Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 943-653-5 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
Ames test (Wagner, 1999) : Negative in 5 strains
HPRT (BASF, 2014) : Negative
Chromosomal Aberration in vitro (Gudi, 2000) : Ambiguous
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Description of key information
In vivo Micronucleus Test (Gudi, 2000) : Negative
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Additional information
The genetic toxicity of methylionone was analyzed in a bacterial reverse mutation assay according Ames et al. (Wagner, 1999). The bacteria strains S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100 were tested with and without metabolic activation by Aroclor-1254 induced rat liver S9 mix according to the plate incorporation method. Although some cytotoxicity in some strains at higher concentrations were noted, no mutagenic effect of methylionone was detected.
A second Ames test was performed with methyl ionone (Quest, 1980). Methyl ionone was tested in Salmonella typhimurium TA 1535, TA1537, TA1538, TA98, and TA100 with and without metabolic activation (S9) using 0 (solvent control), 0.01, 0.1, 1, or 10 μl/well of the test substance in dimethyl sulphoxide. The number of colonies on each plate was counted and the mean number of revertant colonies per treatment group was calculated. At the tested concentrations, no significant increase in the number of revertant colonies was reported with any of the strains, with or without S9. A slight increase was observed with strain TA1537 at 0.01 ul/plate, and due to this slight increase, a repeat test was conducted at concentrations of 0.005, 0.01, 0.05, and 0.1 ul/plate. No significant increase in the number of revertant colonies was reported at any of the tested concentrations.
It was concluded that no evidence of mutagenic potential of Methyl ionone was obtained in this bacterial test system at the dose levels used.
Methyl ionone 70 (CAS 1335-46-2) was tested in a HPRT test in CHO cells with and without metabolic activation (BASF SE, 2014). Cytotoxicity was found in the absence and presence of S9 mix, at least at the highest applied concentrations. The test substance did not cause any relevant increase in the mutant frequencies in two independent experiments.
In a study using a chromosome aberration assay the genetic toxicity in vitro was analyzed in Chinese hamster ovary cells (Gudi, 2000). The cells were incubated for 4 h or 20 h with 12.5, 25, and 50 ug/ml methyl ionone dissolved in DMSO with and without metabolic activation. 0.1 and 0.2 ug/ml mitomycin C was used as positive control in the non-activated assay and 10 and 20 ug/ml cyclophosphamide in the activated assay. After harvesting the cells, frequencies of cells with structural and numerical aberrations were calculated by analyzing a minimum of 200 metaphase spreads and scoring for chromatid-type and chromosome-type aberrations. The resulting findings were ambiguous, as an induction of structural chromosome aberrations was found in the absence of S9 metabolic activation, but not in the presence of S9 metabolic activation. Furthermore, it was negative in both the absence and presence of S9 metabolic activation for the induction of numerical chromosome aberrations.
The genetic toxicity in vivo was analyzed in mammalian erythrocyte micronucleus test (Gudi, 2000). Five male and five female IRC mice per dose were intraperitoneally injected with 20 ml/kg bw at concentrations of 462.5, 925, or 1850 mg/kg body weight methylionone in corn oil. 24 h and 48 h after dosing, animals were sacrificed and bone marrow cells were isolated from the femurs.
Only a light to moderate reduction (up to 35%) in the ratio of polychromatic erythrocytes to total erythrocytes were observed in some of the methylionone-treated groups relative to the respective vehicle controls. A statistically significant increase in micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes (8 MNPCE/10000 PCE) was observed in male mice 24 hrs after treatment with 925 mg/kg. However, this response is not considered biologically relevant (each of the five animals had no more than 3 MPCE, which are within the range of historical solvent control: 0-7 MN/2000 PCE/animal). Also, no significant increase and no dose responsiveness was observed in any other test article treated group regardless of dose level, sex, or bone marrow collection time. Thus, methhylionone could be regarded as not mutagenic in vivo.
Short description of key information:
Genetic toxicity:
- in vitro in bacteria: negative (Ames test)
- in vitro in mammalian cells: negative (HPRT)
- in vitro in mammalian cells: ambigious (chromosome aberration, CHO
cells)
- in vivo: negative (MNT)
Endpoint Conclusion: No adverse effect observed (negative)
Justification for classification or non-classification
Although ambiguous results were found in the chromosome aberration test in mammalian cells in vitro, those foundings were not confirmed in a cytogenicity test in vivo.
Moreover no genetic toxicity could be detected in bacteria as well as in mammalian cells in vitro (HPRT).
Thus, due to overall negative results for genetic toxicity, no classification is required.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.