Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 701-092-1 | CAS number: 1175006-92-4
Flash point
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- flash point of flammable liquids
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 16-Jul-2009 to 06-May-2010
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- Study conducted in compliance with agreed protocols, with no or minor deviations from standard test guidelines and/or minor methodological deficiencies, which do not affect the quality of the relevant results. The study report was conclusive, done to a valid guideline and the study was conducted under GLP conditions.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method A.9 (Flash-Point)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- ISO 2719 (Determination of flash point - Pensky-Martens closed cup method)
- Version / remarks:
- 2002
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- ISO 13736:1997 (Petroleum products and other liquids - Determination of flash point - Abel closed cup method)
- Version / remarks:
- 1997
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of method:
- other: Pensky Martens closed cup
- Key result
- Flash point:
- > 104 °C
- Atm. press.:
- ca. 100.2 kPa
- Remarks on result:
- no flash point according to standard method
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- Due to the aqueous solution of the test item, a flash point was not to be expected. In the preliminary test, the test item was heated from 12 °C to 104 °C. The test was stopped when the test item started boiling. The atmospheric pressure on the day of the measurement was 100.2 kPa.No flash point was observed in this temperature range.
- Executive summary:
- Due to the aqueous solution of the test item, a flash point was not
to be expected. In the preliminary test, the test item was heated from
12 °C to 104 °C. The test was stopped when the test item started boiling.
The atmospheric pressure on the day of the measurement was 100.2 kPa.
No flash point was observed in this temperature range.
Reference
Due to the aqueous solution of the test item, a flash point was not to expect. In the preliminary test, the test item was heated from 12 °C to 104 °C. The test was stopped when the test item started boiling. The atmospheric pressure on the day of the measurement was 100.2 kPa.
No flash point was observed in this temperature range.
Description of key information
Due to the aqueous solution of the test item, a flash point was not to expect. In the preliminary test, the test item was heated from 12 °C to 104 °C. The test was stopped when the test item started boiling. The atmospheric pressure on the day of the measurement was 100.2 kPa.
No flash point was observed in this temperature range.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Additional information
no flash point observed
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
