Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 229-851-8 | CAS number: 6786-83-0
Skin sensitisation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
- Remarks:
- in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- data from handbook or collection of data
- Justification for type of information:
- Data is from publication .
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- An animal model assessment of common dye-induced allergic contact dermatitis
- Author:
- JOE DINARDO, Raleigh N, C; and ZOE DIANA DRAELOS
- Year:
- 2 007
- Bibliographic source:
- j. Cosmet. Sci.., 58, 209-214 May - june
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: modified Buehler and Klecak method for open epicutaneous test
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Modified Buehler and Klecak method for open epicutaneous test was performed to determine the sensitization potential of the test chemical
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of study:
- open epicutaneous test
- Justification for non-LLNA method:
- Not specified.
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- C.I. Basic Violet 1
- IUPAC Name:
- C.I. Basic Violet 1
- Reference substance name:
- 8004-87-3
- EC Number:
- 616-846-4
- Cas Number:
- 8004-87-3
- Molecular formula:
- C24H28ClN3
- IUPAC Name:
- 8004-87-3
- Test material form:
- other: Dye
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): C.I. Basic Violet 1
- Molecular formula: C24H28ClN3
- Molecular: 393.95 g/mol
- Substance type: Organic
Constituent 1
Constituent 2
In vivo test system
Test animals
- Species:
- guinea pig
- Strain:
- not specified
- Sex:
- not specified
- Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
- No data available.
Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Induction
- Route:
- epicutaneous, open
- Vehicle:
- propylene glycol
- Concentration / amount:
- 10%
- Day(s)/duration:
- three times weekly (Monday, Wednesday Friday) for three consecutive weeks.
- Adequacy of induction:
- not specified
Challenge
- No.:
- #1
- Route:
- epicutaneous, open
- Vehicle:
- propylene glycol
- Concentration / amount:
- 10.0%, 5.0%, and 2.5%
- Day(s)/duration:
- 24 hour
- Adequacy of challenge:
- not specified
- No. of animals per dose:
- 10 animals
- Details on study design:
- Details on study design
MAIN STUDY
A. INDUCTION EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: 9
- Exposure period:48 hour
- Test groups: 10
- Control group: no data
- Site: the left flanks of ten albino guinea pigs were shavedand the test material applied three timesweekly( Monday,Wednesday,Friday)for three consecutiv weeeks. Each animal received 0.1 ml of the dye test material over a 1.8-cm circular area.
- Frequency of applications: three times weekly (Monday, Wednesday Friday) for three consecutive weeks.
- Duration: 3 weeks
- Concentrations:10%
B. CHALLENGE EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures:1
- Day(s) of challenge: Two week rest period
- Exposure period: 24 hour
- Test groups: 10
- Control group: No data available.
- Site: right flank of each guinea pig was shaved and test material applied on it.
- Concentrations: 10.0%, 5.0%, and 2.5%
- Evaluation (hr after challenge): 24 hour and 48 hours post-application
Other – The test sites were graded for erythema and edema 24 and 48 hours post-application using a four-point ordinal scale (0 = no reaction, 1 -- slight reaction, 2 = moderate reaction, 3 = severe reaction. A positive reaction was defined as an erythema/edema value during the challenge phase of at least one skin grade higher than during the last induction phase. - Challenge controls:
- No data available.
- Positive control substance(s):
- yes
- Remarks:
- DNCB (2,4-dinitrochlorobenze)
Results and discussion
- Positive control results:
- The positive DNCB (2,4-dinitrochlorobenze) control at the 0.5% induction /challenge concentration elicited positive response in all animals tested.
In vivo (non-LLNA)
Resultsopen allclose all
- Reading:
- other: Challenge
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 10.0%, 5.0%, and 2.5%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Clinical observations:
- No sensitization reaction observed.
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of skin sensitisation
- Reading:
- other: challenge
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 10.0%, 5.0%, and 2.5%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Clinical observations:
- No skin sensitization reaction observed.
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of skin sensitisation
Any other information on results incl. tables
No indication of skin sensitization observed.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- other: not sensitising
- Conclusions:
- No erythema/edema was observed after application of test material .The test result was observed to be negative for the test substance. Therefore the test chemical was considered to be not sensitizing to the skin of guinea pig using modified Buehler and Klecak method for open Epicutaneous testing .
- Executive summary:
Skin sensitization study for test chemical was conducted in guinea pig using modified Buehler and Klecak method for open Epicutaneous testing.
For the induction phase, the left flanks of 10 albino guinea pigs were shaved and the dye test material applied three times weekly (Monday, Wednesday Friday) for three consecutive weeks. Each animal received 0.1 ml of the dye test material over a 1.8-cm circular area. After a rest period of two weeks. In challenge phase the right flank of each guinea pig was shaved and exposed to three different concentration10.0%, 5.0%, and 2.5%.Twenty-four hours after the last induction and challenge application, the animals were depilated to clearly observe dermal reactions.
No erythema/edema was observed after application of test material .The test result was observed to be negative for the test substance. Therefore the test chemical was considered to be not sensitizing to the skin of guinea pig using modified Buehler and Klecak method for open Epicutaneous testing .
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
