Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 446-990-1 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicity to reproduction
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- screening for reproductive / developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- from 2009-05-27 to 2010-04-27
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- This study has been performed in compliance with the: Swiss Ordinance relating to Good Laboratory Practice adopted May 18th, 2005 [SR 813.112.1]. This Ordinance is based on the OECD Principles of Good Laboratory Practice, as revised in 1997 and adopted on November 26th, 1997 by decision of the OECD Council [C (97)186/Final]. These principles were compatible with Good Laboratory Practice regulations specified by regulatory authorities throughout the European Community, the United States (EPA and FDA), and Japan (MHLW, MAFF and METI). There were no circumstances that may have affected the quality or integrity of the data.
Cross-reference
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 010
- Report date:
- 2010
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 421 (Reproduction / Developmental Toxicity Screening Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- TYPES OF QA INSPECTIONS: Study plan; study based (animal delivery, raw data, test system, test item, dose preparation, treatment, body weight, necropsy); process based (analytics work up); analytic appendix; report
- Limit test:
- no
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- LCE08125
- IUPAC Name:
- LCE08125
- Reference substance name:
- -
- EC Number:
- 446-990-1
- EC Name:
- -
- Molecular formula:
- C5H11O5 [C6H10O5]1.45 and C5H10O4 and C5H12O5
- IUPAC Name:
- 2-(hydroxymethyl)oxolane-3,4-diol; 5-{[2,3,4,5-tetrahydroxy-6-(xenoniooxy)hexyl]oxy}pentane-1,2,3,4-tetrol; pentane-1,2,3,4,5-pentol
- Details on test material:
- Description: Orange wax at 20 °C
Batch Number: 1484JG
Purity: 97.3%
Expiry Date (Retest Date): 10-Mar-2010
Storage Conditions: Room temperature (20 ± 5 °C)
Safety Precautions: Routine hygienic procedures (gloves, goggles, face mask)
Constituent 1
Constituent 2
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Wistar
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
Animals: Rat, HanRcc: WIST(SPF)
Rationale: Recognized by international guidelines as a recommended test system.
Breeder: Harlan Laboratories Ltd., Laboratory Animal Services, Wölferstrasse 4, 4414 Füllinsdorf / Switzerland
Number of Animals: 40 males (10 per group) and 40 females (10 per group)
Age (at Start of Treatment): 11 weeks
Body Weight Range (at Start of Treatment): Males (291 to 338 g) and females (185 to 211 g)
Identification: Cage card and individual animal number (ear tattoo).
Randomization: Computer-generated random algorithm. In addition body weights (recorded on the day of allocation) were taken into consideration in order to ensure similar mean body weights in all groups.
Acclimatization: Under test conditions after health examination. Only animals without any visible signs of illness were used for the study.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
Conditions: Standard laboratory conditions. Air-conditioned with 10 - 15 air changes per hour, continuously monitored environmental conditions (temp. range: 22 ± 3 °C; relative humidity range: 30 – 86.7%). There was 12 hour fluorescent light / 12-hour dark cycle with music during the light period.
Accommodation: Individually in Makrolon type-3 cages with wire mesh tops and sterilized standard softwood bedding (‘Lignocel’J. Rettenmaier & Söhne GmbH & CoKG, 73494 Rosenberg / Germany, imported by Provimi Kliba SA, 4303 Kaiseraugst / Switzerland). During the pre-pairing period, cages with males were interspersed amongst those holding females to promote the development of regular estrus cycles.
Diet: Pelleted standard Kliba Nafag 3433 rodent maintenance diet (Provimi Kliba SA, 4303 Kaiseraugst / Switzerland) was available ad libitum (batch no. 15/09).
Water: Community tap-water from Füllinsdorf was available ad libitum in water bottles.
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- water
- Details on exposure:
- DOSE FORMULATIONS
The dose formulations were prepared daily using the test item as supplied by the Sponsor.
LCE08125 was weighed into a glass beaker on a tared precision balance and approximately 80% of the vehicle was added (w/v). Using an appropriate homogenizer, a homogeneous suspension was prepared. Having obtained a homogeneous mixture, the remaining vehicle was added. Separate formulations were prepared for each concentration.
Homogeneity of the test item in the vehicle was maintained during the daily administration period using a magnetic stirrer.
STORAGE OF DOSE FORMULATIONS
Dose formulations were stored at room temperature (20 ± 5 °C) in brown glass beakers.
TREATMENT
Method: Oral, by gavage
Rationale for Method: Administration by gavage is a common and accepted route of exposure for studies of this type.
Frequency of Administration: Daily
Target Dose Levels: Group 1: 0 mg/kg/day (control group); Group 2: 100 mg/kg/day; Group 3: 300 mg/kg/day; Group 4: 1000 mg/kg/day
Rationale for Dose Level Selection: The dose levels were selected based on a previous dose range finding toxicity study in Han Wistar, Harlan Laboratories Study C37152, using dose levels of 100, 300 and 1000 mg/kg/day, resulting in a NOEL of 1000 mg/kg/day.
Dose Volume: 10 mL/kg body weight
Duration of Acclimatization Period: 9 days
Duration of Treatment Period: Males (minimum 4 weeks); females (approximately 7 weeks) - Details on mating procedure:
- MATING, GESTATION AND LACTATION
During the pairing period, females were housed with sexually mature males (1:1) in special automatic mating cages i.e. with synchronized timing to initiate the nightly mating period, until evidence of copulation was observed. This system reduced the variation in the copulation times of the different females. The females were removed and housed individually if:
- the daily vaginal smear was sperm positive, or
- a copulation plug was observed.
The day of mating was designated day 0 post coitum.
All dams were allowed to give birth and rear their litters (F1 pups) up to day 4 post partum. Day 0 was designated as the day on which a female had delivered all her pups. - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- ANALYSIS OF DOSE FORMULATIONS
On the first treatment day one sample from the control group as well as three samples (top, middle and bottom) of about 2 g of each concentration were taken prior to dosing for analysis of concentration and homogeneity. Samples of about 2 g of each concentration were taken from the middle to confirm stability (4 hrs and 7 days). During the last week of the treatment, samples were taken from the middle to confirm concentration. The aliquots for analysis of dose formulations were frozen (-20 ± 5 °C) and delivered on dry ice to Analytic Department (Harlan Laboratories Ltd., Itingen / Switzerland) and stored there at -20 ± 5 °C until analysis.
The samples were analyzed by HPLC coupled to an ELSD detector following an analytical procedure developed at Harlan Laboratories. The test item was used as the analytical standard. Analyzed samples were not discarded without written consent from the study director.
The application formulations investigated during the study were found to comprise LCE08125 in the range of 85.2% to 101.7% and, thus, the required content limit of ±20% with reference to the nominal concentration was met. The homogeneous distribution of LCE08125 in the preparations was approved because single results found did not deviate more than 1.9% (<15%) from the corresponding mean. In addition, the test item was found to be stable in application formulations when kept 7 days at room temperature due to recoveries which met the variation limit of 10% from the time-zero (homogeneity) mean. - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Males: Minimum 4 weeks
Females: Approximately 7 weeks - Frequency of treatment:
- Daily
- Details on study schedule:
- Acclimatization: 9 days (males and females)
First Test Item Administration: Day 1 of pre-pairing (males and females)
Pre-Pairing: 14 days (males and females)
Pairing: 14 days maximum (males and females)
Gestation: Approximately 21 days (females)
Treatment Ends: On day 3 post partum (females); on day before sacrifice (males)
Necropsy: On day 4 post partum (females); after a minimum of 28 days treatment (males)
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
100 mg/kg bw/day
Basis: actual ingested
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
300 mg/kg bw/day
Basis: actual ingested
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
1000 mg/kg bw/day
Basis: actual ingested
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 10
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
Examinations
- Parental animals: Observations and examinations:
- Viability / Mortality: Twice daily
Clinical Signs: Daily cage-side clinical observations (once daily, during acclimatization and up to day of necropsy). Additionally females were observed for signs of difficult or prolonged parturition, and behavioral abnormalities in nesting and nursing.
Food Consumption: Males (weekly during pre-pairing and after pairing periods); females (pre-pairing period days 1 - 8 and 8 - 14, gestation period days 0 - 7, 7 - 14 and 14 - 21 post coitum and lactation period days 1 - 4 post partum). No food consumption was recorded during the pairing period.
Body Weights: Recorded daily from treatment start to day of necropsy. - Litter observations:
- The litters were examined for litter size, live births, still births and any gross anomalies. The sex ratio of the pups was recorded. Pups were weighed individually (without identification) on days 0 (if possible), 1 and 4 post partum.
- Postmortem examinations (parental animals):
- TERMINATION OF THE STUDY
Males were sacrificed after they had been treated for at least 28 days. Dams were sacrificed on day 4 post partum.
When birth did not occur on the expected date (day 21 post coitum), the dams were sacrificed on day 25 post coitum.
NECROPSY
All parent animals were sacrificed by an injection of sodium pentobarbital. All P generation animals were exsanguinated.
All parent animals were examined macroscopically for any structural changes, either at the scheduled necropsy or during the study if death occurred.
For the parent animals, special attention was directed at the organs of the reproductive system.
The number of implantation sites and corpora lutea was recorded for all dams with litters. The uteri of non-pregnant parent females were placed in a solution of ammonium sulfide to visualize possible hemorrhagic areas of implantation sites.
ORGAN WEIGHTS
The testes and epididymides of all parental males were weighed as pairs.
TISSUE PRESERVATION
The ovaries from all parental females were preserved in neutral phosphate buffered 4% formaldehyde solution.
The testes and epididymides from all parental males were preserved in Bouin’s fixative. The prostate and seminal vesicles from all parental males were fixed in neutral phosphate buffered 4% formaldehyde solution.
HISTOTECHNIQUE
All organ and tissue samples to be examined by the principal investigator were processed, embedded and cut at an approximate thickness of 2 - 4 micrometers and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Additionally, the testis was stained by PAS–hematoxylin. Special stains were used at the discretion of the study pathologist.
HISTOPATHOLOGY
Slides of all organs and tissues listed collected at terminal sacrifice from the animals of the control and high-dose groups were examined by the principal investigator. The same applied to all occurring gross lesions and to all animals which died spontaneously or had to be terminated in extremis.
Special emphasis was made on the stages of spermatogenesis and histopathology of interstitial cell structure.
Histological examination of ovaries was carried out on females that did not give birth. In addition, microscopic examination of the reproductive organs of all infertile males was made, if necessary. - Postmortem examinations (offspring):
- TERMINATION OF THE STUDY
Pups were sacrificed on day 4 post partum.
NECROPSY
All pups were sacrificed by an injection of sodium pentobarbital.
All pups were examined macroscopically for any structural changes, either at the scheduled necropsy or during the study if death occurred. - Statistics:
- The following statistical methods were used to analyze food consumption, body weights and reproduction data:
- Means and standard deviations of various data were calculated.
- The Dunnett-test (many to one t-test) based on a pooled variance estimate was applied if the variables could be assumed to follow a normal distribution for the comparison of the treated groups and the control groups for each sex.
- The Steel-test (many-one rank test) was applied instead of the Dunnett-test when the data could not be assumed to follow a normal distribution.
- Fisher's exact-test was applied if the variables could be dichotomized without loss of information. - Reproductive indices:
- From the on-line recorded reproduction data, the following parameters were calculated: fertility indices, mean precoital time, post-implantation losses, mean litter size.
- Offspring viability indices:
- From the on-line recorded reproduction data, the following parameters were calculated: dead/live pups at first litter check, pup sex ratios and postnatal loss (up to day 4 post partum).
Results and discussion
Results: P0 (first parental generation)
General toxicity (P0)
- Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Mortality:
- no mortality observed
- Body weight and weight changes:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Body Weights of Males
No test item-related changes were observed in mean body weight and mean body weight gain in any groups during the entire duration of the study. In higher group, the statistically significantly higher body weight gain on days 6 and 8 of the pairing period was considered to be incidental.
Body Weights of Females
Mean body weight and mean body weight gain were not affected by treatment with the test item in all groups during the entire duration of the period. In absence of any obvious dose-relationship, the statistically significantly higher body weight gain in groups 2 and 3 (i.e.100 mg/kg body weight/day and 300 mg/kg body weight/day) noted during the prepairing period was considered to be incidental. - Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- In male groups mean food consumption was not affected by the treatment with the test item
In females at the high dose level, mean food consumption was slightly slightly lower during the first week of the prepairing period (-7.1% compared to the control), and during the lactation period (-8.4%). None of these reductions was statistically significant and they were not considered of adverse nature since they did not affect mean body weight gain or were transient.. - Food efficiency:
- no effects observed
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not examined
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not examined
- Haematological findings:
- not examined
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- not examined
- Urinalysis findings:
- not examined
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- not examined
- Immunological findings:
- not examined
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- no effects observed
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- The histopathological evaluation of the reproductive organs did not reveal any relevant changes in the high-dose animals.
Special emphasis on stages of spermatogenesis and histopathology of interstitial testicular cell structure did not reveal any differences between control (group 1) and high-dose (group 4) males.
Group 2 male No. 20 and group 3 male No. 29 both showed bilaterally a reduced size of testes and epididymides. These gross lesions correlated histopathologically in both males with marked diffuse tubular degeneration. In male No. 20, the atrophy was accompanied by moderate multifocal spermatic giant cells and minimal diffuse edema, and any stages of spermatogenesis could be recognized anymore. In male No. 29, the atrophy was accompanied by slight moderate multifocal spermatic giant cells and slight diffuse edema, and only in single tubules the stages of
spermatogenesis could unilaterally be recognized (stages IV-V, VIII, and III-XIV). In epididymis of male No. 20, a marked oligospermia with moderate intratubular cellular debris was present and in male No. 29, a massive oligospermia with moderate intratubular cellular
debris and unilateral focal lymphoid cell infiltration was noted. All these findings were considered to be most likely incidental and unrelated to the test item. The prostate and seminal vesicles did not reveal any morphological changes.
The ovaries from group 2 female No. 60 and group 3 female No. 69 which were both not pregnant did not show any morphological changes. The reason for missing pregnancy was the infertility present in the according mating males Nos. 20 and 29. - Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- no effects observed
- Other effects:
- not examined
Reproductive function / performance (P0)
- Reproductive function: oestrous cycle:
- not examined
- Reproductive function: sperm measures:
- no effects observed
- Reproductive performance:
- no effects observed
Details on results (P0)
1.1 CLINICAL SIGNS OR OBSERVATIONS
All animals survived until the scheduled necropsy. No clinical signs were observed during the study.
1.2 FOOD CONSUMPTION OF MALES
Mean food consumption was not affected by the treatment with the test item. Lower food consumption which occurred in groups 2 and 3 during the first week of pre-pairing and during the after pairing period was considered to be incidental since there was no dose-dependent pattern.
See attached figures and tables on pp. 2 to 3; 22 to 23; 27 to 28
1.3 FOOD CONSUMPTION OF FEMALES
In group 4, mean food consumption was slightly lower during the first week of the pre-pairing period (-7.1% compared to the control), and during the lactation period (-8.4%). None of these reductions was statistically significant and they were not considered of adverse nature since they did not affect mean body weight gain or were transient.
In groups 2 and 3, no effects were noted on food consumption during the pre-pairing, gestation and lactation periods.
See attached figures and tables on pp. 4 to 6; 24 to 26; 29 to 31
1.4 BODY WEIGHTS OF MALES
No test item-related changes were observed in mean body weight and mean body weight gain in any groups during the entire duration of the study. In group 4, the statistically significantly higher body weight gain on days 6 and 8 of the pairing period was considered to be incidental.
See attached figures and tables on pp. 7 to 9; 14 to 16; 32 to 34; 40 to 42; 48 to 50
1.5 BODY WEIGHTS OF FEMALES
Mean body weight and mean body weight gain were not affected by treatment with the test item in all groups during the entire duration of the period. In absence of any obvious dose-relationship, the statistically significantly higher body weight gain in groups 2 and 3 noted during the pre-pairing period was considered to be incidental.
See attached figures and tables on pp. 10 to 13; 17 to 20; 35 to 39; 43 to 47; 51 to 53
2 REPRODUCTION AND BREEDING DATA
2.1 MATING PERFORMANCE AND FERTILITY
The median and mean precoital times were unaffected by treatment with the test item. Mean precoital times were 3.4, 3.7, 2.4 and 2.2 days in order of ascending dose level. The median precoital time was 4, 4, 2 and 2 days in order of ascending dose level.
One female (no. 60) in group 2 and one female (no. 69) in group 3 were not pregnant. Thus the fertility indices were 100.0%, 90.0%, 90.0% and 100.0% in groups 1, 2, 3 and 4.
2.2 DURATION OF GESTATION
The mean duration of gestation was unaffected by treatment with the test item. Mean duration of gestation was 21.2, 21.4, 21.3 and 21.4 days, in order of ascending dose level.
2.3 CORPORA LUTEA COUNT
The mean number of corpora lutea per dam (determined at necropsy) was similar in all groups (13.8, 14.1, 14.6 and 13.7 in order of ascending dose level) and gave no indication of a test item-related effect.
2.4 IMPLANTATION RATE AND POST-IMPLANTATION LOSS
The mean number of implantations per dam and the post-implantation losses were unaffected by treatment with the test item.
The mean numbers of implantations per litter were 13.6, 12.9, 13.2 and 12.4 in order of ascending dose level. The slightly lower number of implantation sites in group 4 was due to one female (no. 76) which had only six implantation sites. The mean incidence of post-implantation loss as a percentage of total implantations was 5.1, 6.9, 5.0 and 5.6% in order of ascending dose level.
2.5 LITTER SIZE AT FIRST LITTER CHECK
The number of live pups at first litter check was unaffected by treatment with the test item. The mean number of live pups per litter was 12.9, 12.0, 12.6 and 11.7 in order of ascending dose level.
2.6 POSTNATAL LOSS DAYS 0 - 4 POST PARTUM
Postnatal loss up to day 4 post partum was not affected by the treatment with the test item.
The viability indices were 100.0%, 100.0%, 99.1% and 99.1% in order of ascending dose levels.
3 TERMINAL FINDINGS - PARENTAL ANIMALS
3.1 ORGAN WEIGHTS
In males, weights (absolute and relative to body weight) of testes and epididymides were not affected by the treatment with the test item in any groups.
3.2 MACROSCOPICAL FINDINGS
During necropsy of parent animals type and incidence of abnormal findings did not give any indication of a test item-related effect.
Males: One male in group 4 had a red brown diaphragmatic hernia. One male each in group 2 and 3 had reduced size of both testes and epididymides. These findings were considered incidental.
Females: No abnormal findings were observed during the macroscopical examination of females.
3.3 HISTOPATHOLOGY FINDINGS
The histopathological evaluation of the reproductive organs did not reveal any relevant changes in the high-dose animals.
Special emphasis on stages of spermatogenesis and histopathology of interstitial testicular cell structure did not reveal any differences between control (group 1) and high-dose (group 4) males.
Group 2 male No. 20 and group 3 male No. 29 both showed bilaterally a reduced size of testes and epididymides. These gross lesions correlated histopathologically in both males with marked diffuse tubular degeneration. In male No. 20, the atrophy was accompanied by moderate multifocal spermatic giant cells and minimal diffuse edema, and any stages of spermatogenesis could be recognized anymore. In male No. 29, the atrophy was accompanied by slight moderate multifocal spermatic giant cells and slight diffuse edema, and only in single tubules the stages of spermatogenesis could unilaterally be recognized (stages IV-V, VIII, and III-XIV). In epididymis of male No. 20, a marked oligospermia with moderate intratubular cellular debris was present and in male No. 29, a massive oligospermia with moderate intratubular cellular debris and unilateral focal lymphoid cell infiltration was noted. All these findings were considered to be most likely incidental and unrelated to the test item. The prostate and seminal vesicles did not reveal any morphological changes.
The ovaries from group 2 female No. 60 and group 3 female No. 69 which were both not pregnant did not show any morphological changes. The reason for missing pregnancy was the infertility present in the according mating males Nos. 20 and 29.
Effect levels (P0)
open allclose all
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: Since no adverse effects were observed, the general NOAEL (No Observed Adverse Effect Level) was established at 1000 mg/kg/day. NOAL = highest dose tested
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEL
- Effect level:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: Under the conditions of this study, the NOEL (No Observed Effect Level) for reproduction/ developmental toxicity was considered to be 1000 mg/kg/day. NOEL = highest dose tested
- Remarks on result:
- other: Generation: reproduction/development (migrated information)
Results: P1 (second parental generation)
General toxicity (P1)
- Clinical signs:
- not examined
- Mortality:
- not examined
- Body weight and weight changes:
- not examined
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- not examined
- Food efficiency:
- not examined
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not examined
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not examined
- Haematological findings:
- not examined
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- not examined
- Urinalysis findings:
- not examined
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- not examined
- Immunological findings:
- not examined
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- not examined
- Gross pathological findings:
- not examined
- Neuropathological findings:
- not examined
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- not examined
- Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- not examined
Reproductive function / performance (P1)
- Reproductive function: oestrous cycle:
- not examined
- Reproductive function: sperm measures:
- not examined
- Reproductive performance:
- not examined
Effect levels (P1)
- Remarks on result:
- not measured/tested
- Remarks:
- no second parental generation
Results: F1 generation
General toxicity (F1)
- Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- At first litter check and during lactation no findings were observed during the external examination of pups.
No clinical signs were noted in any groups. - Mortality / viability:
- no mortality observed
- Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- not examined
- Food efficiency:
- not examined
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not examined
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not examined
- Haematological findings:
- not examined
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- not examined
- Urinalysis findings:
- not examined
- Sexual maturation:
- not examined
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- not examined
- Gross pathological findings:
- no effects observed
- Histopathological findings:
- not examined
- Other effects:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Sex ratios at first litter check and on day 4 post partum were unaffected by exposure to the test
item.
Developmental neurotoxicity (F1)
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- not examined
Developmental immunotoxicity (F1)
- Developmental immunotoxicity:
- not examined
Details on results (F1)
1.1 EXTERNAL EXAMINATION AT FIRST LITTER CHECK AND DURING LACTATION
At first litter check and during lactation no findings were observed during the external examination of pups.
No clinical signs were noted in any groups.
1.2 SEX RATIOS
Sex ratios at first litter check and on day 4 post partum were unaffected by exposure to the test item.
The proportion of males on day 4 post partum was 47%, 42%, 49% and 46% in order of ascending dose level.
1.3 PUP WEIGHTS TO DAY 4 POST PARTUM
Mean pup weights were unaffected by treatment with the test item. On day 1 post partum mean pup weights were 5.9, 6.0, 6.1 and 6.3 g in order of ascending dose level.
Mean pup weight gain during lactation was also not affected by the treatment with the test item. Mean pup weights on day 4 post partum were 8.6, 8.8, 8.9 and 9.1 g in order of ascending dose level.
1.4 MACROSCOPICAL FINDINGS
No abnormal findings were noted at macroscopic examination of the pups.
Effect levels (F1)
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Generation:
- F1
- Effect level:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: no significant adverse effect noted
Results: F2 generation
General toxicity (F2)
- Clinical signs:
- not examined
- Mortality / viability:
- not examined
- Body weight and weight changes:
- not examined
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- not examined
- Food efficiency:
- not examined
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not examined
- Haematological findings:
- not examined
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- not examined
- Urinalysis findings:
- not examined
- Sexual maturation:
- not examined
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- not examined
- Gross pathological findings:
- not examined
- Histopathological findings:
- not examined
Developmental neurotoxicity (F2)
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- not examined
Developmental immunotoxicity (F2)
- Developmental immunotoxicity:
- not examined
Effect levels (F2)
- Remarks on result:
- not measured/tested
- Remarks:
- only F1 generation examined
Overall reproductive toxicity
- Reproductive effects observed:
- not specified
Any other information on results incl. tables
SUMMARY OF PERFORMANCE
P Animals Breeding for F1 Litters
Group |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
Female numbers |
41-50 |
51-60 |
61-70 |
71-80 |
Number of females paired |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
Number of females mated |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
Number of pregnant females (A) |
10 |
9 |
9 |
10 |
Number of females which reared their pups until day 4 post partum |
10 |
9 |
9 |
10 |
(A) Female Nos. 60 and 69 were not pregnant.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- This study is a valid investigation of the toxicological effects resulting from repeated oral-gavage administration of the test item LCE08125 to rats. LCE08125 was administered in Milli-Q-Water as vehicle at dosages of 100, 300, and 1000 mg/kg body weight/day, and controls received the vehicle only. LCE08125 was administered to male rats for at least 28 days and to female rats for 14 days prior to pairing, through the pairing and gestation periods until the F1 generation reached day 3 post partum.
Since no adverse effects were observed, the general NOAEL (No Observed Adverse Effect Level) was established at 1000 mg/kg/day.
Under the conditions of this study, the NOEL (No Observed Effect Level) for reproduction/ developmental toxicity was considered to be 1000 mg/kg/day. - Executive summary:
The purpose of this study was to generate preliminary information concerning the effects of LCE08125 on male and female reproductive performance such as gonadal function, mating behavior, conception and parturition.
Four groups of 10 males and 10 females were treated by gavage with LCE08125 once daily. Males were treated over a 14-day pre-pairing period and during the pairing period up to one day before necropsy. Females were treated throughout the pre-pairing, pairing, gestation and lactation period up to day 3 post partum.
The following dose levels were used:
Group 1: 0 mg/kg body weight/day (control group)
Group 2 100 mg/kg body weight/day
Group 3: 300 mg/kg body weight/day
Group 4 1000 mg/kg body weight/day
A standard dose volume of 10 mL/kg body weight with a daily adjustment to the actual body weight was used. Control animals were dosed with the vehicle alone (highly purified water).
PARENTAL ANIMALS
General Tolerability
All animals survived until the scheduled necropsy and no clinical signs were observed during the entire study.
Food Consumption and Body Weights
In males and females, mean food consumption, mean body weight and mean body weight gains were not adversely affected by the treatment with the test item for the whole duration of the treatment.
Relevant reproduction data (mean number of corpora lutea, mean number of implantations per dam, and the post-implantation losses) were not affected by treatment with the test item. The mean duration of gestation was similar in all groups.
Mean weight of testes and epididymides were not affected by treatment with the test item.
No test item-related effects were noted in reproductive organs in high-dose animals.
Mean litter size at first litter check and on day 4 post partum was not affected by treatment with the test item. Mean pup weights and weight gains were also not affected.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.