Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Genetic toxicity: in vitro

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
Remarks:
Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
Experimental starting date (first day of data collection): 26 June 2015; Experimental completion date: 24 July 2015
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: GLP Guideline study.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2015
Report date:
2015

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of assay:
bacterial reverse mutation assay

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
2-​Pentanone, 4-​methyl-​, reaction products with 2-​(2-​aminoethoxy)​ethanol
EC Number:
615-768-8
Cas Number:
72480-17-2
Molecular formula:
C10 H21 N O2
IUPAC Name:
2-​Pentanone, 4-​methyl-​, reaction products with 2-​(2-​aminoethoxy)​ethanol
Test material form:
other: liquid

Method

Target gene:
Tester strains TA98 and TA1537 are reverted from histidine dependence (auxotrophy) to histidine independence (prototrophy) by frameshift mutagens. Tester strain TA1535 is reverted by mutagens that cause basepair substitutions. Tester strain TA100 is reverted by mutagens that cause both frameshift and basepair substitution mutations. Specificity of the reversion mechanism in E. coli is sensitive to basepair substitution mutations, rather than frameshift mutations (Green and Muriel, 1976).
Species / strainopen allclose all
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
Not applicable
Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
not applicable
Species / strain / cell type:
E. coli WP2 uvr A
Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
Not applicable
Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
not applicable
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
Aroclor 1254-induced rat liver S9.
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- In the initial toxicity-mutation assay:1.50/5.00/15.0/50.0/150/500/1500 and 5000 μg per plate.- In the confirmatory mutagenicity assay: 15.0/50.0/150/500/1500 and 5000 μg per plate.
Vehicle / solvent:
The vehicle used was :- Vehicle: DMSO- CAS number: 67-68-5- Supplier: Sigma-Aldrich- Lot number: BCBJ4366V- Purity: 99.99%- Expiration date: February 2018
Controlsopen allclose all
Untreated negative controls:
yes
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
Remarks:
DMSO
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Remarks:
diluted is DMSO
Positive control substance:
2-nitrofluorene
Remarks:
Positive control for TA 98 without metabolic activation.
Untreated negative controls:
yes
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
Remarks:
DMSO
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Remarks:
diluted is sterile water
Positive control substance:
sodium azide
Remarks:
Positive control for TA100 and TA 1535 without metabolic activation.
Untreated negative controls:
yes
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
Remarks:
DMSO
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Remarks:
diluted is DMSO
Positive control substance:
other: 2-aminoanthracene
Remarks:
2-Aminoanthracene is the positive control for TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537 and WP2 uvra with metabolic activation.
Untreated negative controls:
yes
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
Remarks:
DMSO
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Remarks:
diluted is DMSO
Positive control substance:
9-aminoacridine
Remarks:
Positive control for TA 1537 without metabolic activation.
Untreated negative controls:
yes
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
Remarks:
DMSO
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Remarks:
diluted is DMSO
Positive control substance:
methylmethanesulfonate
Remarks:
Positive control for WP2 uvra without metabolic activation.
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation).NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS:- Initial toxicity-mutation assay: In duplicate- Confirmatiry mutagenicity assay: in triplicateTreatment of Test SystemOn the day of its use, minimal top agar, containing 0.8 % agar (W/V) and 0.5 % NaCl (W/V), was melted and supplemented with L-histidine, D-biotin and L-tryptophan solution to a final concentration of 50 μM each. Top agar not used with S9 or Sham mix was supplemented with 25 mL of sterile water for each 100 mL of minimal top agar. Bottom agar was Vogel-Bonner minimal medium E (Vogel and Bonner, 1956) containing 1.5 % (W/V) agar. Nutrient bottomagar was Vogel-Bonner minimal medium E containing 1.5 % (W/V) agar and supplemented with 2.5 % (W/V) Oxoid Nutrient Broth No. 2 (dry powder). Nutrient Broth was Vogel-Bonner salt solution supplemented with 2.5 % (W/V) Oxoid Nutrient Broth No. 2 (dry powder).To confirm the sterility of the S9 and Sham mixes, a 0.5 mL aliquot of each was plated on selective agar. To confirm the sterility of the test substance and the vehicle, all test substance dose levels and the vehicle used in each assay were plated on selective agar with an aliquot volume equal to that used in the assay. These plates were incubated under the same conditions as the assay.One-half (0.5) milliliter of S9 or Sham mix, 100 μL of tester strain (cells seeded) and 50.0 μL of vehicle or test substance dilution were added to 2.0 mL of molten selective top agar at 45±2°C. When plating the positive controls, the test substance aliquot was replaced by a 50 μL aliquot of appropriate positive control. After vortexing, the mixture was overlaid onto the surface of 25 mL of minimal bottom agar. After the overlay had solidified, the plates were inverted and incubated for 48 to 72 hours at 37±2°C. Plates that were not counted immediately following the incubation period were stored at 2-8°C until colony counting could be conducted.
Evaluation criteria:
Evaluation of Test ResultsFor each replicate plating, the mean and standard deviation of the number of revertants per plate were calculated and are reported.For the test substance to be evaluated positive, it must cause a dose-related increase in the mean revertants per plate of at least one tester strain over a minimum of two increasing concentrations of test substance as specified below:Strains TA1535 and TA1537Data sets were judged positive if the increase in mean revertants at the peak of the dose response was equal to or greater than 3.0-times the mean vehicle control value.Strains TA98, TA100 and WP2 uvrAData sets were judged positive if the increase in mean revertants at the peak of the dose response was equal to or greater than 2.0-times the mean vehicle control value.An equivocal response is a biologically relevant increase in a revertant count that partially meets the criteria for evaluation as positive. This could be a dose-responsive increase that does not achieve the respective threshold cited above or a non-dose responsive increase that is equal to or greater than the respective threshold cited. A response was evaluated as negative if it was neither positive nor equivocal.
Statistics:
Electronic Data Collection SystemsThe primary computer or electronic systems used for the collection of data or analysis included but were not limited to the following:- LIMS Labware System: Test Substance Tracking- Excel 2007 (Microsoft Corporation): Calculations- Sorcerer Colony Counter and Ames Study Manager (Perceptive Instruments): Data Collection/Table Creation- Kaye Lab Watch Monitoring system (Kaye GE): Environmental Monitoring- BRIQS: Deviation and audit reporting

Results and discussion

Test resultsopen allclose all
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not applicable
Positive controls validity:
valid
Species / strain:
E. coli WP2 uvr A
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not applicable
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
other: all strains/cell types tested
Remarks:
Migrated from field 'Test system'.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Solubility Test

DMSO was selected as the solvent of choice based on the solubility of the test substance and compatibility with the target cells. The test substance formed a clear solution in DMSO at a concentration of approximately 500 mg/mL, the maximum concentration tested in the solubility test conducted at BioReliance.

Sterility Results

No contaminant colonies were observed on the sterility plates for the vehicle control, the test substance dilutions or the S9 and Sham mixes.

Tester strain titer results:

Experiment

Tester strain

TA98

TA100

TA1535

TA1537

WP2 uvra

Titer value (x10E9 cells per ml)

B1

1.9

1.6

1.7

6.1

11.4

B2

1.4

1.2

1.1

1.6

2.2

Initial toxicity-mutation assay:

In Experiment B1 (Initial Toxicity-Mutation Assay), the maximum dose tested was 5000 μg per plate; this dose was achieved using a concentration of 100 mg/mL and a 50.0 μL plating aliquot. The dose levels tested were 1.50, 5.00, 15.0, 50.0, 150, 500, 1500 and 5000 μg per plate. No positive mutagenic responses were observed with any of the tester strains in either the presence or absence of S9 activation. Neither precipitate nor toxicity was observed. Based on the findings of the initial toxicity-mutation assay, the maximum dose plated in the confirmatory mutagenicity assay was 5000 μg per plate.

Confirmatory mutagenicity assay:

In Experiment B2 (Confirmatory Mutagenicity Assay), no positive mutagenic responses were observed with any of the tester strains in either the presence or absence of S9 activation. The dose levels tested were 15.0, 50.0, 150, 500, 1500 and 5000 μg per plate. Neither precipitate nor background lawn toxicity was observed.

CONCLUSION

All criteria for a valid study were met as described in the protocol. The results of the Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay indicate that, under the conditions of this study, the test material did not cause a positive mutagenic response with any of the tester strains in either the presence or absence of Aroclor-induced rat liver S9.

Historical negative and positive control values, 2014, Revertants per plate

Historical Negative and Positive Control Values

2014

Revertants per plate

Strain

Control

Activation

None

Rat liver

TA98

Neg

16

5

5

42

6-26

24

7

5

53

10-38

Pos

232

258

57

2691

 

400

165

109

1382

 

TA100

Neg

94

14

66

152

66-122

102

18

63

164

66-138

Pos

681

176

213

1767

 

681

259

186

2793

 

TA1535

Neg

11

4

2

31

3-19

13

5

2

36

3-23

Pos

586

226

16

2509

 

117

99

23

1060

 

TA1538

Neg

7

3

1

19

1-13

9

4

1

23

1-17

Pos

411

355

32

2921

 

72

52

10

562

 

WP2 uvra

Neg

25

7

7

62

11-39

28

8

10

55

12-44

Pos

376

123

99

1026

 

302

102

91

687

 

SD=standard deviation; Min=minimum value; Max=maximum value; 95% CL = Mean ±2 SD (but not less than zero); Neg=negative control (including but not limited to deionized water, dimethyl sulfoxide, ethanol and acetone); Pos=positive control

 

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Interpretation of results (migrated information):negative with metabolic activationnegative without metabolic activationAll criteria for a valid study were met as described in the protocol. The results of the Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay indicate that, under the conditions of this study, the test material did not cause a positive mutagenic response with any of the tester strains in either the presence or absence of Aroclor-induced rat liver S9.
Executive summary:

Salmonella typhimurium tester strains TA98, TA100, TA1535 and TA1537 and Escherichia coli tester strain WP2 uvrA in the presence and absence of Aroclor-induced rat liver S9. The assay was performed in two phases, using the plate incorporation method. The first phase, the initial toxicity-mutation assay, was used to establish the dose-range for the confirmatory mutagenicity assay and to provide a preliminary mutagenicity evaluation. The second phase, the confirmatory mutagenicity assay, was used to evaluate and confirm the mutagenic potential of the test substance.

Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) was selected as the solvent of choice based on the solubility of the test substance and compatibility with the target cells. The test substance formed a clear solution in DMSO at a concentration of approximately 500 mg/mL, the maximum concentration tested in the solubility test conducted at BioReliance.

In the initial toxicity-mutation assay, the maximum dose tested was 5000 μg per plate; this dose was achieved using a concentration of 100 mg/mL and a 50.0 μL plating aliquot. The dose levels tested were 1.50, 5.00, 15.0, 50.0, 150, 500, 1500 and 5000 μg per plate. No positive mutagenic responses were observed with any of the tester strains in either the presence or absence of S9 activation. Neither precipitate nor toxicity was observed. Based on the findings of the initial toxicity-mutation assay, the maximum dose plated in the confirmatory mutagenicity assay was 5000 μg per plate.

In the confirmatory mutagenicity assay, no positive mutagenic responses were observed with any of the tester strains in either the presence or absence of S9 activation. The dose levels tested were 15.0, 50.0, 150, 500, 1500 and 5000 μg per plate. Neither precipitate nor background lawn toxicity was observed.

Under the conditions of this study, the test material, was concluded to be negative in the Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay.