Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Acute Toxicity: inhalation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
acute toxicity: inhalation
Type of information:
migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Guideline study with acceptable restrictions. Lack of test material details.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1994
Report date:
1994

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 403 (Acute Inhalation Toxicity)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
lack of test material details
GLP compliance:
not specified
Test type:
standard acute method
Limit test:
yes

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
68424-31-7
Cas Number:
68424-31-7
IUPAC Name:
68424-31-7
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): only trade name given
- Analytical purity: no data
- Physical state: straw coloured liquid

Test animals

Species:
rat
Strain:
other: Alpk:APfSD
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Alderly Park, Cheshire, UK
- Age at study initiation: 7 weeks

Administration / exposure

Route of administration:
inhalation: aerosol
Type of inhalation exposure:
nose only
Vehicle:
clean air
Details on inhalation exposure:
GENERATION OF TEST ATMOSPHERE / CHAMBER DESCRIPTION
- Source and rate of air: dried and filtered air with a nominal flow rate of 20 L/min
- System of generating aerosols: glass concentric jet atomiser
- Method of particle size determination: Marple Cascade Impactor

TEST ATMOSPHERE
- Brief description of analytical method used: a gravimetric method was used
- Samples taken from breathing zone: yes

TEST ATMOSPHERE
- MMAD (Mass median aerodynamic diameter) / GSD (Geometric st. dev.): 1.51 µm/2.51 µm

CLASS METHOD
- Rationale for the selection of the starting concentration: a maximum concentration of 5 mg/L (OECD limit test) was selected for the target exposure level.
Analytical verification of test atmosphere concentrations:
yes
Duration of exposure:
4 h
Concentrations:
5.0 mg/L (nominal concentration)
5.1 mg/L (analytical concentration)
No. of animals per sex per dose:
5
Control animals:
not specified
Details on study design:
- Duration of observation period following administration: 14 days
- Frequency of observations and weighing: Animals were observed for gross clinical abnormalities during exposure and were checked daily thereafter. A detailed examination was conducted after exposure on Day 1 and on consecutive days, up to and including Day 15. Individual body weights were recorded on Day 1 and Days 2, 3, 8 and 15.
- Necropsy of survivors performed: yes

Results and discussion

Effect levelsopen allclose all
Sex:
male/female
Dose descriptor:
LC50
Effect level:
> 5.1 mg/L air (analytical)
Based on:
test mat.
Exp. duration:
4 h
Sex:
male/female
Dose descriptor:
LC50
Effect level:
> 5 mg/L air (nominal)
Based on:
test mat.
Exp. duration:
4 h
Mortality:
No mortality occurred during the study period.
Clinical signs:
other: Immediately after exposure clinical signs were noticed, e.g. hunched position, chromodacryorrhea, piloerection, staining around nose and wet fur. These signs were consistent with the use of restraint for exposure to the test atmosphere. Animals showed rap
Body weight:
No effect on body weight was noted.
Gross pathology:
Necropsy revealed no substance-related findings.
Other findings:
Lung weights were within normal limits in all animals.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not classified
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
CLP: not classified
DSD: not classified