Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 237-158-7 | CAS number: 13674-84-5
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vivo
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian cell study: DNA damage and/or repair
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: DNA damage and/or repair
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Acceptable, well-documented publication/study report which meets basic scientific principles.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- review article or handbook
- Title:
- European Union Risk Assessment Report TRIS(2-CHLORO-1-METHYLETHYL) PHOSPHATE (TCPP)
- Author:
- Ireland (lead) and United Kingdom
- Year:
- 2 008
- Bibliographic source:
- Covance Laboratories Ltd.
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- no guideline available
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The Single Cell Gel Electrophoresis assay (also known as comet assay) is an uncomplicated and sensitive technique for the detection of DNA damage at the level of the individual eukaryotic cell. It was first described by Singh et al. in 1988. It has since gained in popularity as a standard technique for evaluation of DNA damage/repair, biomonitoring and genotoxicity testing. It involves the encapsulation of cells in a low-melting-point agarose suspension, lysis of the cells in neutral or alkaline (pH>13) conditions, and electrophoresis of the suspended lysed cells. This is followed by visual analysis with staining of DNA and calculating fluorescence to determine the extent of DNA damage. This can be performed by manual scoring or automatically by an imaging software.
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- mammalian comet assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Tris(2-chloro-1-methylethyl) phosphate
- EC Number:
- 237-158-7
- EC Name:
- Tris(2-chloro-1-methylethyl) phosphate
- Cas Number:
- 13674-84-5
- Molecular formula:
- C9H18Cl3O4P
- IUPAC Name:
- tris(2-chloro-1-methylethyl) phosphate
- Details on test material:
- TCPP
There are differences in the isomer content from each supplier,but these are not important given that the properties of the isomers are expected to be very similar.
Purity
A typical purity(total of the four isomers)is>97.9%.All testing described in this report is for the commercial product.
Impurities
The impurity profile of the commercial product TCPP is specific to individual manufacturers. It is not likely that the impurities will have had particular influence on any of the results obtained.
Additives
No additives are used.
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- not specified
- Sex:
- male
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- no data
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- corn oil
- Details on exposure:
- In this study,groups of six male rats were administered TCPP in corn oil as a single dose via oral gavage at either 750 or 1500 mg/kg.The choice of dose levels was based on previous toxicity studies on TCPP,which identified 1500 mg/kg as the maximum tolerated dose.In the
absence of any gender differences in the acute toxicity studies with rats,only male animals were tested.The negative(vehicle)control group received corn oil only. - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 3 or 24 after dosing.
- Frequency of treatment:
- single dose
- Post exposure period:
- not applicable.
Doses / concentrations
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
750, 1500 mg/kg
Basis:
actual ingested
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- six
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Positive control(s):
- The positive control group received a single gavage dose of ethyl methansulfonate(EMS)at 250 mg/kg three hours prior to necropsy.
Examinations
- Tissues and cell types examined:
- liver cell
- Details of tissue and slide preparation:
- For each animal, a section of the liver was removed,cut into small pieces and pushed through bolting cloth of pore size 150μm to produce single cell suspensions.An aliquot of the cell suspension was then added to agarose,plated onto four slides and allowed to gel.Three slides were placed in
lysis buffer for 1 hour,then transferred to electrophoresis buffer(pH>13)to allow DNA to unwind for 30 minutes,after which the slides were electrophoresed at 0.7 V/cm for 40 minutes. - Evaluation criteria:
- no data
- Statistics:
- no data
Results and discussion
Test results
- Sex:
- male
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- no effects
- Remarks:
- Cloud assessment and analysis of diffusion slides of TCPP and vehicle control treated animals demonstrated low levels of cells (less than 15%)with significantly fragmented DNA,indicating little cytotoxicity,necrosis or apoptosis in the cell preparations.
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- Nothing to add in this field.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Lethargy was observed in one animal at 1500 mg/kg, with no other clinical signs noted.At necropsy, the livers of animals dosed at 1500 mg/kg were noted to be darker in appearance than those of the 750 mg/kg or vehicle control groups. Cloud assessment and analysis of diffusion slides of TCPP and vehicle control treated animals demonstrated low levels of cells (less than 15%) with significantly fragmented DNA, indicating little cytotoxicity,necrosis or apoptosis in the cell preparations. Comet analysis of livers treated with TCPP, sampled at either 3 or 24 hours post dosing,had slightly elevated group mean tail moments and intensities compared with the concurrent control.However,there was no dose response, the increases were within the degree of variation frequently seen with this assay and also fell within the historical control range.The positive control induced a clear increase in tail
moment and tail intensity.
Summary of group mean data for in vivo Comet assay with TCPP
Treatment group (mg/kg/day) | Sample time (hrs after dosing) | Group mean % clouds | Group mean % diffused cells | Tail Moment ± SEM | Tail Intensity ± SEM |
Vehicle (0) | 3 | 2.17 | 6.33 | 0.29 ± 0.04 | 2.20 ± 0.20 |
TCPP (750) | 3 | 3.08 | 4.83 | 0.48 ± 0.04 | 2.94 ± 0.12 |
TCPP (1500) | 3 | 2.50 | 8.83 | 0.51 ± 0.05 | 3.46 ± 0.25 |
Positive control EMS | 3 | 2.17 | 11.33 | 1.40 ± 0.05 | 6.77 ± 0.31 |
Vehicle (0) | 24 | 2.17 | 5.50 | 0.41± 0.04 | 2.91 ± 0.20 |
TCPP (750) | 24 | 1.42 | 6.67 | 0.41 ± 0.02 | 2.90 ± 0.14 |
TCPP (1500) | 24 | 1.33 | 7.50 | 0.49 ± 0.05 | 3.29 ± 0.32 |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information): negative
It was concluded that TCPP did not induce DNA damage in the liver or rats treated up to 1500 mg/kg.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.