Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Genetic toxicity: in vitro

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
Type of information:
(Q)SAR
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2021
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with adequate and reliable documentation / justification
Justification for type of information:
The model has been trained on experimental data fulfilling regulatory requirements. In particular, the experimental mutagenic activity derives from the Ames assay [4,5]. Experimental negative results were included in the training set of the model only if results were available for all the strains requested by the OECD TG 471 (OECD, 1997) with and without metabolic activation and conducted according to Good Laboratory Practice (GLP).

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
other company data
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2021
Report date:
2021

Materials and methods

Principles of method if other than guideline:
a. Model or submodel name: Knowledge-based expert rule system for predicting mutagenicity (Ames test) of aromatic amines and azo compounds implemented in KNIME Analytical Platform (https://www.knime.com/knime-analytics-platform)
b. Model Version: 2016
c. Reference to QMRF: [2]
d. Predicted value (model result): suspected mutagen (2 generated amines; 1 mutagenic amine; 1 non-mutagenic)
e. Predicted value (comments): Disperse Orange 044 is an azo dye that generate two aromatic amine after azo-bond cleavage. One generated amines is predicted as mutagen, the other non-mutagenic, leading to a final suspected mutagenic
f. Input for prediction neutralised SMILES as in 1.5. The Ames test is performed in buffer. Regarding the use of in silico models, the substances used in the laboratory tests, as in the training set, which are originally neutral or as salt, are transformed into the salt of buffer during the experiment, and again are expected to general equivalent results. For this reason, the neutralization done on the structure for modelling purposes is legitimate.

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
3,3'-[[4-[(2-chloro-4-nitrophenyl)azo]phenyl]imino]bis[propiononitrile]
EC Number:
223-765-4
EC Name:
3,3'-[[4-[(2-chloro-4-nitrophenyl)azo]phenyl]imino]bis[propiononitrile]
Cas Number:
4058-30-4
Molecular formula:
C18H15ClN6O2
IUPAC Name:
3,3'-[[4-[(2-chloro-4-nitrophenyl)azo]phenyl]imino]bis[propiononitrile]

Results and discussion

Remarks on result:
ambiguous mutagenic potential (based on QSAR/QSPR prediction)

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
The substance is predicted to be suspected mutagenic.