Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 912-664-7 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Toxicity to soil macroorganisms except arthropods
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to soil macroorganisms except arthropods: long-term
- Type of information:
- migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Guideline study
Cross-referenceopen allclose all
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to other study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 008
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- ISO 11268-2 (Effects of Pollutants on Earthworms. 2. Determination of Effects on Reproduction)
- Deviations:
- no
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- not applicable
- GLP compliance:
- no
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Cobalt dichloride
- EC Number:
- 231-589-4
- EC Name:
- Cobalt dichloride
- Cas Number:
- 7646-79-9
- Molecular formula:
- Cl2Co
- IUPAC Name:
- cobalt(2+) dichloride
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): CoCl2.6H2O
- source: VVWR, Belgium
- Other: No other parameters reported
Constituent 1
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Details on properties of test surrogate or analogue material (migrated information):
not applicable
Sampling and analysis
- Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Details on sampling:
- To confirm the nominal cobalt concentrations in the soil, soils were digested in hot acid (HCI:HN03, 1:5 v/v, microwave heating)
Test substrate
- Vehicle:
- no
- Details on preparation and application of test substrate:
- All the soils were thoroughly mixed with concentrations of CoCL2.6H2O and moisture content was between 50 and 60% of water holding capacity (WHC). After spiking, samples were allowed to equilibrate for one week under the same conditions as those used for the toxicity tests.
Test organisms
- Test organisms (species):
- Eisenia fetida
- Animal group:
- annelids
- Details on test organisms:
- TEST ORGANISM
- Common name: earthworm
- Source: Blades Biological (Cowden, UK)
- Age at test initiation (mean and range, SD): adult with fully developed clitellum
- Weight at test initiation (mean and range, SD): 400-700mg ww
ACCLIMATION
not reported
Study design
- Study type:
- laboratory study
- Substrate type:
- natural soil
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 28 d
- Post exposure observation period:
- the number of worms and cocoons was determined after washing the soil through a 1 mm sieve
Test conditions
- Test temperature:
- 20 ± 1°C
- pH:
- 4.3-7.5
- Moisture:
- 50-60% of water holding capacity
- Details on test conditions:
- 10 adult worms with a fully developed clitellum, were exposed to test jar containing 500g soils (wet weight). At the start of the test, 2 % (dry weight) finely ground cow dung was supplied. At the end of the tests (day 28), the number of worms and cocoons was determined after washing the soil through a 1 nun sieve. During exposure, all test vessels were kept at 20 ± 1 DC and a lightdark cycle of 16:8 at 400 - 800 lux. Soil moisture content (50 - 60 WHC) was adjusted twice a week by replenishing weight loss with the appropriate amount of deionised water. four to five replicates. Test jars were monitored daily to visually assess possible behavioural changes of the organisms.
TEST SYSTEM
- Test container (material, size): jar
- Amount of soil or substrate: 500 g ww
- No. of organisms per container (treatment): 10
- No. of replicates per treatment group: 4
SOURCE AND PROPERTIES OF SUBSTRATE (if soil)
The soils tested were 10 natural soils exhibiting large variance in soil characteristics. see table 1 below.
OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Photoperiod: 16/8 light/dark
- Light intensity: 400-800 lux
EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED (with observation intervals if applicable) : reproduction
VEHICLE CONTROL PERFORMED: no
TEST CONCENTRATIONS
The concentrations of cobalt (added as CoCh.6H20 , VWR, Belgium) were chosen in logarithmic series. The ranges of concentrations were selected based on (1) results of cobalt toxicity in two artificial soils OECD and LUF A.2 to E. albidus (Lock et aI. , 2006) and of the range finding tests 6 with three soils (Kasterlee, bcuven and Brecy) using E. fetida; ana \2) the linear relationship between metal toxicity (expressed as ECso) and the Cation Exchange Capacity (CEC) of the soils observed in previous studies (Lock et ai., 2003 ; Van Eeckhout et ai., 2005). - Nominal and measured concentrations:
- not reported
- Reference substance (positive control):
- no
Results and discussion
Effect concentrationsopen allclose all
- Duration:
- 28 d
- Dose descriptor:
- EC10
- Effect conc.:
- 56 mg/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (not specified)
- Conc. based on:
- other: added Co in Athens soil
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Remarks on result:
- other: 95% CL: 27-113
- Duration:
- 28 d
- Dose descriptor:
- EC10
- Effect conc.:
- 57 mg/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (not specified)
- Conc. based on:
- other: added Co in Jyndevad soil
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Remarks on result:
- other: 95% CL: 21.9-148
- Duration:
- 28 d
- Dose descriptor:
- EC10
- Effect conc.:
- 201 mg/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (not specified)
- Conc. based on:
- other: added Co on Kasterlee soil
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Remarks on result:
- other: 95% CL: 124-327
- Duration:
- 28 d
- Dose descriptor:
- EC10
- Effect conc.:
- 122 mg/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (not specified)
- Conc. based on:
- other: added Co in Aluminusa soil
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Remarks on result:
- other: 95% CL: 59-244
- Duration:
- 28 d
- Dose descriptor:
- EC10
- Effect conc.:
- 100 mg/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (not specified)
- Conc. based on:
- other: added Co in Woburn soil
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Remarks on result:
- other: 95% CL: 42-216
- Duration:
- 28 d
- Dose descriptor:
- EC10
- Effect conc.:
- 130 mg/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (not specified)
- Conc. based on:
- other: added Co in Sidney soil
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Remarks on result:
- other: 95% CL: 72-231
- Duration:
- 28 d
- Dose descriptor:
- EC10
- Effect conc.:
- 426 mg/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (not specified)
- Conc. based on:
- other: added Co in Souli II soil
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Remarks on result:
- other: 95% CL: 310-584
- Duration:
- 28 d
- Dose descriptor:
- EC10
- Effect conc.:
- 385 mg/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (not specified)
- Conc. based on:
- other: added Co in Brecy soil
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Remarks on result:
- other: 955 CL: 228-637
- Duration:
- 28 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 163 mg/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (not specified)
- Conc. based on:
- other: added Co in Leuven soil
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Remarks on result:
- other: No reliable EC10 available, NOEC used instead
- Details on results:
- not reported
- Results with reference substance (positive control):
- not applicable
- Reported statistics and error estimates:
- From the obtained concentration-response relationships, the EC50s and ECl0s (with 95% confidence limits) were calculated using the log-logistic response model (Haanstra et ai. , 1995). k y = l+(~JS X50 Where y = response of measured endpoint (e.g. number of juveniles or cocoons) k = response of measured endpoint at x = 0 s = slope parameter x = concentration (on a linear scale) Xso = ECso (median effective concentration) 9 The above mentioned model is re-parameterized to estimate both ECso and ECIO together in one run of the program: k Where y = response of measured endpoint (e.g. number of juveniles or cocoons) k = response of measured endpoint at x = 0 x = concentration (on a linear scale) Xso = ECso (median effective concentration) x)O = ECso (10% effective concentration) Model fitting and the calculations of the 95% confidence limits was carried out using LevenbergMarquardt (Levenberg, 1944; Marquardt, 1963), which is included in the Statistica 6.0 Software (Statsoft, Tulsa, OK). Comparison among ECso values based on the 95% confidence limits was performed following procedure described in Sprague and Fogels (1977). Reproduction of F candida, E. fetida and E. albidus after 28 or 42 days of exposure were statistically compared with those in the control soils using analysis of variance (ANOV A) followed by the Dunnett-test. When the assumption of normality or homogeneity of variance was not met, a non parametric analysis (Mann Whitney U-tests) was applied. Results of these analyses are expressed as p-values, with p < 0.05 were considered significant. These analyses were used to derive the No Observed Effect Concentration (NOEC) and Lowest Observed Effect Concentration (LOEC) values for the different soils. The relationship between the toxicity data (NOEC, EClOs and ECsos) and the soil parameters were investigated using linear regression analysis (Statistica 6.0).
Any other information on results incl. tables
According to REACH guidance Chapter R. 10 (Table R.10 -1) EC 10 values are used preferentially for PNEC derivation and therefore NOEC values are only presented as supporting information. However, one NOEC value is used for PNEC derivation since the EC10 was not reliable.
Duration | Endpoint | Effect Conc. | Nominal/Measured | Conc.based on | Basis for effect |
28 d | NOEC | 196 mg/kg soil dw | meas. (not specified) | other: total Co in Kasterlee soil | reproduction |
28 d | NOEC | 170 mg/kg soil dw | meas. (not specified) | other: total Co in Leuven soil | reproduction |
28 d | NOEC | 370 mg/kg soil dw | meas. (not specified) | other: total Co in Brecy soil | reproduction |
28 d | NOEC | 88 mg/kg soil dw | meas. (not specified) | other: total Co in Jyndevad soil | reproduction |
28 d | NOEC | 181 mg/kg soil dw | meas. (not specified) | other: total Co in Aluminusa soil | reproduction |
28 d | NOEC | 179 mg/kg soil dw | meas. (not specified) | other: total Co in Woburn soil | reproduction |
28 d | NOEC | 573 mg/kg soil dw | meas. (not specified) | other: total Co in Souli II soil | reproduction |
28 d | NOEC | <62 mg/kg soil dw | meas. (not specified) | other: total Co in Atherns soil | reproduction |
28 d | NOEC | 162 mg/kg soil dw | meas. (not specified) | other: total Co in Sidney soil | reproduction |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- In total, 9 results were selected for PNEC derivation: between 56 mg added Co/kg (Athens soil) and 385 mg added Co/kg (Souli II soil).
- Executive summary:
not applicable
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
