Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 618-804-0 | CAS number: 919-94-8
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Additional information
A gene mutation test with prokaryotes, a gene mutation study with mammalian cells and a chromosome aberration test with mammalian cells on TAEE are available (all in vitro data), all performed in accordance with OECD guidelines and under GLP.
TAEE was tested in a GLP-compliant guideline bacterial mutation assay (reverse mutation assay, Method B13/14 of Directive 2004/73/EC) using Salmonella typhimurium tester strains TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537 and TA102 exposed via plate incorporation (one experiment) and liquid pre-incubation (one experiment with partial repeat) (Covance Laboratories Ltd, 2009e). Test concentrations up to 5000 µg/plate were used in the absence and in the presence of Aroclor 1254-induced rat S9 fraction. The test substance was not cytotoxic nor was there any consistent increase in the frequency of revertant colonies in any strain both with and without metabolic activation. The results indicate that TAEE is not mutagenic in this Ames test when tested up to the maximum concentration required in current test guidelines.
Mutagenic potential of TAEE in mammalian cells was assessed in a GLP compliant guideline MLA study (Method B17 of Directive 2004/73/EC) using L5178y TK+/- cells (Covance Laboratories Ltd, 2009f). Test concentrations of up to 1162 µg/ml were used in the main test both in the absence and in the presence of Aroclor 1254-induced rat S9 fraction, and the study was run using 2 independent repeats. No cytotoxicity was present at the maximum concentration used, equivalent to 10 mM. A statistically significant linear trend observed in the presence of S-9 in one experiment was not replicated in the independent repeat and increases in mutation frequency for all treated cultures were in any event below the global evaluation factor for the test. The vehicle and positive controls (-S9 methylmethanesulphonate; +S9 benzo(a)pyrene) gave acceptable responses in both experiments. The results indicate that the test substance is not mutagenic in L5178Y TK+/- cells in vitro in the absence or presence of Aroclor 1254-induced rat S9 fraction.
Clastogenic potential of TAEE was assessed in a GLP compliant guideline study (draft OECD guideline 487) using cultured human lymphocytes (Covance Laboratories Ltd, 2009g). Test concentrations in a range 500-1200 µg/ml were evaluated in the absence and in the presence of S9 fraction using a 3+21 hr treatment protocol, and concentrations of 5-200 µg/ml in the absence of S9 using a 24+0 hr protocol. Under these conditions, cytotoxicity of approx. 50-70% was present at the highest concentrations examined for each protocol. The frequencies of binucleate cells with micronuclei following treatment in the absence and presence of S9 were not significantly different from those observed in concurrent vehicle controls for all concentrations examined. The vehicle and positive controls (-S9 mitomycin C, vinblastine; +S9 cyclophosphamide) gave acceptable responses and all other aspects of the tests were valid. The results indicate that the test substance is not clastogenic in human lymphocytes in vitro in the absence or presence of Aroclor 1254-induced rat S9 fraction.
Short description of key information:
A gene mutation test with prokaryotes, a gene mutation study with mammalian cells and a chromosome aberration test with mammalian cells (all in vitro and performed in accordance with OECD guidelines and under GLP) were negative.
Endpoint Conclusion: No adverse effect observed (negative)
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the negative results of the available in vitro studies and in accordance with Directive 67/548/EEC and EU Classification, Labeling and Packaging of Substances and Mixtures (CLP) Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008, classification is not necessary for mutagenicity.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.