Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / bone marrow chromosome aberration
Remarks:
Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Study period:
1990-1991
Reliability:
4 (not assignable)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Non-GLP. 20 cells were examined instead of 100 cells/animals recommendation. 2 doses were checked instead of 3 doses. Dose selection was not met guideline requirement.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1990
Report date:
1991

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 475 (Mammalian Bone Marrow Chromosome Aberration Test)
Deviations:
yes
Principles of method if other than guideline:
20 cells were examined instead of 100 cells/animals recommendation.
2 doses were checked instead of 3 doses.
Dose selection was not met guideline requirement.
GLP compliance:
no
Type of assay:
chromosome aberration assay

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Tyrosine, N-(aminocarbonyl)-3-methoxy-O,α-dimethyl-
EC Number:
608-271-2
Cas Number:
28861-00-9
Molecular formula:
C13H18N2O5
IUPAC Name:
Tyrosine, N-(aminocarbonyl)-3-methoxy-O,α-dimethyl-

Test animals

Species:
mouse
Strain:
other: CLFP
Sex:
male
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: no data
- Age at study initiation: no data
- Weight at study initiation: 30 g (average weight)
- Assigned to test groups randomly: [no/yes, under following basis: ] 2 test groups and 1 vehicle control, 1 positive control group, 1 unchanged control group
- Fasting period before study: no data
- Housing: no data
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): no data
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): no data
- Acclimation period: no data

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): no data
- Humidity (%): no data
- Air changes (per hr): no data
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): no data

IN-LIFE DATES: From: To:

Administration / exposure

Route of administration:
oral: gavage
Vehicle:
- Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: oleum helianthi (sunflower oil)
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle:
- Concentration of test material in vehicle:
- Amount of vehicle (if gavage or dermal):
- Type and concentration of dispersant aid (if powder):
- Lot/batch no. (if required):
- Purity:
Duration of treatment / exposure:
24 h, 48 h
Frequency of treatment:
1 treatment/test group
Post exposure period:
24 h/50 % of the test animals
48 h/50 % of the test animals
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
Remarks:
Doses / Concentrations:
250 mg/bwkg
Basis:
other: 1/20 x LD50
Remarks:
Doses / Concentrations:
125 mg/bwkg
Basis:
other: 1/40 x LD50
No. of animals per sex per dose:
1st test group, 250 mg/bwkg, 20 animals
2nd test group, 125 mg/bwkg, 20 animals
vehicle control group, 0.1 mL oleum helianthi/animal, 20 animals
Positive control group, 100 mg/kg Cyclophosphamide, 10 animals
Unchanged control, 10 animals
Control animals:
yes, concurrent no treatment
yes, concurrent vehicle
Positive control(s):
cyclophosphamide
- Justification for choice of positive control(s): no data
- Route of administration: oral, gavage
- Doses / concentrations: 100 mg/bwkg

Examinations

Tissues and cell types examined:
mouse bone marrow, from femur
Details of tissue and slide preparation:
DATTA and co-workers (1970), Wurster (1972).
Statistics:
Fisher-probe, Delanuois (1979).

Results and discussion

Test results
Sex:
male
Genotoxicity:
negative
Toxicity:
no effects
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Interpretation of results (migrated information): negative
Experimental results has not shown genotoxic effects in the examined doses of the test substance.