Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Physical & Chemical properties

Flash point

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Referenceopen allclose all

Endpoint:
flash point of flammable liquids
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Study period:
2017
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method A.9 (Flash-Point)
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of method:
closed cup
Flash point apparatus:
other: Eraflash tester
Specific details on test material used for the study:
Viscous brown liquid
Key result
Flash point:
> 209 °C
Remarks on result:
no flash point according to standard method
Remarks:
No flash-point was observed below the temperature at which reaction and/or degradation of the test item occurred.

It was visually observed that the test item reacted and/or degraded between approximately 205 and 209 °C. No flammable vapour/air mixture was produced at temperatures below the temperature at which reaction and/or degradation of the test item occurred. From this, it was concluded that the test item has no flash point.

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
The closed cup method was applied for the determination of the flash-point of EnvaMul 600.
No flash-point was observed below the temperature at which reaction and/or degradation of the test item occurred (209 °C).

Executive summary:

The flash-point of the test item was determined using an Eraflash flash-point tester (Eralytics, Vienna, Austria). 

A preliminary test was conducted.

The test cup was heated at a rate of 5 ±0.5 °C/minute. Starting at 25 °C, an attempt was made to ignite the vapour of the test item for every 2 °C temperature rise.

No flash-point was observed below the temperature at which reaction and/or degradation of the test item (i.e. between 205 and 207 °C) occurred. Therefore, the preliminary test was repeated. Starting at 25 °C the ignition source was applied for every 2 °C temperature rise.

It was visually observed that the test item reacted and/or degraded between approximately 205 and 209 °C. No flammable vapour/air mixture was produced at temperatures below the temperature at which reaction and/or degradation of the test item occurred. From this, it was concluded that the test item has no flash point.

Endpoint:
flash point of flammable liquids
Data waiving:
study technically not feasible
Justification for data waiving:
other:
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
data waiving: supporting information

Description of key information

During the preliminary study to determine the melting point of EnvaMul 600 it was visually observed that the test item reacted and/or degraded between approximately 205 and 209 °C. No flammable vapour/air mixture was produced at temperatures below the temperature at which reaction and/or degradation of the test item occurred.  From this, it was concluded that the test item has no flash point.

For performing the chemical safety assessment, a value of 205 °C is considered as it represents the worst case scenario.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Flash point at 101 325 Pa:
205 °C

Additional information