Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Genetic toxicity: in vitro

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
Remarks:
Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
24 October 2001- 04 March 2002
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: GLP guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2002
Report date:
2002

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: EEC Directive 2000/32/EC, Part B: Methods for the Determination of Toxicity; B.10 "Mutagenicity: In Vitro mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test.
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of assay:
in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
00945
IUPAC Name:
00945
Test material form:
solid: particulate/powder
Remarks:
migrated information: powder

Method

Target gene:
Cultured peripheral human lymphocytes
Species / strain
Species / strain / cell type:
lymphocytes:
Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
not specified
Metabolic activation:
with
Metabolic activation system:
Aroclor-1254 induced rat liver S9-mix
Vehicle / solvent:
Dimethyl sulfoxide
Controls
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
cyclophosphamide
mitomycin C

Results and discussion

Test resultsopen allclose all
Species / strain:
lymphocytes:
Metabolic activation:
without
Genotoxicity:
not determined
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not applicable
Positive controls validity:
valid
Species / strain:
lymphocytes:
Metabolic activation:
with
Genotoxicity:
not determined
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not applicable
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
other: all strains/cell types tested
Remarks:
Migrated from field 'Test system'.

Any other information on results incl. tables

The possible clastogenicity of the test substance was tested in two independent experiments. The positive control chemicals for both cytogenetic assays (MMC-C and CP) both produced statistically significant increases in the frequency of aberrant cells. It was therefore concluded that the test conditions were adequate and that the metabolic activation system (S9 -mix) functioned properly.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
It is concluded that the test is valid and that the test substance is not clastogenic in human lymphocytes under the experimental conditions described in the report. Negative result
Executive summary:

The possible clastogenicity of the test substance was tested in two independant experiments. In the first cytogenetic assay, in the absence of S9 -mix (the metabolic activation system), the test substance induced a statistically significant increase in the number of cells with chromosome aberrations at the intermediate concentration of 75ug/ml when gaps were induced only. Since the type of aberrations observed were only breaks and gaps, the increase was not dose dependant and well within our historical background control data it was considered to be not biologically relevant. In the presence of S9 -mix, the test substance did not induce a statiscally significant or biologically relevant increase in the number of cells with chromosome aberrations.

In the second cytogenetic assay, Diolat did not induce a statiscally significant or biologically relevant increase in the number of cells with chromosome aberrations.