Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 220-266-3 | CAS number: 2695-37-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 23 June to 7 July 1992
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- Species: SPF bred New Zealand White albino rabbits
Supplier: Charles River Wiga FRG, Sulzfeld, Germany
Sex and age: males, young adult
Date of arrival: June 5, 1992
Body weight range at start of study: 2870-2900 g
Identification: earmarking: 320-322
Acclimatization period: 18 days
Caging: individually in suspended galvanized cages, fitted with wire-mesh floor and front
Lighting: 12 hours light/12 hours dark cycle
Temperature: 20 ± 3 °C
Humidity: 53-87% (upper limit incidentally higher than the intended 70%, because of meteorological circumstances or because of wet cleaning of the
animal room)
Ventilation: ca 10 air changes/hour
Diet: standard laboratory rabbit diet and tap water, ad libitum - Type of coverage:
- occlusive
- Preparation of test site:
- clipped
- Vehicle:
- water
- Controls:
- no
- Amount / concentration applied:
- A plastic cup with a diameter of ca 2.5 cm was loaded with 0.75 g of the test mixture (0.5 g of the test material and 0.25 g water)
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 4 hours
- Observation period:
- 1, 24. 48 and 72 hours, then 7 and 14 days.
- Number of animals:
- 3
- Details on study design:
- After the exposure period, the application site was cleaned with a paper tissue and water
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 1h
- Score:
- 4
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 14 d
- Remarks on result:
- positive indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 1h
- Score:
- 4
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 14 d
- Remarks on result:
- positive indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 24h
- Score:
- 4
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 14 d
- Remarks on result:
- positive indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 24h
- Score:
- 3
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 14 d
- Remarks on result:
- positive indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 48h
- Score:
- 4
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 14 d
- Remarks on result:
- positive indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 48h
- Score:
- 3
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 14 d
- Remarks on result:
- positive indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 72h
- Score:
- 4
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 14 d
- Remarks on result:
- positive indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 48h
- Score:
- 2
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 14 d
- Remarks on result:
- positive indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 7d
- Score:
- 3.7
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 14 d
- Remarks on result:
- positive indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 7d
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 1
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 14 d
- Remarks on result:
- positive indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 14d
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 14d
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Interpretation of results:
- highly irritating
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
- Conclusions:
- On the basis of the results obtained it was concluded that, under the conditions of this study, the substance is considered severely irritating for the skin of rabbits after a 4-hour dermal contact period.
- Executive summary:
The skin irritation was assessed according to the OECD 404 test guideline in compliance with GLP using three New Zealand White rabbits.
The fur of the application was clipped and the substance applied in water for an expsure period of 4 hours with occluded dressing.
At 24 hours after removal, the skin effects observed in three rabbits consisted of moderate erythema, slight is chemic necrosis, and slight, moderate or severe oedema.
At 48 and 72 hours after removal, the three rabbits showed moderate erythema, very slight or slight ischemic necrosis, and moderate oedema. In addition, one rabbit showed slight incrustation at 72 hours after removal.
At 7 days after removal, well-defined erythema, very slight ischemic necrosis (one rabbit) and very slight oedema were observed in the three rabbits.
At 14 days after removal, all skin effects had cleared completely.
On the basis of the results obtained it was concluded that, under the conditions of this study, the substance is considered severely irritating for the skin of rabbits after a 4-hour dermal contact period.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (irritating)
Eye irritation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 22 June 1992
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 438 (Isolated Chicken Eye Test Method for Identifying Ocular Corrosives and Severe Irritants)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Species:
- chicken
- Strain:
- other: ROSS, spring chickens
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- Approximately 7 week old, male or female chickens (ROSS, spring chickens), bodyweight range approximately 2.5 -3.0 kg, were used as eye-donors. Twelve heads of these animals were obtained from poultry slaughter house v.d.Bor, Amersfoortseweg 118, Nijkerkerveen, the Netherlands. Heads of the animals were severed immediately after sedation of the animals by electric shock and incision of the neck for bleeding, and before they reached the next station or the process line.
The heads were placed in small plastic boxes (3 heads per box) on a bedding of paper tissues moistened with isotonic saline.
Next, they were transported to the testing facility. During transportation, the heads were kept at ambient temperature. - Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- no
- Amount / concentration applied:
- The test substance was applied in amounts of 0.03g, by powdering the entire surface of the cornea.
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- total exposure period of 10 seconds
- Duration of post- treatment incubation (in vitro):
- The control eye and test eyes were examined at 30, 75, 120, 180 and 240 minutes after treatment
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- The test substance was tested on five out of the six eyes; the sixth eye was treated in a similar way with isotonic saline only and served as a control.
- Details on study design:
- Within 2 hours after kill, eyes were carefully dissected and placed in a superfusion apparatus using the following procedure:
First the eye-lids were carefully removed without damaging the cornea and a small drop of Fluorescein sodium BP 2%w/v was applied to the corneal surface for a few seconds and subsequently rinsed off with isotonic saline of ambient temperature.
Next, the head with the fluorescein-treated cornea was examined with a slit-lamp microscope (Slit-lamp 900BM), to ensure that the cornea was not damaged. If undamaged, the eye was further dissected from the head without damaging the eye or cornea. Care was taken to remove the eye-ball from the orbit without cutting off the optic nerve too short.
The enucleated eye was placed in a stainless steel clamp with the cornea positioned vertically and transferred to a chamber of the superfusion apparatus. The clamp holding the eye was positioned in such a way that the entire cornea was supplied with isotonic saline from a bent, stainless steel tube, at a rate of ca 0.10 -0.15ml/min. The six chambers of the superfusion apparatus as well as the saline were temperature controlled at 32± 1.5°C.
Six eyes were selected and after placing in the superfusion apparatus, the eyes were examined again with the slit-lamp microscope to ensure that they were not damaged. Corneal thickness was measured using the Depth Measuring Attachment no.II for the Haag-Streit slit-lamp microscope. Thickness of the cornea was expressed in instrument units. An accurate measurement was taken at the corneal apex of each eye. Eyes with a corneal thickness deviating more than 10% of the average corneal thickness of the six eyes, or eyes that were unacceptably stained with fluorescein (score higher than 0.5), indicating the cornea to be permeable, or eyes that showed any other signs of damage, were rejected as test eyes and were replaced.
After an equilibration period of 45 -60 minutes, the corneal thickness of the six eyes was measured again to determine the zero reference value for corneal swelling calculations. At time t=0, i.e.immediately after the zero reference measurement, the test substance was applied to the eye. For this purpose, the clamp holding the eye was placed on a paper tissue outside the chamber with the cornea facing upwards. The test substance was applied in amounts of 0.03g, by powdering the entire surface of the cornea. After a total exposure period of 10 seconds, the corneal surface was rinsed thoroughly with 20ml of isotonic saline of ambient temperature. Next, the eye in the holder was returned to its chamber. This procedure was repeated for each test eye. The test substance was tested on five out of the six eyes; the sixth eye was treated in a similar way with isotonic saline only and served as a control. The control eye and test eyes were examined at 30, 75, 120, 180 and 240 minutes after treatment. All examinations were carried out with the slit-lamp microscope. - Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Run / experiment:
- Timepoint: 30 min
- Value:
- 1
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- not applicable
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Run / experiment:
- Timepoint: 75 min
- Value:
- > 1.3 - < 1.5
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- not applicable
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Run / experiment:
- Timepoint: 120 min
- Value:
- > 1.3 - < 1.5
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- not applicable
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Run / experiment:
- Timepoint: 180 min
- Value:
- > 1.3 - < 1.5
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- not applicable
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Run / experiment:
- Timepoint: 240 min
- Value:
- > 19.4 - < 24.1
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- not applicable
- Irritation parameter:
- percent corneal swelling
- Run / experiment:
- Timepoint: 30 min
- Value:
- > 12.1 - < 15.5
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- not applicable
- Irritation parameter:
- percent corneal swelling
- Run / experiment:
- Timepoint: 75 min
- Value:
- > 14.5 - < 19
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- not applicable
- Irritation parameter:
- percent corneal swelling
- Run / experiment:
- Timepoint: 120 min
- Value:
- > 18 - < 24.1
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- not applicable
- Irritation parameter:
- percent corneal swelling
- Run / experiment:
- Timepoint: 180 min
- Value:
- > 18.7 - < 22.4
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- not applicable
- Irritation parameter:
- percent corneal swelling
- Run / experiment:
- Timepoint: 240 min
- Value:
- > 19.4 - < 24.1
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- not applicable
- Interpretation of results:
- irritating
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
- Conclusions:
- On the basis of the results obtained with this ex vivo bioassay and according to the scheme for EC classification applied it can be concluded that Spinomar NaSS is irritating, but not corrosive to eyes.
- Executive summary:
The eye irritation was assessed in vitro (ex vivo) by means of the Chicken Enucleated Eye Test according to a method equivalent to the OECD Guideline 438 Isolated Chicken Eye Test Method) in compliance with GLP. Five enucleated eyes were treated with the undiluted substance and one control eye was treated in the same manner except without the application of test material.
Application of the substance caused moderate coreneal swelling, slight to moderate corneal opacity and moderate fluorescein retention in the test eyes.
On the basis of the results obtained with this ex vivo bioassay and according to the scheme for EC classification applied it can be concluded that Spinomar NaSS is irritating, but not corrosive to eyes.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (irritating)
Additional information
Justification for selection of skin irritation / corrosion endpoint:
The study is a GLP compliant in vivo test designed to measure the skin irritation of the substance.
Justification for selection of eye irritation endpoint:
The study is a GLP compliant ex vivo test designed to measure the eyye irritation of the substance.
Effects on skin irritation/corrosion: highly irritating
Effects on eye irritation: irritating
Justification for classification or non-classification
In vivo skin irritation
The skin irritation was assessed according to the OECD 404 test guideline in compliance with GLP using three New Zealand White rabbits. The fir of the application was clipped and the substance applied in water for an expsure period of 4 hours with occluded dressing.At 24 hours after removal, the skin effects observed in three rabbits consisted of moderate erythema, slight is chemic necrosis, and slight, moderate or severe oedema. At 48 and 72 hours after removal, the three rabbits showed moderate erythema, very slight or slight ischemic necrosis, and moderate oedema. In addition, one rabbit showed slight incrustation at 72 hours after removal. At 7 days after removal, well-defined erythema, very slight ischemic necrosis (one rabbit) and very slight oedema were observed in the three rabbits. At 14 days after removal, all skin effects had cleared completely. On the basis of the results obtained it was concluded that, under the conditions of this study, the substance is considered severely irritating for the skin of rabbits after a 4-hour dermal contact period.
In vitro (ex vivo) eye irritation
The eye irritation was assessed in vitro (ex vivo) by means of the Chicken Enucleated Eye Test according to a method equivalent to the OECD Guideline 438 Isolated Chicken Eye Test Method) in compliance with GLP. Five enucleated eyes were treated with the undiluted substance and one control eye was treated in the same manner except without the application of test material.
Application of the substance caused moderate coreneal swelling, slight to moderate corneal opacity and moderate fluorescein retention in the test eyes.
On the basis of the results obtained with this ex vivo bioassay and according to the scheme for EC classification applied it can be concluded that Spinomar NaSS is irritating, but not corrosive to eyes.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.