Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
12 October, 2010
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2010
Report date:
2010

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: OECD 438(Isolated Chicken Eye Test Method for Identifying Ocular Corrosives and Severe Irritants)
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
110-83-3
IUPAC Name:
110-83-3
Constituent 2
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Cyclohexene
EC Number:
203-807-8
EC Name:
Cyclohexene
Cas Number:
110-83-8
Molecular formula:
C6H10
IUPAC Name:
cyclohexene
Details on test material:
Lot No. 10817K
Purity: 99.83%

Test animals / tissue source

Species:
other: chicken

Test system

Vehicle:
other: Sodium chloride (Salsol solution 0.9%)
Controls:
not required
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
Amount(s) applied (volume with unit): 30μL
Duration of treatment / exposure:
10 seconds
Observation period (in vivo):
The control eye and test eyes were evaluated pre-treatment and at approximately 30, 60, 75, 120, 180 and 240 minutes after the post-treatment rinse. Minor variations within ±5 minutes were considered acceptable.
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
N/A

Results and discussion

In vivo

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation parameter:
other: Maximum corneal swelling at up to 75min (%)
Basis:
mean
Score:
-2
Remarks on result:
other: ICE Class: Ⅰ
Irritation parameter:
other: Maximum corneal swelling at up to 240min (%)
Basis:
mean
Score:
-9
Remarks on result:
other: ICE Class: Ⅱ
Irritation parameter:
other: Maximum corneal opacity
Basis:
mean
Score:
0.17
Remarks on result:
other: ICE Class: Ⅰ
Irritation parameter:
other: Fluorescein retention
Basis:
mean
Score:
0.17
Remarks on result:
other: ICE Class: Ⅰ
Irritation parameter:
other: Other observation
Remarks on result:
other: None
Irritation parameter:
other: Overall ICE Class
Remarks on result:
other: 2×Ⅰ, 1×Ⅱ

Any other information on results incl. tables

RESULTS OF COTROL TEST

- Positive Control: Trichloroacetic acid 30 (w/v) %

 Observation  Value ICE Class 
 Mean maximum corneal swelling at up to 75 min  -14%  Severe
 Mean maximum corneal swelling at up to 240 min  -21%  Severe
 Mean maximum corneal opacity  3.83  Ⅳ
 Mean fluorescein retention  3.00  Ⅳ
 Other Observations   Immediate cornea opacity score 4. Severe thinning (up to -21%) was observed in all eyes (3/3) at during the observation period.
 Overall ICE Class  -  , 2×Ⅳ

The positive control Trichloroacetic acid 30 (w/v) % was classed as severely irritating, GHS Classification: Category 1.

- Negative Control: Sodium chloride

Observation  Value ICE Class 
 Mean maximum corneal swelling at up to 75 min  0%  Ⅰ
 Mean maximum corneal swelling at up to 240 min  0%  Ⅰ
 Mean maximum corneal opacity  0.00
 Mean fluorescein retention  0.00  Ⅰ
 Other Observations

 None

  -

 Overall ICE Class  -  3×Ⅰ

The negative control Sodium chloride 0.9% had no significant effects on the chicken eye in this study.

※APPENDIX 1 TABLES OF ICE CLASSIFICATION

Table 2.1 ICE classification criteria for corneal class

 Mean Corneal Swelling (%) ICE Class 
0 to 5  Ⅰ 
>5 to 12 †  Ⅱ 
>12 to 18 ( >75 min after treatment )  Ⅱ 
>12 to 18 ( ≦75 min after treatment )  Ⅲ 
>18 to 26  Ⅲ 
>26 to 32 ( >75 min after treatment )  Ⅲ 
>26 to 32 ( ≦75 min after treatment )   Ⅳ
>32   Ⅳ

† Negative numbers -5% to -12% are also given a grade II. Values below -12% are not classified.

Table 2.2 ICE classificartion for opacity

Mean Maximum Opacity Score  ICE Class 
0.0 – 0.5   Ⅰ
 0.6 – 1.5  Ⅱ
1.6 – 2.5  Ⅲ 
2.6 – 4.0  Ⅳ 

Table 2.3 ICE classification criteria for mean fluorescein retention

Mean Fluorescein Retention Score at 30 minutes post - treatment ICE Class 
0.0 – 0.5   Ⅰ
 0.6 – 1.5  Ⅱ
1.6 – 2.5  Ⅲ 
2.6 – 3.0  Ⅳ 

※APPENDIX 2 CLASSIFICATION

Table 3.1 Assessment of the general IN VITRO eye irritancy and regulatory GHS classification.

The following table is used to identify the probably eye irritancy potential of test items. In the case where the result indicates Severely Irritating, then the test item can be classified as Severe. In all other cases the probable level of irritancy can be reported, but a regulatory in vivo rabbit eye irritation test is required for regulatory classification and labelling purposes.

 Classification  Combinations of the three ICE Classes
 A = Not irritating  3×I 2×I, 1×II 2xII, 1xI
 B = Slight irritating (GHS category 2B: Mild irritant / causes eye irritation)  3×II 2×II, 1×III 1×I, 1×II, 1×III
 C = Moderate irritating (GHS category 2A: Irritant / causes eye irritation)  3×III 2×III, 1×II 2xI, 1xIV 2×III, 1×IV 2×III, 1×I 2×II, 1×IV 1×II, 1×III, 1×IV
 D = Severely irritating (GHS category 1: Irreversible effects on the eye / serious damage to the eye) 3×IV 2×IV, 1×III 2×IV, 1×II 2×IV, 1×I1 Immediate cornea opacity score 3 or 4 Severe loosening of epithelium 

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not irritating
Remarks:
Migrated information
Conclusions:
In vitro eye irritation study in the Isolated Chicken Eyes model with Cyclohexene, the results indicate that the test item was not irritating.