Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 294-785-9 | CAS number: 91770-03-5
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Short-term toxicity to fish
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- short-term toxicity to fish
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- From 2001-02-12 to 2001-04-30
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Remarks:
- acceptable restriction was that analytical measurements on the test material were not conducted.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 203 (Fish, Acute Toxicity Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method C.1 (Acute Toxicity for Fish)
- Deviations:
- no
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Not applicable.
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- 2000-04-26
- Analytical monitoring:
- no
- Details on sampling:
- - Concentrations: 0, and 1000 mg/L WAF loading rates. Limit test approach used based on range finding study. It was considered unnecessary and unrealistic to test at loading rates in excess of 1000 mg/L.
- Sample storage conditions before analysis: not applicable. - Vehicle:
- no
- Details on test solutions:
- PREPARATION AND APPLICATION OF TEST SOLUTION (especially for difficult test substances)
- Method: The test material was prepared as a Water Accommodated Fraction. Using a syringe, an amount of test material (21 .OO g) was added onto the surface of dechlorinated tap water (2 1 litres) to give the 1000 mg/l loading rate. This was then stirred, by magnetic stirrer, using a stirring rate approximately equal to 30 rpm. This stirring rate ensured that there was no gross mixing of the test material. This was stirred for 24 hours. The stirring was stopped after 24 hours and the mixture allowed to settle for 2 hours.
A wide bore glass tube covered at one end with parafilm was submerged into the vessel, sealed end down, to a depth of approximately 5 cm from the bottom of the vessel. Microscopic observations made on the WAF indicated that a significant amount of dispersed test material was present in the water column and hence it was considered justifiable to remove undissolved material by filtering through a glass wool plug (2-4 cm in length) to trap microemulsions. Prior to use the glass wool was preconditioned by thoroughly soaking overnight in deionised reverse osmosis water, rinsing three times with deionised reverse osmosis water and dechlorinated tap water followed by autoclaving. This preconditioning of the glass wool was a deviation from the protocol however the use of unconditioned glass wool has been shown to signifcantly alter the pH of the dilution water. This deviation did not affect the results or integrity of the study. The aqueous phase or WAF was then removed by siphon (the first 75-100 mL discarded) and used for testing.
- Eluate: Laboratory tap water dechlorinated and partly softened.
- Differential loading: not applicable.
- Controls: Laboratory tap water dechlorinated and partly softened.
- Evidence of undissolved material (e.g. precipitate, surface film, etc): none. - Test organisms (species):
- Oncorhynchus mykiss (previous name: Salmo gairdneri)
- Details on test organisms:
- TEST ORGANISM
- Common name: rainbow trout
- Strain: no data
- Age at study initiation (mean and range, SD): no data
- Length at study termination (length definition, mean, range and SD): 4.5+/- 0.4 cm
- Weight at study termination (mean and range, SD): 0.77 +/- 0.2 g at the end of the study.
At the start of the study, 10 fish were placed in each test vessel at random, in the prepared test solutions. The test vessels were then covered to reduce evaporation and maintained at 14°C in a temperature controlled room with a photoperiod of 16:8 h, with 20 min dawn and dusk transition periods for a period of 96 h. The control group was maintained under identical conditions but not exposed to the test material.
ACCLIMATION
- Acclimation period: Fish were acclimatized to test conditions from 15 February 2001 to 1 March 2001
- Acclimation conditions (same as test or not): yes
- Type and amount of food: fish were fed with commercial trout pellets.
- Feeding frequency: Fish were fed until approximately 48 hours prior to the start of the definitive test.
- Health during acclimation (any mortality observed): Less than 1% mortality in 7 days prior to start of test. - Test type:
- static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- yes
- Total exposure duration:
- 96 h
- Post exposure observation period:
- none
- Hardness:
- 100 mg/L as CaCO3.
- Test temperature:
- 14.0°C
- pH:
- 7.6-7.8
- Dissolved oxygen:
- 8.2-9.7 mg O2/L.
- Salinity:
- not applicable.
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- nominal concentrations: 0 and 1000 mg/L
- Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- Test vessel: 20 L glass
- Type (delete if not applicable): closed, static
- Material, size, headspace, fill volume: 20 L
- Aeration: by narrow bore glass tubes.
- No. of organisms per vessel: 10
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates): 2
- No. of vessels per control (replicates): 1
- Biomass loading rate: 0.39 g bw/L
OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Adjustment of pH: no data
- Photoperiod: 1:8
- Light intensity: no data
- Stirring rate recorded periodically
TEST CONCENTRATIONS
- Range finding study
- Test concentrations: 0, 10, 100, 1000 mg/L
- Results used to determine the conditions for the definitive study: no effect, in the range-finding study. - Reference substance (positive control):
- no
- Duration:
- 96 h
- Dose descriptor:
- LL50
- Effect conc.:
- > 1 000 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- mortality (fish)
- Duration:
- 96 h
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 1 000 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- mortality (fish)
- Details on results:
- There were no mortalities in 20 fish exposed to a 1000 mg/l loading rate WAF for a period of 96 hours.
- Results with reference substance (positive control):
- Not applicable
- Reported statistics and error estimates:
- None.
- Sublethal observations / clinical signs:
Table 1: Cumulative mortality data in the definitive study.
Nominal loading rate (mg/L)
Cumulative mortality (n = 10)
% mortality
3 h
6 h
24 h
48 h
72 h
96 h
96 h
Control
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1000 R1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1000 R2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- The 96-Hour LL50 based on nominal loading rates was greater than 1000 mg/L loading rate WAF and correspondingly the No Observed Effect Loading rate was 1000 mg/L loading rate WAF.
- Executive summary:
Introduction: A study was performed to assess the acute toxicity of the test material to rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). The method followed that described in the OECD Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals (1992) No 203, "Fish, Acute Toxicity Test'' referenced as Method C.l of Commission Directive 92/69/EEC (which constitutes Annex V of Council Directive 67/548/EEC), US CFR Title 40, Part 797, Section 1400 and US EPA Draft Ecological Effects Test Guideline OPPTS 850.1075.
Methods: Following a preliminary range-finding study fish were exposed, in two groups of ten, to a Water Accommodated Fraction (WAF) of the test material, at a single nominal loading rate of 1000 mg/L for a period of 96 hours under static test conditions. The number of mortalities and any sub-lethal effects of exposure in each test and control vessel were determined 3 and 6 hours after the start of exposure and then daily throughout the study until termination after 96 hours.
Results: The 96-Hour LL50* based on nominal loading rates was greater than 1000 mg/L loading rate WAF and correspondingly the No Observed Effect Loading rate was 1000 mg/L loading rate WAF.
It was considered unnecessary and unrealistic to test at loading rates in excess of 1000 mg/L.
*LL = Lethal Loading rate
Reference
Description of key information
The 96-Hour LL50 value based on nominal loading rates was greater than 1000 mg/L loading rate WAF and correspondingly the No Observed Effect Loading rate was 1000 mg/L loading rate WAF (OECD 203 and EU Method C.1).
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Fresh water fish
Fresh water fish
- Effect concentration:
- 1 000 mg/L
Additional information
Guideline: A study was performed to assess the acute toxicity of the test material to rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). The method followed that described in the OECD Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals (1992) No 203, "Fish, Acute Toxicity Test'' referenced as Method C.1 of Commission Directive 92/69/EEC (which constitutes Annex V of Council Directive 67/548/EEC), US CFR Title 40, Part 797, Section 1400 and US EPA Draft Ecological Effects Test Guideline OPPTS 850.1075.
Methods: Following a preliminary range-finding study fish were exposed, in two groups of ten, to a Water Accommodated Fraction (WAF) of the test material, at a single nominal loading rate of 1000 mg/L for a period of 96 hours under static test conditions. The number of mortalities and any sub-lethal effects of exposure in each test and control vessel were determined 3 and 6 hours after the start of exposure and then daily throughout the study until termination after 96 hours.
Results:The 96-Hour LL50 value based on nominal loading rates was greater than 1000 mg/L loading rate WAF and correspondingly the No Observed Effect Loading rate was 1000 mg/L loading rate WAF. It was considered unnecessary and unrealistic to test at loading rates in excess of 1000 mg/L.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.