Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 243-978-6 | CAS number: 20702-77-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Oral route:
- Key study. Method similar to OECD 420 (non-GLP). The oral LD50 in rats for the substance was found to be ≥ 5000 mg/kg bw.
- Key study. Method similar to OECD 420 (non-GLP). The oral LD50 in rats for the substance was found to be ≥ 5000 mg/kg bw.
- Supporting study: Method similar to OECD 474 (non-GLP). During an in vivo micronucleus assay, the acute oral LD50 in rats for the substance was found to be ≥ 5000 mg/kg bw.
Based on the available data, the substance is considered to be non-toxic, with an LD50 ≥ 5000 mg/kg bw.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Acute toxicity: via oral route
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- acute toxicity: oral
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Study period:
- 1983.
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: OECD Guideline 474
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Acute exposure during in vivo micronucleus assay: single administration of 4 doses up to 5000 mg/kg bw, 6 animals per dose, observation time 48h.
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Test type:
- other: in vivo micronucleus assay.
- Limit test:
- no
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Source: Synthesized by Nutrilite Products, Buena Park, CA. The NMR spectrum was consistent with a purity of ca. 99%. - Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- Swiss Webster
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Simonsen Laboratories, Gilroy, CA.
- Age at study initiation: approximately 6 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 16-32 g
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): commercial rodent diet (Purina Rodent Chow, Ralston Purina Co., St. Louis, MO).
- Water ad libitum. - Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- other: 2% acacia (gum arabic) in water
- Details on oral exposure:
- VEHICLE
- Concentration in vehicle: Oral dosing was by gavage in 2% acacia (gum arabic) in water at 10ml/kg bw. - Doses:
- 200, 500, 1000, and 5000 mg/kg bw.
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 6 animals of either sex (12 in negative and positive controls).
- Control animals:
- yes
- Details on study design:
- - Duration of observation period following administration: Single dose administration, observation period of 48h after treatment.
- Key result
- Sex:
- male/female
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Effect level:
- >= 5 000 mg/kg bw
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Remarks on result:
- not determinable due to absence of adverse toxic effects
- Mortality:
- No mortality was observed after 48h.
- Clinical signs:
- other: No effects.
- Gross pathology:
- No data.
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Remarks:
- EU criteria.
- Conclusions:
- The test item was found to be non toxic, with an LD50 > 5000 mg/kg bw.
- Executive summary:
During an in vivo micronucleus assay of the test substance, male and female Swiss-Webster mice were treated with the test substance over the range of 200-5000mg/kg. Under test conditions, no toxicity signs were observed on mice treated with the test substance. Therefore, the test item is considered to be non-toxic, with an LD50 > 5000 mg/kg bw.
- Endpoint:
- acute toxicity: oral
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- From April 19th to May 3rd, 1973.
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 420 (Acute Oral Toxicity - Fixed Dose Method)
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- - Procedure found in Section 191.1 (f)(1) of the Federal Hazardous Substance Act; NPI Standard Test No.6.
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Test type:
- fixed dose procedure
- Limit test:
- yes
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Lot No. 6-RS-7, received April 5, 1973.
- Purity (HPLC): 98.5% - Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Wistar
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Weight at study initiation: 234g (females) and 290g (males).
- Fasting period before study: overnight
- Diet: commercial laboratory animal feed ad libitum.
- Water: bottled spring water ad libitum.
- Acclimation period: 6d.
IN-LIFE DATES: From: April 19, 1973 To: May 3, 1973. - Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- water
- Details on oral exposure:
- VEHICLE
- Concentration in vehicle: The test material was used in a 12.5% gravimetric suspension in water.
- Amount of vehicle (if gavage):
MAXIMUM DOSE VOLUME APPLIED:
DOSAGE PREPARATION: the powdered neohesperidin dihydrochalcone was mixed with 8cc of distilled water and allowed to stand 15min prior to being administered to animals. Females received 1.2g and males 1.5g test item each. - Doses:
- 5000 mg/kg bw.
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 5 per sex per dose
- Control animals:
- yes
- Details on study design:
- - Duration of observation period following administration: 14 days
- Frequency of observations and weighing: Animals were observed for signs of pharmacologic activity and drug toxicity at 1, 3, 6 and 24h post-dosage. Observations were made daily thereafter to a total of 14d.
- Necropsy of survivors performed: yes. Animals sacrificed at the end of the 14-day observation period were subjected to complete gross necropsy.
- Other examinations performed: clinical signs, body weight, histopathology. - Key result
- Sex:
- male/female
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Effect level:
- >= 5 000 mg/kg bw
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Remarks on result:
- not determinable due to absence of adverse toxic effects
- Mortality:
- All animals were alive at the completion of the test.
- Clinical signs:
- other: No effects observed.
- Gross pathology:
- No gross changes observed.
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Remarks:
- EU criteria
- Conclusions:
- Based on read-across approach, the target substance was found to be non toxic, LD50 ≥ 5000mg/kg.
- Executive summary:
The acute oral toxicity of neohesperidin dihydrochalcone on rats was studied by a method similar to OECD TG 420. A limit test was performed by administering a single dose of 5g/kg bw test item to 10 (5M/5F) Wistar rats, and observing the effects for 14 days (clinical signs, body weights). No effects were observed in any animal. Therefore, the test item was found to be non toxic, with an LD50 > 5000 mg/kg bw.
- Endpoint:
- acute toxicity: oral
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- From Agust 11th to September 24th, 1978.
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 420 (Acute Oral Toxicity - Fixed Dose Method)
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- - Procedure by Hagan, E.C. (1959). Acute Toxicity; Appraisal of the Safety of Chemicals in Foods, Drugs and Cosmetics, pp. 17-25. (see 'Attached background material').
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Test type:
- fixed dose procedure
- Limit test:
- yes
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Lot No. 26-RS-17, received 11/8/1978.
- Purity (HPLC): 98.5% - Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Wistar
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Weight at study initiation: 176-210 g.
- Fasting period before study: overnight
- Diet: commercial laboratory animal feed ad libitum.
- Water: bottled spring water ad libitum.
- Acclimation period: 6d. - Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- water
- Details on oral exposure:
- VEHICLE
- Concentration in vehicle: The test material was used in a 12.5% gravimetric suspension in water. - Doses:
- 5000 mg/kg bw.
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 5 per sex per dose
- Control animals:
- yes
- Details on study design:
- - Duration of observation period following administration: 14 days
- Frequency of observations and weighing: Animals were observed for signs of pharmacologic activity and drug toxicity at 1, 3, 6 and 24h post-dosage. Observations were made daily thereafter to a total of 14d.
- Necropsy of survivors performed: yes. Animals sacrificed at the end of the 14-day observation period were subjected to complete gross necropsy.
- Other examinations performed: clinical signs, body weight. - Key result
- Sex:
- male/female
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Effect level:
- >= 5 000 mg/kg bw
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Remarks on result:
- not determinable due to absence of adverse toxic effects
- Mortality:
- 1/5 males died at day 9, 0/5 females died.
- Clinical signs:
- other: No effects observed.
- Gross pathology:
- No gross changes observed.
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Remarks:
- EU criteria.
- Conclusions:
- The test item was found to be non toxic, LD50 ≥ 5000 mg/kg bw.
- Executive summary:
The study of the acute oral toxicity of neohesperidin dihydrochalcone on rats was performed by a method similar to OECD TG 420. A limit test was performed by administering a single dose of 5g/kg bw test item to 10 (5M/5F) Wistar rats, and observing the effects for 14 days (clinical signs, body weights). One male died on day 9, but no gross changes were observed, and no effects were noted on any other animal. Therefore, the test item was found to be non toxic, with an LD50 > 5000 mg/kg bw.
Referenceopen allclose all
Table 1. Acute Oral Toxicity for neohesperidin dihydrochalcone.
Animal Number |
Sex |
Body weight (g) |
Hours |
Days |
Body weight (final, g) |
|||||||||
1 |
3 |
6 |
24 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
14 |
||||
1 |
M |
204 |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
358 |
2 |
208 |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
348 |
|
3 |
210 |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
382 |
|
4 |
176 |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
308 |
|
5 |
206 |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
+ |
160 |
|
6 |
F |
196 |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
230 |
7 |
202 |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
254 |
|
8 |
188 |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
244 |
|
9 |
196 |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
254 |
|
10 |
188 |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
N |
228 |
N: normal, D: depression, SD: slight depression, D: severe depression, +: animal death.
Remarks: Animal #1 - #4, #6 - #10: no gross changes observed. Animal #5: No gross changes observed (died on day 9).
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Value:
- 5 000 mg/kg bw
- Quality of whole database:
- The two studies used for read-across have a Klimisch score of 2.
Acute toxicity: via inhalation route
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Acute toxicity: via dermal route
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Acute toxicity: oral route.
- Key study. The acute oral toxicity of the test item on rats was studied by a method similar to OECD TG 420. A limit test was performed by administering a single dose of 5 g/kg bw test item to 10 (5M/5F) Wistar rats, and observing the effects for 14 days (clinical signs, body weights). No effects were observed in any animal. Therefore, the test item was found to be non toxic, with an LD50 > 5000 mg/kg bw.
- Key study. The study of the acute oral toxicity of the test item on rats was performed by a method similar to OECD TG 420. A limit test was performed by administering a single dose of 5 g/kg bw test item to 10 (5M/5F) Wistar rats, and observing the effects for 14 days (clinical signs, body weights). One male died on day 9, but no gross changes were observed, and no effects were noted on any other animal. Therefore, the test item was found to be non toxic, with an LD50 > 5000 mg/kg bw.
- Supporting study. During an in vivo micronucleus assay on the test item, male and female Swiss-Webster mice were treated with the test item over the range of 200-5000mg/kg, and observed for 48h. Under test conditions, no toxicity signs were observed on any of the treated mice. Therefore, the test item is considered to be non-toxic, with an LD50 > 5000 mg/kg bw.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on available data (oral LD50 > 5000 mg/kg bw in rats), the substance is not classified for acute toxity according to CLP Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.