Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 235-935-5 | CAS number: 13052-09-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicological Summary
- Administrative data
- Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
- Workers - Hazard via dermal route
- Workers - Hazard for the eyes
- Additional information - workers
- General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
- General Population - Hazard via dermal route
- General Population - Hazard via oral route
- General Population - Hazard for the eyes
- Additional information - General Population
Administrative data
Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 35 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 50
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 1 763 mg/m³
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
The dose descriptor of 1000 mg/kg/day was selected from an OECD 422 oral study with rats. See the discussion for route to route extrapolation calculation.
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- Based on ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 4
- Justification:
- Based on extrapolation from exposure in a OECD 422 to Chronic exposure
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- NA Based on ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- Based on ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- Based on ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- Based on ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- Based on ECHA REACH Guidance
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- skin irritation/corrosion
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- skin irritation/corrosion
DNEL related information
Workers - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 50 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 200
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 10 000 mg/kg bw/day
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
The dose descriptor of 1000 mg/kg/day was selected from an OECD 422 oral study with rats. See the discussion for route to route extrapolation calculation.
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- Based on ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 4
- Justification:
- Based on extrapolation from exposure in a OECD 422 to Chronic exposure
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- Based on ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- Based on ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- Based on ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- Based on ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- Based on ECHA REACH Guidance
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- skin irritation/corrosion
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- skin irritation/corrosion
Workers - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Additional information - workers
1,1,4,4-tetramethylbutane-1,4,diyl bis(2-ethylperoxyhexanoate) CAS# 13052-09-0
DNEL Discussion
Initial Dose Descriptor
The oral administration of 1,1,4,4-tetramethylbutane-1,4-diylbis(2-
ethylperoxyhexanoate) (CAS 13052-09-0) to rats by gavage, at dose levels of 30, 300
and 1000 mg/kg bw/day, resulted in treatment related findings in animals of either sex
treated with 30, 300 and 1000 mg/kg bw/day. The effects detected in females were
mainly confined to adaptive microscopic thyroid changes and there were no findings
observed that were considered to represent an adverse effect of treatment. The ‘No
Observed Adverse Effect Level' (NOAEL) for females was considered to be 1000 mg/kg
bw/day.
The effects detected in males were mainly confined to adaptive microscopic liver and
thyroid changes and hyaline droplet nephropathy at 300 and 1000 mg/kg bw/day. The
hyaline droplet nephropathy of the kidney consisted of increased incidence and severity
of hyaline droplets, tubular degeneration, granulated tubular casts and interstitial
inflammatory infiltrate. This nephropathy was deemed to be related to treatment and to
represent an adverse effect of treatment to the rat. Hyaline droplets were also present
for males at 30 mg/kg bw/day but these occurred in the absence of any degenerative
changes and the No Observed Adverse Effect Level' (NOAEL) for males was therefore
considered to be 30 mg/kg bw/day. However, the hyaline droplets nephropathy at higher
dosages were consistent with well documented changes that are peculiar to the male rat
in response to treatment with some hydrocarbons. This effect is, therefore, not indicative
of a hazard to human health. In the context of this study, the remaining kidney findings,
consisting of tubular and/or degeneration, tubular dilation/vacuolation, granulated tubular
casts and interstitial inflammatory infiltrate detected in males are more likely to be
correlated to the same condition as hyaline droplet accumulation and are, therefore,
considered to represent limited relevance to humans.
Enhanced evaluation of reproduction for this study did not indicate any effect of
treatment on reproduction including litter size and offspring survival, growth and
development at dosages up to 1000 mg/kg bw/day. The ‘No Observed Effect Level’
(NOEL) for reproductive toxicity was considered to be 1000 mg/kg bw/day.
Therefore, the NOAEL, for DNEL calculation, was set a 1000 mg/kg/day.
DNEL dermal-systemic-worker
The dose descriptor of 1000 mg/kg/day, was selected from an OECD 422 oral study with rats.
Oral absorption rat – oral/dermal absorption human: Assume 10% absorption based on the physical-chemical properties, in accordance with Endpoint Specific Guidance Chapter 8 and 7c (R.7.12).
1000 mg/kg/day/0.10 mg/kg/day = 10000 = dermal dose descriptor
Applying assessment factors in accordance with Endpoint Specific Guidance Chapter 8:
Correction for interspecies differences (apply factor for allometric scaling 4 for rat x 2.5 for additional factors): 10
10000 mg/kg/day/10 = 1000 mg/kg/day
Correction for intraspecies difference: 5
1000 mg/kg/day/5 = 200 mg/kg/day
Correction for duration: 4
200 mg/kg/day/4 = 50 mg/kg/day
Correction for dose-response: 1 due to NOAEL
50 mg/kg/day/1 = 50
Correction for whole database: 1 due to quality of study
50 mg/kg/day/1 = 50 mg/kg/day
Total AF = 200
50 mg/kg/day DNEL dermal-worker-systemic
DNEL inhalation-systemic-worker
The dose descriptor of 1000 mg/kg/day, was selected from an OECD 422 oral study with rats.
Assume ABSoral-rat/ABSinh-human is 1 based on phys-chem properties and Endpoint Specific Guidance chapters 8 and 7c (R.7.12).
Corrected inhalatory NOAEC from oral NOAEL
Oral NOAEL x (1/sRVrat) x (ABSoral-rat/ABSinh-human) x (sRVhuman/wRV)
[ABS: absorption; sRV: standard Respiratory Volume; wRV: worker Respiratory Volume]
Corrected NOAEC = 1000 mg/kg/day x (1/0.38 m3/kg/day) x (1.0) x 6.7 m3/10m3
= 1763 mg/m3
Applying remaining assessment factors in accordance with Endpoint Specific Guidance Chapter 8:
Correction for interspecies differences: 2.5
1763 mg/m3/2.5 = 705 mg/m3
Correction for intraspecies differences: 5
705 mg/m3/5 = 141 mg/m3
Correction for duration: 4
141 mg/m3/4 = 35 mg/m3
Correction for dose-response: 1
35 mg/m3/1 = 35 mg/m3
Correction for whole database: 1 due to quality of study
35 mg/m3/1 = 35 mg/m3
Total AF = 50
35 mg/m3 DNEL inhalation-systemic-worker
NOTE:
There are no consumer uses of this substance. Human exposure, via the environment, is unlikely due to the instability of the peroxide. Only DNELs for the relevant populations will have to be derived (Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment R.8.1.2.3).
Properties Considered for DNEL Derivation
Endpoint |
1,1,4,4-tetramethylbutane-1,4-diyl bis(2-ethylperoxyhexanoate) CAS# 13052-09-0 |
Oral* Absorption |
Dermal* Absorption |
Inhalation* Absorption |
MW |
430.618 |
y |
moderate |
liquid |
WS |
27.9 ug/L |
n |
n |
n***** |
Log Pow |
>6.5 (7.1 extrapolated) |
y**** |
n*** |
y**** |
VP |
The VP of the test substance at 25 deg C is well below 0.01 Pa |
NA |
y** |
n |
Skin irritation |
not irritating |
|
n |
|
Sensitization |
No |
|
|
|
Toxicity Data |
|
y |
|
|
Overall Absorption |
|
y (based on log P and tox data) |
n (perhaps 10% max) |
n (based on WS and VP) |
* per ECHA Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment Ch 7C
** VPs below 100 Pa are likely to be well absorbed and the amount absorbed dermally may be more than 10% of the amount that would be absorbed by inhalation
***Above 6 the rate of transfer between the stratum corneum and the epidermis will be slow and will limit absorption across the skis. Uptake into the stratum corneum itself may be slow.
****Any lipophilic compoud may be taken up by micellular solubilization but this mechanism may be of particular importance for highly lipophillic compounds (log P >4) particularly those that are poorly soluble in water (1 mg/L or less) that would otherwise be poorly absorbed.
*****Low water solubility, like small particle size enhances penetration to the lower respiratory tract. For absorption of deposited material similar criteria as for GI absorption apply.
General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
General Population - Hazard via oral route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Additional information - General Population
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.