Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 201-535-4 | CAS number: 84-51-5
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicological Summary
- Administrative data
- Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
- Workers - Hazard via dermal route
- Workers - Hazard for the eyes
- Additional information - workers
- General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
- General Population - Hazard via dermal route
- General Population - Hazard via oral route
- General Population - Hazard for the eyes
- Additional information - General Population
Administrative data
Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.66 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 75
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 20 mg/kg bw/day
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 49.3 mg/m³
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
For workers inhalation NOAEC is corrected as follows:
NOAECcorr=NOAELoral*(1/0.38 m3 /kg/d)*(ABSoral-rat/ABSinhhuman)*(6.7 m3 (8h)/10 m3 (8h)) *(7 days/5 days) = 20*2.63*1*0.67*1.4 = 49.3 mg/m3
The NOAEL for the OECD 422 (Dunster et al, 2012) used in the DNEL calculation is 20 mg/kg bw/d.
Correction factor for differences in bioavailability (ABS), inhalation vs. oral absorption:
Correction factor for differences in respiratory volume (SRV): 2.63 (1/0.38 m3/kg)
Correction factor for light activity at work (WORKER): 0.67 (6.7 m3/10 m3) for 8h exposure time
Correction for differences between human and experimental exposure conditions (EXPCOND): 1.4 (7 days/5 days)
Only 2.6% of the inhalable particles are less than 100 µm and therefore possible uptake of this substance is by oral route following transport of deposited inhaled particles to pharynx and ingestion afterwards. Consequently, the default factor two for the extrapolation of an oral NOAEL to inhalation NOAEC could therefore be omitted in this case.
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- not required, starting point is NOAEL
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 6
- Justification:
- extrapolation from sub-acute to chronic
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- not for concentrations
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- default factor for remaining differences
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- for worker
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- not required
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- not required
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Workers - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.07 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 300
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 20 mg/kg bw/day
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 20 mg/kg bw/day
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
8 h exposure time, no dermal study available.
The NOAEL for the OECD 422 (Dunster et al, 2012) used in the DNEL calculation is 20 mg/kg bw/d.
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- not required, starting point is NOAEL
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 6
- Justification:
- extrapolation from sub-acute to chronic
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- rat to human
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- default factor for remaining differences
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- for worker
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- not required
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- not required
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Workers - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Additional information - workers
The key study for DNEL derivation was identified as the recent OECD 422 study (Dunster, 2012) where an NOAEL of 20 mg/kg/day was derived based on effects observed at 100 mg/kg/day. The critical effects retained at 100 mg/kg/day were a decreased in red blood cell parameters associated with an extramedullary hematopoiesis of the spleen.
The reason for selecting this study is that the design includes both the OECD 407 and OECD 421 guidelines requirements and the exposure duration included an additional 2 weeks exposure duration when compared to a standard 4 weeks toxicity study. The target organs reported in that study were comparable to the available 28 days study performed by Hatano in 2001. The reliability assessment of this latter study was quite difficult as no full report was available.
No DNELs for acute and local effects were derived because 2 -ethylanthraquinone is not classified for acute dermal toxicity, acute oral toxicity or local irritation. Indeed, no local effects could be observed in repeated dose toxicity studies and therefore no respective DNELs have been derived. The DNELs for chronic systemic toxicity for the inhalation and dermal route were derived via route-to-route extrapolation based on a repeated dose oral toxicity study (Dunster/Watson, 2012).
General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.12 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 150
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 20 mg/kg bw/day
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 17.4 mg/m³
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
For general population inhalation NOAEC (24 h exposure/d):
NOAECcorr=NOAELoral*( (1/1.15 m3 /kg/d)*(ABSoral-rat/ABSinhhuman) mg/m3= 20*0.87 = 17.4 mg/m3
The NOAEL for the OECD 422 (Dunster et al, 2012) used in the DNEL calculation is 20 mg/kg bw/d.
Correction factor for differences in bioavailability (ABS), inhalation vs. oral absorption:
Correction factor for differences in respiratory volume (SRV): 0.87 (1/1.15 m3/kg)
Correction for differences between human and experimental exposure conditions (EXPCOND): 1 (7 days/7 days)
Only 2.6% of the inhalable particles are less than 100 µm and therefore possible uptake of this substance is by oral route following transport of deposited inhaled particles to pharynx and ingestion afterwards. Consequently, the default factor two for the extrapolation of an oral NOAEL to inhalation NOAEC could therefore be omitted in this case.
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- not required, starting point is NOAEL
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 6
- Justification:
- extrapolation from sub-acute to chronic
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- not required for concentration
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- default factor for remaining differences
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- general population
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- not required
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- not required
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- acute toxicity
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.03 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 600
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 20 mg/kg bw/day
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
24 h exposure time, no dermal study available
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- not required, starting point is NOAEL
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 6
- Justification:
- extrapolation from sub-acute to chronic
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- extrapolation rat to human
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- remaining differences
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- general population
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- not required
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- not required
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
General Population - Hazard via oral route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.03 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 600
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 20 mg/kg bw/day
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
There is no route to route extrapolation performed. The NOAEL for the OECD 422 (Dunster et al, 2012) used in the DNEL calculation is 20 mg/kg bw/d.
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- not required, starting point is NOAEL
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 6
- Justification:
- extrapolation from sub-acute to chronic
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- extrapolation rat to human
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- remaining differences
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- general population
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- not required
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- not required
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Additional information - General Population
Three studies were deemed possibly relevant for the calculation of inhalation, dermal and oral systemic DNELs: a combined repeated dose toxicity study with the reproduction/developmental toxicity screening test (Dunster et al, 2012), a 28 days toxicity study (Hatano, 2001) and an embryo-fetal development study (Stannard, 2017). The NOAEL for the OECD 422 was 20 mg/kg bw/d based on based on a decreased in red blood cell parameters associated with an extramedullary hematopoiesis of the spleen observed at 100 mg/kg/day. The NOAEL for the 28 day toxicity study was 10 mg/kg bw /d also based on a decreased in red blood cell parameters at 50mg/kg bw/day. The NOAEL for the OECD 414 was 15 mg/kg bw/d based on lower maternal bodyweight gain at 50 mg/kg bw/d.
It was decided not to include the 28 day study (Hatano, 2001) in the calculation of the DNELs as the design of the OECD 422 includes 2 additional weeks exposure duration when compared to a standard 4 weeks toxicity study and the target organs reported in that study were comparable to the ones in the available 28 days study performed by Hatano in 2001. Moreover the reliability of this latter study was quite difficult to assess as no full report was available.
The lowest DNEL for general population which was derived from the OECD 422 study (Dunster et al, 2012) was calculated as shown below:
|
OECD 422
|
AF for dose response relationship |
1 |
AF for difference in duration of exposure |
6 |
AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling) |
1 |
AF for other interspecies differences |
2.5 |
AF for intraspecies differences |
5 |
AF for the quality of the whole database |
1 |
AF for remaining uncertainties |
1 |
Overall AF |
75 |
DNEL |
0.66 |
No DNELs for acute and local effects were derived because 2 -ethylanthraquinone is not classified for acute dermal toxicity, acute oral toxicity or local irritation. Indeed, no local effects could be observed in repeated dose toxicity studies and therefore no respective DNELs have been derived. The DNELs for chronic systemic toxicity for the inhalation and dermal route were derived via route-to-route extrapolation based on a repeated dose oral toxicity study (Dunster et al, 2012).
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.