2016 to 30 December 2016
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 422 (Combined Repeated Dose Toxicity Study with the Reproduction / Developmental Toxicity Screening Test)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- see "Any other information on materials and methods incl. tables"
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Health Effects Test Guidelines, OPPTS 870.3650, Combined Repeated Dose Toxicity Study with the Reproduction/Developmental Toxicity Screening Test, July 2000.
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- see "Any other information on materials and methods incl. tables"
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 421 (Reproduction / Developmental Toxicity Screening Test)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- "Any other information on materials and methods incl. tables"
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: The United States EPA Health Effects Test Guidelines, OPPTS 870.3550, Reproduction/Developmental Toxicity Screening Test, July 2000.
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- see "Any other information on materials and methods incl. tables"
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: Commission regulation (EC) No 440/2008 Part B: Methods for the Determination of Toxicity and other Health Effects; B.7: "Repeated Dose (28 days) Toxicity (oral)". Official Journal of the European Union No. L142, May 2008.
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- "Any other information on materials and methods incl. tables"
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: OECD Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals, Guideline 407, Repeated Dose 28-day Oral Toxicity Study in Rodents, October 2008.
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- "Any other information on materials and methods incl. tables"
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: The United States EPA Health Effects Test Guidelines, OPPTS 870.3050, Repeated dose 28-day oral toxicity study in rodents, July 2000.
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- see "Any other information on materials and methods incl. tables"
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Limit test:
- yes
- Justification for study design:
- The Combined Repeated Dose Toxicity Study with the Reproduction/Developmental Toxicity Screening Test in the Rats was conducted according to OECD No. 422 guideline and OECD No. 43 guidance document. The guideline was designed for use with the rat, which is the preferred rodent species for reproduction toxicity testing.
The purpose of the study was to obtain information on the possible toxic effects of the test item 6,6’-di-tert-butyl-2,2’-thiodi-p-cresol following repeated (daily) administration by oral gavage to Wistar rats at 3 dose levels. A control group received the vehicle only (corn oil).
The study included a reproductive/developmental toxicity screening test, intended to provide initial information on possible effects on male and female reproductive performance such as gonadal function, mating behaviour, conception, pregnancy, parturition and also on the development of the F1 offspring from conception to post-natal day (PND) 13. - Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Internal identification number 207570/A
Identification LOWINOX® TBP-6
Appearance White powder
Batch C034J0059
Purity/Composition 99.8 %
Test item storage At room temperature
Stable under storage conditions until 12 May 2017 (expiry date) - Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- other: Crl:WI(Han) (outbred, SPF-Quality).
- Details on species / strain selection:
- This species and strain of rat has been recognized as appropriate for general and reproduction toxicity studies. Charles River Den Bosch has general and
reproduction/developmental historical data in this species from the same strain and source. This animal model has been proven to be susceptible to the effects of reproductive toxicants. - Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- Test system: Rat: Crl:WI(Han) (outbred, SPF-Quality). Nulliparous and non-pregnant females and untreated animals were used at initiation of the study.
Source F0:Charles River Deutschland, Sulzfeld, Germany.
Age at start pretest: Females - approximately 11 weeks.
Age at start F0-treatment: Males - approximately 10 weeks / Females: approximately 13 weeks.
Number of F0-animals: 48 females and 40 males.
At the end of the pretest phase, 40 females with at least two regular estrous cycles were selected at random and further used in the study. The remaining females were removed from the study.
Acclimatization F0: At least 5 days prior to start of pretest (females) or treatment (males).
Health inspection F0: At least upon receipt of the animals.
Randomization F0: Before initiation of pretest, by computer-generated random algorithm according to body weight, with all animals within ± 20% of the sex mean.
Identification F0: During pretest (females) and treatment (males and females): by earmark and tattoo. Reserve females were numbered R1 through R8 at random by indelible marker. Any reserve female replacing an allocated female prior to treatment received identification by earmark and tattoo.
Mating procedures
Following a minimum of 14 days of exposure for the males and females, one female was cohabitated with one male of the same treatment group, avoiding sibling mating. Detection of mating was confirmed by evidence of sperm in the vaginal lavage or by the appearance of an intravaginal copulatory plug. This day was designated Day 0 post-coitum. Once mating was confirmed, the males and females were separated. A maximum of 14 days was allowed for mating, after which females who had not shown evidence of mating were separated from their males.
Parturition
The females were allowed to litter normally. Postnatal day (PND) 1 was defined as the day when a litter was found completed (i.e. membranes and placentas cleaned up, nest built and/or feeding of pups started). Females that were littering were left undisturbed.
Number of pups: 424 pups.
Identification of pups
On PND 1, all pups were randomized per litter and individually identified by means of subcutaneous injection of Indian ink.
When general hair growth blurred the identification, the pups were identified by tattoo on the feet.
Culling
To reduce variability among the litters, on PND 4 eight pups from each litter of equal sex distribution (if possible) were selected. Blood samples were collected from two of the surplus pups (see section 0). Selective elimination of pups, e.g. based upon body weight, or anogenital distance was not done. Whenever the number of male or female pups prevented having four of each sex per litter, partial adjustment (for example, five males and three females) was acceptable.
Animal Husbandry
Room number: Room A0.07 (A0.23 for motor activity measurements).
Conditions: Environmental controls for the animal room were set to maintain 18 to 24°C, a relative humidity of 40 to 70%, at least 10 room air changes/hour, and a 12-hour light/12-hour dark cycle: the photoperiod is between 07:00 and 19:00 hrs daily. Any variations to these conditions were maintained in the raw data and had no effect on the outcome of the study.
Accommodation
Pretest: Females were housed in groups of 5 females/cage in Macrolon plastic cages (MIV type, height 18 cm).
Pre-mating: Animals were housed in groups of 5 animals/sex/cage in Macrolon plastic cages (MIV type, height 18 cm).
Mating: Females were caged together with males on a one-to-one-basis in Macrolon plastic cages (MIII type, height 18 cm).
Post-mating: Males were housed in their home cage (Macrolon plastic cages, MIV type, height 18 cm) with a maximum of 5 animals/cage. Females were individually housed in Macrolon plastic cages (MIII type, height 18 cm).
Lactation
Females were housed in Macrolon plastic cages (MIII type, height 18 cm). Pups were housed with the dam, except during locomotor activity monitoring of the dams, when the pups were kept warm in their home cage using bottles filled with warm water. In order to avoid hypothermia of pups, pups were not left without their dam or a bottle filled with warm water for longer than 30 40 minutes.
General
Sterilized sawdust as bedding material (Lignocel S 8-15, JRS - J.Rettenmaier & Söhne GmbH + CO. KG, Rosenberg, Germany) and paper as cage-enrichment/nesting material (Enviro-dri, Wm. Lillico & Son (Wonham Mill Ltd), Surrey, United Kingdom) were supplied. During locomotor activity monitoring, animals were housed individually in a Hi-temp polycarbonate cage (Ancare corp., USA; dimensions: 48.3 x 26.7 x 20.3 cm) without cage-enrichment, bedding material, food and water.
Diet: Free access to pelleted rodent diet (SM R/M-Z from SSNIFF® Spezialdiäten GmbH, Soest, Germany).
Water: Free access to tap-water.
Diet, water, bedding and cage-enrichment/nesting material evaluation for contaminants and/or nutrients was performed according to facility standard procedures. There were no findings that could interfere with the study. - Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Mass median aerodynamic diameter (MMAD):
- 196.378 µm
- Vehicle:
- propylene glycol
- Details on exposure:
- Treatment - Parental Animals
Method
Oral gavage, using a plastic feeding tube. Formulations were placed on a magnetic stirrer during dosing. A dose control system (DCS) was used as additional check to verify the dosing procedure according to Standard Operating Procedures. (Test Facility Study No. 513607 was used for DCS).
Dose volume: 5 mL/kg body weight. Actual dose volumes were calculated according to the latest body weight.
Frequency: Once daily for 7 days per week, approximately the same time each day with a maximum of 6 hours difference between the earliest and latest dose.
Treatment period: Males were treated for 31 days, i.e. 2 weeks prior to mating, during mating, and up to the day prior to scheduled necropsy. Females that delivered were treated for 50-56 days, i.e. during 2 weeks prior to mating (with the objective of covering at least two complete estrous cycles), the variable time to conception, the duration of the pregnancy and at least 13 days after delivery up to and including the day before scheduled necropsy. Females which failed to deliver healthy offspring were treated for 38-45 days.
Routinely, females that are littering are left undisturbed. In this study, female nos. 52, 55 and 59 (Group 2) and 73 (Group 4) were not dosed on one occasion as they were littering at the time of dosing. The omission of one day of dosing over a period of several weeks was considered not to affect the toxicological evaluation.
Treatment - Pups
Pups were not treated directly but were potentially exposed to the test item in utero, via maternal milk or from exposure to maternal urine/feces. - Details on mating procedure:
- Following a minimum of 14 days of exposure for the males and females, one female was cohabitated with one male of the same treatment group, avoiding sibling mating. Detection of mating was confirmed by evidence of sperm in the vaginal lavage or by the appearance of an intravaginal copulatory plug. This day was designated Day 0 post-coitum. Once mating was confirmed, the males and females were separated. A maximum of 14 days was allowed for mating, after which females who had not shown evidence of mating were separated from their males.
- Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- Analytical verification of doses was conducted using a Liquid chromatography diode array detector (LC-DAD)
Procedural recovery samples
The mean recoveries of the procedural recovery samples fell within the criterion of 90-110%. It demonstrated that the analytical method was adequate for the determination of the test item in the test samples.
Test samples
In the Group 1 formulation, no test item was detected.
The concentrations analyzed in the formulations of Groups 2, 3 and 4 were in agreement with the target concentrations (i.e. mean accuracies between 90% and 110%).
The formulations of Group 2 and Group 4 were homogeneous (i.e. coefficient of variation ≤ 10%). - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Males were treated for 31 days, i.e. 2 weeks prior to mating, during mating, and up to the day prior to scheduled necropsy. Females that delivered were treated for 50-56 days, i.e. during 2 weeks prior to Repeated dose toxicity: oral - Charles River Laboratories Den Bosch B.V. - 513606 mating (with the objective of covering at least two complete estrous cycles), the variable time to conception, the duration of the pregnancy and at least 13 days after delivery up to and including the daybefore scheduled necropsy. Females which failed to deliver healthy offspring were treated for 38-45 days.
- Frequency of treatment:
- Once daily for 7 days per week, approximately the same time each day with a maximum of 6 hours difference between the earliest and latest dose.
- Details on study schedule:
- Pups were not dosed directly but could have potentially been exposed to the test item in utero, via maternal milk or from exposure to maternal urine/feces.
- Dose / conc.:
- 50 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Dose / conc.:
- 150 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Dose / conc.:
- 500 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 10 males and 10 females per dosing group
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Details on study design:
- Based on the results of a dose range finding study in which toxicity was noted at 500 mg/kg but not at 250 mg/kg (Test Facility Study No. 513610), the dose levels for this combined 28-day oral gavage study with reproduction/developmental toxicity screening test were selected to be 50, 150 and 500 mg/kg.
- Positive control:
- None.
- Parental animals: Observations and examinations:
- Mortality / Viability: At least twice daily.
Clinical signs: Clinical observations (detailed clinical signs and arena) were conducted from start of treatment onwards up to the day prior to necropsy at least at 1 hour (± 30 min)) after dosing based on the peak period of anticipated effects. Once prior to start of treatment and at weekly intervals during the treatment period this was also performed outside the home cage in a standard arena. The time of onset, grade and duration of any observed sign was recorded. Signs were graded for s
everity and the maximum grade was predefined at 3 or 4. Grades were coded as slight (grade 1), moderate (grade 2), severe (grade 3) and very severe (grade 4). For certain signs, only its presence (grade 1) or absence (grade 0) was scored. In the data tables, the scored grades were reported, as well as the percentage of animals affected in summary tables.
Functional Observations
The following functional observations tests were performed on each individual animal of the selected 5 animals/sex/group:
• hearing ability (HEARING), pupillary reflex (PUPIL L/R), and static righting reflex (STATIC R) (Score 0 = normal/present, score 1 = abnormal/absent).
• fore- and hind-limb grip strength, recorded as the mean of three measurements per animal (Series M4-10, Mark-10 Corporation, J.J. Bos, Gouda, The Netherlands).
• locomotor activity (recording period: 1-hour under normal laboratory light conditions, using a co mputerized monitoring system, Kinder Scientific LLC, Poway, USA). Total movements and ambulations are reported. Ambulations represent movements characterized by a relocation of the entire body position like walking, whereas total movements represent all movements made by the animals, including ambulations but also smaller or finer movements like grooming, weaving or movements of
the head. The selected males were tested during Week 4 of treatment and the selected females were tested once during the last week of lactation (e.g. PND 6-13). These tests were performed after observation for clinical signs (incl. arena observation, if applicable) and started at 1 hour (± 30 min) after dosing.
Body weights: Males and females were weighed on the first day of treatment (prior to first dosing) and weekly thereafter. Mated females were weighed on Days 0, 4, 7, 11, 14, 17 and 20 post-coitum and during lactation on PND 1, 4, 7 and 13.
Food consumption: Weekly, except for males and females which were housed together for mating and for females without evidence of mating. Food consumption of mated females was measured on Days 0, 4, 7, 11, 14, 17 and 20 post-coitum and during lactation on PND 1, 4, 7 and 13.
Water consumption: Subjective appraisal was maintained during the study, but no quantitative investigation was introduced as no treatment related effect was suspected.
General reproduction data:
Male number paired with, mating date, confirmation of pregnancy, and delivery day were recorded.
Pregnant females were examined to detect signs of difficult or prolonged parturition, and cage debris of pregnant females were examined for evidence of abortion or premature delivery. Any deficiencies in maternal care (such as inadequate construction or cleaning of the nest, pups left scattered and cold,physical abuse of pups or apparently inadequate lactation or feeding) were examined. - Oestrous cyclicity (parental animals):
- Daily vaginal lavage was performed to determine the stage of estrous beginning 14 days prior to treatment (pretest), the first 14 days of treatment and during mating until evidence of copulation was observed. Vaginal lavage continued for those females with no evidence of copulation until termination of the mating period. During pretest, this was done for 48 females. On the day of scheduled necropsy, a vaginal lavage was taken to determine the stage of estrous.
- Sperm parameters (parental animals):
- Not specified
- Litter observations:
- Each litter was examined to determine the following, if practically possible:
Mortality / Viability: The numbers of live and dead pups were determined on PND 1 and daily thereafter. If possible, defects or cause of death were evaluated.
Clinical signs: At least once daily, detailed clinical observations were made for all animals. Only days on which clinical signs were present between first and last litter check are presented in the respective tables.
Body weights: Live pups were weighed on PND 1, 4, 7 and 13.
Sex: Sex was determined for all pups on PND 1 and 4. Sex ratio (% male pups / % female pups) was calculated per group.
Anogenital distance: Anogenital distance (AGD) was measured for all live pups on PND 1. The AGD was normalized to the cube root of body weight.
Areola/nipple retention: On PND 13, all males in each litter were examined for the number of areola/nipples.
Clinical Laboratory Investigations (F0-Generation only)
Blood samples were collected at the end of the treatment period on the day of scheduled necropsy from the selected 5 animals/sex/group under anaesthesia using isoflurane (Abbott B.V., Hoofddorp, The Netherlands) between 7.00 and 10.30 a.m.
The animals were deprived of food overnight (with a maximum of 24 hours) before blood sampling, but water was available. Blood samples were drawn from the retro-orbital sinus and collected into tubes (Greiner Bio-One GmbH, Kremsmünster, Austria) prepared with K3-EDTA for haematological parameters (0.5 mL), with citrate for clotting tests (0.45 mL) and tubes treated with Li-heparin for clinical biochemistry parameters (0.5 mL). An additional blood sample (0.25 mL) was collected into serum tubes for determination of bile acids.
Haematology
The following haematology parameters were determined in blood prepared with K3-EDTA as an anti-coagulant, using the ADVIA® 2120i Hematology System (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics B.V., Den Haag, The Netherlands):
Parameter (Abbreviation) Unit
White blood cells (WBC) 109/L
Differential leucocyte count:
Neutrophils %WBC
Lymphocytes %WBC
Monocytes %WBC
Eosinophils %WBC
Basophils %WBC
Red blood cells 1012/L
Reticulocytes %RBC
Red blood cell distribution width (RDW) %
Haemoglobin mmol/L
Haematocrit L/L
Mean corpuscular volume (MCV) fL
Mean corpuscular haemoglobin (MCH) fmol
Mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentration (MCHC) mmol/L
Platelets 109/L
The following clotting parameters were determined in plasma prepared with citrate as anti-coagulant, using the STA Compact® (Diagnostica Stago S.A.S., Asnières, France):
Parameter (Abbreviation) Unit
Prothrombin Time (PT) s
Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (APTT) s
Clinical Biochemistry
The following clinical biochemistry parameters were determined using the AU400 (Beckman Coulter Nederland B.V., Woerden, The Netherlands). All parameters were determined in plasma, except for bile acids which were determined in serum:
Parameter (Abbreviation) Unit
Alanine aminotransferase (ALAT) U/L
Aspartate aminotransferase (ASAT) U/L
Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP) U/L
Total protein g/L
Albumin g/L
Total Bilirubin μmol/L
Bile acids μmol/L
Urea mmol/L
Creatinine μmol/L
Glucose mmol/L
Cholesterol mmol/L
Sodium mmol/L
Potassium mmol/L
Chloride mmol/L
Calcium mmol/L
Inorganic Phosphate (Inorg. Phos) mmol/L
Blood Sampling for Thyroid Hormone Analysis
F1-generation, PND 4 pups:
From 2 surplus pups per litter at culling (if possible). Blood samples from the 2 pups per litter were collected into one serum tube. If only 1 surplus pup per litter was available at culling, as much as possible blood was collected from this single pup.
Blood samples were collected by decapitation, between 7.00 and 10.30 a.m.. Blood samples from the 2 pups per litter (0.4 mL in total) were collected into one serum tube (Greiner Bio-One GmbH, Kremsmünster, Austria) for possible future measurement of thyroxine (T4). After clotting and centrifugation, serum samples were stored at ≤-75°C. Under these storage conditions, the samples are stable for 6 months. Any samples remaining after 6 months were discarded.
F1-generation, PND 13-15 pups:
From 2 pups per litter (if possible from one male and one female) at planned necropsy.
As part of the necropsy procedure, blood samples (0.9 mL) were drawn by aorta puncture under anaesthesia using isoflurane (Abbott B.V., Hoofddorp, The Netherlands), between 7.00 and 10.30 a.m.. Blood was collected into serum tubes.
After clotting and centrifugation, serum from each sample was divided into 2 aliquots: 150 µL serum for measurement of thyroxine (T4) and the remaining volume of serum for possible future measurement of thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH).
Serum samples were stored at ≤-75°C. Under these storage conditions, the samples are stable for 6 months. Any samples remaining after 6 months will be discarded.
F0-generation, males and females:
End of study from all animals at planned necropsy; this included females on Day 14-16 of lactation, all females that failed to deliver healthy pups and all males after at least 4 weeks of treatment (including all males that failed to sire).
Blood samples were collected under anaesthesia using isoflurane between 7.00 and 10.30 a.m. The animals were deprived of food overnight (with a maximum of 24 hours) before blood sampling, but water was available. Blood samples (0.9 mL) were drawn from the retro-orbital sinus and collected into serum tubes (Greiner Bio-One GmbH, Kremsmünster, Austria).
After clotting and centrifugation, serum was used as listed below.
Males: 1 aliquot of 150 µL serum was used for measurement of thyroxine (T4), and the remaining volume of serum was stored for possible future measurement of thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH).
Females: The serum was stored for possible future measurement of thyroxine (T4) and/or thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH).
Serum samples were stored at ≤-75°C. Under these storage conditions, the samples are stable for 6 months. Any samples remaining after 6 months will be discarded.
In general:
Total T4 was measured in serum using the Immulite 1000® (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics B.V., Den Haag, The Netherlands):
Parameter (Abbreviation) Unit
Thyroxine (T4) µg/dL
- Postmortem examinations (parental animals):
- F0-generation - Pathology
F0-generation - Termination
The animals were deprived of food overnight (with a maximum of 24 hours) before blood sampling, but water was available.
All animals surviving to the end of the observation period were deeply anaesthetized using isoflurane (Abbott B.V., Hoofddorp, The Netherlands) and subsequently exsanguinated.
Necropsy was conducted on the following days:
Condition Day of necropsy
Males Following completion of the mating period (a minimum of 28 days of dose administration).
Females which delivered PND 14-16.
Females which failed to deliver (nos. 77, 69) Post-coitum Day 25 (female no. 77 with evidence of mating) or 18 days after the last day of the mating period (female no. 69 without evidence of mating).
Females with total litter loss (nos. 51, 79) Within 24 hours of total litter loss
F0-generation – Macroscopic Examination
After sacrifice, all animals were subjected to a full post mortem necropsy, with special attention being paid to the reproductive organs. Descriptions of all macroscopic abnormalities were recorded.
The number of former implantation sites were recorded for all paired females.
Samples of the following tissues and organs were collected and fixed in 10% buffered formalin (neutral phosphate buffered 4% formaldehyde solution, Klinipath, Duiven, The Netherlands).
Selected 5 animals/sex/group (see Allocation):
Identification marks: not processed
(Nasopharynx)
Adrenal glands
(Esophagus)
(Aorta)
Ovaries
Brain - cerebellum, mid-brain, cortex (7-levels)
(Pancreas)
Caecum
Peyer's patches [jejunum, ileum] if detectable
Cervix
Pituitary gland
Clitoral gland
Preputial gland
Colon
Prostate gland
Coagulation gland
Rectum
(Cowper’s gland)
(Salivary glands - mandibular, sublingual)
Duodenum
Sciatic nerve
Epididymides
Seminal vesicles
Eyes (with optic nerve (if detectable) and Harderian gland)
Skeletal muscle
(Skin)
Mammary gland area (males and females)
Spinal cord -cervical, midthoracic, lumbar
Femur including joint
Spleen
(Glans penis)
Sternum with bone marrow
(Levator ani plus bulbocavernosus muscle complex (LABC))
Stomach
Testes
Heart
Thymus
Ileum
Thyroid including parathyroid if detectable
Jejunum
(Tongue)
Kidneys
Trachea
(Lacrimal gland, exorbital)
Urinary bladder
(Larynx)
Uterus
Liver
Vagina
Lung, infused with formalin
All gross lesions
Lymph nodes - mandibular, mesenteric
Tissues/organs mentioned in parentheses were not examined by the pathologist, since no signs of toxicity were noted at macroscopic examination.
All remaining animals:
Cervix
Preputial gland
Clitoral gland
Prostate gland
Coagulation gland
Seminal vesicles
Cowper’s glands
Testes
Epididymides
Thyroid including parathyroid if detectable
Glans penis
Uterus
Levator ani plus bulbocavernosus muscle complex (LABC)
Vagina
All gross lesions
Mammary gland area (males and females)
Identification marks: not processed
Ovaries
F0-generation – Organ Weights
Terminal body weights were recorded from all rats at scheduled necropsy.
The following organ weights were recorded from the following animals on the scheduled day of necropsy:
Selected 5 animals/sex/group (see Allocation):
Adrenal glands
Brain
Epididymides
Heart
Kidneys
Liver
Ovaries
Prostate
Seminal vesicles including coagulating glands
Spleen
Testes
Thymus
Thyroid, including parathyroid if detectable
Uterus, including cervix
All remaining animals:
Epididymides
Prostate
Seminal vesicles including coagulating glands
Testes
Thyroid (including parathyroid if detectable)
Absolute organ weights and organ to body weight ratios are reported.
F0-generation - Histotechnology
All organ and tissue samples, as defined under Histopathology (following section), were processed, embedded and cut at a thickness of 2-4 micrometers. These slides were stained with haematoxylin and eosin (Klinipath, Duiven, The Netherlands). The additional slides of the testes (to examine staging of spermatogenesis) were stained with PAS/haematoxylin (Klinipath, Duiven, The Netherlands).
F0-generation – Histopathology
The following slides were examined by a pathologist:
• The preserved organs and tissues of the selected 5 animals/sex of Groups 1 and 4 (see Allocation).
• Additional slides of the testes of the selected 5 males of Groups 1 and 4 (see Allocation) and all males that failed to sire (see table below).
• The mammary gland of the females with total litter loss.
• All gross lesions of all animals (all dose groups).
• Thyroid gland of the selected 5 males of Groups 2 and 3, based on (possible) treatment-related changes in this organ in Group 4.
• The reproductive organs of all males that failed to sire and all females that failed to deliver healthy pups:
Group Female/Male nos. Reason
1 --- ---
2 51/11 Total litter loss
3 69/29 Not mated
4 77/37 Female was not pregnant
79/39 Total litter loss
All abnormalities were described and included in the report. An attempt was made to correlate gross observations with microscopic findings.
A peer review on the histopathology data was performed by a second pathologist.
- Postmortem examinations (offspring):
- F1-generation Pups - Pathology
F1-generation Pups - Termination
Pups, younger than 7 days were euthanized by decapitation.
All remaining pups (PND 7-15), except those used for blood sampling on PND 13-15, were sacrificed using Euthasol® 20% (AST Farma B.V., Oudewater, The Netherlands) by intraperitoneal (ip) injection.
Pups 13 and 14 (litter 48), 3 and 4 (litter 61) and 8 (litter 72) found dead during the weekend were fixed in an identified container containing 70% ethanol (Klinipath, Duiven, The Netherlands) as they were not necropsied on the same day.
On PND 4 (at culling), from 2 pups per litter, blood samples (0.4 mL in total) were collected by decapitation between 7.00 and 10.30 a.m. Blood samples from the 2 pups per litter were collected into one serum tube.
On PND 13-15, from 2 pups per litter (if possible from one male and one female) blood samples were collected at planned necropsy. As part of the necropsy procedure, blood samples (0.9 mL) were drawn by aorta puncture under anaesthesia using isoflurane (Abbott B.V., Hoofddorp, The Netherlands), between 7.00 and 10.30 a.m., followed by exsanguination. Blood was collected into serum tubes.
Necropsy was conducted on the following days:
Condition Day of necropsy
Culling PND 4.
Terminal sacrifice PND 13-15.
Spontaneous deaths As soon as possible after death and always within 24 hours.
F1-generation pups - Macroscopic Examination
All pups were sexed by both external as well as internal examination. Descriptions of all abnormalities were recorded.
At terminal sacrifice (PND 13-15), the thyroid from 2 pups per litter, i.e. the same pups as selected for blood sampling (see also section 5.10 and 5.12.1), was preserved in 10% buffered formalin.
The stomach of pups not surviving to the scheduled necropsy date was examined for the presence of milk, if possible. If possible, defects or cause of death were evaluated. - Statistics:
- Statistical Analyses
The following statistical methods were used to analyse the data:
• If the variables could be assumed to follow a normal distribution, the Dunnett-test (Ref. 2; many-to-one t-test) based on a pooled variance estimate was applied for the comparison of the treated groups and the control groups for each sex.
• The Steel-test (many-to-one rank test) was applied if the data could not be assumed to follow a normal distribution.
• The Fisher Exact-test was applied to frequency data.
• The Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric ANOVA test was applied to motor activity data to determine intergroup differences.
All tests were two-sided and in all cases p < 0.05 was accepted as the lowest level of significance. Group means were calculated for continuous data and medians were calculated for discrete data (scores) in the summary tables. Test statistics were calculated on the basis of exact values for means and pooled variances. Individual values, means and standard deviations may have been rounded off before printing. Therefore, two groups may display the same printed means for a given parameter, yet display different test statistics values. - Reproductive indices:
- Live birth index
Percentage live males at First Litter Check
Percentage live females at First Litter Check
Viability index
Lactation index - Offspring viability indices:
- Post-implantation survival index
Mating index
Precoital time
Fertility index
Conception index
Gestation index
Duration of gestation - Clinical signs:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No treatment-related clinical signs of toxicity were noted during daily clinical observations or during weekly arena observations.
Slight salivation was noted after dosing, starting after about two weeks of treatment, at all dose levels, most frequently at 150 and 500 mg/kg. This salivation was considered to be a physiological response rather than a sign of systemic toxicity considering its slight severity and the time of occurrence (i.e.after dosing).
One female at 500 mg/kg (no. 76) showed lethargy, shallow respiration and piloerection towards the end of the gestation period (on one or two days). Based on the incidental occurrence of these signs of distress and the absence of abnormalities in her body weight development and food consumption, these findings were considered not to be toxicologically relevant.
Any other clinical signs noted incidentally occurred within the range of background findings to be expected for rats of this age and strain which are housed and treated under the conditions in this study and showed no dose-related trend. At the incidence observed, these were considered to be unrelated to treatment. - Dermal irritation (if dermal study):
- not examined
- Mortality:
- no mortality observed
- Description (incidence):
- No mortality occurred during the study period.
- Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Body weight and body weight gain were not affected by treatment.
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No treatment-related changes in food consumption before or after allowance for body weight were noted.
- Food efficiency:
- not specified
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not specified
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not specified
- Haematological findings:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No toxicologically relevant changes occurred in haematology parameters of treated rats.
Isolated statistically significant variations noted in haematology parameters in males were unrelated to treatment or not toxicologically relevant due to the lack of a dose-related response or a slightly high concurrent control value. - Clinical biochemistry findings:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No toxicologically relevant changes occurred in clinical biochemistry parameters of treated rats.
The statistically significant variations noted in clinical biochemistry parameters were unrelated to treatment or not toxicologically relevant due to the lack of a dose-related response, slight magnitude of the difference from controls (values in treated rats remained within normal limits), and/or a slightly low concurrent control value.
Thyroid hormone analyses:
Serum levels of T4 in F0 males were not affected by treatment. - Urinalysis findings:
- not specified
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Hearing ability, pupillary reflex and static righting reflex were normal in all examined animals.
Grip strength was similar across the groups, except for a statistically significantly lower hind limb grip strength in males at 500 mg/kg. This finding was not accompanied by a decrease in fore limb grip strength and the values at 500 mg/kg were within the normal range for male rats of this strain and age. Therefore, the lower hind limb grip strength in males at 500 mg/kg was considered not to be toxicologically relevant.
The variation in motor activity did not indicate a relation with treatment. All groups showed a similar ha bituation profile with a decreasing trend in activity over the duration of the test period. - Immunological findings:
- not specified
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- In the thyroid gland of males, an increased incidence and severity (up to slight) of follicular cell hypertrophy was present starting at 150 mg/kg/day, and colloid alteration was present at 500 mg/kg (up to slight).
The remainder of the recorded microscopic findings were within the range of background pathology encountered in rats of this age and strain. There was no test item related alteration in the prevalence, severity, or histologic character of those incidental tissue alterations. This included the recorded findings of control animals which erroneously received the test item. - Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- not specified
- Other effects:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Mating index
Mating index was not affected by treatment. Except for one female at 150 mg/kg (no. 69), all females showed evidence of mating.
Fertility and Conception index
Fertility and conception index were not affected by treatment.
Except for one female at 500 mg/kg (no. 77), all mated females were pregnant. This incidental non-pregnancy without related histopathology changes in reproductive organs was considered to be unrelated to treatment.
Precoital time
Precoital time was not affected by treatment.
Number of implantation sites
Number of implantation sites was considered not to be adversely affected by treatment.
The mean number of implantation sites at 500 mg/kg was slightly lower than that in the control group. The lower mean value at 500 mg/kg was largely due to the low number of implantation sites in two females (nos. 73 and 79 with five and two implantation sites, respectively). Such low numbers of implantation sites occasionally occur in untreated controls. Moreover, the difference from the control group was not statistically significant. Therefore, this finding was considered not to be toxicologically relevant. - Reproductive function: oestrous cycle:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Length and regularity of the estrous cycle were not affected by treatment.
Most females had regular cycles of 4 days. Control female no. 46 had an irregular cycle and extended di-estrus during paring was noted for female no. 69 at 150 mg/kg. These findings were considered to be unrelated to treatment because their incidence was within normal limits and showed no dose-related trend. - Reproductive function: sperm measures:
- not specified
- Reproductive performance:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- There were 1/10 couples treated at 50 mg/kg (female/male no. 51/11, total litter loss), 1/10 couples treated at 150 mg/kg (female/male no. 69/29, not mated) and 2/10 couples treated at 500 mg/kg (female/male no. 77/37, not pregnant; no. 79/39, total litter loss) that failed to deliver healthy pups. Histopathology did not reveal any changes in the reproductive organs that could explain the reproductive failure or total litter loss.
There were no morphological findings in the reproductive organs of either sex which could be attributed to the test item, and spermatogenic staging profiles were normal for all males examined. - Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 500 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male
- Remarks on result:
- not determinable
- Key result
- Critical effects observed:
- no
- Clinical signs:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No clinical signs occurred among pups that were considered to be related to treatment.
The nature and incidence of the clinical signs observed incidentally remained within the range considered normal for pups of this age, and were therefore considered to be of no toxicological relevance.
Note: Only days on which clinical signs were present between first and last litter check are presented in the table. - Dermal irritation (if dermal study):
- not examined
- Mortality / viability:
- no mortality observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No mortality occurred during the study period.
- Body weight and weight changes:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Body weights of pups were considered not to be affected by treatment.
Compared to controls, mean body weights of male and female pups at 500 mg/kg were higher from birth until PND 13. The relative differences gradually decreased from about 20% at PND 1 (statistically significant) to about 10% at PND 13 (no longer statistically significant). The higher means at 500 mg/kg were particularly due to the higher (exceeding normal limits) weights and weight gain of the pups of one small litter (no. 73, two male and two female pups). The higher pup weights in this small litter are consistent with the generally recognized inverse relation between litter size and pup body weight. Pups of the other litters at 500 mg/kg had normal body weights at birth and thereafter (except for those of litter no. 71 which had slightly lower weights at PND 13). For these reasons, the higher mean pup weights at 500 mg/kg were considered to reflect normal biological variation rather than an effect of the test item. - Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- not specified
- Food efficiency:
- not specified
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not specified
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not specified
- Haematological findings:
- not specified
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Serum T4 levels in male and female PND 13-15 pups were not affected by treatment.
- Urinalysis findings:
- not specified
- Sexual maturation:
- not specified
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- not specified
- Gross pathological findings:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Histopathological findings:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No macroscopic findings were noted among pups that were considered to be related to treatment.
The nature and incidence of the few findings noted (mostly in pups found dead) remained within the range considered normal for pups of this age, and were therefore considered to be unrelated to treatment. - Other effects:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Gestation index and duration
Gestation index and duration of gestation were not affected by treatment.
Parturition/maternal care
No signs of difficult or prolonged parturition were noted among the pregnant females. Examination of cage debris of pregnant females revealed no signs of abortion or premature birth. No deficiencies in maternal care were observed.
Post-implantation survival index
Post-implantation survival index (total number of offspring born as percentage of total number of uterine implantation sites) was not affected by treatment. The survival indices across the groups were 90-96%.
Live birth index
Live birth index (number of live offspring on PND 1 as percentage of total number of offspring born) was not affected by treatment. The live birth indices across the groups were 97 or 99%.
At first litter check, four pups of the control group (litter nos. 46-48), three pups at 150 mg/kg (litter nos. 61 and 64) and one pup at 500 mg/kg (litter no. 72) were found dead. One female at 50 mg/kg (no. 51) had only one dead pup at first litter check (total litter loss). This pup mortality was considered to be unrelated to treatment because the mortality incidence was within normal limits and showed no dose-related trend.
The mean number of living pups at first litter check was slightly lower at 500 mg/kg. The difference from the concurrent control group was not statistically significant and could be explained by the small size of two litters in the 500 mg/kg group (litter nos. 73 (four pups) and 79 (two pups)) which correlated with low numbers of implantation sites in the dams. Such small litter sizes occasionally occur in untreated controls. All other litters at 500 mg/kg had normal sizes (between 8 and 14 pups). For these reasons, the lower mean litter size at 500 mg/kg was considered not to be toxicologically relevant.
Viability index
Viability index (number of live offspring on PND 4 before culling as percentage of number of live offspring on PND 1) was not affected by treatment. The viability indices across the groups were 94-98%.
Female no. 79 at 500 mg/kg had total litter loss (one of her two pups went missing on PND 2, the other on PND 4). In addition, six pups of the control group (of four litters), two pups at 50 mg/kg (of two litters), six pups at 150 mg/kg (of four litters), and one pup at 500 mg/kg went missing (presumably cannibalized) or were found dead between PND 2-4 (mostly at PND 2). This post-natal loss was considered to be unrelated to treatment as the incidence showed no dose-related trend and remained within the range considered normal for pups of this age.
Lactation index
Lactation index (number of live offspring on PND 13 as percentage of number of live offspring after culling on PND 4) was not affected by treatment. The lactation index was 99% at 150 mg/kg (one pup of litter no. 70 went missing on PND 7) and 100% in the other groups.
Sex ratio
Sex ratio was not affected by treatment.
Anogenital distance
Anogenital distance (absolute and normalized for body weight) in male and female pups was not affected by treatment.
Areola/nipple retention
Treatment up to 500 mg/kg had no effect on areola/nipple retention. For none of the examined male pups nipples were observed at PND 13 - Behaviour (functional findings):
- not specified
- Developmental immunotoxicity:
- not specified
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Generation:
- F1
- Effect level:
- 500 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Remarks on result:
- not determinable
- Key result
- Critical effects observed:
- no
- Key result
- Reproductive effects observed:
- no
- Lowest effective dose / conc.:
- 150 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Treatment related:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- No reproduction toxicity was observed up to the highest dose level tested (500 mg/kg).
No treatment-related or toxicologically relevant changes were noted in any of reproductive parameters investigated in this study (i.e. mating, fertility and conception indices, precoital time, number of implantation sites, estrous cycle, spermatogenic profiling, and histopathological examination of reproductive organs).
No developmental toxicity was observed up to the highest dose level tested (500 mg/kg).
No treatment-related or toxicologically relevant changes were noted in any of the developmental parameters investigated in this study (i.e. gestation, viability and lactation indices, duration of gestation, parturition, sex ratio, maternal care and early postnatal pup development consisting of mortality, clinical signs, body weight, anogenital distance, areola/nipple retention, T4 thyroid hormone levels and macroscopy).
In conclusion, based on these results, a parental, reproduction and developmental No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) of at least 500 mg/kg was derived.
The parental No Observed Effect Level (NOEL) was established at 150 mg/kg based on non-adverse microscopic changes in the thyroids of males at 500 mg/kg. - Executive summary:
Combined 28-day repeated dose toxicity study with the reproduction/developmental toxicity screening test of LOWINOX® TBP-6 in rats by oral gavage.
The study was based on the following guidelines:
• OECD 422, Combined Repeated Dose Toxicity Study with the Reproduction/Developmental Toxicity Screening Test, July 2016.
• OPPTS 870.3650, Combined Repeated Dose Toxicity Study with the Reproduction/Developmental Toxicity Screening Test, July 2000.
• OECD 421, Reproduction/Developmental Toxicity Screening Test, July 2016.
• OPPTS 870.3550, Reproduction/Developmental Toxicity Screening Test, July 2000.
• EC No 440/2008 B.7: "Repeated Dose (28 days) Toxicity (oral)", May 2008.
• OECD 407, Repeated Dose 28-day Oral Toxicity Study in Rodents, October 2008.
• OPPTS 870.3050, Repeated dose 28-day oral toxicity study in rodents, July 2000.
Based on the results of a dose range finding study in which toxicity was noted at 500 mg/kg but not at 250 mg/kg (Test Facility Study No. 513610 ), the dose levels for this combined 28 -day oral gavage study with reproduction/developmental toxicity screening test were selected to be 50, 150 and 500 mg/kg.
The test item, LOWINOX® TBP-6, formulated in propylene glycol, was administered daily by oral gavage to SPF-bred Wistar Han rats. One control group and three treated groups were tested, each consisting of 10 males and 10 females. Males were treated for 31 days, i.e. 2 weeks prior to mating, during mating, and up to termination. Females were treated for 50-56 days, i.e. during 2 weeks prior to mating, during
mating, during post-coitum, and during 13-15 days of lactation. Females which failed to deliver healthy offspring were treated for 38-45 days.
The following observations and examinations were evaluated: mortality / viability, clinical signs (daily), functional observations and locomotor activity (end of treatment), body weight and food consumption (at least at weekly intervals), estrous cycle determination (14 days prior to treatment, 14 days of treatment and during mating until evidence of mating, and on the day of necropsy), clinical pathology (end of
treatment), measurement of thyroid hormone T4 (F0-males at the end of treatment, PND 13-15 pups), macroscopy at termination, organ weights and histopathology on a selection of tissues. In addition, the following reproduction/developmental parameters were determined: mating, fertility and conception indices, number of implantation sites, gestation index and duration, parturition, maternal care, sex ratio and early postnatal pup development (mortality, clinical signs, body weights, anogenital distance, areola/nipple retention and macroscopy).
Formulations were analyzed once during the study to assess accuracy and homogeneity.
There were no toxicologically relevant changes in the in-life parameters up to 500 mg/kg.
Slight salivation was noted after dosing at all dose levels, most frequently at 150 and 500 mg/kg. This was considered to be a physiological response rather than a sign of systemic toxicity. Treatment-related microscopic changes were present in the thyroid of male rats, characterized by an increased incidence and severity of follicular cell hypertrophy starting at 150 mg/kg, and alteration of the colloid at 500 mg/kg. These findings were regarded as non-adverse based on their low degree (up to slight) and the absence of other treatment-related findings.
No treatment-related or toxicologically relevant changes were noted in clinical pathology parameters, organ weights or findings at macroscopic examination.
In conclusion:
Based on these results, a parental, reproduction and developmental No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) of at least 500 mg/kg was derived.
The parental No Observed Effect Level (NOEL) was established at 150 mg/kg based on non-adverse microscopic changes in the thyroids of males at 500 mg/kg.
Reference
No treatment-related or toxicologically relevant changes were noted in any of reproductive parameters investigated in this study (i.e. mating, fertility and conception indices, precoital time, number of implantation sites, estrous cycle, spermatogenic profiling, and histopathological examination of reproductive organs).
No treatment-related or toxicologically relevant changes were noted in any of the developmental parameters investigated in this study (i.e. gestation, viability and lactation indices, duration of gestation, parturition, sex ratio, maternal care and early postnatal pup development consisting of mortality, clinical signs, body weight, anogenital distance, areola/nipple retention, T4 thyroid hormone levels and macroscopy).
|
GROUP 1 CONTROL |
GROUP 2 50 MG/KG |
GROUP 3 150 MG/KG |
GROUP 4 500 MG/KG |
|
AT WEEK 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
HEARING |
MEDIAN |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
SCORE 0/1 |
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
PUPIL L |
MEDIAN |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
SCORE 0/1 |
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
PUPIL R |
MEDIAN |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
SCORE 0/1 |
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
STATIC R |
MEDIAN |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
SCORE 0/1 |
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
GRIP FORE |
MEAN |
1288 |
1162 |
1439 |
1373 |
GRAM |
ST.DEV |
176 |
120 |
178 |
187 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
GRIP HIND |
MEAN |
612 |
557 |
581 |
497 * |
GRAM |
ST.DEV |
65 |
57 |
44 |
93 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
FEMALES |
|
||||
|
|
GROUP 1 |
GROUP 2 |
GROUP 3 |
GROUP 4 |
|
|
CONTROL |
50 MG/KG |
150 MG/KG |
500 MG/KG |
LACTATION |
|
|
|
|
|
HEARING |
MEDIAN |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
SCORE 0/1 |
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
PUPIL L |
MEDIAN |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
SCORE 0/1 |
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
PUPIL R |
MEDIAN |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
SCORE 0/1 |
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
STATIC R |
MEDIAN |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
SCORE 0/1 |
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
GRIP FORE |
MEAN |
840 |
1025 |
870 |
1009 |
GRAM |
ST.DEV |
122 |
206 |
228 |
245 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
GRIP HIND |
MEAN |
613 |
690 |
621 |
680 |
GRAM |
ST.DEV |
88 |
67 |
66 |
81 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
MOTOR ACTIVITY MALES
AT WEEK 4 |
TEST SUMMARY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
GROUP 1 |
GROUP 2 |
GROUP 3 |
GROUP 4 |
|
|
CONTROL |
50 MG/KG |
150 MG/KG |
500 MG/KG |
Total Movements |
MEAN1 |
3794 |
2571 |
2772 |
3065 |
|
ST.DEV |
2378 |
182 |
1016 |
669 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
Ambulations |
MEAN1 |
852 |
587 |
625 |
842 |
|
ST.DEV |
594 |
72 |
334 |
280 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
*/** Wilcoxon test significant at 5% (*) or 1% (**) level
1Group mean of all intervals
2combined
|
|
|||
|
||||
MOTOR ACTIVITY TEST SUMMARY |
||||
FEMALES |
||||
AT LACTATION |
||||
|
GROUP 1 |
GROUP 2 |
GROUP 3 |
GROUP 4 |
|
CONTROL |
50 MG/KG |
150 MG/KG |
500 MG/KG |
TotalMovements MEAN1 |
3492 |
3270 |
2229 |
3235 |
ST.DEV |
1449 |
1151 |
413 |
818 |
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
Ambulations MEAN1 |
848 |
680 |
545 |
773 |
ST.DEV |
355 |
345 |
140 |
284 |
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
*/** Wilcoxon test significant at 5% (*) or 1% (**) level
1Group mean of all intervals combined
BODY WEIGHTS (GRAM) SUMMARY MALES
|
GROUP 1 CONTROL |
GROUP 2 50 MG/KG |
GROUP 3 150 MG/KG |
GROUP 4 500 MG/KG |
|
PRE MATING DAY 1 |
MEAN |
298 |
297 |
294 |
300 |
WEEK 1 |
ST.DEV |
7.4 |
11.1 |
13.0 |
9.4 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
DAY 8 |
MEAN |
319 |
320 |
315 |
321 |
WEEK 2 |
ST.DEV |
8.5 |
16.4 |
17.5 |
12.6 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
MATING PERIOD DAY 1 |
MEAN |
339 |
341 |
335 |
343 |
WEEK 1 |
ST.DEV |
9.5 |
20.6 |
21.5 |
16.7 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
DAY 8 |
MEAN |
351 |
357 |
347 |
357 |
WEEK 2 |
ST.DEV |
10.4 |
20.4 |
19.3 |
17.7 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
DAY 15 |
MEAN |
368 |
375 |
365 |
374 |
WEEK 3 |
ST.DEV |
12.2 |
22.7 |
21.3 |
20.4 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
FEMALES |
|
||||
|
|
GROUP 1 |
GROUP 2 |
GROUP 3 |
GROUP 4 |
|
|
CONTROL |
50 MG/KG |
150 MG/KG |
500 MG/KG |
PRE MATING DAY 1 |
MEAN |
221 |
225 |
222 |
226 |
WEEK 1 |
ST.DEV |
8.2 |
11.5 |
7.6 |
14.3 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
DAY 8 |
MEAN |
222 |
226 |
224 |
228 |
WEEK 2 |
ST.DEV |
8.9 |
12.5 |
9.5 |
15.8 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
MATING PERIOD DAY 1 |
MEAN |
229 |
232 |
231 |
235 |
WEEK 1 |
ST.DEV |
9.2 |
13.9 |
8.7 |
17.3 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
DAY 8 |
MEAN |
|
|
263 |
|
WEEK 2 |
ST.DEV N |
|
|
--- 1 |
|
DAY 15 WEEK 3 |
MEAN ST.DEV |
|
|
268 --- |
|
|
N |
|
|
1 |
|
DAY 22 |
MEAN |
|
|
257 |
|
WEEK 4 |
ST.DEV N |
|
|
--- 1 |
|
DAY 29 |
MEAN |
|
|
260 |
|
WEEK 5 |
ST.DEV N |
|
|
--- 1 |
|
*/** Dunnett-test based on pooled variance significant at 5% (*) or 1% (**) level
F0-GENERATION
BODY WEIGHTS (GRAM) SUMMARY FEMALES
|
|
GROUP 1 CONTROL |
GROUP 2 50 MG/KG |
GROUP 3 150 MG/KG |
GROUP 4 500 MG/KG |
POST COITUM DAY 0 |
MEAN |
231 |
235 |
232 |
238 |
|
ST.DEV. |
10.3 |
14.5 |
10.0 |
15.7 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
9 |
9 |
DAY 4 |
MEAN |
245 |
248 |
248 |
256 |
|
ST.DEV. |
10.9 |
16.1 |
11.2 |
16.0 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
9 |
9 |
DAY 7 |
MEAN |
253 |
256 |
255 |
264 |
|
ST.DEV. |
10.1 |
16.7 |
12.0 |
18.5 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
9 |
9 |
DAY 11 |
MEAN |
269 |
271 |
271 |
277 |
|
ST.DEV. |
9.9 |
17.6 |
14.3 |
20.6 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
9 |
9 |
DAY 14 |
MEAN |
279 |
284 |
283 |
286 |
|
ST.DEV. |
11.3 |
19.7 |
15.5 |
20.9 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
9 |
9 |
DAY 17 |
MEAN |
299 |
304 |
305 |
309 |
|
ST.DEV. |
11.6 |
25.2 |
16.9 |
22.8 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
9 |
9 |
DAY 20 |
MEAN |
336 |
341 |
346 |
341 |
|
ST.DEV. |
16.3 |
34.2 |
18.6 |
28.4 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
9 |
9 |
LACTATION DAY 1 |
MEAN |
260 |
263 |
264 |
272 |
|
ST.DEV. |
9.3 |
20.4 |
16.3 |
21.9 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
9 |
9 |
DAY 4 |
MEAN |
273 |
276 |
276 |
281 |
|
ST.DEV. |
15.5 |
19.8 |
15.8 |
24.0 |
|
N |
10 |
9 |
9 |
9 |
DAY 7 |
MEAN |
284 |
287 |
289 |
292 |
|
ST.DEV. |
15.6 |
18.7 |
16.5 |
23.2 |
|
N |
10 |
9 |
9 |
8 |
DAY 13 |
MEAN |
302 |
299 |
297 |
306 |
|
ST.DEV. |
16.0 |
21.5 |
17.5 |
21.9 |
|
N |
10 |
9 |
9 |
8 |
*/** Dunnett-test based on pooled variance significant at 5% (*) or 1% (**) level Explanations for excluded data are listed in the tables of the individual values
BODY WEIGHT GAIN (%) SUMMARY MALES
|
GROUP 1 CONTROL |
GROUP 2 50 MG/KG |
GROUP 3 150 MG/KG |
GROUP 4 500 MG/KG |
|
PRE MATING DAY 1 |
MEAN |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
WEEK 1 |
ST.DEV |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
DAY 8 |
MEAN |
7 |
8 |
7 |
7 |
WEEK 2 |
ST.DEV |
2.0 |
2.2 |
2.1 |
1.6 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
MATING PERIOD DAY 1 |
MEAN |
14 |
15 |
14 |
14 |
WEEK 1 |
ST.DEV |
2.9 |
3.5 |
3.0 |
2.6 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
DAY 8 |
MEAN |
18 |
20 |
18 |
19 |
WEEK 2 |
ST.DEV |
3.5 |
3.7 |
3.1 |
2.9 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
DAY 15 |
MEAN |
24 |
26 |
24 |
24 |
WEEK 3 |
ST.DEV |
4.2 |
4.2 |
3.4 |
3.5 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
FEMALES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GROUP 1 |
GROUP 2 |
GROUP 3 |
GROUP 4 |
|
|
CONTROL |
50 MG/KG |
150 MG/KG |
500 MG/KG |
PRE MATING DAY 1 |
MEAN |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
WEEK 1 |
ST.DEV |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
DAY 8 |
MEAN |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
WEEK 2 |
ST.DEV |
2.5 |
1.4 |
1.7 |
1.8 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
MATING PERIOD DAY 1 |
MEAN |
3 |
3 |
4 |
4 |
WEEK 1 |
ST.DEV |
2.6 |
2.5 |
2.9 |
3.5 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
DAY 8 |
MEAN |
|
|
15 |
|
WEEK 2 |
ST.DEV N |
|
|
--- 1 |
|
DAY 15 WEEK 3 |
MEAN ST.DEV |
|
|
17 --- |
|
|
N |
|
|
1 |
|
DAY 22 |
MEAN |
|
|
12 |
|
WEEK 4 |
ST.DEV N |
|
|
--- 1 |
|
DAY 29 |
MEAN |
|
|
14 |
|
WEEK 5 |
ST.DEV N |
|
|
--- 1 |
|
*/** Dunnett-test based on pooled variance significant at 5% (*) or 1% (**) level
F0-GENERATION
BODY WEIGHT GAIN (%) SUMMARY FEMALES
|
|
GROUP 1 CONTROL |
GROUP 2 50 MG/KG |
GROUP 3 150 MG/KG |
GROUP 4 500 MG/KG |
POST COITUM DAY 0 |
MEAN |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
ST.DEV. |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
9 |
9 |
DAY 4 |
MEAN |
6 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
|
ST.DEV. |
1.8 |
1.8 |
1.8 |
2.8 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
9 |
9 |
DAY 7 |
MEAN |
9 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
|
ST.DEV. |
1.7 |
1.9 |
2.2 |
3.3 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
9 |
9 |
DAY 11 |
MEAN |
16 |
15 |
17 |
16 |
|
ST.DEV. |
2.5 |
2.1 |
3.1 |
3.4 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
9 |
9 |
DAY 14 |
MEAN |
20 |
20 |
22 |
20 |
|
ST.DEV. |
2.1 |
2.5 |
3.4 |
2.8 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
9 |
9 |
DAY 17 |
MEAN |
30 |
29 |
32 |
30 |
|
ST.DEV. |
3.0 |
4.5 |
3.5 |
4.7 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
9 |
9 |
DAY 20 |
MEAN |
45 |
45 |
49 |
43 |
|
ST.DEV. |
3.0 |
8.3 |
3.6 |
7.6 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
9 |
9 |
LACTATION DAY 1 |
MEAN |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
ST.DEV. |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
9 |
9 |
DAY 4 |
MEAN |
5 |
5 |
5 |
3 |
|
ST.DEV. |
3.1 |
2.9 |
3.0 |
3.4 |
|
N |
10 |
9 |
9 |
9 |
DAY 7 |
MEAN |
10 |
9 |
10 |
8 |
|
ST.DEV. |
3.1 |
3.4 |
4.1 |
2.4 |
|
N |
10 |
9 |
9 |
8 |
DAY 13 |
MEAN |
16 |
14 |
13 |
13 |
|
ST.DEV. |
3.6 |
4.4 |
6.8 |
2.6 |
|
N |
10 |
9 |
9 |
8 |
*/** Dunnett-test based on pooled variance significant at 5% (*) or 1% (**) level Explanations for excluded data are listed in the tables of the individual values
FOOD CONSUMPTION (G/ANIMAL/DAY) SUMMARY MALES
|
|
GROUP 1 CONTROL |
GROUP 2 50 MG/KG |
GROUP 3 150 MG/KG |
GROUP 4 500 MG/KG |
PRE MATING DAYS 1-8 |
MEAN |
22 |
22 |
22 |
23 |
WEEKS 1-2 |
ST.DEV |
0.9 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.7 |
|
N (CAGE) |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
DAYS 8-15 |
MEAN |
21 |
22 |
22 |
23 |
WEEKS 2-3 |
ST.DEV |
0.2 |
0.1 |
0.5 |
1.3 |
|
N (CAGE) |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
MEAN OF MEANS OVER PRE MATI... |
MEAN |
22 |
22 |
22 |
23 |
MATING PERIOD |
|
|
|
|
|
DAYS 1-8 |
MEAN |
23 |
23 |
23 |
23 |
WEEKS 1-2 |
ST.DEV |
0.7 |
0.2 |
0.4 |
1.0 |
|
N (CAGE) |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
DAYS 8-15 |
MEAN |
22 |
22 |
22 |
23 |
WEEKS 2-3 |
ST.DEV |
0.5 |
0.1 |
0.8 |
1.0 |
|
N (CAGE) |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
MEAN OF MEANS OVER MATING P... |
MEAN |
22 |
22 |
22 |
23 |
FEMALES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GROUP 1 |
GROUP 2 |
GROUP 3 |
GROUP 4 |
|
|
CONTROL |
50 MG/KG |
150 MG/KG |
500 MG/KG |
PRE MATING DAYS 1-8 |
MEAN |
15 |
15 |
15 |
15 |
WEEKS 1-2 |
ST.DEV |
0.6 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
|
N (CAGE) |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
DAYS 8-15 |
MEAN |
14 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
WEEKS 2-3 |
ST.DEV |
0.6 |
0.4 |
0.4 |
0.6 |
|
N (CAGE) |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
MEAN OF MEANS OVER PRE MATI... |
MEAN |
15 |
15 |
15 |
15 |
F0-GENERATION
FOOD CONSUMPTION (G/ANIMAL/DAY) SUMMARY FEMALES |
|
GROUP 1 CONTROL |
GROUP 2 50 MG/KG |
GROUP 3 150 MG/KG |
GROUP 4 500 MG/KG |
POST COITUM DAYS 0-4 |
MEAN |
16 |
16 |
16 |
19 |
|
ST.DEV. |
2.8 |
2.8 |
3.0 |
3.8 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
9 |
9 |
DAYS 4-7 |
MEAN |
18 |
18 |
18 |
20 |
|
ST.DEV. |
1.6 |
2.2 |
1.7 |
3.4 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
9 |
9 |
DAYS 7-11 |
MEAN |
19 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
|
ST.DEV. |
1.3 |
2.3 |
2.4 |
3.2 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
9 |
9 |
DAYS 11-14 |
MEAN |
21 |
21 |
22 |
22 |
|
ST.DEV. |
1.1 |
2.2 |
3.0 |
2.4 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
9 |
9 |
DAYS 14-17 |
MEAN |
20 |
20 |
20 |
22 |
|
ST.DEV. |
0.6 |
2.4 |
2.2 |
2.9 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
9 |
9 |
DAYS 17-20 |
MEAN |
23 |
22 |
24 |
24 |
|
ST.DEV. |
2.2 |
2.5 |
2.5 |
2.8 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
9 |
9 |
MEAN OF MEANS |
|
19 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
LACTATION DAYS 1-4 |
MEAN |
25 |
27 |
25 |
26 |
|
ST.DEV. |
4.1 |
3.0 |
2.8 |
5.3 |
|
N |
6 |
6 |
8 |
9 |
DAYS 4-7 |
MEAN |
37 |
38 |
37 |
37 |
|
ST.DEV. |
4.3 |
3.5 |
3.6 |
5.2 |
|
N |
10 |
9 |
9 |
8 |
DAYS 7-13 |
MEAN |
49 |
46 |
46 |
47 |
|
ST.DEV. |
3.3 |
3.8 |
4.4 |
5.4 |
|
N |
10 |
9 |
9 |
8 |
MEAN OF MEANS |
|
37 |
37 |
36 |
36 |
*/** Dunnett-test based on pooled variance significant at 5% (*) or 1% (**) level Explanations for excluded data are listed in the tables of the individual values
|
|
GROUP 1 CONTROL |
GROUP 2 50 MG/KG |
GROUP 3 150 MG/KG |
GROUP 4 500 MG/KG |
PRE MATING DAYS 1-8 |
MEAN |
68 |
70 |
69 |
71 |
WEEKS 1-2 |
ST.DEV |
1.9 |
0.2 |
1.1 |
2.3 |
|
N (CAGE) |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
DAYS 8-15 |
MEAN |
67 |
69 |
69 |
70 |
WEEKS 2-3 |
ST.DEV |
0.0 |
0.4 |
2.3 |
4.1 |
|
N (CAGE) |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
MEAN OF MEANS OVER PRE MATI... |
MEAN |
68 |
69 |
69 |
71 |
MATING PERIOD |
|
|
|
|
|
DAYS 1-8 |
MEAN |
64 |
64 |
65 |
65 |
WEEKS 1-2 |
ST.DEV |
1.3 |
1.0 |
0.8 |
2.7 |
|
N (CAGE) |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
DAYS 8-15 |
MEAN |
58 |
58 |
60 |
61 |
WEEKS 2-3 |
ST.DEV |
0.8 |
0.4 |
2.0 |
2.3 |
|
N (CAGE) |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
MEAN OF MEANS OVER MATING P... |
MEAN |
61 |
61 |
63 |
63 |
FEMALES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GROUP 1 |
GROUP 2 |
GROUP 3 |
GROUP 4 |
|
|
CONTROL |
50 MG/KG |
150 MG/KG |
500 MG/KG |
PRE MATING DAYS 1-8 |
MEAN |
67 |
66 |
68 |
67 |
WEEKS 1-2 |
ST.DEV |
1.0 |
1.5 |
2.0 |
1.3 |
|
N (CAGE) |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
DAYS 8-15 |
MEAN |
65 |
63 |
67 |
68 |
WEEKS 2-3 |
ST.DEV |
0.9 |
0.3 |
0.7 |
1.1 |
|
N (CAGE) |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
MEAN OF MEANS OVER PRE MATI... |
MEAN |
66 |
64 |
67 |
68 |
F0-GENERATION
RELATIVE FOOD CONSUMPTION (G/KG BODY WEIGHT/DAY) SUMMARY FEMALES |
|
GROUP 1 CONTROL |
GROUP 2 50 MG/KG |
GROUP 3 150 MG/KG |
GROUP 4 500 MG/KG |
POST COITUM DAYS 0-4 |
MEAN |
66 |
65 |
65 |
73 |
|
ST.DEV. |
10.6 |
9.3 |
12.7 |
14.4 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
9 |
9 |
DAYS 4-7 |
MEAN |
70 |
69 |
72 |
76 |
|
ST.DEV. |
6.2 |
4.7 |
5.3 |
9.4 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
9 |
9 |
DAYS 7-11 |
MEAN |
70 |
67 |
71 |
73 |
|
ST.DEV. |
4.4 |
5.2 |
6.5 |
8.5 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
9 |
9 |
DAYS 11-14 |
MEAN |
74 |
72 |
77 |
76 |
|
ST.DEV. |
4.3 |
4.5 |
8.7 |
5.4 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
9 |
9 |
DAYS 14-17 |
MEAN |
68 |
66 |
66 |
70 |
|
ST.DEV. |
2.2 |
4.5 |
5.8 |
6.1 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
9 |
9 |
DAYS 17-20 |
MEAN |
68 |
66 |
69 |
71 |
|
ST.DEV. |
7.0 |
6.4 |
7.2 |
6.8 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
9 |
9 |
MEAN OF MEANS |
|
69 |
67 |
70 |
73 |
LACTATION DAYS 1-4 |
MEAN |
93 |
98 |
91 |
92 |
|
ST.DEV. |
12.8 |
8.5 |
7.8 |
18.1 |
|
N |
6 |
6 |
8 |
9 |
DAYS 4-7 |
MEAN |
130 |
133 |
126 |
125 |
|
ST.DEV. |
12.1 |
14.5 |
11.1 |
13.4 |
|
N |
10 |
9 |
9 |
8 |
DAYS 7-13 |
MEAN |
161 |
154 |
155 |
154 |
|
ST.DEV. |
9.9 |
10.3 |
12.8 |
16.0 |
|
N |
10 |
9 |
9 |
8 |
MEAN OF MEANS |
|
128 |
128 |
124 |
124 |
*/** Dunnett-test based on pooled variance significant at 5% (*) or 1% (**) level Explanations for excluded data are listed in the tables of the individual values
HAEMATOLOGY SUMMARY MALES
|
|
GROUP 1 CONTROL |
GROUP 2 50 MG/KG |
GROUP 3 150 MG/KG |
GROUP 4 500 MG/KG |
END OF TREATMENT WBC |
MEAN |
6.9 |
7.5 |
5.7 |
6.8 |
10E9/L |
ST.DEV |
2.0 |
1.4 |
0.9 |
1.3 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
Neutrophils |
MEAN |
14.3 |
14.6 |
13.6 |
12.1 |
%WBC |
ST.DEV |
3.1 |
3.9 |
3.4 |
1.7 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
4 |
Lymphocytes |
MEAN |
82.9 |
82.7 |
83.6 |
85.1 |
%WBC |
ST.DEV |
2.7 |
4.6 |
3.3 |
1.9 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
4 |
Monocytes |
MEAN |
1.7 |
1.8 |
1.8 |
1.9 |
%WBC |
ST.DEV |
0.3 |
0.5 |
0.6 |
0.3 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
4 |
Eosinophils |
MEAN |
1.0 |
0.9 |
1.0 |
0.9 |
%WBC |
ST.DEV |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
4 |
Basophils |
MEAN |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
%WBC |
ST.DEV |
0.1 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.0 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
4 |
Red blood cells |
MEAN |
8.88 |
8.71 |
8.78 |
8.62 |
10E12/L |
ST.DEV |
0.21 |
0.29 |
0.32 |
0.34 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
Reticulocytes |
MEAN |
2.2 |
2.5 |
2.7 |
2.7 |
%RBC |
ST.DEV |
0.3 |
0.4 |
0.3 |
0.6 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
RDW |
MEAN |
11.8 |
12.9 |
12.1 |
12.1 |
% |
ST.DEV |
0.6 |
2.1 |
0.7 |
0.3 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
Haemoglobin |
MEAN |
10.0 |
9.8 |
10.0 |
9.7 |
mmol/L |
ST.DEV |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
0.2 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
Haematocrit |
MEAN |
0.451 |
0.447 |
0.463 |
0.449 |
L/L |
ST.DEV |
0.013 |
0.007 |
0.018 |
0.013 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
MCV |
MEAN |
50.7 |
51.4 |
52.8 |
52.2 |
fL |
ST.DEV |
1.5 |
1.7 |
2.1 |
1.7 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
MCH |
MEAN |
1.12 |
1.13 |
1.14 |
1.13 |
fmol |
ST.DEV |
0.03 |
0.04 |
0.04 |
0.03 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
MCHC |
MEAN |
22.19 |
22.05 |
21.58 * |
21.67 |
mmol/L |
ST.DEV |
0.33 |
0.52 |
0.30 |
0.22 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
Platelets |
MEAN |
837 |
757 |
755 |
683 * |
10E9/L |
ST.DEV |
136 |
20 |
48 |
50 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
+/++ Steel-test significant at 5% (+) or 1% (++) level
*/** Dunnett-test based on pooled variance significant at 5% (*) or 1% (**) level
|
|
GROUP 1 CONTROL |
GROUP 2 50 MG/KG |
GROUP 3 150 MG/KG |
GROUP 4 500 MG/KG |
END OF TREATMENT PT |
MEAN |
17.9 |
18.6 |
18.1 |
18.4 |
s |
ST.DEV |
0.6 |
0.3 |
0.5 |
0.4 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
APTT |
MEAN |
15.0 |
17.1 |
15.4 |
16.4 |
s |
ST.DEV |
1.3 |
2.3 |
1.4 |
2.4 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
HAEMATOLOGY SUMMARY FEMALES
|
|
GROUP 1 CONTROL |
GROUP 2 50 MG/KG |
GROUP 3 150 MG/KG |
GROUP 4 500 MG/KG |
END OF TREATMENT WBC |
MEAN |
7.3 |
7.2 |
7.6 |
8.1 |
10E9/L |
ST.DEV |
1.0 |
1.3 |
1.3 |
2.1 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
Neutrophils |
MEAN |
52.3 |
45.6 |
43.5 |
45.6 |
%WBC |
ST.DEV |
9.1 |
8.4 |
4.4 |
6.4 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
Lymphocytes |
MEAN |
41.5 |
48.7 |
50.9 |
48.8 |
%WBC |
ST.DEV |
7.8 |
8.2 |
4.2 |
6.0 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
Monocytes |
MEAN |
4.2 |
4.5 |
4.3 |
4.9 |
%WBC |
ST.DEV |
1.4 |
1.3 |
0.7 |
1.2 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
Eosinophils |
MEAN |
2.0 |
1.1 |
1.1 |
0.6 |
%WBC |
ST.DEV |
1.5 |
0.5 |
0.3 |
0.4 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
Basophils |
MEAN |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
%WBC |
ST.DEV |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
Red blood cells |
MEAN |
7.79 |
7.89 |
7.70 |
7.57 |
10E12/L |
ST.DEV |
0.50 |
0.70 |
0.46 |
0.58 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
Reticulocytes |
MEAN |
3.4 |
3.2 |
2.9 |
3.5 |
%RBC |
ST.DEV |
0.7 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
RDW |
MEAN |
13.1 |
13.7 |
14.7 |
13.4 |
% |
ST.DEV |
1.1 |
1.1 |
1.3 |
0.5 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
Haemoglobin |
MEAN |
9.3 |
9.4 |
9.2 |
9.2 |
mmol/L |
ST.DEV |
0.9 |
1.0 |
0.6 |
0.7 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
Haematocrit |
MEAN |
0.433 |
0.434 |
0.431 |
0.442 |
L/L |
ST.DEV |
0.036 |
0.047 |
0.038 |
0.047 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
MCV |
MEAN |
55.6 |
55.0 |
56.0 |
58.3 |
fL |
ST.DEV |
1.7 |
2.2 |
2.0 |
1.8 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
MCH |
MEAN |
1.19 |
1.19 |
1.19 |
1.21 |
fmol |
ST.DEV |
0.05 |
0.04 |
0.02 |
0.02 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
MCHC |
MEAN |
21.43 |
21.66 |
21.28 |
20.77 |
mmol/L |
ST.DEV |
0.32 |
0.40 |
0.52 |
0.60 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
Platelets |
MEAN |
782 |
793 |
803 |
801 |
10E9/L |
ST.DEV |
78 |
36 |
126 |
184 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
|
GROUP 1 CONTROL |
GROUP 2 50 MG/KG |
GROUP 3 150 MG/KG |
GROUP 4 500 MG/KG |
END OF TREATMENT PT |
MEAN |
17.3 |
17.4 |
17.7 |
17.3 |
s |
ST.DEV |
0.5 |
1.4 |
0.8 |
0.6 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
APTT |
MEAN |
13.1 |
13.4 |
12.7 |
14.2 |
s |
ST.DEV |
1.7 |
2.5 |
0.7 |
2.0 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY SUMMARY MALES
|
|
GROUP 1 CONTROL |
GROUP 2 50 MG/KG |
GROUP 3 150 MG/KG |
GROUP 4 500 MG/KG |
END OF TREATMENT ALAT |
MEAN |
49.8 |
47.7 |
43.1 |
44.6 |
U/L |
ST.DEV |
20.5 |
10.4 |
9.3 |
6.8 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
ASAT |
MEAN |
86.4 |
82.8 |
85.2 |
85.8 |
U/L |
ST.DEV |
4.0 |
4.7 |
10.0 |
13.3 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
ALP |
MEAN |
179 |
162 |
151 |
169 |
U/L |
ST.DEV |
62 |
57 |
59 |
39 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
Total protein |
MEAN |
65.0 |
64.3 |
63.0 |
63.0 |
g/L |
ST.DEV |
2.1 |
1.6 |
1.2 |
2.1 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
Albumin |
MEAN |
34.7 |
34.1 |
33.7 |
33.2 * |
g/L |
ST.DEV |
1.2 |
0.7 |
0.6 |
1.1 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
Total bilirubin |
MEAN |
2.5 |
2.0 * |
2.1 |
2.1 |
umol/L |
ST.DEV |
0.3 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
Urea |
MEAN |
8.1 |
8.0 |
7.9 |
7.7 |
mmol/L |
ST.DEV |
2.5 |
1.1 |
1.5 |
0.2 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
Creatinine |
MEAN |
41.1 |
41.1 |
41.1 |
40.3 |
umol/L |
ST.DEV |
2.9 |
1.2 |
1.5 |
1.3 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
Glucose |
MEAN |
7.94 |
8.26 |
8.55 |
8.19 |
mmol/L |
ST.DEV |
1.07 |
1.27 |
1.19 |
0.82 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
Cholesterol |
MEAN |
1.92 |
1.89 |
1.85 |
2.03 |
mmol/L |
ST.DEV |
0.16 |
0.25 |
0.36 |
0.40 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
Bile Acids |
MEAN |
28.7 |
13.6 * |
16.1 * |
16.1 * |
umol/L |
ST.DEV |
11.8 |
2.6 |
6.5 |
6.7 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
Sodium |
MEAN |
141.0 |
140.6 |
141.5 |
141.2 |
mmol/L |
ST.DEV |
0.2 |
0.3 |
1.5 |
0.4 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
Potassium |
MEAN |
3.59 |
4.02 ** |
3.75 |
3.82 * |
mmol/L |
ST.DEV |
0.11 |
0.13 |
0.16 |
0.13 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
Chloride |
MEAN |
102 |
103 |
102 |
103 |
mmol/L |
ST.DEV |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
Calcium |
MEAN |
2.60 |
2.58 |
2.56 |
2.60 |
mmol/L |
ST.DEV |
0.08 |
0.05 |
0.03 |
0.03 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
*/** Dunnett-test based on pooled variance significant at 5% (*) or 1% (**) level
- Page 19 -
- Page 19 -
|
|
GROUP 1 CONTROL |
GROUP 2 50 MG/KG |
GROUP 3 150 MG/KG |
GROUP 4 500 MG/KG |
END OF TREATMENT Inorg.Phos |
MEAN |
1.99 |
2.05 |
1.94 |
1.99 |
mmol/L |
ST.DEV |
0.20 |
0.20 |
0.18 |
0.21 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
Total T4 |
MEAN |
4.93 |
4.00 |
4.06 |
4.34 |
ug/dL |
ST.DEV |
1.58 |
0.76 |
0.81 |
0.92 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
*/** Dunnett-test based on pooled variance significant at 5% (*) or 1% (**) level
|
|
GROUP 1 CONTROL |
GROUP 2 50 MG/KG |
GROUP 3 150 MG/KG |
GROUP 4 500 MG/KG |
END OF TREATMENT ALAT |
MEAN |
75.1 |
59.9 |
79.7 |
76.5 |
U/L |
ST.DEV |
17.8 |
11.6 |
29.2 |
13.9 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
ASAT |
MEAN |
118.1 |
100.0 |
112.1 |
112.1 |
U/L |
ST.DEV |
24.7 |
15.0 |
29.2 |
22.4 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
ALP |
MEAN |
108 |
125 |
162 |
129 |
U/L |
ST.DEV |
29 |
38 |
67 |
62 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
Total protein |
MEAN |
59.0 |
61.5 |
62.9 |
60.8 |
g/L |
ST.DEV |
9.7 |
2.1 |
1.3 |
2.3 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
Albumin |
MEAN |
31.7 |
32.8 |
33.0 |
31.8 |
g/L |
ST.DEV |
4.3 |
0.1 |
0.6 |
1.5 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
Total bilirubin |
MEAN |
2.7 |
2.3 |
2.3 |
2.2 |
umol/L |
ST.DEV |
0.3 |
0.6 |
0.4 |
0.4 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
Urea |
MEAN |
14.2 |
10.9 |
11.2 |
10.2 |
mmol/L |
ST.DEV |
4.9 |
0.6 |
0.9 |
2.1 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
Creatinine |
MEAN |
47.5 |
45.8 |
44.4 |
43.2 |
umol/L |
ST.DEV |
3.0 |
2.5 |
3.0 |
3.1 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
Glucose |
MEAN |
7.03 |
7.98 |
7.92 |
7.96 |
mmol/L |
ST.DEV |
1.00 |
1.07 |
0.98 |
0.70 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
Cholesterol |
MEAN |
1.80 |
2.15 |
2.30 |
2.18 |
mmol/L |
ST.DEV |
0.17 |
0.35 |
0.39 |
0.56 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
Bile Acids |
MEAN |
60.7 |
58.0 |
39.3 |
32.6 |
umol/L |
ST.DEV |
60.7 |
72.3 |
26.1 |
7.8 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
Sodium |
MEAN |
134.6 |
137.8 ** |
136.8 * |
137.2 ** |
mmol/L |
ST.DEV |
0.9 |
1.7 |
1.2 |
0.9 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
Potassium |
MEAN |
3.62 |
3.53 |
3.98 |
3.79 |
mmol/L |
ST.DEV |
0.29 |
0.46 |
0.58 |
0.50 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
Chloride |
MEAN |
94 |
96 |
97 |
97 |
mmol/L |
ST.DEV |
2 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
Calcium |
MEAN |
2.53 |
2.63 |
2.70 |
2.61 |
mmol/L |
ST.DEV |
0.23 |
0.12 |
0.10 |
0.04 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
|
GROUP 1 CONTROL |
GROUP 2 50 MG/KG |
GROUP 3 150 MG/KG |
GROUP 4 500 MG/KG |
END OF TREATMENT Inorg.Phos |
MEAN |
3.08 |
2.91 |
2.83 |
2.68 |
mmol/L |
ST.DEV |
0.38 |
0.55 |
0.53 |
0.34 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
Total T4 |
MEAN |
--- |
--- |
--- |
--- |
ug/dL |
ST.DEV |
--- |
--- |
--- |
--- |
|
N |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
MACROSCOPIC FINDINGS SUMMARY MALES
|
GROUP 1 CONTROL |
GROUP 2 50 MG/KG |
GROUP 3 150 MG/KG |
GROUP 4 500 MG/KG |
END OF TREATMENT Animals examined |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
Animals without findings |
7 |
7 |
9 |
10 |
Animals affected |
3 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
Epididymides |
|
|
|
|
Nodule(s) Cowper's gland |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
Agenesis |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
Thymus Focus/foci |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
Mandibular lymph n |
|
|
|
|
Discolouration |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
FEMALES |
|
|
|
|
|
GROUP 1 |
GROUP 2 |
GROUP 3 |
GROUP 4 |
|
CONTROL |
50 MG/KG |
150 MG/KG |
500 MG/KG |
INTERCURRENT DEATH |
|
|
|
|
Animals examined |
|
1 |
|
1 |
Animals affected |
|
1 |
|
1 |
General observations |
|
|
|
|
Total litter loss |
|
1 |
|
1 |
END OF TREATMENT Animals examined |
10 |
9 |
10 |
9 |
Animals without findings |
7 |
4 |
5 |
5 |
Animals affected |
3 |
5 |
5 |
4 |
Stomach Focus/foci |
3 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
Uterus Contains fluid |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
Clitoral glands |
|
|
|
|
Focus/foci |
0 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
Thyroid gland Reduced in size |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
Thymus Focus/foci |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
Reduced in size |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
Discolouration |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
Skin Alopecia |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
# / ## Fisher's Exact test significant at 5% (#) or 1% (##) level
ORGAN WEIGHTS (GRAM) SUMMARY MALES
|
GROUP 1 CONTROL |
GROUP 2 50 MG/KG |
GROUP 3 150 MG/KG |
GROUP 4 500 MG/KG |
|
END OF TREATMENT BODY W. |
MEAN |
349 |
356 |
345 |
354 |
(GRAM) |
ST.DEV |
12 |
24 |
19 |
19 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
BRAIN |
MEAN |
2.07 |
2.05 |
2.01 |
2.04 |
(GRAM) |
ST.DEV |
0.09 |
0.07 |
0.05 |
0.04 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
HEART |
MEAN |
0.928 |
1.011 |
0.895 |
1.003 |
(GRAM) |
ST.DEV |
0.069 |
0.069 |
0.023 |
0.092 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
LIVER |
MEAN |
9.22 |
9.22 |
9.05 |
9.34 |
(GRAM) |
ST.DEV |
0.93 |
0.93 |
0.73 |
1.19 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
THYROIDS |
MEAN |
0.015 |
0.015 |
0.018 * |
0.016 |
(GRAM) |
ST.DEV |
0.002 |
0.002 |
0.003 |
0.003 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
THYMUS |
MEAN |
0.334 |
0.409 |
0.353 |
0.365 |
(GRAM) |
ST.DEV |
0.071 |
0.052 |
0.042 |
0.125 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
KIDNEYS |
MEAN |
2.40 |
2.46 |
2.39 |
2.43 |
(GRAM) |
ST.DEV |
0.06 |
0.12 |
0.19 |
0.15 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
ADRENALS |
MEAN |
0.060 |
0.064 |
0.072 |
0.058 |
(GRAM) |
ST.DEV |
0.008 |
0.008 |
0.006 |
0.007 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
SPLEEN |
MEAN |
0.586 |
0.672 |
0.640 |
0.639 |
(GRAM) |
ST.DEV |
0.055 |
0.091 |
0.110 |
0.089 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
TESTES |
MEAN |
3.46 |
3.57 |
3.59 |
3.47 |
(GRAM) |
ST.DEV |
0.28 |
0.32 |
0.27 |
0.19 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
PROSTATE GLAND |
MEAN |
0.893 |
0.942 |
1.043 |
0.916 |
(GRAM) |
ST.DEV |
0.140 |
0.183 |
0.111 |
0.104 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
EPIDIDYMIDES |
MEAN |
1.134 |
1.096 |
1.091 |
1.077 |
(GRAM) |
ST.DEV |
0.085 |
0.118 |
0.065 |
0.028 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
SEMINAL VESICLES |
MEAN |
1.638 |
1.415 * |
1.424 * |
1.514 |
(GRAM) |
ST.DEV |
0.155 |
0.164 |
0.215 |
0.210 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
GROUP 1 CONTROL |
GROUP 2 50 MG/KG |
GROUP 3 150 MG/KG |
GROUP 4 500 MG/KG |
END OF TREATMENT BODY W. |
MEAN |
349 |
356 |
345 |
354 |
(GRAM) |
ST.DEV |
12 |
24 |
19 |
19 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
BRAIN |
MEAN |
0.59 |
0.58 |
0.58 |
0.58 |
(%) |
ST.DEV |
0.04 |
0.04 |
0.03 |
0.03 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
HEART |
MEAN |
0.264 |
0.285 |
0.258 |
0.282 |
(%) |
ST.DEV |
0.025 |
0.021 |
0.011 |
0.007 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
LIVER |
MEAN |
2.62 |
2.59 |
2.61 |
2.62 |
(%) |
ST.DEV |
0.17 |
0.12 |
0.12 |
0.15 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
THYROIDS |
MEAN |
0.004 |
0.004 |
0.005 * |
0.004 |
(%) |
ST.DEV |
0.001 |
0.001 |
0.001 |
0.001 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
THYMUS |
MEAN |
0.094 |
0.116 |
0.102 |
0.101 |
(%) |
ST.DEV |
0.017 |
0.016 |
0.008 |
0.028 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
KIDNEYS |
MEAN |
0.68 |
0.69 |
0.69 |
0.68 |
(%) |
ST.DEV |
0.03 |
0.03 |
0.04 |
0.02 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
ADRENALS |
MEAN |
0.017 |
0.018 |
0.021 * |
0.016 |
(%) |
ST.DEV |
0.002 |
0.002 |
0.003 |
0.002 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
SPLEEN |
MEAN |
0.167 |
0.189 |
0.184 |
0.180 |
(%) |
ST.DEV |
0.020 |
0.020 |
0.025 |
0.023 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
TESTES |
MEAN |
0.99 |
1.01 |
1.04 |
0.98 |
(%) |
ST.DEV |
0.07 |
0.09 |
0.10 |
0.06 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
PROSTATE GLAND |
MEAN |
0.257 |
0.264 |
0.302 * |
0.259 |
(%) |
ST.DEV |
0.045 |
0.046 |
0.033 |
0.026 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
EPIDIDYMIDES |
MEAN |
0.325 |
0.309 |
0.317 |
0.305 |
(%) |
ST.DEV |
0.026 |
0.037 |
0.027 |
0.018 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
SEMINAL VESICLES |
MEAN |
0.471 |
0.399 * |
0.412 * |
0.427 |
(%) |
ST.DEV |
0.051 |
0.052 |
0.051 |
0.053 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
ORGAN WEIGHTS (GRAM) SUMMARY FEMALES
|
|
GROUP 1 CONTROL |
GROUP 2 50 MG/KG |
GROUP 3 150 MG/KG |
GROUP 4 500 MG/KG |
END OF TREATMENT BODY W. |
MEAN |
266 |
266 |
263 |
267 |
(GRAM) |
ST.DEV |
12 |
17 |
15 |
28 |
|
N |
10 |
9 |
10 |
10 |
BRAIN |
MEAN |
1.91 |
1.91 |
1.96 |
1.94 |
(GRAM) |
ST.DEV |
0.02 |
0.05 |
0.10 |
0.07 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
HEART |
MEAN |
0.805 |
0.841 |
0.805 |
0.874 |
(GRAM) |
ST.DEV |
0.076 |
0.072 |
0.051 |
0.097 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
LIVER |
MEAN |
8.79 |
9.22 |
9.20 |
9.99 |
(GRAM) |
ST.DEV |
0.34 |
0.82 |
0.78 |
1.02 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
THYROIDS |
MEAN |
0.014 |
0.013 |
0.015 |
0.015 |
(GRAM) |
ST.DEV |
0.002 |
0.003 |
0.003 |
0.002 |
|
N |
10 |
9 |
10 |
10 |
THYMUS |
MEAN |
0.214 |
0.182 |
0.199 |
0.236 |
(GRAM) |
ST.DEV |
0.038 |
0.052 |
0.049 |
0.042 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
KIDNEYS |
MEAN |
1.80 |
1.98 |
1.98 |
2.03 |
(GRAM) |
ST.DEV |
0.10 |
0.14 |
0.28 |
0.23 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
ADRENALS |
MEAN |
0.075 |
0.078 |
0.069 |
0.076 |
(GRAM) |
ST.DEV |
0.009 |
0.005 |
0.015 |
0.004 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
SPLEEN |
MEAN |
0.518 |
0.527 |
0.521 |
0.570 |
(GRAM) |
ST.DEV |
0.089 |
0.056 |
0.088 |
0.078 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
OVARIES |
MEAN |
0.111 |
0.121 |
0.111 |
0.119 |
(GRAM) |
ST.DEV |
0.010 |
0.024 |
0.012 |
0.010 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
UTERUS |
MEAN |
0.386 |
0.503 |
0.464 |
0.559 |
(GRAM) |
ST.DEV |
0.052 |
0.111 |
0.084 |
0.211 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
ORGAN/BODY WEIGHT RATIOS (%) SUMMARY FEMALES
|
|
GROUP 1 CONTROL |
GROUP 2 50 MG/KG |
GROUP 3 150 MG/KG |
GROUP 4 500 MG/KG |
END OF TREATMENT BODY W. |
MEAN |
266 |
266 |
263 |
267 |
(GRAM) |
ST.DEV |
12 |
17 |
15 |
28 |
|
N |
10 |
9 |
10 |
10 |
BRAIN |
MEAN |
0.72 |
0.72 |
0.76 |
0.69 |
(%) |
ST.DEV |
0.03 |
0.04 |
0.02 |
0.04 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
HEART |
MEAN |
0.305 |
0.317 |
0.310 |
0.308 |
(%) |
ST.DEV |
0.025 |
0.015 |
0.009 |
0.024 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
LIVER |
MEAN |
3.33 |
3.47 |
3.55 |
3.52 |
(%) |
ST.DEV |
0.12 |
0.25 |
0.25 |
0.27 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
THYROIDS |
MEAN |
0.005 |
0.005 |
0.006 |
0.006 |
(%) |
ST.DEV |
0.001 |
0.001 |
0.001 |
0.001 |
|
N |
10 |
9 |
10 |
10 |
THYMUS |
MEAN |
0.080 |
0.068 |
0.077 |
0.083 |
(%) |
ST.DEV |
0.011 |
0.018 |
0.021 |
0.010 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
KIDNEYS |
MEAN |
0.68 |
0.74 |
0.76 |
0.71 |
(%) |
ST.DEV |
0.03 |
0.04 |
0.08 |
0.03 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
ADRENALS |
MEAN |
0.028 |
0.029 |
0.027 |
0.027 |
(%) |
ST.DEV |
0.004 |
0.000 |
0.005 |
0.002 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
SPLEEN |
MEAN |
0.197 |
0.199 |
0.201 |
0.201 |
(%) |
ST.DEV |
0.038 |
0.019 |
0.031 |
0.025 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
OVARIES |
MEAN |
0.042 |
0.045 |
0.043 |
0.042 |
(%) |
ST.DEV |
0.005 |
0.006 |
0.005 |
0.002 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
UTERUS |
MEAN |
0.146 |
0.188 |
0.178 |
0.195 |
(%) |
ST.DEV |
0.016 |
0.031 |
0.030 |
0.066 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
REPRODUCTIONDATASUMMARY
|
GROUP 1CONTROL |
GROUP 2 50 MG/KG |
GROUP 3 150 MG/KG |
GROUP 4 500 MG/KG |
Females paired |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
Females mated |
10 |
10 |
9 |
10 |
Pregnant females |
10 |
10 |
9 |
9 |
Females with total litter loss on Day 1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
Females with living pups on Day 1 |
10 |
9 |
9 |
9 |
Mating index (%) |
100 |
100 |
90 |
100 |
(Females mated / Females paired) * 100 |
|
|
|
|
Fertility index (%) |
100 |
100 |
90 |
90 |
(Pregnant females / Females paired) * 100 |
|
|
|
|
Conception index (%) |
100 |
100 |
100 |
90 |
(Pregnant females / Females mated) * 100 |
|
|
|
|
Gestation index (%) |
100 |
90 |
100 |
100 |
(Females with living pups on Day 1 / Pregnant females) * 100 |
|
|
|
|
F0-GENERATION - POSTCOITUM
DAY OF THE PAIRING PERIOD |
GROUP 1 CONTROL |
GROUP 2 50 MG/KG |
GROUP 3 150 MG/KG |
GROUP 4 500 MG/KG |
NUMBER OF FEMALES MATED 1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
4 |
3 |
1 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
1 |
3 |
MEDIAN PRECOITAL TIME |
3 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
MEAN PRECOITAL TIME |
2.5 |
3.1 |
2.3 |
2.3 |
N |
10 |
10 |
9 |
10 |
IMPLANTATION SITES FEMALES |
SUMMARY |
|
|||
|
|
GROUP 1 |
GROUP 2 |
GROUP 3 |
GROUP 4 |
|
|
CONTROL |
50 MG/KG |
150 MG/KG |
500 MG/KG |
NECROPSY Implantations |
MEAN |
12.5 |
12.1 |
13.4 |
10.0 |
|
ST.DEV |
2.4 |
4.4 |
1.6 |
4.2 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
9 |
9 |
F0-GENERATION - LACTATION |
||||
GROUP 1 CONTROL |
GROUP 2 |
GROUP 3 |
GROUP 4 |
|
50 MG/KG |
150 MG/KG |
500 MG/KG |
||
LITTERS TOTAL |
10 |
10 |
9 |
9 |
DURATION OF GESTATION MEAN (+) |
21.2 |
21.6 |
21.1 |
21.7 |
ST.DEV. |
0.4 |
0.5 |
0.3 |
0.7 |
N |
10 |
10 |
9 |
9 |
DEAD PUPS AT FIRST LITTER CHECK |
||||
LITTERS AFFECTED (#) |
3 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
TOTAL |
4 |
1 |
3 |
1 |
MEAN (+) |
0.4 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
0.1 |
ST.DEV. |
0.7 |
0.3 |
0.7 |
0.3 |
N |
10 |
10 |
9 |
9 |
LIVING PUPS AT FIRST LITTER CHECK |
||||
% OF MALES / FEMALES (#) |
51 / 49 |
52 / 48 |
45 / 55 |
53 / 47 |
TOTAL |
113 |
108 |
109 |
85 |
MEAN (+) |
11.3 |
10.8 |
12.1 |
9.4 |
ST.DEV. |
2 |
4.6 |
2.3 |
4.2 |
N |
10 |
10 |
9 |
9 |
POSTNATAL LOSS |
||||
% OF LIVING PUPS |
5.3 |
1.9 |
5.5 |
3.5 |
LITTERS AFFECTED (#) |
4 |
2 |
4 |
2 |
TOTAL (#) |
6 |
2 |
6 |
3 |
MEAN (+) |
0.6 |
0.2 |
0.7 |
0.3 |
ST.DEV. |
1 |
0.4 |
0.9 |
0.7 |
N |
10 |
10 |
9 |
9 |
CULLED PUPS |
||||
TOTAL |
28 |
35 |
32 |
22 |
LIVING PUPS DAY 4 P.P. |
||||
TOTAL |
79 |
71 |
71 |
60 |
MEAN (+) |
7.9 |
7.1 |
7.9 |
6.7 |
ST.DEV. |
0.3 |
2.5 |
0.3 |
2.8 |
N |
10 |
10 |
9 |
9 |
BREEDING LOSS DAYS 5 - 13 P.P. |
||||
% OF LIVING PUPS AT DAY 4 P.P. |
0 |
0 |
1.4 |
0 |
LITTERS AFFECTED (#) |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
TOTAL (#) |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
MEAN (+) |
0 |
0 |
0.1 |
0 |
ST.DEV. |
0 |
0 |
0.3 |
0 |
N |
10 |
10 |
9 |
9 |
LIVING PUPS DAY 13 P.P. |
||||
% OF MALES / FEMALES (#) |
48 / 52 |
51 / 49 |
49 / 51 |
53 / 47 |
TOTAL |
79 |
71 |
70 |
60 |
MEAN (+) |
7.9 |
7.1 |
7.8 |
6.7 |
ST.DEV. |
0.3 |
2.5 |
0.4 |
2.8 |
N |
10 |
10 |
9 |
9 |
Steel-test significant at 5% (+) or 1% (++) level
DEVELOPMENTAL DATA |
|
|||
|
GROUP 1 |
GROUP 2 |
GROUP 3 |
GROUP 4 |
|
CONTROL |
50 MG/KG |
150 MG/KG |
500 MG/KG |
Total number of offspring born |
117 |
109 |
112 |
86 |
Total number of uterine implantation sites |
125 |
121 |
121 |
90 |
Number of live offspring on Day 1 after littering |
113 |
108 |
109 |
85 |
Number of live offspring on Day 4 (before culling) |
107 |
106 |
103 |
82 |
Number of live offspring on Day 4 (after culling) |
79 |
71 |
71 |
60 |
Number of live offspring on Day 13 after littering |
79 |
71 |
70 |
60 |
Post-implantation survival index (%) |
94 |
90 |
93 |
96 |
(Total number of offspring born/Total number of uterine implantation sites) * 100 |
|
|
|
|
Live birth index (%) |
97 |
99 |
97 |
99 |
(Number of live offspring on Day 1 after littering/Total number of offspring born) * 100 |
|
|
|
|
Viability index (%) |
95 |
98 |
94 |
96 |
(Number of live offspring on Day 4 (before culling)/Number of live offspring on Day 1 after littering)*100 |
|
|
|
|
Lactation index (%) |
100 |
100 |
99 |
100 |
(Number of live offspring on Day 13 after littering/Number of live offspring on Day 4 (after culling)) * 100 |
|
|
|
|
BODY WEIGHTS OF PUPS(GRAM)
F0-GENERATION -LACTATION
DAY |
SEX |
|
GROUP 1 CONTROL |
GROUP 2 50 MG/KG |
GROUP 3 150 MG/KG |
GROUP 4 500 MG/KG |
1 |
M |
MEAN |
6.0 |
6.5 |
6.0 |
7.1 * |
|
|
ST.DEV. |
0.7 |
0.6 |
0.9 |
1.3 |
|
|
N |
10 |
9 |
9 |
9 |
|
F |
MEAN |
5.7 |
6.2 |
5.6 |
6.8 * |
|
|
ST.DEV. |
0.8 |
0.7 |
0.9 |
1.4 |
|
|
N |
10 |
9 |
9 |
9 |
|
M+F |
MEAN |
5.9 |
6.4 |
5.8 |
7.0 * |
|
|
ST.DEV. |
0.7 |
0.6 |
0.9 |
1.4 |
|
|
N |
10 |
9 |
9 |
9 |
4 |
M |
MEAN |
8.7 |
9.4 |
8.7 |
10.5 |
|
|
ST.DEV. |
1.3 |
1.0 |
1.3 |
2.4 |
|
|
N |
10 |
9 |
9 |
8 |
|
F |
MEAN |
8.4 |
8.9 |
8.1 |
10.2 * |
|
|
ST.DEV. |
1.3 |
1.2 |
1.3 |
2.3 |
|
|
N |
10 |
9 |
9 |
8 |
|
M+F |
MEAN |
8.5 |
9.2 |
8.4 |
10.4 * |
|
|
ST.DEV. |
1.2 |
1.0 |
1.3 |
2.4 |
|
|
N |
10 |
9 |
9 |
8 |
7 |
M |
MEAN |
14.4 |
15.1 |
14.3 |
16.6 * |
|
|
ST.DEV. |
1.5 |
1.1 |
1.6 |
3.1 |
|
|
N |
10 |
9 |
9 |
8 |
|
F |
MEAN |
14.0 |
14.5 |
13.3 |
16.2 |
|
|
ST.DEV. |
1.3 |
1.2 |
1.7 |
3.3 |
|
|
N |
10 |
9 |
9 |
8 |
|
M+F |
MEAN |
14.2 |
14.8 |
13.8 |
16.4 |
|
|
ST.DEV. |
1.3 |
1.1 |
1.7 |
3.2 |
|
|
N |
10 |
9 |
9 |
8 |
13 |
M |
MEAN |
28.5 |
28.5 |
27.7 |
30.9 |
|
|
ST.DEV. |
1.6 |
1.2 |
2.1 |
5.1 |
|
|
N |
10 |
9 |
9 |
8 |
|
F |
MEAN |
27.7 |
27.7 |
26.3 |
29.8 |
|
|
ST.DEV. |
1.6 |
1.4 |
2.4 |
5.2 |
|
|
N |
10 |
9 |
9 |
8 |
|
M+F |
MEAN |
28.1 |
28.1 |
26.9 |
30.4 |
|
|
ST.DEV. |
1.5 |
1.3 |
2.2 |
5.1 |
|
|
N |
10 |
9 |
9 |
8 |
*/** Dunnett-test based on pooled variance significant at 5% (*) or 1% (**) level
F0-GENERATION -LACTATION
|
GROUP 1 CONTROL |
GROUP 2 50 MG/KG |
GROUP 3 150 MG/KG |
GROUP 4 500 MG/KG |
|
anogenital dist M mm |
MEAN |
2.48 |
2.59 |
2.60 |
2.70 |
|
ST. DEV. |
0.14 |
0.09 |
0.13 |
0.27 |
|
N |
10 |
9 |
9 |
9 |
anogenital dist F mm |
MEAN |
1.05 |
0.97 |
0.94 |
1.11 |
|
ST.DEV. |
0.17 |
0.02 |
0.18 |
0.21 |
|
N |
10 |
9 |
9 |
9 |
Number of nipples |
MEAN |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
|
MEDIAN (+) |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
|
N |
10 |
9 |
9 |
8 |
# / ## Fisher's Exact test significant at 5% (#) or 1% (##) level
CORRECTED ANOGENITAL DISTANCE SUMMARY FEMALES
|
GROUP 1 CONTROL |
GROUP 2 50 MG/KG |
GROUP 3 150 MG/KG |
GROUP 4 500 MG/KG |
|
PND 1 norm anog dist M |
MEAN |
1.37 |
1.39 |
1.43 |
1.41 |
mm |
ST.DEV |
0.07 |
0.03 |
0.10 |
0.06 |
|
N |
10 |
9 |
9 |
9 |
norm anog dist F |
MEAN |
0.59 |
0.53 |
0.53 |
0.58 |
mm |
ST.DEV |
0.10 |
0.02 |
0.10 |
0.09 |
|
N |
10 |
9 |
9 |
9 |
CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY SUMMARY MALES
|
|
GROUP 1 CONTROL |
GROUP 2 50 MG/KG |
GROUP 3 150 MG/KG |
GROUP 4 500 MG/KG |
PUPS (PND 13-15) Total T4 |
MEAN |
6.60 |
7.36 |
5.76 |
6.65 |
ug/dL |
ST.DEV |
1.36 |
2.01 |
1.13 |
0.83 |
|
N |
10 |
9 |
9 |
8 |
CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY SUMMARY FEMALES
|
|
GROUP 1 CONTROL |
GROUP 2 50 MG/KG |
GROUP 3 150 MG/KG |
GROUP 4 500 MG/KG |
PUPS (PND 13-15) Total T4 |
MEAN |
6.09 |
6.32 |
5.62 |
5.88 |
ug/dL |
ST.DEV |
1.31 |
1.03 |
1.05 |
1.01 |
|
N |
10 |
9 |
9 |
8 |
Effect on fertility: via oral route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- 500 mg/kg bw/day
- Study duration:
- subacute
- Species:
- rat
- Quality of whole database:
- K1
Effect on fertility: via inhalation route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Effect on fertility: via dermal route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Combined 28-day repeated dose toxicity study with the reproduction/developmental toxicity screening test of LOWINOX® TBP-6 in rats by oral gavage.
The study was based on the following guidelines:
• OECD 422, Combined Repeated Dose Toxicity Study with the Reproduction/Developmental Toxicity Screening Test, July 2016.
• OPPTS 870.3650, Combined Repeated Dose Toxicity Study with the Reproduction/Developmental Toxicity Screening Test, July 2000.
• OECD 421, Reproduction/Developmental Toxicity Screening Test, July 2016.
• OPPTS 870.3550, Reproduction/Developmental Toxicity Screening Test, July 2000.
• EC No 440/2008 B.7: "Repeated Dose (28 days) Toxicity (oral)", May 2008.
• OECD 407, Repeated Dose 28-day Oral Toxicity Study in Rodents, October 2008.
• OPPTS 870.3050, Repeated dose 28-day oral toxicity study in rodents, July 2000.
Based on the results of a dose range finding study in which toxicity was noted at 500 mg/kg but not at 250 mg/kg (Test Facility Study No. 513610 ), the dose levels for this combined 28 -day oral gavage study with reproduction/developmental toxicity screening test were selected to be 50, 150 and 500 mg/kg.
The test item, LOWINOX® TBP-6, formulated in propylene glycol, was administered daily by oral gavage to SPF-bred Wistar Han rats. One control group and three treated groups were tested, each consisting of 10 males and 10 females. Males were treated for 31 days, i.e. 2 weeks prior to mating, during mating, and up to termination. Females were treated for 50-56 days, i.e. during 2 weeks prior to mating, during
mating, during post-coitum, and during 13-15 days of lactation. Females which failed to deliver healthy offspring were treated for 38-45 days.
The following observations and examinations were evaluated: mortality / viability, clinical signs (daily), functional observations and locomotor activity (end of treatment), body weight and food consumption (at least at weekly intervals), estrous cycle determination (14 days prior to treatment, 14 days of treatment and during mating until evidence of mating, and on the day of necropsy), clinical pathology (end of
treatment), measurement of thyroid hormone T4 (F0-males at the end of treatment, PND 13-15 pups), macroscopy at termination, organ weights and histopathology on a selection of tissues. In addition, the following reproduction/developmental parameters were determined: mating, fertility and conception indices, number of implantation sites, gestation index and duration, parturition, maternal care, sex ratio and early postnatal pup development (mortality, clinical signs, body weights, anogenital distance, areola/nipple retention and macroscopy).
Formulations were analyzed once during the study to assess accuracy and homogeneity.
There were no toxicologically relevant changes in the in-life parameters up to 500 mg/kg.
Slight salivation was noted after dosing at all dose levels, most frequently at 150 and 500 mg/kg. This was considered to be a physiological response rather than a sign of systemic toxicity. Treatment-related microscopic changes were present in the thyroid of male rats, characterized by an increased incidence and severity of follicular cell hypertrophy starting at 150 mg/kg, and alteration of the colloid at 500 mg/kg. These findings were regarded as non-adverse based on their low degree (up to slight) and the absence of other treatment-related findings.
No treatment-related or toxicologically relevant changes were noted in clinical pathology parameters, organ weights or findings at macroscopic examination.
In conclusion:
Based on these results, a parental, reproduction and developmental No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) of at least 500 mg/kg was derived.
The parental No Observed Effect Level (NOEL) was established at 150 mg/kg based on non-adverse microscopic changes in the thyroids of males at 500 mg/kg.
Effects on developmental toxicity
Description of key information
No developmental toxicity was observed up to the highest dose level tested (500 mg/kg).
No treatment-related or toxicologically relevant changes were noted in any of the developmental parameters investigated in this study (i.e. gestation, viability and lactation indices, duration of gestation, parturition, sex ratio, maternal care and early postnatal pup
development consisting of mortality, clinical signs, body weight, anogenital distance, areola/nipple retention, T4 thyroid hormone levels and macroscopy).
Effect on developmental toxicity: via oral route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- 500 mg/kg bw/day
- Study duration:
- subacute
- Species:
- rat
- Quality of whole database:
- K1
Effect on developmental toxicity: via inhalation route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Effect on developmental toxicity: via dermal route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Justification for classification or non-classification
Due to the lack of effects noted on the sexual function, fertility and development parameters, 6,6’-di-tert-butyl-2,2’-thiodi-p-cresol is not classified for reproductive toxicity in accordance with Regulation (EC) 1272/2008.
Additional information
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

EU Privacy Disclaimer
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our websites.