Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 243-956-6 | CAS number: 20665-85-4
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 02 February 2016 - 05 April 2016
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 016
- Report date:
- 2016
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 490 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Tests Using the Thymidine Kinase Gene)
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- other: In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test With L5178y Mouse Lymphoma Cells
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 4-formyl-2-methoxyphenyl isobutyrate
- EC Number:
- 243-956-6
- EC Name:
- 4-formyl-2-methoxyphenyl isobutyrate
- Cas Number:
- 20665-85-4
- Molecular formula:
- C12H14O4
- IUPAC Name:
- 4-formyl-2-methoxyphenyl 2-methylpropanoate
- Test material form:
- other: liquid
Constituent 1
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): Isobutavan
- Physical state: Almost colourless to pale yellow liquid
- Lot/batch No.: SC00016272
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: 11 December 2017
- Storage condition of test material: At room temperature protected from light
Method
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9 Mix
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- In the first experiment, ISOBUTAVAN was tested up to concentrations of 490 and 1000 μg/ml in the absence and presence of S9-mix, respectively.
In the second experiment, the test item was tested up to concentrations of 450 μg/ml in the absence of S9-mix. - Vehicle / solvent:
- The test item was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO, Merck Darmstadt, Germany).
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Solvent
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- DMSO
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- methylmethanesulfonate
- Remarks:
- with and without S9 activation
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- Dose range finding test:
In the dose range finding test, L5178Y mouse lymphoma cells were treated with a test item concentration range of 17 to 1600 μg/ml in the absence of S9-mix with 3- and 24-hour treatment periods and in the presence of S9-mix with a 3-hour treatment period.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
Any other information on results incl. tables
The mutation frequency found in the solvent control cultures was within the acceptability criteria of this assay and within the 95% control limits of the distribution of the historical negative control database
Positive control chemicals, methyl methanesulfonate and cyclophosphamide, both produced significant increases in the mutation frequency. In addition, the mutation frequency found in the positive control cultures was within the 95% control limits of the distribution of the historical positive control database. It was therefore concluded that the test conditions were adequate and that the metabolic activation system (S9-mix) functioned properly.
In the absence of S9-mix, an increase above the positive threshold of MF(controls) + 126 (GEF= 237 x 10-6) was observed at the toxic top dose of 490 μg/ml. The increase observed was at a RTG of 10% and according to the guideline a result would not be considered positive if the increase in MF occurred only at or below 10% RTG. The increase observed in the next dose level of 436 μg/ml with a RTG of 32%, was a 1.9-fold increase in the mutation frequency and was not above the GEF.
After the prolonged treatment period (24 hour), an increase in the mutation frequency above the critical value of 170 per 106 survivors was only observed at the toxic top dose of 450 μg/ml with a RTG of 12%. The mutation frequency at this concentration was not above the GEF and there was no concentration related increase observed. Therefore the result is considered to be negative and of no biological relevance.
In the presence of S9-mix, ISOBUTAVAN did not induce a significant increase in the mutation frequency. Since the meaningful increase (above the positive threshold, GEF) in the mutation frequency at the TK locus in the absence of S9-mix is only observed at the top concentration with a RTG of 10% after the 3 hour treatment and the increase was above the critical value of 170 per 106 survivors after the prolonged treatment period but not above the GEF, the biological relevance of these increases is doubtful. Therefore the test results for the 3hr test in the absence of S9-mix is considered equivocal under the experimental conditions described in the report. The test item was not mutagenic in the current test in the presence of S9-mix.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- The test item was not mutagenic in the current test in the presence of S9-mix.
- Executive summary:
Evaluation of the mutagenic activity of ISOBUTAVAN in an in vitro mammalian cell gene mutation test with L5178Y mouse lymphoma cells. This report describes the effects of ISOBUTAVAN on the induction of forward mutations at the thymidine-kinase locus (TK-locus) in L5178Y mouse lymphoma cells. The test was performed in the absence of S9-mix with 3 and 24-hour treatment periods and in the presence of S9-mix with a 3 hours treatment period (rat liver S9-mix induced by a combination of phenobarbital and ß-naphthoflavone). The study procedures described in this report were based on the most recent OECD guideline. Batch SC00016272 of ISOBUTAVAN was an almost colourless to pale yellow liquid. The test item was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide. In the first experiment, ISOBUTAVAN was tested up to concentrations of 490 and 1000 μg/ml in the absence and presence of S9-mix, respectively. The incubation time was 3 hours. The relative total growth (RTG) was 10% in the absence of S9-mix. In the presence of S9-mix, no cytotoxicity was observed, however ISOBUTAVAN was tested up to the precipitating dose level of 1000 μg/ml in compliance with the guideline. In the absence of S9-mix, an increase above the positive threshold of MF(controls) + 126 (GEF= 237 x 10-6) was observed at the toxic top dose of 490 μg/ml with a RTG of 10%. The mutation frequency observed in the second highest dose level of 436 μg/ml (RTG of 32%) was not above the GEF and therefore considered negative. In the presence of S9-mix, none of the tested concentrations reached a mutation frequency of MF(controls) + 126. In the second experiment, the test item was tested up to concentrations of 450 μg/ml in the absence of S9-mix. The incubation time was 24 hours. The RTG was 12%. After the prolonged treatment period, an increase in the mutation frequency above the critical value of 170 per 106 survivors was only observed at the toxic top dose of 450 μg/ml. The increase observed in the first experiment (short treatment) was at a RTG of 10% and according to the guideline a result would not be considered positive if the increase in MF occurred only at or below 10% RTG. After the prolonged treatment period (24 hour), an increase in the mutation frequency above the critical value of 170 per 106 survivors was only observed at the toxic top dose of 450 μg/ml with a RTG of 12%. The mutation frequency at this concentration was not above the GEF and there was no concentration related increase observed. Therefore the result is considered to be negative and of no biological relevance. The mutation frequency found in the solvent control cultures was within the acceptability criteria of this assay and within the 95% control limits of the distribution of the historical negative control database. Positive control chemicals, methyl methanesulfonate and cyclophosphamide, both produced significant increases in the mutation frequency. In addition, the mutation frequency found in the positive control cultures was within the 95% control limits of the distribution of the historical positive control database. It was therefore concluded that the test conditions were adequate and that the metabolic activation system (S9-mix) functioned properly.
Since the meaningful increase (above the positive threshold, GEF) in the mutation frequency at the TK locus in the absence of S9-mix is only observed at the top concentration with a RTG of 10% after the 3 hour treatment and the increase was above the critical value of 170 per 106 survivors after the prolonged treatment period but not above the GEF, the biological relevance of this increase is doubtful. Therefore the test results for the 3hr test in the absence of S9-mix are considered equivocal under the experimental conditions described in the report. The test item was not mutagenic in the current test in the presence of S9-mix.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

EU Privacy Disclaimer
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our websites.