Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 431-840-1 | CAS number: 87010-29-5 OXIPROPAZON; OXYPROPAZON
Toxicological Summary
Administrative data
Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 17 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
DNEL related information
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 30
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
Acute/short term exposure
DNEL related information
Local effects
Acute/short term exposure
DNEL related information
Workers - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 2.4 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
DNEL related information
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 120
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
Acute/short term exposure
DNEL related information
Workers - Hazard for the eyes
Additional information - workers
Acute exposure
The guidance on dose/concentration response regarding human health (section R8.1.2.5 of chapter R.8 of the Guidance on Information Requirements and Chemical Safety Assessment) indicates that acute DNELs do not need to be calculated for substances that are not classified for an acute toxicity hazard. As this substance is not classified, no acute DNELs need to be calculated.
Long-term exposure
- Inhalation DNEL
For deriving the inhalation DNEL regarding long-term exposure the oral 28-day study was used as starting point. Decreased urea in both sexes and increased red blood cells and hematocrit in females were observed in the oral 28-day toxicity study. A NOAEL of 285 mg/kg bw/day was established.
Correction of starting point from an oral study to the inhalation route:
285 mg/kg bw/day * 6.7m3/10m3 (correction for activity driven differences of respiratory volumes in workers compared to workers in rest) / 0.38 m3/kg bw (respiratory volume of rats for 8 hours exposure) / 1 (factor for route-to-route extrapolation) = 503 mg/m3
The corrected starting point for inhalation is 503 mg/m3.
The following assessment factors were used:
remaining differences: 1
intraspecies: 5
exposure duration: 6
quality of whole database: 1
Thus, the overall assessment factor is 30 and the DNEL for long-term exposure inhalation for workers: 17 mg/m3.
- Dermal DNEL
For deriving the dermal DNEL regarding long-term exposure the same starting point as used for derivation of the inhalation DNEL was used. Decreased urea in both sexes and increased red blood cells and hematocrit in females were observed in the oral 28-day toxicity study. A NOAEL of 285 mg/kg bw/day was established.
Correction of starting point from an oral study to the dermal route:
285 mg/kg bw/day x 1 (factor for route-to-route extrapolation) = 285 mg/kg bw/day
The corrected starting point for the dermal route is 285 mg/kg bw/day.
The following assessment factors were used:
interspecies: 4
remaining differences: 1
intraspecies: 5
exposure duration: 6
quality of whole database: 1
Thus, the overall assessment factor is 120 and the DNEL for long-term exposure dermal for workers: 2.4 mg/kg bw/day.General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 4 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
DNEL related information
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 60
Acute/short term exposure
DNEL related information
Local effects
Acute/short term exposure
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 1.2 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
DNEL related information
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 240
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
Acute/short term exposure
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard via oral route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 1.2 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
DNEL related information
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 240
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
Acute/short term exposure
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard for the eyes
Additional information - General Population
Acute exposure
The guidance on dose/concentration response regarding human health (section R8.1.2.5 of chapter R.8 of the Guidance on Information Requirements and Chemical Safety Assessment) indicates that acute DNELs do not need to be calculated for substances that are not classified for an acute toxicity hazard. As this substance is not classified, no acute DNELs need to be calculated.
Long-term exposure
- Inhalation DNEL
For deriving the inhalation DNEL regarding long-term exposure the oral 28-day study was used as starting point. Decreased urea in both sexes and increased red blood cells and hematocrit in females were observed in the oral 28-day toxicity study. A NOAEL of 285 mg/kg bw/day was established.
Correction of starting point from an oral study to the inhalation route:
285 mg/kg bw/day / 1.15 m3/kg bw (respiratory volume of rats for 24 hours exposure) / 1 (factor for route-to-route extrapolation) = 248 mg/m3
The corrected starting point for inhalation is 248 mg/m3.
The following assessment factors were used:
remaining differences: 1
intraspecies: 10
exposure duration: 6
quality of whole database: 1
Thus, the overall assessment factor is 60 and the DNEL for long-term exposure inhalation for the general population: 4 mg/m3.
- Dermal DNEL
For deriving the dermal DNEL regarding long-term exposure the same starting point as used for derivation of the inhalation DNEL was used. Decreased urea in both sexes and increased red blood cells and hematocrit in females were observed in the oral 28-day toxicity study. A NOAEL of 285 mg/kg bw/day was established.
Correction of starting point from an oral study to the dermal route:
285 mg/kg bw/day x 1 (factor for route-to-route extrapolation) = 285 mg/kg bw/day
The corrected starting point for the dermal route is 285 mg/kg bw/day.
The following assessment factors were used:
interspecies: 4
remaining differences: 1
intraspecies: 10
exposure duration: 6
quality of whole database: 1
Thus, the overall assessment factor is 240 and the DNEL for long-term exposure dermal for the general population: 1.2 mg/kg bw/day.
- Oral DNEL
For deriving the oral DNEL regarding long-term exposure the oral NOAEL of 285 mg/kg bw/day was used as starting point. Decreased urea in both sexes and increased red blood cells and hematocrit in females were observed at the highest tested dose.
The following assessment factors were used:
interspecies: 4
remaining differences: 1
intraspecies: 10
exposure duration: 6
quality of whole database: 1
Thus, the overall assessment factor is 240 and the DNEL for long-term exposure dermal for the general population: 1.2 mg/kg bw/day.Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
