Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Genetic toxicity: in vitro

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Study period:
not specified
Reliability:
3 (not reliable)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
significant methodological deficiencies
Remarks:
Significant experimental and reporting deficiencies: purity/stability of test item missing; method was not fully described (incubation duration & temperature missing; evaluation criteria missing; treatment procedure missing); individual data missing; historical control data was missing; three concentrations were only tested instead of five concentrations; information on cytotoxicity indicates that higher concentrations could have been tested; 2-aminoanthracene was used during testing without metabolic activation; confirmatory experiment missing

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
publication
Title:
Absence of mutagenic activity of acidity regulators in the Ames Salmonella/microsome test
Author:
Al-Ani, F. Y. & Al-Lami, S. K.
Year:
1988
Bibliographic source:
Mutation Research 206: 467 - 470.

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
Version / remarks:
1983-05-26
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
please refer to the field "Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies" above
GLP compliance:
not specified
Remarks:
not specified in the publication
Type of assay:
bacterial reverse mutation assay

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
Citric acid
EC Number:
201-069-1
EC Name:
Citric acid
Cas Number:
77-92-9
Molecular formula:
C6H8O7
Test material form:
not specified
Details on test material:
- Source: State enterprise for dairy products
Specific details on test material used for the study:
not specified

Method

Target gene:
TA97: his D 6610 his O 1242
TA98: his D 3052
TA100: his G 46
Species / strain
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium, other: TA97, TA98, TA100 and TA104
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
S9 mix
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
500, 1000 and 2000 µg/plate (with and without metabolic activation)
Vehicle / solvent:
- Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: distilled water
Controls
Untreated negative controls:
not specified
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
Remarks:
distilled water
True negative controls:
not specified
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
other: 2-aminoanthracene
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium; in agar (plate incorporation)

NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: triplicates

DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: bacterial background lawn growth
Rationale for test conditions:
not specified
Evaluation criteria:
not specified
Statistics:
means

Results and discussion

Test results
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium, other: TA97, TA98, TA100 and TA104
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
not specified
Untreated negative controls validity:
not specified
Positive controls validity:
not specified
Additional information on results:
The spontaneous reversions of the tester strains were within the acceptable range (Levin et al., 1982a,b; Maron and Ames, 1983; Levin and Ames, 1986). A decreased spontaneous reversion frequency of TA97 was noted.

In the presence or absence of S9 mix, the numbers of revertants in all tester strains for all concentrations of the test item tested were not significantly different from the respective negative controls. In some cases the number of revertants with S9 was statistically higher than the number of colonies on negative control plates.

Routine examination of the bacterial background lawn indicates the absence of toxicity associated with the doses of the compounds tested.

*References:
- Levin, D.E., E. Yamasaki and B.N. Ames (1982a) A new Salmonella tester strain TA97, for the detection of frameshift mutagens. A run of cytosines as a mutational hot-spot, Mutation Res., 94, 315 330.
- Levin, D.E., M.C. Hollstein, M.F. Christman, E.A. Schwiers and B.N. Ames (1982b) A new Salmonella tester strain, TA102, with A:T base pairs at the site of mutation to detect oxidative mutagens, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (U.S.A.), 79, 7445-7449.
- Maron, D.M., and B.N. Ames (1983) Revised methods for the Salmonella mutagenicity test, Mutation Res., 113, 173-215.
- Levin, D.E., and B.N. Ames (1986) Classifying mutagens as to their specificity in causing the six possible transitions and transversions: a simple analysis using the Salmonella mutagenicity
assay, Environ. Mutagen., 8, 9 28.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
According to the authors, the substance tested non-mutagenic under the conditions of the study.