Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin sensitisation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2016
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2016
Report date:
2016

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Remarks:
Health Care Inspectorate of Health, Welfare and Sport, Den Haag, The Netherlands
Type of study:
Buehler test
Justification for non-LLNA method:
We needed the non-LLNA method for a registration in China.

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
1,2,4-Benzenetricarboxylic acid, mixed dodecyl and octy triesters
IUPAC Name:
1,2,4-Benzenetricarboxylic acid, mixed dodecyl and octy triesters
Constituent 2
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
tris(mixed dodecyl and octyl)benzene-1,2,4-tricarboxylate
EC Number:
700-342-7
Cas Number:
1163775-81-2
Molecular formula:
C14H47O6 to C18H55O6
IUPAC Name:
tris(mixed dodecyl and octyl)benzene-1,2,4-tricarboxylate
Constituent 3
Reference substance name:
Linplast 812 TM
IUPAC Name:
Linplast 812 TM
Specific details on test material used for the study:
N/A

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
guinea pig
Strain:
Hartley
Sex:
female
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Beijing Vital Rive Laboratory Animal Technology Co., Ltd., China
- Age at arrival: 28 to 41 days
- Weight at study initiation: 334.98 g (mean weight of the test animals); 340.6 g (mean weight of the control animals)
- Housing: Animals were housed in plastic cage (80cmx50cmcx20cm) which held 10 to 12 animals with cob bedding during the study period. Animals used for preliminary irritation test were housed in a seperate cage after grouping.
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): pellet rodent diet with complete nutrition supplied by Beijing Keaoxieli Feed Co. Ltd.
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): was purified by HT-R01000 purity system
- Acclimation period: 5 - 8 days


ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 18.9-25 (target value 17-23 °C)
- Humidity (%): 39-64 % (target value 30-70 %)
- Air changes (per hr): not mentioned
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12

Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)

Induction
Route:
other: topical
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Challenge
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
No. of animals per dose:
test group: 20 animals
control group: 10 animals
Details on study design:
RANGE FINDING TESTS:
Select two animals at random from all the animals. Directly apply 0.2 mL of neat test item to the animal to determine whether it has a skin irritating effect. No irritaiton was found, so the neat test item was selected for both induction and challenging.
Remove the fur by clipping the two flanks of the midline of each animal prior to the application. Put 0.2 mL neat test item on a piece of filter paper (about 2 cmx2cm) to each side of clipped area of the animal, and place a piece of patch (a gauze which was stuck to one layer non-allergenic medical adhesive tape). And then the patch was wrapped with the non-allergenic medical adhesive tape for 6 hours.
After 6 hours of exposure, the patch was removed and residual test item were removed by cotton wool soaked in water.
In the morning of the next day after exposure day, the dosing area was observed for local reactions.

MAIN STUDY
A. INDUCTION EXPOSURE
The left flanks of guinea pigs were clipped free of hair the day prior to each induction. The right flanks of guinea pigs were clipped free of hair the day prior to each challenging. Clear area was about 3 cmx3cm.
Once each week for three weeks (on Day 0 (first inducition date), day 7 and day 14) put 0.2 mL test item on a piece of filter paper (about 2cmx2cm) to the left side of clipped area of the animal, and place a piece of patch (a gauze which was stuck to one layer non-allergenic medical adhesive tape). And then the patch was wrapped with the non-allergenic medical adhesive tape for 6 hours.
- No. of exposures: 3
- Exposure period: 1st exposure (day 0): topical exposure (4 cm²) 6 hours; 2nd exposure (day7): topical exposure for 6 hours; 3rd exposure (day14): topical exposure for 6 hours
Clnical observation and scoring: at approximately 24 and 48 hours after each inducition, the guinea pigs were observed and scored for erythema and edema.


B. CHALLENGE EXPOSURE
On day 28, the test item was applied to the right site of the depilated back of each animal for both treated group and control group. The operation procedure was the same as the induction phase.
At approximatedly 21 hours and 45 hours after removing the patch, the challenge area was depilated of hair. At approximately 24 and 48 hours after removing the patch, the guinea pigs were observed and scored for erythema and edema.

- No. of exposures: 1
- Day(s) of challenge: on day 28
- Exposure period: dermal application for 6 hours
- Test groups: undiluted test substance (2 x 2 cm patch)
- Control group: undiluted test substance (2 x 2 cm patch)
- Site: left flanks
- Concentrations: 100% v/v
- Evaluation (hr after challenge): 24 and 48 hours after application
Challenge controls:
see above B. Challenge exposure
Positive control substance(s):
yes
Remarks:
2,4-Dinitrochlorobenzene (DNCB)

Results and discussion

Positive control results:
Historical data, skin sensitisation result of positve control, DNCB, in the labs center:
The treated animals had an incidence of 18/20 after 24 and 48 h.
The control animals had an incidence of 1/12 after 24 and 48 h.

In vivo (non-LLNA)

Resultsopen allclose all
Key result
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
100 %
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Key result
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
100 %
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Key result
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
100 %
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
20
Key result
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
100 %
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
20
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
positive control
Dose level:
not reported
No. with + reactions:
17
Total no. in group:
20
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
positive control
Dose level:
not reported
No. with + reactions:
13
Total no. in group:
20

Any other information on results incl. tables

RESULTS OF PILOT STUDY: no irritation at concentrations of 100% test substance

RESULTS OF TEST:

There were no deaths or morbidity during the test.

No abnormalities were found during the induction phase.

No abnormalities were found on the control animals and treated animals observed at 24 and 48 hours observation.

The incidence of skin sensitisation was 0 (0/20) for both 24 h and 48 h observation.

All of the animals showed expected gains in body weight during the test.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
Based on the results of this study 1,2,4-Benzenetricarboxylic acid, mixed dodecyl and octyl ester is not a skin sensitiser.
Executive summary:

The study was designed to determine the potential for 1,2,4 -Benzenetricarboxylic acid, mixed dodecyl and octyltriesters to elicit a skin sensitisation reaction according to OECD 406. This study contained preliminary skin irritation test and main skin sensitisation test. Two animals were used to select highest non-irritating concentration and mild to moderate concentration in the preliminary skin irritation test. Thirty animals were used in the main skin sensitisation test, which included one control group (10 animals) and one treated group (20 animals). In the challenging phase, on day 28, 0.2 mL neat test item was dosed to the right flank of each animal of control group and treated group. 24 and 48 hours after the patch was removed in each induction the skin reactions were observed. Twenty four hours and forty eight hours after the patch was removed in challenging the skin reactions were observed and scored. Animals were weighed on the day prior to the first induction dose, and at the conclusion of the study.

There were no deaths or moribund during the test.

No abnormalities were found during the induction phase.

No abnormalities were found during on the control animals and treated animals observed at 24 h and 48 h.

The incidence of skin sensitisation is 0 (0/20) for both 24 h observation and 48 h observation.

All of the animals showed expected gains in body weight during the test.

Based on above results, the test item was not considered to cause sensitisation to guinea pigs.