Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Genetic toxicity: in vitro

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1996
Report date:
1996

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
JAPAN: Guidelines for Screening Mutagenicity Testing Of Chemicals
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of assay:
other: chromosomal aberrations

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Methyl laurate
EC Number:
203-911-3
EC Name:
Methyl laurate
Cas Number:
111-82-0
Molecular formula:
C13H26O2
IUPAC Name:
methyl laurate
Test material form:
liquid
Details on test material:
Dodecanoic acid methyl ester [methyl laurate, CAS No. 111-82-0], manufactured by Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd., Lot. No. GD 01, content 99.2%, molecular weight 214.35, melting point 5 ° C., boiling point 141 ° C., specific gravity 0.8706 (20 ° C.). Colorless and transparent liquid
Specific details on test material used for the study:
Dodecanoic acid methyl ester (abbreviation: MD, CAS No.:111-82-0, lot number: GB01, manufactured by Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.) is a colorless transparent liquid and has a melting point of 5 ° C, a boiling point of 141 ° C. (15 mmHg) , Molecular formula C13 H26 O2, molecular weight 214.35, purity 98% (impurity unknown).

Method

Target gene:
chromosomes
Species / strain
Species / strain / cell type:
Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
CHL/IU cells derived from Chinese hamster, obtained from Research · Resource Bank (JCRB) (February 1988, at passage: 4th passage, now 12th) were used in the test within 10 years of thawing succession age.
Cytokinesis block (if used):
colcemid
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
S9 fraction from livers of rats induced with phenobarbital and 5,6-benzoflavone
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
A preliminary toxicity test was conducted based on cell proliferation rates. The proliferation inhibitory action of the test substance on CHL/IU cells was determined by measuring the proliferation of each group using a monolayer culture cell densitometer (Monocellater ™ , Olympus Optical Co., Ltd.), and the solvent control group as baseline.
Vehicle / solvent:
acetone
Controls
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
cyclophosphamide
mitomycin C
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
DURATION
-Exposure duration:
a) Continuous treatment: 24 hrs, 48 hrs
b) Short-term treatment: 6hrs; 18 hrs for recovery
-Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells):
a) Continuous treatment: 24 hrs, 48 hrs
b) Short-term treatment: 24 hrs
SPINDLE INHIBITOR: Colcemid
STAIN: Giemsa stain
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED:
Stractural aberrations: 200 cells/group
Polyploidy: 800 cells/group
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY:
-Method: relative total growth
Rationale for test conditions:
guideline
Evaluation criteria:
Criteria for a positive call: a statistically significant increase in the frequency of cells with chromosomal aberrations in the treated group compared with that of the solvent control group, and a statistically significant difference in the dose trend test. An inconclusive result will be designated when there is a significant increase in the frequency of cells with aberrations without a postive dose response trend test.
The test will be considered negative when there is no significant difference in frequency of cells with chromosomal aberrations.
The test is inconclusive when the number of cells observed has fewer than 100 structural aberrations, and less than 400 polyploidy due to cytotoxicity.
Statistics:
Fisher's direct probability method is used to distinguish between the solvent background chromosomal aberration levels and those of the test substance- treated group, with a significance level of p <0.05. In addition, when significant differences were found by Fisher's exact stochastic method, the Cochran-Armitage's trend test is applied (p <0.05) to test for significance of the dose dependency.

Results and discussion

Test results
Key result
Species / strain:
Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not applicable
Positive controls validity:
valid
Additional information on results:
In the preliminary toxicity screening test, concentrations up to 2.0 mg/ml resulted in significant decrease in cell growth in the 24 and 48 hour continuous cultures with and without S9, and in the 6 hour culture with S9. Cells in the 6-hour culture without S9 tolerated the test material with growth rates above 50%. Therefore, the maximum concentration of the test substance used in the continuous exposure assay was 0.06 mg / ml, and was 0.1 mg / ml in the short-term assay in the presence of S9 mix. In the short term assay without S9 mix, 2.1 mg / ml (10 mM) was the maximum concentration tested. Toxicity was observed (> 50 mitotic index) in the main study of continuous exposure at the high dose of 0.06 mg/ml, but not in the other modules of the study.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Table 1: Continuous

Group

Concentration (mg/ml)

Time of Exposure (h)

No of Cells analysed

No. of structural aberrations

Others3)

No. of cells with aberrations

Polyploid4)(%)

Trend test5)

 

 

 

gap

ctb

cte

csb

cse

mul2)

total

TAG (%)

TA (%)

 

SA

NA

Control

 

 

200

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

0.13

NT

NT

Solvent1)

0

24

200

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0 (0.0)

0(0.0)

0.38

MD

0.015

24

200

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

0.13

MD

0.03

24

200

1

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

1 (0.5)

0 (0.0)

0.25

MD

0.06

24

173

0

1

0

1

0

0

2

1

2 (1.2)

2 (1.2)

0.556)

MC

0.00005

24

200

11

40

133

2

3

0

189

2

110 (55.0)

105 (52.5)

0.00

 

Solvent1)

0

48

200

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

0.00

NT

NT

MD

0.015

48

200

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

0.25

MD

0.03

48

200

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

0.13

MD

0.06

48

200

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

0.63

MC

0.00005

48

200

6

35

137

4

6

20

208

6

94 (47.0)

94 (47.0)

0.25

Table 2: Short-term

Group

Concentration (mg/ml)

S9 mix

Time of Exposure (h)

No of cells analyzed

No. of structural aberrations

Others3)

No. of cells with aberrations

Polyploid4)(%)

Trend test5)

 

 

 

 

gap

ctb

cte

csb

cse

mul2)

total

TAG (%)

TA (%)

 

SA

NA

Control

 

 

 

200

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

0.63

NT

NT

Solvent1)

0

-

6-(18)

200

0

0

1

0

1

0

2

0

2 (1.0)

2 (1.0)

0.63

MD

0.53

-

6-(18)

200

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

0.25

MD

1.1

-

6-(18)

200

1

1

0

0

0

0

2

0

2 (1.0)

1 (0.5)

0.25

MD

2.1

-

6-(18)

200

0

0

1

0

0

0

1

0

1 (0.5)

1 (0.5)

0.25

CPA

0.005

-

6-(18)

200

0

1

0

0

0

0

1

0

1 (0.5)

1 (0.5)

0.13

 

Solvent1)

0

+

6-(18)

200

1

0

1

0

0

0

2

1

2 (1.0)

1 (0.5)

0.25

NT

NT

MD

0.025

+

6-(18)

200

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

0.5

MD

0.05

+

6-(18)

200

1

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

1 (0.5)

0 (0.0)

0.75

MD

0.1

+

6-(18)

200

0

0

2

0

0

0

2

0

1 (0.5)

1 (0.5)

1.38

CPA

0.005

+

6-(18)

200

7

40

126

1

2

0

176

0

95 (47.5)

93 (46.5)

0.25

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
A guideline OECD 473-compliant chromosomal aberration test was undertaken with the test material in acetone, with and without rat liver S9 fraction, with valid positive controls. Cytotoxicity was seen at the higher doses in a preliminary dose-range finding study. There were no increase in the number of chromosome aberrations (excluding gaps) or polyploidy observed. The test substance does not induce chromosomal aberrations in CHL/IU cells under the conditions of this study.