Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Hazard for aquatic organisms

Freshwater

Hazard assessment conclusion:
no data available: testing technically not feasible

Marine water

Hazard assessment conclusion:
no data available: testing technically not feasible

STP

Hazard assessment conclusion:
no data available: testing technically not feasible

Sediment (freshwater)

Hazard assessment conclusion:
no data available: testing technically not feasible

Sediment (marine water)

Hazard assessment conclusion:
no data available: testing technically not feasible

Hazard for air

Air

Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified

Hazard for terrestrial organisms

Soil

Hazard assessment conclusion:
no data available: testing technically not feasible

Hazard for predators

Secondary poisoning

Hazard assessment conclusion:
no potential for bioaccumulation

Additional information

Conclusion on classification

Experimental data is available for the acute aquatic toxicity to fish, invertebrates and algae of 1 member of this category (CAS Numbers: 68921-67-5 and 68513-69-9). Similar sensitivity was found in all three trophic levels: fish (O. mykiss) 96 hr LL50= 1.1 mg/L; invertebrates (D. magna) 48hr EL50= 1.2 mg/L; algae (P. subcapitata) 72 hr ErL50= 2.3 mg/L.

 

PETROTOX QSAR data was also considered for CLP for the Lead Registrant samples when no experimental data for a stream was available. The predicted LL50values for all three trophic levels ranged from 3.07 to 23.3 mg/L, whereas the predicted EL10values for all three trophic levels ranged from 0.403 to 4.44 mg/L.

 

Based on the available experimental acute toxicity data of 1 member of this category and predicted acute toxicity data of the representative constituents of these streams, according to Table 4.1.0 (a) of CLP Regulations, the streams in this category would not warrant the classification as Acute Aquatic 1 (H400).

 

Based on the predicted chronic toxicity data of the representative constituents of these streams, according to Table 4.1.0 (b)(i) of CLP Regulations the streams in this category would warrant the classification of Chronic Category 2 (H411).

 

Based on acute and chronic aquatic classifications of the constituents of these streams and Classification Criteria for Mixtures, as laid down in CLP Regulations, the streams in this category should have a minimum classifications of Chronic Category 2 (H411). Other streams in the category would warrant an Acute Aquatic 1 (H400) and Chronic Aquatic 1 (H410).

 

Conclusion

Based on acute and chronic aquatic classifications of the constituents of the streams and Classification Criteria for Mixtures as laid down in CLP Regulations, the streams in this category should have the classifications of Chronic Category 2 (H411) or Acute Aquatic 1 (H400) and Chronic Aquatic 1 (H410).