Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 700-673-7 | CAS number: 132638-45-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 28-09-2011 to 17-11-2011
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Guideline study performed under GLP. All relevant validity criteria were met.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 012
- Report date:
- 2012
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.5100 - Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test (August 1998)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- JAPAN: Guidelines for Screening Mutagenicity Testing Of Chemicals
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- inspected: July 2011; signature: August 2011
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 2-methoxy-4-methylphenyl methyl carbonate
- EC Number:
- 700-673-7
- Cas Number:
- 132638-45-0
- Molecular formula:
- C10H12O4
- IUPAC Name:
- 2-methoxy-4-methylphenyl methyl carbonate
- Test material form:
- other: liquid
Constituent 1
Method
- Target gene:
- histidine or tryptophan locus
Species / strainopen allclose all
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not applicable
- Species / strain / cell type:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not applicable
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Phenobarbitone/B-Naphthoflavone induced rat liver S9.
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Preliminary Toxicity Test (plate incorporation method): 0, 0.15, 0.50, 5, 15, 50, 150, 500, 1500 and 5000 µg/plate
Experiment 1 (plate incorporation method): 0, 50, 150, 500, 1500 and 5000 µg/plate
Experiment 2 (pre-incubation method): 0, 50, 150, 500, 1500 and 5000 µg/plate
Dose levels were selected based on the results of the Preliminary Toxicity Test. The top dose was the guideline specified limit dose level selected due to absence of cytotoxicity and solubility of the test item in the solvent/vehicle. - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO)
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: The test item was immiscible in sterile distilled water at 50 mg/mL but was fully miscible in dimethyl sulphoxide at the same concentration in solubility checks performed. Dimethyl sulphoxide was selected as the vehicle.
Controlsopen allclose all
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide
- 9-aminoacridine
- N-ethyl-N-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine
- Remarks:
- Without metabolic activation S9
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- benzo(a)pyrene
- other: 2-Aminoanthracene
- Remarks:
- With metabolic activation S9
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: Experiment 1. in medium; in agar (plate incorporation) ; Experiment 2. in medium; in agar (pre-incubation)
DURATION
- Exposure duration:
Experiment 1. All of the plates were incubated at 37 ºC for approximately 48 hours and scored for the presence of revertant colonies using an automated colony counting system. The plates were viewed microscopically for evidence of thinning (toxicity).
Experiment 2. 0.1 mL of the appropriate bacterial strain culture, 0.5 mL of phosphate buffer OR S9-mix (as appropriate) and 0.1 mL of the test item formulation, vehicle or 0.1 mL of appropriate positive control were incubated at 37 ºC for 20 minutes (with shaking) prior to addition of 2 mL of molten amino-acid supplemented media. Subsequently, the procedure for incubation and duration was the same as in Experiment 1.
SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): histidine-deficient agar
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 3
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: relative total growth - Evaluation criteria:
- There are several criteria for determining a positive result. Any, one, or all of the following can be used to determine the overall result of the study:
1. A dose-related increase in mutant frequency over the dose range tested (De Serres and Shelby, 1979).
2. A reproducible increase at one or more concentrations.
3. Biological relevance against in-house historical control ranges.
4. Statistical analysis of data as determined by UKEMS (Mahon et al., 1989).
5. Fold increase greater than two times the concurrent solvent control for any tester strain (especially if accompanied by an out of historical range response).
A test item is considered non-mutagenic (negative) in the test system if the above criteria are not met.
In instances of data prohibiting definitive judgement about test item activity are reported as equivocal. - Statistics:
- Statistical methods (Mahon, et al.); as recommended by the UKEMS Subcommittee on Guidelines for Mutagenicity Testing, Report - Part III (1989).
Results and discussion
Test results
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and E. coli WP2
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Remarks:
- See table 1 to table 4
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY: cytotoxicity was not evident at any concentration
- Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1 Test Results: Range-Finding Test – Without Metabolic Activation
Test Substance Concentration |
Mean number of colonies per plate (SD) |
||||
Base-pair substitution type |
Frame-shift type |
||||
TA100 |
TA1535 |
WP2uvrA |
TA98 |
TA1537 |
|
0 |
75 (14.5) |
12 (1.5) |
27 (4.2) |
19 (7.0) |
12 (3.5) |
50 |
83 (4.0) |
13 (4.2) |
30 (1.0) |
15 (1.0) |
13 (1.0) |
150 |
75 (1.0) |
15 (1.5) |
24 (2.1) |
11 (1.7) |
13 (1.5) |
500 |
84 (3.2) |
15 (3.2) |
29 (0.6) |
15 (2.6) |
14 (0.6) |
1500 |
72 (4.6) |
15 (0.6) |
24 (2.1) |
12 (3.8) |
11 (2.1) |
5000 |
77 (0.6) |
16 (2.5) |
19 (6.8) |
15 (3.8) |
9 (2.1) |
Positive Controls |
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
ENNG |
ENNG |
ENNG |
4NQO |
9AA |
Concentration |
3 |
5 |
2 |
0.2 |
80 |
Mean number of colonies per plate (SD) |
415 |
101 |
723 |
110 |
925 |
ENNG
N-ethyl-N’-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine
4NQO 4-Nitroquinoline-1-oxide
9AA 9-Aminoacridine
Table 2 Test Results: Range-Finding Test – With Metabolic Activation
Test Substance Concentration |
Mean number of colonies per plate (SD) |
||||
Base-pair substitution type |
Frame-shift type |
||||
TA100 |
TA1535 |
WP2uvrA |
TA98 |
TA1537 |
|
0 |
73 (10.2) |
12 (1.2) |
34 (2.3) |
25 (1.2) |
12 (5.2) |
50 |
70 (5.6) |
12 (3.1) |
32 (0.6) |
18 (3.1) |
10 (1.5) |
150 |
80 (5.9) |
11 (3.5) |
32 (2.5) |
18 (0.0) |
10 (0.0) |
500 |
87 (20.8) |
13 (1.5) |
26 (1.0) |
14 (0.6) |
6 (0.6) |
1500 |
77 (3.5) |
12 (1.2) |
24 (5.1) |
11 (3.1) |
15 (1.0) |
5000 |
78 (10.7) |
9 (3.5) |
23 (3.2) |
13 (2.3) |
9 (2.1) |
Positive Controls |
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
2AA |
2AA |
2AA |
BP |
2AA |
Concentration |
1 |
2 |
10 |
5 |
2 |
Mean number of colonies per plate (SD) |
720 |
336 |
269 |
295 |
256 |
BP
Benzo(a)pyrene
2AA 2-Aminoanthracene
Table 3 Test Results: Main Test – Without Metabolic Activation
Test Substance Concentration |
Mean number of colonies per plate (SD) |
||||
Base-pair substitution type |
Frame-shift type |
||||
TA100 |
TA1535 |
WP2uvrA |
TA98 |
TA1537 |
|
0 |
75 (13.5) |
20 (8.5) |
24 (4.5) |
28 (2.5) |
14 (4.0) |
50 |
68 (7.0) |
22 (8.7) |
15 (2.0) |
22 (4.5) |
13 (4.6) |
150 |
72 (3.2) |
18 (3.2) |
18 (6.9) |
22 (1.5) |
12 (3.0) |
500 |
79 (11.6) |
19 (5.0) |
20 (2.1) |
16 (2.0) |
13 (2.1) |
1500 |
65 (1.0) |
16 (3.5) |
14 (1.7) |
23 (3.1) |
7 (1.2) |
5000 |
74 (16.1) |
20 (6.1) |
14 (3.0) |
25 (9.0) |
11 (4.5) |
Positive Controls |
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
ENNG |
ENNG |
ENNG |
4NQO |
9AA |
Concentration |
3 |
5 |
2 |
0.2 |
80 |
Mean number of colonies per plate (SD) |
379 |
162 |
721 |
113 |
1393 |
ENNG
N-ethyl-N’-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine
4NQO 4-Nitroquinoline-1-oxide
9AA 9-Aminoacridine
Table 4 Test Results: Main Test – With Metabolic Activation
Test Substance Concentration |
Mean number of colonies per plate (SD) |
||||
Base-pair substitution type |
Frame-shift type |
||||
TA100 |
TA1535 |
WP2uvrA |
TA98 |
TA1537 |
|
0 |
99 (10.2) |
14 (3.8) |
32 (5.6) |
13 (3.2) |
15 (3.1) |
50 |
77 (12.3) |
19 (4.5) |
33 (3.0) |
14 (3.1) |
16 (2.5) |
150 |
93 (10.3) |
17 (8.5) |
32 (5.1) |
13 (1.7) |
13 (2.9) |
500 |
76 (6.6) |
19 (2.1) |
30 (0.6) |
18 (7.1) |
12 (3.6) |
1500 |
88 (6.9) |
16 (4.4) |
25 (5.5) |
15 (5.0) |
15 (3.1) |
5000 |
73 (14.8) |
21 (1.7) |
22 (10.4) |
16 (2.9) |
9 (1.0) |
Positive Controls |
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
2AA |
2AA |
2AA |
BP |
2AA |
Concentration |
1 |
2 |
10 |
5 |
2 |
Mean number of colonies per plate (SD) |
707 |
389 |
198 |
248 |
247 |
BP
Benzo(a)pyrene
2AA 2-Aminoanthracene
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results:
Negative
Under the conditions of this study the test item was considered to be non-mutagenic in the presence and absence of S9 activation. - Executive summary:
The study was performed to the requirements of OECD Guideline 471, EU Method B13/14, US EPA OCSPP 870.5100 and Japanese guidelines for bacterial mutagenicity testing under GLP, to evaluate the potential mutagenicity of the test substance in a bacterial reverse mutation assay using S.typhimurium strains TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537 and E.coli strain WP2uvrA- in both the presence and absence of S-9 mix. The test strains were treated with the test substance using both the Ames plate incorporation and pre incubation methods at five dose levels, in triplicate, both with and without the addition of a rat liver homogenate metabolizing system (10% liver S9 in standard co-factors). The dose range for Experiment 1 was predetermined in a preliminary toxicity assay and was 50 to 5000 µg/plate. The experiment was repeated on a separate day (pre-incubation method) using fresh cultures of the bacterial strains and fresh test item formulations. Five test item dose levels were again selected in Experiment 2 and was 50 to 5000 µg/plate. The vehicle (dimethyl sulphoxide) control plates gave counts of revertant colonies within the normal range. All of the positive control chemicals used in the test induced marked increases in the frequency of revertant colonies, both with or without metabolic activation. Thus, the sensitivity of the assay and the efficacy of the S9-mix were validated. The test item caused no visible reduction in the growth of the bacterial lawn in all strains up to 5000 µg/plate. No test item precipitate was observed on the plates at any of the doses tested in either the presence or absence of S9-mix. There were no toxicologically significant increases in the frequency of revertant colonies recorded for any of the bacterial strains, with any dose of the test item, either with or without metabolic activation (S9‑mix) in Experiment 1 (plate incorporation method). Similarly, no significant increases in the frequency of revertant colonies were recorded for any of the bacterial strains, with any dose of the test item, either with or without metabolic activation (S9-mix) in Experiment 2 (pre‑incubation method). It was concluded that, under the conditions of this assay, the test item gave a negative, i.e. non-mutagenic response in S.typhimurium strains TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537 and E.coli strain WP2uvrA- in the presence and absence of S-9 mix.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.