Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin sensitisation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Study performed to GLP and guideline

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2002

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of study:
Buehler test

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
10101-41-4
EC Number:
600-148-1
Cas Number:
10101-41-4
IUPAC Name:
10101-41-4
Constituent 2
Reference substance name:
calcium sulfate, dihydrate
IUPAC Name:
calcium sulfate, dihydrate
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): Calcium sulfate dihydrate
- Analytical purity: 99.9%
- Lot/batch No.: Sigma Aldrich Corporation, Lot No. - 109H0166

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
guinea pig
Strain:
Hartley
Sex:
male
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Age at study initiation: 5-6 weeks old
- Weight at study initiation: 306.4 - 457.9 g



Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)

Inductionopen allclose all
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Vehicle:
water
Concentration / amount:
- Induction: 0.4 g/0.4 mL (100 %); pre-treatment had conducted with 13 %, 25 %, 50 % and 100 % of test substance.

- Challenge: 0.4 g/0.4 ml (100 %)
Challengeopen allclose all
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Vehicle:
water
Concentration / amount:
- Induction: 0.4 g/0.4 mL (100 %); pre-treatment had conducted with 13 %, 25 %, 50 % and 100 % of test substance.

- Challenge: 0.4 g/0.4 ml (100 %)
No. of animals per dose:
40 animals in total
Details on study design:
A patch (Whatman # filter paper, 2 x 2 cm) including 0.4 g of test material, which was dissolved in 0.4 mL of sterile distilled water, was applied to the abraded and intact sites on the shaved backs (4 x 4 cm) of Guinea pigs. . It was held in place for 6 hours with three fold gauze patches, which were applied in place with elasticity bandage (6.4 cm width) to prevent leakage.


After 6 hours, three fold gauze patches were removed and the exposed areas washed using warm water without altering the existing response or the integrity of the epidermis. The skin of animals was examined in accordance with the sensitization grading system and scored at 1 and 24 hours after the patches removal for induction; and 24 and 48 hours after the patches removal for challenge.

The test of induction on the skin was performed 3 times on the day 0, 7 and 14 but the test of challenge was performed 2 weeks after the final test of induction.









Positive control substance(s):
yes
Remarks:
0.1% 1-Chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene (solvent: 10% Propylene Glycol)

Results and discussion

In vivo (non-LLNA)

Resultsopen allclose all
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
100%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
20
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 100%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0.
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
100%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
20
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 100%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not sensitising
Remarks:
Migrated information
Conclusions:
All test groups except the positive control had a sensitization score of 0 (no visible change) for both the induction and challenge test. Calcium sulfate dihydrate is not-sensitizing.