Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
From 29-09-1992 to 04-10-1992
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1992

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Methyl [(dimethoxyphosphinothioyl)thio]acetate
EC Number:
212-058-6
EC Name:
Methyl [(dimethoxyphosphinothioyl)thio]acetate
Cas Number:
757-86-8
Molecular formula:
C5H11O4PS2
IUPAC Name:
methyl 2-{[dimethoxy(sulfanylidene)-λ⁵-phosphanyl]sulfanyl}acetate
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): MPEM
- Substance type: Intermediate
- Physical state: Liquid
- Purity test date:
- Lot/batch No.: 20825

Test animals / tissue source

Species:
rabbit
Strain:
other: SPF albino of the stock Mol:Russian, females
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Møllegaard Breeding Centre Ltd, Ejby, DK-4623 Ll. Skensved, Denmark
- Age at study initiation: not known
- Weight at study initiation: 2.4 to 2.5 kg
- Fasting period before study: -
- Housing: single PPL cages, 45 cm x 55 cm, perforated floor.
- Diet : ad libitum "Altromin 2123" from Compagny Altromin GmbH D-4937 Lage, Lippe, Germany
- Water : ad libitum, acidified with hydrochloric acid to pH 2,5.
- Acclimation period: one week

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 21, ± 3
- Humidity (%):55, ± 15
- Air changes (per hr): 10 times
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12

Test system

Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
other: only one eye on each rabbit treated, the other eye served as control
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0,1 ml
- Concentration (if solution): pure
Duration of treatment / exposure:
24 hours
Observation period (in vivo):
over 72 hours, observations at 1 hour, 24 hours, 48 hours and 72 hours after exposure
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
4
Details on study design:
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): yes, with 20 ml 0,9 % sodium chloride water
- Time after start of exposure: at 24 hours after exposure

SCORING SYSTEM: As in OECD guideline 405

TOOL USED TO ASSESS SCORE: oculoguttae fluoresceini, UV light to detect corneal damage

Results and discussion

In vivo

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 24, 48 and 72 hours
Score:
0
Max. score:
1
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 72 hours
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 24, 48 and 72 hours
Score:
0.1
Max. score:
1
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 72 hours
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Remarks:
oedema of conjunctiva (chemosis)
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 24, 74 and 72 hours
Score:
0.4
Max. score:
2
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 72 hours
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Remarks:
redness of
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 24, 48 and 72 hours
Score:
0.2
Max. score:
1
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 72 hours
Irritant / corrosive response data:
At the 72 hours reading/observation, no reaction was observed in the eyes of any of the 4 rabbits used for this experiment

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not irritating
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
Based on the result from this study, MPEM can not be classified as eye irritating