Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 229-904-5 | CAS number: 6829-22-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
A modified Local Lymph Node Assay (IMDS) was carried out in mice with
Macrolex Rot E2G Gran.(CAS no 6829-22-7) in polyethylene glycol 400
formulation to establish if there is any specific (sensitizing) or
nonspecific (irritating) stimulating potential of the test item.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin sensitisation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation: in vivo (LLNA)
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: OECD TG Guideline 429 and GLP with a modification and without positve control substance
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 429 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- The modification refer to the measurement of cell proliferation by cell counting instead of radioactive labelling. In addition, the acute inflammatory skin reaction is determined to discriminate specific from non-specific activation of immun system
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Modified LLNA (IMDS = Integrated Model for the Differentiation of Skin Reactions): The modification refers to the measurement of cell proliferation by cell counting instead of radioactive labelling. In addition, the acute inflammatory skin reaction is determined to discriminate specific from non-specific activation of immune system, as also recommended in the update of OECD TG 429.
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of study:
- mouse local lymph node assay (LLNA)
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- NMRI
- Sex:
- female
- Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Age at study initiation:
- Weight at study initiation:
- Housing: in groups of 6
- Diet ad libitum
- Water ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 5 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22
- Humidity (%): 50
- Air changes (per hr): 10
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 / 12 - Vehicle:
- other: polyethylene glycol 400
- Concentration:
- 0% (vehicle control); 1%, 10% and 25 % as suspension in polyethylene glycol 400
- No. of animals per dose:
- NMRI mice, female, 6 animals/group
- Details on study design:
- The test item in the formulation, the vehicle were applied epicutaneousely onto the dorsal part of both ears.of the animals. This treatment was repeated on three consecutive days. The volume administered was 25 µl/ear. The used concentrations were based on the experience with this test system and the properties of the test item.
The animals were anaestetized by inhalation of carbon dioxid and sacrificed one day after the last application. The appropriate organs were then removed .Lymphatic organs (the auricular lymph nodes) were transferred into physiological saline
Investigations:
-weight of lymph nodes
- cell counts in lymph nodes
- stimulation index is calculated by dividing the absolute number of weight or cell count of the subtancetreated lymp nodes by the vehicle treated ones
- ear swelling
- ear weight - Positive control substance(s):
- not specified
- Statistics:
- Mann-Whitney or Wilcoxon significance test(U-test ) at levels of 5 and 1 %
Outlying values in the LN weights were eliminated at a probability level of 99 % by Nalimov's method
In addition, for the LLNA/IMDS the smallest significant differences in the means were calculated by Sheffe's method, which can be used for both equal and unequal sample sizes. - Positive control results:
- no data
- Parameter:
- SI
- Remarks on result:
- other: see Remark
- Remarks:
- It has to be clarified that the positive level for the cell count index is exclusively defined for the NMRI mice used for this study: the positive level is 1.25 for cell count index. Compared to vehicle treated animals, the measured cell counts in the test substance groups reached or exceeded the 'positive level' defined for this assay. The cell count indices were determined 1.0 (vehicle), 1.53, 1.63, 1.48 Thus, the positive level was reached or exceeded. The positive level which is 2x10[exp-2] mm increase has not been reached in all dose groups. In addition, there was no significant increase in the ear weights.
- Key result
- Parameter:
- other: disintegrations per minute (DPM)
- Remarks on result:
- other: Modified LLNA; measurement of cell counts instead of radioactive labelling.
- Interpretation of results:
- Category 1B (indication of skin sensitising potential) based on GHS criteria
- Executive summary:
Macrolex Rot E2G was examined for sensitization according to OECD TG 429 under GLP conditions. The modification refer to the measurement of cell proliferation by cell counting instead of radioactive labelling. In addition, the acute inflammatory skin reaction is determined to discriminate specific from non-specific activation of immun system, as also recommended in the update of OECD TG 429. NMRI mice were treated dermally with 0% (vehicle control); 1%, 10% and 25 % as suspension in polyethylene glycol 400 once per day on 3 consecutive days. One day later the evaluation was done: cell count index of draining lymph nodes, ear swelling and ear weight.
Compared to vehicle treated animals, the measured cell counts in the test substance groups reached or exceeded the 'positive level' defined for this assay;1.25. The cell count indices were determined 1.0 (vehicle), 1.53, 1.63, 1.48 Thus, the positive level was reached or exceeded. The positive level which is 2x10[exp-2]mm increase of ear swelling has not been reached in all dose groups. In addition, there was no significant increase in the ear weights
Thus, the results show that Macrolex Rot E2G has a weak sensitising potential in mice after dermal application.
Reference
The results show that the test item (Macrolex Rot E2G Gran.) has a weak sensitizing potential in mice after dermal application. There was an increase compared to vehicle treated animals regarding the cell counts and the weight of the draining lymph nodes in all dose groups.
Thus, a hint for a substance specific activation of the cells of the immune system via dermal application was found by the method used, i.e. the test item has a weak skin sensitizing potential.
An irritating potential at the same doses measured by acute ear swelling or ear weights, however, could not be determined.
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (sensitising)
- Additional information:
The results show that the test item (Macrolex Rot E2G Gran., CAS no 6829-22-7) has a weak sensitizing potential in mice after dermal application. There was an increase compared to vehicle treated animals regarding the cell counts and the weight of the draining lymph nodes in all dose groups. Thus, a hint for a substance specific activation of the cells of the immune system via dermal application was found by the method used, i.e. the test item has a weak skin sensitizing potential.
Respiratory sensitisation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
- Additional information:
No data.
Justification for classification or non-classification
In all dose groups the "positive level" which is 1.25 for the cell count index was just met or exceeded 1.0 (vehicle), 1.53 (1% solution), 1.63 (10% solution), 1.48 (25% solution). But this increase was not dose-dependent for cell count indices. The reason for this is not known.
According to CLP classification criteria (Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008) a classification as Skin Sens. 1B (H317: May cause an allergic skin reaction) is proposed.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

EU Privacy Disclaimer
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our websites.