Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 231-218-6 | CAS number: 7450-69-3
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Biodegradation in water: screening tests
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- biodegradation in water: ready biodegradability
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2013-01-30 - 2013-04-18
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: The study was conducted according to an internationally accepted guideline. All study parameters are based on the specific guideline.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 013
- Report date:
- 2013
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 301 B (Ready Biodegradability: CO2 Evolution Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Phenyl diamidophosphate
- EC Number:
- 231-218-6
- EC Name:
- Phenyl diamidophosphate
- Cas Number:
- 7450-69-3
- Molecular formula:
- C6H9N2O2P
- IUPAC Name:
- [(diaminophosphoryl)oxy]benzene
- Test material form:
- solid: crystalline
- Details on test material:
- Name PPDA
Composition phosphoric acid phenylester diamide, contains 4.9% ammonium chloride and 2.9% phenol
CAS No. 7450-69-3
EINECS-No. 231-218-6
Molecular formula C6H9N2O2P
Molecular weight 172.1 g/mol
Purity 92.2% (HPLC)
Constituent 1
Study design
- Oxygen conditions:
- aerobic
- Inoculum or test system:
- activated sludge, domestic (adaptation not specified)
- Details on inoculum:
- Specification
Activated sludge from a biologic sewage treatment plant was used. The chosen plant is treating mostly domestic sewage.
Source
The sludge was taken from the activation basin of the ESN (Stadtentsorgung Neustadt) sewage treatment plant, Im Altenschemel, NW-Lachen-Speyerdorf.
Pre-Treatment
The sludge was filtrated, washed with tap water twice, then washed with and re-sus-pended in test medium. It was then aerated for 12 hours. The dry matter was determined with 3700 mg suspended solids/litre. - Duration of test (contact time):
- 28 d
Initial test substance concentration
- Initial conc.:
- 20 mg/L
- Based on:
- DOC
Parameter followed for biodegradation estimation
- Parameter followed for biodegradation estimation:
- CO2 evolution
- Details on study design:
- The medium was prepared from the stock solutions. The stock solution of the positive control was prepared and its TOC was measured. The stock solution of the test item was prepared and its TOC was measured. The inoculum was taken from its source, washed, aerated and the dry matter was determined.
The test vessels were filled with medium and inoculum. Then all flasks were aerated for 72 hours with purified, CO2-free, moistened air to purge the system of CO2.
The test vessels were aerated with purified (by activated charcoal), CO2-scrubbed, mois-tened air. The scrubbing of carbon dioxide was achieved by bubbling the purified air through a flask containing 1.5 m-NaOH. To control the absence of CO2, the air was then led through a flask containing a solution of Ba(OH)2 before reaching the test vessels.
Magnetic stirrers were used to prevent deposition of inoculum.
The emitted CO2 was trapped in 0.25-m-NaOH. Two scrubbers containing 100 mL each were connected in series to the test vessels. The initial IC value of the 0.25 m-NaOH was separately determined in each flask.
Sampling
From each front scrubber flask, ten samples were taken in order to determine the emitted CO2 (on days 0, 2, 4, 7, 9, 11, 14, 18, 23 and 29). The sample volume was 1 mL. The re-sulting change in the volume of the front flask was considered in the calculation of emitted CO2.
On day 28, 5 mL HCl 2-m. were added to each test flask in order to drive off dissolved CO2. On day 29, samples from both scrubber flasks were taken.
Reference substance
- Reference substance:
- aniline
Results and discussion
% Degradationopen allclose all
- Parameter:
- % degradation (CO2 evolution)
- Value:
- 2.1
- Sampling time:
- 2 d
- Parameter:
- % degradation (CO2 evolution)
- Value:
- 14.3
- Sampling time:
- 7 d
- Parameter:
- % degradation (CO2 evolution)
- Value:
- 59.8
- Sampling time:
- 11 d
- Parameter:
- % degradation (CO2 evolution)
- Value:
- 72.6
- Sampling time:
- 18 d
- Parameter:
- % degradation (CO2 evolution)
- Value:
- 76.7
- Sampling time:
- 29 d
Any other information on results incl. tables
Emitted carbon in mg/L
Day |
Control 1 |
Control 2 |
Positive Control 1 |
Positive Control 2 |
Test 1 |
Test 2 |
Abiotic Control |
Toxicity Control |
2 |
0.59 |
0.42 |
0.53 |
0.48 |
1.00 |
0.88 |
0.12 |
0.33 |
4 |
1.41 |
1.01 |
4.91 |
1.60 |
2.00 |
1.84 |
0.24 |
2.79 |
7 |
1.92 |
1.95 |
12.32 |
10.55 |
4.46 |
5.16 |
0.18 |
13.13 |
9 |
2.13 |
2.32 |
15.87 |
13.52 |
10.49 |
8.36 |
0.05 |
16.54 |
11 |
2.36 |
2.63 |
18.31 |
16.10 |
15.03 |
14.00 |
-0.01 |
19.76 |
14 |
2.77 |
2.86 |
19.61 |
17.69 |
16.74 |
17.07 |
-0.03 |
23.38 |
18 |
2.77 |
2.97 |
19.68 |
18.76 |
17.27 |
17.68 |
-0.03 |
25.86 |
23 |
2.83 |
3.17 |
19.95 |
18.95 |
17.73 |
18.18 |
-0.06 |
31.13 |
29 |
3.22 |
3.53 |
20.99 |
19.48 |
17.73 |
19.86 |
-0.25 |
36.46 |
Degradation values in %
Day |
Positive Control 1 |
Positive Control 2 |
Positive Control Mean |
Test 1 |
Test 2 |
Test Mean |
Abiotic Control |
Toxicity Control |
2 |
0.1 |
-0.1 |
0.0 |
2.4 |
1.9 |
2.1 |
0.6 |
-0.4 |
4 |
18.3 |
1.9 |
10.1 |
3.9 |
3.1 |
3.5 |
1.2 |
3.9 |
7 |
51.5 |
42.7 |
47.1 |
12.5 |
16.0 |
14.3 |
0.9 |
27.8 |
9 |
67.7 |
56.0 |
61.9 |
41.1 |
30.5 |
35.8 |
0.3 |
35.6 |
11 |
78.4 |
67.4 |
72.9 |
62.3 |
57.2 |
59.8 |
0.0 |
42.8 |
14 |
83.3 |
73.8 |
78.6 |
69.2 |
70.9 |
70.1 |
-0.1 |
51.1 |
18 |
83.4 |
78.8 |
81.1 |
71.6 |
73.6 |
72.6 |
-0.1 |
57.1 |
23 |
84.0 |
79.1 |
81.6 |
73.2 |
75.5 |
74.4 |
-0.3 |
69.8 |
29 |
87.4 |
79.9 |
83.6 |
71.4 |
82.0 |
76.7 |
-1.2 |
82.2 |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Interpretation of results:
- readily biodegradable
- Conclusions:
- The following data were determined for the test item PPDA:
10-day-window: day 7 – 17
degradation at the end of 10-day-window 72 %
degradation at the end of the test 77 %
pass level following guideline: 60% at the end of 10-day-window
Therefore, when applying the 10-day-window, PPDA is readily biodegradable following OECD 301B/EU C.4-C. - Executive summary:
The test item PPDA was tested using a concentration of nominally 20 mg organic carbon/L (corresponding to 51.1 mgPPDA/L) in test medium following OECD 301B and EU-Method C.4-C.
Aniline was chosen as positive control.
Activated sludge was used as inoculum (concentration in the test 24.9 mg dry matter/L). The test was left running for 28 days.
All validity criteria were met. Degradation of the positive control was 62 % after nine days.
The following data were determined for the test itemPPDA:
10-day-window: day 7 – 17
degradation at the end of 10-day-window 72 %
degradation at the end of the test 77 %
pass level following guideline: 60% at the end of 10-day-windowTherefore, when applying the 10-day-window, PPDA is readily biodegradable following OECD 301B/EU C.4-C.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
