Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 219-672-3 | CAS number: 2495-27-4
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Study period:
- 01-06-2005- 05-08-2005
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Guideline study OECD 473, GLP. Study according to relevant guideline.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 005
- Report date:
- 2005
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Version / remarks:
- adopted July 21, 1997
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Monomer Mix average C14.8
- IUPAC Name:
- Monomer Mix average C14.8
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): Monomer Mix
- Supplier: Evonik Oil Additives GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany
- Substance type: organic
- Physical state at room temperature: liquid
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: Dez. 31, 2005
- Stability under test conditions: Stability in solvent: 30 days at room temperature in water, saline, DMSO, ethanol, tetrahydrofurane and acetone
- Storage condition of test material: At room temperature, protected from light
Constituent 1
Method
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Mammalian rat liver microsomal fraction induced with phenobarbital / ß-naphthoflavone (S9 mix)
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Experiment I: 18 hrs prep. interval, 4 hrs exposure period: without S9 mix: 5.9, 11.7, 23.4, 46.9, 93.8, 187.5 (p), 375.0 (p), 750.0 (p), 1500.0 (p),
3000.0 (p) µg/ml
18 hrs prep. interval, 4 hrs exposure period: with S9 mix: 5.9, 11.7, 23.4, 46.9, 93.8, 187.5 (p), 375.0 (p), 750.0 (p), 1500.0 (p),
3000.0 (p) µg/ml
(p): Precipitation occurred
Experiment II: 18 hrs prep. interval, 18 hrs exposure period: without S9 mix: 46.9, 93.8, 187.5 (p), 375.0 (p), 750.0 (p), 1500.0 (p), 3000.0 (p) µg/ml
28 hrs prep. interval, 28 hrs exposure period: without S9 mix: 23.4, 46.9, 93.8, 187.5 (p), 375.0 (p), 750.0 (p), 1500.0 (p),
3000.0 (p) µg/ml
Experiment II: 28 hrs prep. interval, 4 hrs exposure period: with S9 mix: 23.4, 46.9, 93.8, 187.5 (p), 375.0 (p), 750.0 (p) µg/ml
(p): Precipitation occurred - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: Tetrahydrofuran (THF) (E. Merck, D-64293 Darmstadt, Germany; purity: 99.5%)
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: The solvent was chosen according to its solubility properties and its relative non-toxicity to the cells.
The final concentration of THF in the culture medium was 0.5 % (v/v).
Controlsopen allclose all
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- concurrent solvent controls (THF) were performed
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- dissolved in: nutrient medium
- Positive control substance:
- ethylmethanesulphonate
- Remarks:
- Final concentration: 300 - 400 µg/ml (2.4 - 3.2 mM)
Migrated to IUCLID6: without metabolic activation
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- dissolved in: saline (0.9 % (w/v)
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- Remarks:
- Final concentration: 1.4 µg/ml (5.0 µM)
Migrated to IUCLID6: with metabolic activation
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
DURATION
- Preincubation period:
- Exposure duration: 4 h (with S9 mix); 18 and 28 hours (without S9 mix)
SPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays): colcemid
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): Giemsa (Merck, D-64293 Darmstadt, Germany)
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 2
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: 100 metaphases were scored
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: mitotic index; in addition the number of polyploid cells in 500 metaphase plates per culture was scored (% polyploid metaphases) - Evaluation criteria:
- ACCEPTABILITY OF THE ASSAY
The chromosomal aberration assay is considered acceptable if it meets the following criteria:
a) The number of aberrations found in the negative and/or solvent controls falls within the range of historical laboratory control
data: 0.00 % - 4.00 %.
b) The positive control substances should produce significant increases of the number of cells with structural chromosomal aberrations, which are within the range of the laboratory's historical control data:
Test group Aberrant cells in % Test group Aberrant cells in %
Final concentration (excl. gaps) Range Final concentration (excl. gaps) Range
Without S9 mix With S9 mix
EMS 200 - 400 µg/mL 7.0 - 63.0 CPA 0.7 - 1.4 µg/mL 7.0 - 49.0
EVALUATION OF RESULTS
A test article is classified as mutagenic if it induces reproducibly either a significant concentration-related increase in the number of structural
chromosomal aberrations or a significant and reproducible positive response for at least one of the test points.
A test article producing reproducibly neither a significant concentration-related increase in the number of structural chromosomal aberrations nor
a significant and reproducibly positive response at any one of the test points is considered nonmutagenic in this system.
Statistical significance was confirmed by means of the Fisher's exact test (p < 0.05).
However, both biological and statistical significance should be considered together. - Statistics:
- Statistical significance at the five per cent level (p < 0.05) was evaluated by means of the Fisher's exact test. Evaluation was performed only for cells
carrying aberrations exclusive gaps.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY:
In both cytotogenetic experiments, in the absence and presence of S9 mix, no biologically relevant increase in the number of cells carrying structural chromosome aberrations was observed.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative
In the Chromosomal aberration test with Chinese hamster V79 cells in vitro according to OECD 473 in the presence and absence of mammalian metabolic activation structural chromosomal aberrations were not observed when tested up to cytotoxic and/or precipitationg concentrations.
Therefore, the test substance is considered to be non-mutagenic under the experimental conditions reported. - Executive summary:
The test item Monomer mix, dissolved in THF, was assessed for its potential to induce structural chromosomal aberrations in Chinese hamster V79 cells in vitro in two independant experiments.
The study design was performed as follows:
Experiment I: 18 hrs preparation interval, 4 hrs exposure period without and with S9 mix
Experiment II: 18 hrs prep. interval, 18 hrs exposure period without S9 mix and 28 hrs prep. interval, 4 hrs and 28 hr exposure period with S9 mix.
In each experimental group, two parallel cultures were analysed. Per culture 100 metaphase plates were scored for structural chromosomal aberrations.
The highest applied concentration in Experiment I (3000 µg/ml of the test item, approx. 10 mM) was chosen with regard to the molecular weight of the test item with respect to the current OECD 473.
No clear toxic effects indicated by reduced mitotic indices or cell numbers of below 50% were observed up to the highest required test item concentration. Therefore, concentrasions at the border of test item solubility in culture medium were scored for cytogenetic damage.
In both independent experiments, no biologically relevant increase in the number of cells carrying structural chromosomal aberrations was observed after treatment with the test item. However, in Experiments I and II, in the absence of S9 mix, statistically significant increases (2 % - 2.5 % aberrant cells, exclusive gaps) were observed, but were within our historical control range (0.0 - 4.0 % aberrant cells, exclusive gaps) and are regarded as being biologically irrelevant.
No relevant increase in the frequencies of polyploid metaphases was found after treatment with the test item as compared to the frequencies of the controls.
Appropriate mutagens were used as positive controls. They induced statistically significant increases (p < 0.05) in cells with structural chromosome aberrations.
In conclusion, it can be stated that under the experimental conditions reported, the test item did not induce structural chromosomal aberrations as determined by the chromosome aberration test in V79 cells (Chinese hamster cell line) in vitro.
Therefore, the test substance is considered to be non-clastogenic under the experimental conditions reported.
NOTE: Any of data in this dataset are disseminated by the European Union on a right-to-know basis and this is not a publication in the same sense as a book or an article in a journal. The right of ownership in any part of this information is reserved by the data owner(s). The use of this information for any other, e.g. commercial purpose is strictly reserved to the data owners and those persons or legal entities having paid the respective access fee for the intended purpose.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.