Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin sensitisation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: equivalent to current guidelines, according to GLP

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Report date:
2004

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 429 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
alternative parameters used
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of study:
mouse local lymph node assay (LLNA)

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Nonane-1,9-diol
EC Number:
223-517-5
EC Name:
Nonane-1,9-diol
Cas Number:
3937-56-2
Molecular formula:
C9H20O2
IUPAC Name:
nonane-1,9-diol
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): 1,9-Nonandiol
- Physical state: Crystalline / white at room temperature; Liquid / white after heating at about 80 - 100°C
- Analytical purity: 98.8 cor. area%
- Lot/batch No.: 42638
- Stability under test conditions: The stability under storage conditions was confirmed by reanalysis.
- Storage condition of test material: Room temperature, exclusion of oxygen (storage under nitrogen)

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
mouse
Strain:
other: CBA/JICO
Sex:
female
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Deutschland GmbH
- Age at study initiation: 9 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 19.5 g - 25.0 g
- Housing: single housed
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 15 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20-24 °C
- Humidity (%): 30-70 %
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12

Study design: in vivo (LLNA)

Vehicle:
propylene glycol
Concentration:
10, 30, and 60 %
No. of animals per dose:
6
Details on study design:
- Criteria used to consider a positive response:

lf a test substance does not show a statistically significant increase in ceII count and/or lymph node weight as compared to the vehicle control in the presence of statistically significantly increased ear weights as indication of skin irritation, it is considered not to be a sensitizer.

lf at least one concentration tested causes a concentration dependent statistically significant increase in cell count and/or lymph node weight without being accompanied by a statistically significant increase in ear weight, the test substance is considered to be a sensitizer.

lf statistically significant increases in ear weights are running in parallel to the increase in ceII count and/or lymph node weight, it cannot be ruled out, that the lymph node response was caused by irritation and not by skin sensitization. Then, for identification of the relevance of the statistical evaluation, a comparison of the results of the present test to appropriate historical control values is performed. lt one or a combination of the measured parameters change statistical significance, evaluation on basis of the criteria described above may be possible. lf the statistical comparison with
the historical control does not yield results useful tor evaluation, further investigations may be necessary to differentiate between irritation and sensitization response.

lf a test substance does not elicit a statistical significant increase in lymph node weight and/or cell count but shows a clear concentration related increase in response, further investigating of the sensitization potential at higher concentrations would be considered.
Positive control substance(s):
other: Historical control: Alpha-Hexylcinnamaldehyde
Statistics:
WILCOXON-test

Results and discussion

In vivo (LLNA)

Results
Parameter:
SI
Remarks on result:
other: see Remark
Remarks:
Lymphnode weight Index: untreated: 0.89 vehicle: 1 10% TS: 0.95 30% TS: 0.87 60% TS: 0.76 Cell count index: untreated: 0.89 vehicle: 1 10% TS: 1.05 30% TS: 0.92 60% TS: 0.88 Ear weight index: untreated: 0.97 vehicle: 1 10% TS: 1.06 30% TS: 1.08* 60% TS: 1.04 *for p<=0.05

Any other information on results incl. tables

No signs of systemic toxicity were noticed.

Applicant's summary and conclusion