Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 266-733-5 | CAS number: 67584-55-8
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 26 March 2012 - 24 October 2012
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Guideline study conducted under GLP
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 012
- Report date:
- 2012
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 202 (Daphnia sp. Acute Immobilisation Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Guideline:
- other: European Commission Regulation (EC), EC No. 440/2008, Part C, PubNo. L142, C.2.
- Guideline:
- other: ISO International Standard 6341.
- Deviations:
- no
- Guideline:
- other: Guidance document on aquatic toxicity testing of difficult substances and mixtures, OECD series on testing and assessment number 23, December 14, 2000.
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- C4 Acylate
- IUPAC Name:
- C4 Acylate
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report: MTDID 7831
- Physical state: Waxy solid
- Analytical purity: 93.96 w%
- Storage condition of test material: At room temperature in the dark
Constituent 1
Sampling and analysis
- Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Details on sampling:
- - Sampling method: During the final test, single 2 mL samples were taken from all test concentrations and control at time 0h and 48h. At both time points, the replicates were pooled at each concentration before sampling. Samples were taken from near the center of the water column.
- Sample storage conditions before analysis: Samples were stored in a freezer (≤ -15 °C) until analysis.
Test solutions
- Vehicle:
- no
- Details on test solutions:
- PREPARATION AND APPLICATION OF TEST SOLUTION (especially for difficult test substances)
- Method: Loading rates were individually prepared by applying a 30min treatment period of ultrasonic waves followed by 1 day of magnetic stirring. The resulting dispersions were left to settle for a maximum of 30min, after which the clear WAFs were collected by siphoning and used for testing.
- Controls: Test medium without test substance or other additives.
- Evidence of undissolved material (e.g. precipitate, surface film, etc): no visible undissolved test substance was observed at the test initiation.
Test organisms
- Test organisms (species):
- Daphnia magna
- Details on test organisms:
- TEST ORGANISM
- Common name: Water flea
- Strain: Daphnia magna (Crustacea, Cladocera) (Straus, 1820)
- Source: In-house laboratory culture with a known history.
- Age at study initiation (mean and range, SD): < 24 hours, from parental daphnids of more than two weeks old
- Method of breeding: Breeding batch started by placing approximately 250 daphnids less than 3 days old into 5 liters of M7 medium (adjusted ISO medium) in an all-glass culture vessel. Cultures were maintained for a maximum age of 4 weeks. After the first 7 days, cultures are renewed by replacement of half of the medium twice weekly. Cultures were maintained at 18 - 22 °C and fed daily with a suspension of freshwater algae.
- Feeding during test: None
Study design
- Test type:
- static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- yes
- Total exposure duration:
- 48 h
Test conditions
- Hardness:
- 180 mg/L (CaCO3)
- Test temperature:
- 19.7 - 20.5 °C
- pH:
- 7.7 - 8.0
- Dissolved oxygen:
- 8.7 - 9.1 mg/L
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- Nominal concentrations of WAFs: 0.5, 0.9, 1.6, 2.9, and 5.0 mg/L
Mean measured concentrations of WAFs: 0.31, 0.46, 0.91, 0.14, and 1.4 mg/L - Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- Test vessel: 100 mL, all-glass containers covered with plastic lid; test volume was 80 mL
- Aeration: No
- No. of organisms per vessel: 5
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates): 4
- No. of vessels per control (replicates): 4
TEST MEDIUM / WATER PARAMETERS
- Source/preparation of dilution water: Tap water purified by reverse-osmosis (RO-water, GEON Waterbehandeling, Berkel-Enschot, The Netherlands)
- Culture medium different from test medium: no, standard M7 medium used throughout. M7 is based on standard ISO medium supplemented with additional minerals.
OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Adjustment of pH: No
- Photoperiod: 16 h:8 h light:dark
EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED (with observation intervals if applicable) :
TEST CONCENTRATIONS
- Spacing factor for test concentrations: 1.8
- Range finding study: yes
Daphnia magna exposed to a range of 0.1 to 100 mg/l (nominal concentration of MTDID 20422) increasing by a factor of 10 and to a control.
- Results used to determine the conditions for the definitive study: Yes - Reference substance (positive control):
- yes
- Remarks:
- Potassium dichromate (K2Cr2O7)
Results and discussion
Effect concentrations
- Duration:
- 48 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- 1.2 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (geom. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- mobility
- Remarks on result:
- other: 95% C.I. 1.0 to 1.4 mg/L
- Details on results:
- Measured concentrations at beginning and conclusion of test are shown in Table 1. Mean measured concentrations were used to calculate EC50 (except for the measured concentration of 0.14 mg/L/nominal 2.9 mg/L. The laboratory does not have an explanation for the resulting WAF prepared at 2.9 mg/L being much lower than expected. It is suspected that this concentration was prepared incorrectly in some way, therefore the results from this concentration were not used to determine the EC50). Immobilisation data in Table 2.
- Mortality of control: 5% immobilized at 48 hours. Number of daphnids that became immobilized was under 10%
- Other adverse effects control: None
- Abnormal responses: None
- Any observations (e.g. precipitation) that might cause a difference between measured and nominal values: Chemical has low water solubility.
- Effect concentrations exceeding solubility of substance in test medium: Possible. WAFs were also prepared at a loading rate of 5 mg/L in the study with zebrafish. Resulting concentrations were considerably lower (0.40 and 0.42 mg/L at the start of the first and last renewal, respectively) in the fish WAFs despite the fact that the same medium was used as the Daphnia test. This difference was likely caused by the difference in the volume of the medium used for the preparation of test solutions (1 vs 25 liters) and the lower stirring force used to prepare the fish test solutions. It is believed by the testing laboratory that the maximum solubility in this medium was reached in the zebra-fish study and that likely the higher concentrations in the Daphnia study were above the medium solubility although no undissolved test substance was visible. - Results with reference substance (positive control):
- The 48-hr EC50 was 0.38 mg/L with a 95% confidence interval of 0.34 - 0.45 mg/L for the positive control, potassium dichromate. This result was in the lower range of the expected historical response (a 48h EC50 between 0.3 and 1.0 mg/L) for this laboratory. Hence, the sensitivity of this batch of D. magna was in agreement when compared to the historical data collected at this laboratory.
- Reported statistics and error estimates:
- The 48 EC50 value was calculated from the probits of the percentages of affected daphnids and the logarithms of the corresponding test substance concentrations using the maximum likelihood estimation method (Finney, D.J., 1971: Probit analysis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., 3rd edition).
The result for the WAF of 2.9 mg/L (measured 0.14 mg/L) was lower than expected based on results obtained from the remaining WAFs. It is not known why but the results were not used in the calculation of the EC50 value.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1. Concentrations of test substance in the test medium – final test |
|||
Time of sampling |
Concentration |
||
Nominal WAF C4 Acrylate (mg/I) |
Measured C4 Acrylate (mg/l) |
Percent of initial concentration |
|
0 hours |
Control |
n.d. |
─ |
0.5 |
0.282 |
─ |
|
0.9 |
0.523 |
─ |
|
1.6 |
0.971 |
─ |
|
2.9 |
0.148 |
─ |
|
5.0 |
1.59 |
─ |
|
|
|||
48 hours |
Control |
n.d. |
─ |
0.5 |
0.330 |
117 |
|
0.9 |
0.397 |
76 |
|
1.6 |
0.847 |
87 |
|
2.9 |
0.128 |
87 |
|
5.0 |
1.28 |
80 |
n.d. Not detected
Table 2. Acute immobilization of daphnia after 24 and 48 hours in the final test |
||||||
Measured Concentration C4 Acrylate (mg/L) |
Vessel replicate |
Number Daphnia exposed |
Response at 24 h |
Response at 48 h |
||
Number |
% of Total |
Number |
% of Total |
|||
Control |
A |
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
B |
5 |
0 |
0 [1] |
|||
C |
5 |
0 |
0 |
|||
D |
5 |
0 |
1 |
|||
0.31 |
A |
5 |
0 [1] |
0 |
0 |
0 |
B |
5 |
0 |
0 |
|||
C |
5 |
0 [1] |
0 |
|||
D |
5 |
0 [1] |
0 [1] |
|||
0.46 |
A |
5 |
0 [1] |
0 |
0 |
0 |
B |
5 |
0 [2] |
0 |
|||
C |
5 |
0 |
0 |
|||
D |
5 |
0 |
0 |
|||
0.91 |
A |
5 |
1 |
10 |
0 |
15 |
B |
5 |
1 |
2 |
|||
C |
5 |
0 [1] |
1 |
|||
D |
5 |
0 |
0 |
|||
0.14 |
A |
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
B |
5 |
0 [1] |
0 |
|||
C |
5 |
0 [3] |
0 |
|||
D |
5 |
0 [4] |
0 [3] |
|||
1.4 |
A |
5 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
75 |
B |
5 |
0 |
4 |
|||
C |
5 |
0 |
2 |
|||
D |
5 |
0 |
4 |
|||
[ ] between brackets: number of daphnia observed trapped at the surface of the test solutions. These organisms were reimmersed into the respective solutions before recording of mobility. |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Remarks:
- In the control, less than 10% of daphnids became immobilised. The oxygen concentration at the end of the test was ≥ 3 mg/l in control and test vessels.
- Conclusions:
- The 48-hour EC50 (immobilisation) of C4 acrylate to Daphnia magna was 1.2 mg/l, 95% C.I. 1.0 -1.4 mg/l (OECD 202).
- Executive summary:
The toxicity of C4 acrylate to the water flea, Daphnia magna, was assessed in a 48-hour toxicity test conducted according to the OECD 202 (2004) method. The average exposure concentrations were calculated by geometric means of the concentrations of C4 acrylate measured in the samples taken at the start (0h) and the end of the test (48h).
The 48-hour EC50 of C4 acrylate to Daphna magna for immobilisation was 1.2 mg/L from the probits of the percentages of affected daphnids and the logarithms of the corresponding test substance concentrations using the maximum likelihood estimation method.
The study was performed in accordance with internationally-accepted test guidelines and Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) standards. Therefore, this study is reliable without restrictions and the results are suitable for purposes of Risk Assessment, Classification & Labeling, and PBT Analysis.
Results Synopsis
Test type: static (based on data obtained using OECD 202 methodology) 48-hr EC50 = 1.2 mg/L
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
