Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 276-763-0 | CAS number: 72676-55-2
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
5,5'-Dithiodi-1,3,4-thiadiazole-2(3H)-thione is sensitising to the skin based on the LLNA results.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin sensitisation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation: in vivo (LLNA)
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- February - March 2014
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 429 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
- Version / remarks:
- 2010
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.42 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of study:
- mouse local lymph node assay (LLNA)
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- CBA
- Sex:
- female
- Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
- On receipt the animals were randomly allocated to cages. The animals were nulliparous and non-pregnant. After an acclimatization period of nine days the animals were selected at random and a cage card was prepared with details of test item, project number, dose level, sex, study dates and the initials of the Study Director. At the start of the study, the animals were in the weight range of 15 to 23 g, and were approximately eight to twelve weeks old.
The temperature and relative humidity remained within 19 to 25 °C and 30 to 70%, respectively, during the study. The rate of air exchange was approximately fifteen changes per hour and the lighting was controlled by a time switch to give twelve hours continuous light (06.00 to 18.00) and twelve hours darkness.
The animals were provided with environmental enrichment items which were considered not to contain any contaminant of a level that might have affected the purpose or integrity of the study. - Vehicle:
- dimethylformamide
- Concentration:
- Based on results from the preliminary study the following doses were selected for the main study: 0, 10, 25, and 50%, w/w in dimethyl formamide.
- No. of animals per dose:
- 5
- Details on study design:
- Following a preliminary screening test in which no clinical signs of systemic toxicity or excessive local skin irritation nor irritation indicated by an equal or greater than 25% increase in mean ear thickness were noted at a concentration of 50% w/w, this concentration was selected as the highest dose investigated in the main test.
Groups of five mice were treated with the test item at concentrations of 50%, 25% or 10% w/w in dimethyl formamide. The mice were treated by daily application of 25 µL of the appropriate concentration of the test item to the dorsal surface of each ear for three consecutive days (Days 1, 2, 3). The test item formulation was administered using an automatic micropipette and spread over the dorsal surface of the ear using the tip of the pipette. A further group of five mice received the vehicle alone in the same manner.
Five days following the first topical application of the test item or vehicle (Day 6) all mice were injected via the tail vein with 250 µL of phosphate buffered saline (PBS) containing 3H methyl thymidine (3HTdR: 80 µCi/mL, specific activity 2.0 Ci/mmoL, ARC UK Ltd), giving a total of 20 µCi to each mouse.
Observations
Clinical Observations: All animals were observed twice daily (pre- and post-dose) on Days 1, 2 and 3 and on a daily basis on Days 4, 5 and 6. Any clinical signs of toxicity, skin irritation, or signs of ill health during the test were recorded.
Body Weights:
The body weight of each mouse was recorded on Day 1 (prior to dosing) and Day 6 (prior to termination).
Terminal Procedures
Termination: Five hours following the administration of 3HTdR all mice were killed by carbon dioxide asphyxiation followed by cervical separation. For each individual animal of each group the draining auricular lymph nodes were excised and processed. For each individual animal 1 mL of PBS was added to the lymph nodes.
Preparation of Single Cell Suspension:
A single cell suspension of the lymph node cells for each individual animal was prepared by gentle mechanical disaggregation through a 200 mesh stainless steel gauze. The lymph node cells were rinsed through the gauze with 4 mL of PBS into a petri dish labeled with the study number and dose concentration. The lymph node cells suspension was transferred to a centrifuge tube. The petri dish was washed with an additional 5 mL of PBS to remove all remaining lymph node cells and these were added to the centrifuge tube. The lymph node cells were pelleted at 1400 rpm (approximately 190 g) for ten minutes. The pellet was re suspended in 10 mL of PBS and re pelleted. The pellet was re suspended in 3 mL of 5% Trichloroacetic acid (TCA) and incubated for approximately 18 hours at approximately 4 °C to precipitate DNA.
Determination of 3HTdR Incorporation: The TCA precipitates were recovered by centrifugation at 2100 rpm (approximately 450 g) for ten minutes, followed by resuspension in 1 mL of TCA. Each resuspended pellet of each individual animal was transferred to a ‘’Poly QTM’’ vial containing 10 mL of scintillation fluid (Optiphase 'Trisafe'). The "Poly Q™" vials containing the samples and scintillation fluid were placed in the sample changer of the scintillator and left for approximately 20 minutes. The purpose of this period of time in darkness was to reduce the risk of luminescence, which has been shown to affect the reliability of the results. After approximately 20 minutes, the vials were shaken vigorously in the dark. 3HTdR incorporation was measured as the number of radioactive disintegrations per minute by beta scintillation counting. - Positive control substance(s):
- hexyl cinnamic aldehyde (CAS No 101-86-0)
- Statistics:
- Data was processed to give group mean values for disintegrations per minute (dpm) per animal (dpm/animal) and standard deviations were appropriate. Individual and group mean dpm values were assessed for dose response relationships by analysis of homogeneity of variance followed by one way analysis of variance (ANOVA). A significant effect was identified by the ANOVA; therefore, pairwise comparisons were performed between control and treated groups. Dunnett's Multiple Comparison test was also used due to the significant results achieved from ANOVA.
- Positive control results:
- Postiive control study (October 18 - 24, 2013), with a Hexylcinnamaldehyde (85%) yielded a positive result and confirmed to be a sensitizer under the conditions of the positive control test when compared to the control DMF.
- Parameter:
- SI
- Value:
- 7.71
- Test group / Remarks:
- Group 10%
- Parameter:
- SI
- Value:
- 10.03
- Test group / Remarks:
- Group 25%
- Parameter:
- SI
- Value:
- 6.11
- Test group / Remarks:
- Group 50%
- Parameter:
- EC3
- Remarks on result:
- not determinable
- Remarks:
- because no dose response observed
- Cellular proliferation data / Observations:
- There were no deaths. No signs of systemic toxicity were noted in the test or control animals during the test. Pale yellow colored residual test item on the ears was noted on all the test mice: Day 1 (post dose) and Days 2 to 4 at a concentration of 50% w/w in dimethyl formamide; Days 1, 2 and 3 (post dose) at a concentration of 25% w/w in dimethyl formamide; and Days 2 and 3 (post dose) at a concentration of 10% w/w in dimethyl formamide.
- Interpretation of results:
- Category 1 (skin sensitising) based on GHS criteria
- Conclusions:
- 5,5'-Dithiodi-1,3,4-thiadiazole-2(3H)-thione is considered to be a sensitizer under the conditions of the test.
- Executive summary:
In a LLNA (OECD 429), conducted according to GLP, 5,5'-Dithiodi-1,3,4-thiadiazole-2(3H)-thione was tested at 10%, 25% and 50% concentration in dimethyl formamide, and resulted in a positive response in mice, with a stimulation index of 7.71, 10.03 and 6.11, respectively. 5,5'-Dithiodi-1,3,4-thiadiazole-2(3H)-thione is therefore considered a skin sensitiser. No EC3 could be determined in the absence of dose-response.
Reference
There were no deaths. No signs of systemic toxicity were noted in the test or control animals during the test. Pale yellow colored residual test item on the ears was noted on all the test mice: Day 1 (post dose) and Days 2 to 4 at a concentration of 50% w/w in dimethyl formamide; Days 1, 2 and 3 (post dose) at a concentration of 25% w/w in dimethyl formamide; and Days 2 and 3 (post dose) at a concentration of 10% w/w in dimethyl formamide.
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (sensitising)
- Additional information:
In a LLNA (OECD 429), conducted according to GLP, 5,5'-Dithiodi-1,3,4-thiadiazole-2(3H)-thione was tested at 10%, 25% and 50% concentration in dimethyl formamide, and resulted in a positive response in mice, with a stimulation index of 7.71, 10.03 and 6.11, respectively. 5,5'-Dithiodi-1,3,4-thiadiazole-2(3H)-thione is therefore considered a skin sensitiser. No EC3 could be determined in the absence of dose-response.
Respiratory sensitisation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the available data, 5,5'-Dithiodi-1,3,4 -thiadiazole-2(3H)-thione should be classified as Skin Sensitiser, category 1, according to the Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 on classification, labelling and packaging (CLP) of substances and mixtures.
Justification : In absence of dose reponse in the LLNA, EC3 value cannot be determined, so no subcategery of classification can be determined.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

EU Privacy Disclaimer
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our websites.