Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 932-165-8 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Biodegradation in water: screening tests
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- biodegradation in water: ready biodegradability
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 30 June 2010 - 29 July 2010
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Remarks:
- GLP guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 301 B (Ready Biodegradability: CO2 Evolution Test)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method C.4-C (Determination of the "Ready" Biodegradability - Carbon Dioxide Evolution Test)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- ISO DIS 9439 (Ultimate Aerobic Biodegradability - Method by Analysis of Released Carbon Dioxide)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Oxygen conditions:
- aerobic
- Inoculum or test system:
- activated sludge, domestic, non-adapted
- Details on inoculum:
- - Source of inoculum/activated sludge (e.g. location, sampling depth, contamination history, procedure): The source of test organisms was activated sludge freshly obtained from a municipal sewage treatment plant: 'Waterschap Aa en Maas', 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands, receiving predominantly domestic sewage.
- Pretreatment: The freshly obtained sludge was kept under continuous aeration until further treatment. The concentration of suspended solids was 3.8 g/L in the concentrated sludge (information obtained from the municipal sewage treatment plant). Before use, the sludge was allowed to settle (48 minutes) and the liquid was decanted for use as inoculum at the amount of 10 mL/L of mineral medium.
- Concentration of sludge: 3.8 g/L
- Water filtered: no - Duration of test (contact time):
- 29 d
- Initial conc.:
- 12 mg/L
- Based on:
- other: Total Organic Carbon (TOC)
- Parameter followed for biodegradation estimation:
- CO2 evolution
- Details on study design:
- TEST CONDITIONS
- Composition of medium: 1 litre mineral medium contains: 10 mL of solution (A), 1 mL of solutions (B) to (D) and Milli-RO water
Stock solutions of mineral components
A) 8.50 g KH2PO4; 21.75 g K2HPO4; 67.20 g Na2HPO4.12H2O; 0.50 g NH4Cl; dissolved in Milli-Q water and made up to 1 litre, pH 7.4 ± 0.2
B) 22.50 g MgSO4.7H2O dissolved in Milli-Q water and made up to 1 litre.
C) 36.40 g CaCl2.2H2O dissolved in Milli-Q water and made up to 1 litre.
D) 0.25 g FeCl3.6H2O dissolved in Milli-Q water and made up to 1 litre.
- Test temperature: between 21.6 and 22.5 °C.
- pH:
At t=0 d: 7.5-7.6
At t=28 d: 7.7-8.0
- pH adjusted: no
- Aeration of dilution water: Not before the test, the test is aerated continously.
- The concentration of suspended solids was 3.8 g/L in the concentrated sludge (information obtained from the municipal sewage treatment plant). Before use, the sludge was allowed to settle (48 minutes) and the liquid was decanted for use as inoculum at the amount of 10 mL/L of mineral medium.
- Continuous darkness: yes
TEST SYSTEM
- Culturing apparatus: 2 litre all-glass brown coloured bottles
- Number of culture flasks/concentration:
Test suspension: containing test substance and inoculum (2 bottles).
Inoculum blank: containing only inoculum (2 bottles)
Positive control: containing reference substance and inoculum (1 bottle).
Toxicity control: containing test substance, reference substance and inoculum (1 bottle).
- Method used to create aerobic conditions:
Synthetic air (a mixture of oxygen (ca. 20%) and nitrogen (ca. 80%)) was sparged through the solutions at a rate of approximately 1-2 bubbles per second (ca. 30-100 mL/min).
- Test performed in open system: yes
- Details of trap for CO2 and volatile organics if used:
CO2 was trapped in barium hydroxide solution. The amount of CO2 produced was determined by titrating the remaining Ba(OH)2 with 0.05 M standardized HCl (1:20 dilution from 1 M HCl (Titrisol® ampul). Titrations were made every second or third day during the first 10 days, and thereafter at least every fifth day until the 28th day, for the inoculum blank and test suspension. Titrations for the positive and toxicity control were made at least 14 days.
SAMPLING
- Sampling frequency: Titration were made on day: 2, 5, 7, 9, 14, 19, 23, 28 and 29
- Sampling method: Titration of the whole volume of CO2-absorber
CONTROL AND BLANK SYSTEM
- Inoculum blank: yes
- Abiotic sterile control: no
- Toxicity control: yes - Reference substance:
- acetic acid, sodium salt
- Parameter:
- % degradation (CO2 evolution)
- Value:
- 70
- Sampling time:
- 29 d
- Remarks on result:
- other: Bottle A: HCl added on the 28th day (last CO2-measurement on the 29th day)
- Parameter:
- % degradation (CO2 evolution)
- Value:
- 75
- Sampling time:
- 29 d
- Remarks on result:
- other: Bottle B: HCl added on the 28th day (last CO2-measurement on the 29th day)
- Details on results:
- In the toxicity control more than 25% biodegradation occurred within 14 days (61%, based on ThCO2). Therefore, the test substance was assumed not to inhibit microbial activity.
- Results with reference substance:
- The positive control substance was biodegraded by 82% within 14 days.
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Interpretation of results:
- readily biodegradable
- Conclusions:
- Biodegradation testing revealed 70 and 75% degradation after 29 days but missed the 10-day window. Because the substance is a UVCB the 10-day window criterion should not be applied according to “OECD Guidelines for the testing of chemicals – Revised introduction to the OECD guidelines for testing of chemicals, Section 3 – Part 1: Principles and strategies related to the testing of degradation of organic chemicals degradation” published by OECD (2006). The biodegradation rate at the end of the test should be used for the assessment. Thus, Vianasses is readily biodegradable.
- Endpoint:
- biodegradation in water: ready biodegradability
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Justification for type of information:
- Refer to read-across justification attached in chapter 13.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Parameter:
- % degradation (CO2 evolution)
- Value:
- 70
- Sampling time:
- 29 d
- Remarks on result:
- other: Bottle A: HCl added on the 28th day (last CO2-measurement on the 29th day)
- Parameter:
- % degradation (CO2 evolution)
- Value:
- 75
- Sampling time:
- 29 d
- Remarks on result:
- other: Bottle B: HCl added on the 28th day (last CO2-measurement on the 29th day)
Referenceopen allclose all
The relative biodegradation values calculated from the measurements performed during the test period revealed 70 and 75% biodegradation after 29 days of Vinasses but missed the 10-day window. According to “OECD Guidelines for the testing of chemicals – Revised introduction to the OECD guidelines for testing of chemicals, Section 3 – Part 1: Principles and strategies related to the testing of degradation of organic chemicals degradation” published by OECD (2006) the ready biodegradability data for mixtures of structurally similar chemicals should be evaluated carefully. For these substances the 10-day window should not be used for the interpretation of results. It is possible that a sequential biodegradation took place which might have led to a prolonged lag-phase and therefore a slower biodegradation period although the test substance was biodegraded in a large amount after the duration of the test. In this case the pass level can be applied after test termination. Thus, Vianasses is considered to be readily biodegradable.
In the toxicity control more than 25% biodegradation occurred within 14 days (61%, based on ThCO2). Therefore, the test substance was assumed not to inhibit microbial activity. The reference substance was degraded to 82% after 14 days.
Table 1: CO2 production and percentage biodegradation of the test substance (bottle A)
Day |
HCl (0.05 N) titrated (mL) |
Produced CO2 (mL HCl) |
Produced CO2 (mg) |
Cumulative CO2 (mg) |
Biodegradation1) (%) |
|
Blank (mean) |
bottle A |
|||||
2 |
45.84 |
38.35 |
7.49 |
8.2 |
8.2 |
9 |
5 |
46.50 |
28.51 |
17.99 |
19.8 |
28.0 |
32 |
7 |
44.51 |
36.23 |
8.28 |
9.1 |
37.1 |
42 |
9 |
46.43 |
41.29 |
5.14 |
5.6 |
42.8 |
49 |
14 |
45.76 |
39.83 |
5.93 |
6.5 |
49.3 |
56 |
19 |
46.56 |
40.71 |
5.85 |
6.4 |
55.7 |
64 |
23 |
44.90 |
43.54 |
1.36 |
1.5 |
57.2 |
65 |
28 |
45.20 |
43.26 |
1.94 |
2.1 |
59.4 |
68 |
29 |
44.81 |
44.72 |
0.09 |
0.1 |
59.5 |
68 |
29 |
47.17 |
46.95 |
0.22 |
0.2 |
59.7 |
68 |
29 |
48.36 |
47.15 |
1.21 |
1.3 |
61.0 |
70 |
1): Calculated as the ratio between CO2produced (cumulative) and the ThCO2 of the test substance: 87.6 mg CO2/2 L
Table 2: CO2 production and percentage biodegradation of the test substance (bottle B)
Day |
HCl (0.05 N) titrated (mL) |
Produced CO2 (ml HCl) |
Produced CO2 (mg) |
Cumulative CO2 (mg) |
Biodegradation1) (%) |
||
Blank (mean) |
bottle B |
||||||
2 |
45.84 |
40.55 |
5.29 |
5.8 |
5.8 |
7 |
|
5 |
46.50 |
27.63 |
18.87 |
20.8 |
26.6 |
30 |
|
7 |
44.51 |
35.14 |
9.37 |
10.3 |
36.9 |
42 |
|
9 |
46.43 |
41.63 |
4.79 |
5.3 |
42.1 |
48 |
|
14 |
45.76 |
40.35 |
5.41 |
6.0 |
48.1 |
55 |
|
19 |
46.56 |
39.20 |
7.36 |
8.1 |
56.2 |
64 |
|
23 |
44.90 |
42.55 |
2.35 |
2.6 |
58.8 |
67 |
|
28 |
45.20 |
41.33 |
3.87 |
4.3 |
63.0 |
72 |
|
29 |
44.81 |
44.14 |
0.67 |
0.7 |
63.8 |
73 |
|
29 |
47.17 |
46.54 |
0.63 |
0.7 |
64.5 |
74 |
|
29 |
48.36 |
46.90 |
1.46 |
1.6 |
66.1 |
75 |
|
1): Calculated as the ratio between CO2produced (cumulative) and the ThCO2of the test substance: 87.6 mg CO2/2 L |
|
Table 3: CO2 production and percentage biodegradation of the positive control substance
Day |
HCl (0.05 N) titrated (mL) |
Produced CO2 (ml HCl) |
Produced CO2 (mg) |
Cumulative CO2 (mg) |
Biodegradation1) (%) |
||
Blank (mean) |
Positive control |
||||||
2 |
45.84 |
41.69 |
4.15 |
4.6 |
4.6 |
5 |
|
5 |
46.50 |
16.08 |
30.42 |
33.5 |
38.0 |
44 |
|
7 |
44.51 |
28.86 |
15.65 |
17.2 |
55.2 |
64 |
|
9 |
46.43 |
37.69 |
8.74 |
9.6 |
64.8 |
76 |
|
14 |
45.76 |
40.51 |
5.25 |
5.8 |
70.6 |
82 |
|
1): Calculated as the ratio between CO2 produced (cumulative) and the ThCO2 of sodium acetate: 85.7 mg CO2/2 L |
|
Table 4: CO2 production and percentage biodegradation of the toxicity control
Day |
HCl (0.05 N) titrated (mL) |
Produced CO2 (ml HCl) |
Produced CO2 (mg) |
Cumulative CO2 (mg) |
Biodegradation1) (%) |
||
Blank (mean) |
toxicity control |
||||||
2 |
45.84 |
28.60 |
17.24 |
19.0 |
19.0 |
11 |
|
5 |
46.50 |
10.05 |
36.45 |
40.1 |
59.0 |
34 |
|
7 |
44.51 |
21.55 |
22.96 |
25.3 |
84.3 |
49 |
|
9 |
46.43 |
34.44 |
11.99 |
13.2 |
97.5 |
56 |
|
14 |
45.76 |
37.74 |
8.02 |
8.8 |
106.3 |
61 |
|
1): Calculated as the ratio between CO2 produced (cumulative) and the sum of the ThCO2 of the test substance and positive control: 173.2 mg CO2/2 L (ThCO2test substance: 87.6 mg CO2/2 L + ThCO2sodium acetate: 85.7 mg CO2/2 L) |
|
Description of key information
Vinasses, residue of fermentation is readily biodegradable. Therefore, based on read-across by grouping of substances, the other members of the category are considered to be readily biodegradable as well.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- Biodegradation in water:
- readily biodegradable
Additional information
The biodegradation of Vinasses, residue of fermentation was tested according to the OECD guideline 301B “Ready Biodegradability: CO2 Evolution Test”. Activated sludge (domestic, non-adapted) was used as inoculum and the test substance was applied at a concentration of 12 mg/L total organic carbon. A biodegradation of 70 – 75% was observed after 29 days without fulfilling the 10-day window criterion. But since Vinasses, residue of fermentation is a UVCB the 10-day window should not be used for interpretation of biodegradability test results of UVCBs according to “OECD Guidelines for the testing of chemicals – Revised introduction to the OECD guidelines for testing of chemicals, Section 3 – Part 1: Principles and strategies related to the testing of degradation of organic chemicals degradation” published by OECD (2006). It is possible that a sequential biodegradation took place which might have led to a prolonged lag-phase and therefore to a slower biodegradation period although the test substance was biodegraded in a large amount during the test. In this case the pass level can be applied after test termination. Therefore, Vinasses, residue of fermentation is considered to be readily biodegradable.
OECD (2006) Guidelines for the testing of chemicals – Revised introduction to the OECD guidelines for testing of chemicals, Section 3 – Part 1: Principles and strategies related to the testing of degradation of organic chemicals degradation.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.