Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 217-288-0 | CAS number: 1800-91-5
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
In vitro Genetic toxicity:
The available set of in vitro studies includes a mutagenicity in bacteria (according to OECD TG 471, EC method B.14, or equivalent methodology in the Japanese standards), an in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test (according to OECD TG 473, EC method B.10) using peripheral human lymphocytes and a mouse lymphoma assay (according to OECD TG 490) conducted in compliance with the good laboratory practice standards.
- Gene mutation (Bacterial reverse
mutation assay): S. typhimurium TA98, TA 100, TA102, TA 1535 and TA
1537: negative with and without metabolic activation. The results were
consistent with another study conducted according to Japanase standard
guidelines in S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100, with
methodology equivalent to the OECD guideline.
- in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test: peripheral human
lymphocytes: negative with and without metabolic activation.
- in vitro gene mutation in L5178Y mouse lmphoma cells, negative with and without metabolic activation in two independent experiments.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1999
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- JAPAN: Guidelines for Screening Mutagenicity Testing Of Chemicals
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Species / strain / cell type:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9 Mix
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Preliminary test; 5, 15, 50, 150, 1500, 5000 micro gram/plate
Test; 156.3, 312.5, 625, 1250, 2500, 5000 micro gram/plate - Vehicle / solvent:
- DMSO: Dimethylsulfoxide
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- DMSO
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- DMSO
- True negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- DMSO
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 9-aminoacridine
- N-ethyl-N-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine
- other: 2-(2-Furyl)-3-(5-nitro-2-furyl)acrylamide
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- DMSO
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- DMSO
- True negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- DMSO
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 2-aminoanthracene
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- Two plates were used for each of seven different concentrations of the sample in the range-finding study and six different concentrations of the sample in the main test. The liver microsome fraction (S9) was prepared from the liver of Slc:Sprague-Dawley rats prepared with phenobarbital and 5,6-benzoflavone.
- Evaluation criteria:
- The result was considered positive if the number of colonies found was twice the number of colonies of the control, which was exposured to dimethylsulfoxide, the solvent for test sample, and concentration-related increase over the range tested and reproducible increase at range finding trial and main test were observed.
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Conclusions:
- negative with and without metabolic activation
The number of revertant colonies in six concentrations, 156.3, 312.5, 625, 1250, 2500 and 5000 microgram/plate did not increase more than twice compare with the solvent control in five bacteria strains with and without activation.
The growth inhibition of the bacteria was not observed. - Executive summary:
The number of revertant colonies in six concentrations, 156.3, 312.5, 625, 1250, 2500 and 5000 microgram/plate did not increase more than twice compare with the solvent control in five bacteria strains with and without activation.
The growth inhibition of the bacteria was not observed either.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- From October, 1995 To December, 1995.
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Version / remarks:
- 1983
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- there was no positive control for the assay with S. typhimurium TA1535 and TA1537 tested with metabolic activation
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- there was no positive control for the assay with S. typhimurium TA1535 and TA1537 tested with metabolic activation
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- not applicable
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- no data
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 50, 150, 500, 1500 and 5000 µg/plate
- Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: ethanol
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: common solvent. - Untreated negative controls:
- other: sterility check with test substance
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 2-acetylaminofluorene
- 9-aminoacridine
- mitomycin C
- other: hydrazine sulphate; Doxorubicine HCl
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation) for trial 1 with and without S9, and for trial 2 without S9; preincubation for trial 2 with S9
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: observation of the background plate
OTHER: triplicates
2 independent experiments were performed:
1st trial: plate test with and without S9
2nd trial: plate test without S9 and pre-incubation test with S9
3 plates/dose/strain, both for the test with and without metabolic activation.
- positive controls:
9-AA: TA1537
mitomycin C: TA102
2-AF: TA98, TA100, TA102 with S9
Doxorubicin HCl: TA98, TA100 without S9
Hydrazine sulfate: TA1535 - Evaluation criteria:
- Comparison of the spontaneous reversions (in the negative control) with the ones in the test article plates and in the positive control plates were done.
Criteria used in the study: The positive controls should induce a number of revertant colonies statistically greater than and at least double the mean number of spontaneous reverted colonies. - Statistics:
- Comparison of the spontaneous reversions (in the negative control) with the ones in the test article plates and in the positive control plates were done by Student's "t" test.
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 102
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- CYTOTOXICITY: At the doses tested no cytotoxic effect was observed.
- Conclusions:
- Negative with and without metabolic activation.
Under the conditions of this test, the test article did not induce any significant increase in the number of reversions, either in the absence or in the presence of metabolic activation, up to the concentration of 5000 µg/plate on TA1535, TA1537, TA98, TA100 and TA102 Salmonella thyphimurium strains, in two independent experiments. - Executive summary:
The ability of the test substance 1,6 -divinylperfluorohexane to induce gene mutation in strain TA1535, TA1537, TA98, TA100 and TA102 of Salmonella typhimurium was assessed. The test substance, dissolved in ethanol, was tested at five concentrations ranging from 50 to 5 000 µg/plate, both with and without metabolic activation. Two independent experiments were performed. No appreciable increase in the number of reversions in comparison with the negative control was evident in either experiment at any tested doses for any strains, wether in the presence or in the absence of metabolic activation. The reference mutagens induced a number of reverted colonies statistically greater than and at least double the mean number of spontaneous reverted colonies. Therefore, the test substance did not induce any significant increase in the number of reversions, either in the absence or in the presence of metabolic activation, up to the concentration of 5 000 µg/plate on TA1535, TA1537, TA98, TA100 and TA102 Salmonella thyphimurium strains.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 23 June 2014 to 21 August 2014
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.10 (Mutagenicity - In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test
- Target gene:
- Not applicable
- Species / strain / cell type:
- lymphocytes: peripheral human lymphocytes from 3 healthy adult, non-smoking, male volunteers 25-, 31-, 35-years old
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- not applicable
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not applicable
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Rat S9 fraction liver homogenate was obtained from Trinova Biochem GmbH, Giessen, Germany and is prepared from male rats (SD) that have been treated orally with a suspension of phenobarbital (80 mg/kg body weight) and ß-naphthoflavone (100 mg/kg).
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- First cytogenetic assay:
Without and with S9-mix : 512, 1600 and 3540 μg/ml culture medium
(3 h exposure time, 24 h fixation time).
Second cytogenetic assay:
512, 1600 and 3540 μg/ml culture medium
(24 h exposure time, 24h fix
48 h exposure time, 24 and 48 h fixation time). - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: Common solvent - Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- mitomycin C
- Remarks:
- Mitomycin C: without S9 ; Cyclophosphamide: with S9
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
DURATION
- Preincubation period: 48 +/- 2h
- Exposure duration: 3h, 24h or 48h
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 20 - 22h
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): 24 and 48h
SPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays): colchicine
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): Giemsa
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED:
1,6-divinylfluorohexane was tested in the absence and presence of 1.8% (v/v) S9-fraction in duplicate in two independent experiments.
At least two slides were prepared per culture. At least three analysable concentrations were used for scoring of the cytogenetic assay. Chromosomes of metaphase spreads were analysed from those cultures with an inhibition of the mitotic index of about 50% or above whereas the mitotic index of the lowest concentration level was approximately the same as the mitotic index of the solvent control.
To prevent bias, all slides were randomly encoded before examination of chromosome aberrations and scored. One hundred metaphase chromosome spreads per culture were examined by light microscopy for chromosome aberrations.
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: mitotic index
The mitotic index of each culture was determined by counting the number of metaphases from at least 1000 cells (with a maximum deviation of 5%)
STRUCTURAL CHROMOSOME ABERRATIONS
Breaks, gaps, minutes, dicentrics and exchange figures. - Evaluation criteria:
- A chromosome aberration test is considered acceptable if it meets the following criteria:
a) The number of chromosome aberrations found in the solvent control cultures should reasonably be within the laboratory historical control data range.
b) The positive control substances should produce a statistically significant (Chi-square test, onesided, p < 0.05) increase in the number of cells with chromosome aberrations.
c) A homogeneous response between the replicate cultures is observed.
d) A possible precipitate present on the slides should not interfere with the scoring of chromosome aberrations. - Statistics:
- A test substance was considered positive (clastogenic) in the chromosome aberration test if:
a) It induced a concentration-related statistically significant (Chi-square test, one-sided, p < 0.05) increase in the number of cells with chromosome aberrations.
b) A statistically significant and biologically relevant increase in the frequencies of the number of cells with chromosome aberrations was observed in the absence of a clear concentration-response relationship.
A test substance was considered negative (not clastogenic) in the chromosome aberration test if none of the tested concentrations induced a statistically significant (Chi-square test, one-sided, p < 0.05) increase in the number of cells with chromosome aberrations.
The incidence of aberrant cells (cells with one or more chromosome aberrations, gaps included or excluded) for each exposure group outside the laboratory historical control data range was compared to that of the solvent control using Chi-square statistics:
X2 =(N-1) (ad-bc)2/(a+b) (c+d) (a+c) (b+d)
where b = the total number of aberrant cells in the control cultures.
d = the total number of non aberrant cells in the control cultures.
n0 = the total number of cells scored in the control cultures.
a = the total number of aberrant cells in treated cultures to be compared with the control.
c = the total number of non aberrant cells in treated cultures to be compared with the control.
n1 = the total number of cells scored in the treated cultures.
N = sum of n0 and n1
If P [ X2 > (N-1) (ad-bc)2/(a+b) (c+d) (a+c) (b+d)] (one-tailed) is small (p< 0.05) the hypothesis that the incidence of cells with chromosome aberrations is the same for both the treated and the solvent control group is rejected and the number of aberrant cells in the test group is considered to be significantly different from the control group at the 95% confidence level. - Key result
- Species / strain:
- lymphocytes: peripheral human lymphocytes
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
- Conclusions:
- Under the experimental conditions of this test, 1,6-divinylfluorohexane is not clastogenic in human lymphocytes, both in the absence and presence of metabolic activation.
- Executive summary:
The effect of 1,6-divinylfluorohexane on the number of chromosome aberrations in cultured peripheral human lymphocytes in the presence and absence of a metabolic activation system (phenobarbital and ß-naphthoflavone induced rat liver S9-mix) has been assessed. The possible clastogenicity of 1,6-divinylfluorohexane was tested in two independent experiments.
The study procedures described in this report were based on the most recent OECD and EC guidelines.
The test substance was soluble in dimethyl sulfoxide, at concentrations of 160 mg/ml and below but formed a suspension at a concentration of 354 mg/ml. In the first cytogenetic assay, 1,6-divinylfluorohexane was tested up to the recommended concentration level of 0.01 M (3540 μg/ml) for a 3 h exposure time with a 24 h fixation time in the absence and presence of 1.8% (v/v) S9-fraction. 1,6-divinylfluorohexane precipitated in the culture medium at this concentration level. In the second cytogenetic assay, 1,6-divinylfluorohexane was tested up to 3540 μg/ml for a 24 and 48 h continuous exposure time with a 24 and 48 h fixation time in the absence of S9-mix. 1,6-divinylfluorohexane precipitated in the culture medium at this concentration level. The number of cells with chromosome aberrations found in the solvent control cultures was within the laboratory historical control data range. Positive control chemicals, mitomycin C (without S9) and cyclophosphamide (with S9), both produced a statistically significant increase in the incidence of cells with chromosome aberrations, indicating that the test conditions were adequate and that the metabolic activation system (S9-mix) functioned properly. 1,6-divinylfluorohexane did not induce a statistically significant or biologically relevant increase in the number of cells with chromosome aberrations in the absence and presence of S9-mix, in either of the two independently performed experiments. No effects of 1,6-divinylfluorohexane on the number of polyploid cells and cells with endoreduplicated chromosomes were observed both in the absence and presence of S9-mix. Therefore it can be concluded that 1,6-divinylfluorohexane does not disturb mitotic processes and cell cycle progression and does not induce numerical chromosome aberrations under the experimental conditions described in this report.
Finally, it is concluded that this test is valid and that 1,6-divinylfluorohexane is not clastogenic in human lymphocytes under the experimental conditions of this study.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2019-09-09 to 2019-12-12
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 490 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Tests Using the Thymidine Kinase Gene)
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian cell gene mutation tests using the thymidine kinase gene
- Target gene:
- Thymidine kinase (TK) locus
- Species / strain / cell type:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- CELLS USED
- Type and source of cells: L5178Y/TK+/- -3.7.2C mouse lymphoma cells from the American Type Culture Collection, (ATCC, Manassas, USA) (2001)
- Suitability of cells: Recommended test system in international guidelines
- Normal cell cycle time (negative control): not specified
For cell lines:
- Absence of Mycoplasma contamination: verified
- Cell cycle length, doubling time or proliferation index : no data
- Modal number of chromosomes: not specified
- Periodically checked for karyotype stability: no data
- Periodically ‘cleansed’ of spontaneous mutants: yes, cleansing was performed prior to the DRF and mutagenicity tests
MEDIA USED
- Type and composition of media:
* basic medium: RPMI 1640 Hepes buffered medium (Dutch modification) containing penicillin/streptomycin (50 U/mL and 50 μg/mL, respectively), 1 mM sodium pyruvate and 2mM L-glutamin.
* Growth medium: Basic medium, supplemented with 10% (v/v) heat-inactivated horse serum (R10-medium).
* Exposure medium for 3-hour exposure: basic medium supplemented with 5% (v/v) heat-inactivated horse serum (R5-medium).
* Exposure medium for 24-hour exposure: basic medium supplemented with 10% (v/v) heat-inactivated horse serum (R10-medium).
* Selective medium: basic medium, supplemented with 20% (v/v) heat-inactivated horse serum (R20-medium) and 5 μg/mL trifluorothymidine (TFT).
* Non-selective medium: basic medium, supplemented with 20% (v/v) heat-inactivated horse serum (R20-medium).
- CO2 concentration: 5.0 ± 0.5% CO2
- humidity level: target 80 - 100%, actual range: 52 - 95%
- temperature: target 37.0 ± 1.0°C, actual range: 34.6 - 37.6°C - Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Type and composition of metabolic activation system:
- source of S9: Rat S9 homogenate purchased from Trinova Biochem GmbH, Giessen, Germany, prepared from male Sprague Dawley rats that have been dosed orally with a suspension of phenobarbital (80 mg/kg body weight) and ß-naphthoflavone (100 mg/kg).
- method of preparation of S9 mix : prepared immediately before use and kept refrigerated. Components per mL physiological saline: 1.63 mg MgCl2.6H2O; 2.46 mg KCl; 1.7 mg glucose-6-phosphate; 3.4 mg NADP; 4 μmol HEPES. The solution is filtered (0.22 μm)-sterilized. To 0.5 mL S9-mix components 0.5 mL S9-fraction is added (50% (v/v) S9-fraction) to complete the S9-mix.
- concentration or volume of S9 mix and S9 in the final culture medium : 4% (v/v) in the exposure medium
- quality controls of S9 : metabolic capability was confirmed in the experiment with the positive control cyclophosphamide - Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- The test item was assessed in a solubility assay, and in a dose-range finding assay to assess cytotoxicity.
Cytotoxicity data were obtained by treating 8 x 106 cells (106 cells/mL for 3 hour treatment) or 6 x 106 cells (1.25 x 105 cells/mL for 24 hour treatment) with a
number of test item concentrations increasing by approximately half log steps.
Assays were done with a 3-hour treatment in a sterile 30 ml centrifuge tube incubated in a shaking incubator at 37°C.
For the 24 hours treatment, 2 sets of cells were treated, one in closed flasks and one in venting flasks. The test item was tested in the absence and presence of S9-mix.
The highest tested concentration was 2000 µg/mL exposure medium, as recommended in the test guideline. - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: based on solubility test (visual homogeneity) and previous studies. Test item concentrations were used within 2 hours after preparation to limit potential volatilisation.
- Justification for percentage of solvent in the final culture medium: maximum recommended concentration in the test guideline (1% v/v) - Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- methylmethanesulfonate
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS:
- Number of cultures per concentration: a single culture per concentration
- Number of independent experiments : 2 independent experiments under test different conditions (a short and a long treatment periods)
METHOD OF TREATMENT/ EXPOSURE:
- Test substance added in medium: 8x10E6 cells per culture were used (10E6 cells/ml) for the 3-hr treatment with and without S9, or 6x10E6 cells (1.25x10E5 cells/ml) for the 24 hour treatment, in closed flasks.
TREATMENT AND HARVEST SCHEDULE:
- Exposure duration/duration of treatment: 3 hrs with and without S9; 24 hours without S9.
FOR GENE MUTATION:
- Expression time (cells in growth medium between treatment and selection): cells were subcultured for 2 days after the treatment period. During this culture period at least 4 x 106 cells (where possible) were subcultured every day in order to maintain log phase growth
- Selection time (incubation with a selective agent): 11-12 days
- Method used: 96-microwell plates.
- selective agent: 5 µg/mL trifluorothymidine (TFT), incubation for 11 or 12 days
- Number of cells seeded and method to enumerate numbers of viable and mutants cells: for cloning efficiency, one cell was added per well (2 x 96-well microtiter plates/concentration) in non-selective medium ; for mutation frequency, 4x10E6 cells were subcultured every day.
- Criteria for small (slow growing) and large (fast growing) colonies: The small colonies are morphologically dense colonies with a sharp contour and with a diameter less than a quarter of a well. The large colonies are morphologically less dense colonies with a hazy contour and with a diameter larger than a quarter of a well. A well containing more than one small colony is classified as one small colony. A well containing more than one large colony is classified as one large colony. A well containing one small and one large colony is classified as one large colony.
METHODS FOR MEASUREMENT OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: For the mutation assays: cloning efficiency and relative total growth (RTG). For determination of the CEday2 the cell suspensions were diluted and seeded in wells of a 96-well dish. One cell was added per well (2 x 96-well microtiter plates/concentration) in non-selective medium.
- Any supplementary information relevant to cytotoxicity: the plates for the TFT-selection were stained for 1.5-2 hours, by adding 0.5 mg/mL 3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) (Sigma) to each well. The plates for the CE day2 and MF were scored with the naked eye or with the microscope.
METHODS FOR MEASUREMENTS OF GENOTOXICIY
Mutation frequency (MF):
For determination of the mutation frequency (MF) a total number of 9.6 x 10E5 cells per concentration were plated in five 96-well microtiter plates, each well containing 2000 cells in selective medium (TFT-selection), with the exception of the positive control groups (MMS and CP) where a total number of 9.6 x 105 cells/concentration were plated in ten 96-well microtiter plates, each well containing 1000 cells in selective medium (TFT-selection).
The microtiter plates for CEday2 and MF were incubated for 11 or 12 days. After the incubation period, the plates for the TFT-selection were stained for 1.5-2 hours, by adding 0.5 mg/mL 3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) (Sigma) to each well. The plates for the CE day2 and MF were scored with the naked eye or with the microscope.
The colonies were divided into small and large colonies. - Evaluation criteria:
- ACCEPTABILITY CRITERIA
a) Absolute cloning efficiency of the solvent controls (CEday2) between 65 and 120% to have an acceptable number of surviving cells analysed for expression of the TK mutation.
b) spontaneous MF in the solvent control ≥ 50 per 10E6 survivors and ≤ 170 per 10E6 survivors.
c) Suspension growth (SG) over the 2-day expression period for the solvent controls between 8 and 32 for the 3-hr treatment, and between 32 and 180 for the 24-hr treatment.
d) positive control should demonstrate an absolute increase in the total MF, i.e, an increase above the spontaneous background MF (an induced MF (IMF)) of at least 300 x 10E-6. At least 40% of the IMF should be reflected in the small colony MF. And/or, the positive control has an increase in the small colony MF of at least 150 x 10E-6 above the concurrent solvent control (a small colony IMF of 150 x 10-6).
If (one of) the acceptability criteria are not met, the test will be rejected and repeated. In case no clear conclusion for positive or negative result can be made an additional confirmation study will be performed to confirm the study results.
ANALYSIS
In addition to the criteria stated below, any increase of the mutation frequency should be evaluated for its biological relevance including a comparison of the results with the historical control data (HCD) range.
The global evaluation factor (GEF) has been defined by the IWGT as the mean of the negative/solvent MF distribution plus one standard deviation. For the microwell version, the GEF is 126 x 10E-6.
* positive/mutagenic: if it induces a MF of more than MF(controls) + 126 in a dose-dependent manner. Any observed increase should be biologically relevant and will be compared with the HCD range.
* equivocal/questionable: if no clear conclusion for positive or negative result can be made after an additional confirmation study.
* negative/not mutagenic): if none of the tested concentrations reaches a mutation frequency of MF(controls) + 126. - Statistics:
- Usually not used in MLA assay.
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Remarks:
- 3-hour treatment
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks:
- one solvent control was used for the determination of MF
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- True negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Remarks:
- 24-hour treatment
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- True negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Data on pH: 7.4 at the concentration 2000g/mL vs 7.4 in the solvent control.
- Data on osmolality: 428 mOsm/kg at a concentration of 2000 µg/mL vs 454 mOsm/kg in the solvent control.
- Possibility of evaporation from medium: the 3-treatment was performed in a closed tube, under agitation. The 24-hour treatment was performed in closed flasks since no severe toxicity was observed in the dose-range findings under these conditions.
- Water solubility: low, therefore the test item was solubilised in DMSO prior to treatment of the culture medium.
- Precipitation and time of the determination: none noted.
- Definition of acceptable cells for analysis: survival
- Other confounding effects: none known
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES: results are reported in Tables 1 (3-hour treatment) and 2 (24-hour treatment)
STUDY RESULTS
- Concurrent vehicle negative and positive control data are reported in Tables 3 and 4
The mutation frequency found in the solvent control cultures was within the acceptability criteria of this assay and within the 95% control limits of the distribution of the historical negative control database.
Positive control chemicals, methyl methanesulfonate and cyclophosphamide, both produced significant increases in the mutation frequency. In addition, the mutation frequency found in the positive control cultures was within the 95% control limits of the distribution of the historical positive control database. The results showed that the test conditions were adequate and the metabolic activation system (S9-mix) functioned properly.
Criteria for data analysis and interpretation:
- the interpretation of the MLA results was based on a GEF value of 126; MF results of treated were compared to the MF of the corresponding controls + 126.
Gene mutation tests in mammalian cells are reported in Tables 3 (3-hour treatment) and 4 (24-hour treatment):
- Results from cytotoxicity measurements:
o Relative total growth (RTG) and cloning efficiency (CEday2)
- Genotoxicity results:
In the experiment with 3-hour treatment with and without metabolic activation, the cloning efficiency of one of the duplicate solvent controls was below the acceptability criteria (CEday2 within the range 65 - 120 %). Since the other solvent control was within the acceptability criteria, and duplicate solvent control groups are no longer requested the revised test guideline OECD 490, the determination of the mutation frequency of the test item was done with only one solvent control (deviation to the study plan).
The determination of the mutagenicity of the test item with only one solvent control had no effect on the results of the study as no increase in the mutation frequency was observed in the treatment groups compared to the solvent control.
HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA
- Negative (solvent/vehicle) historical control data: in Table 5
- Positive historical control data: in Table 6 - Conclusions:
- The test substance 1,6-divinylperfluorohexane is not mutagenic in the L5178Y Mouse Lymphoma Cells with and without metabolic activation.
- Executive summary:
The mutagenic potential of 1,6-divinylperfluorohexane was assessed for its ability to induce forward mutations at the thymidine kinase (TK) locus in L5178Y mouse lymphoma cells, either in the absence or presence of a metabolic system (S9-mix). The TK mutational system detects base pair mutations, frame shift mutations and small deletions.
The test was performed in the absence of S9-mix with 3 and 24 hour treatment periods and in the presence of S9-mix with a 3 hour treatment period.
The study procedures described in this report were based on the most recent OECD test guideline 490. The vehicle of the test item was dimethyl sulfoxide.
The vehicle of the test item was dimethyl sulfoxide.
The test item was tested up to the maximum recommended conncentration of 2000 µg/mL in both experiments, without causing severe cytotoxicity. In the first experiment the incubation time was 3 hours, with or without metabolic activation. In the second experiment, the incubation time was 24-hours, in closed flasks, in the absence of metabolic activation.
The mutation frequency found in the solvent control cultures was within the acceptability criteria of this assay and within the 95% control limits of the distribution of the historical negative control database.
Positive control chemicals, methyl methanesulfonate and cyclophosphamide, both produced significant increases in the mutation frequency. In addition, the mutation frequency found in the positive control cultures was within the 95% control limits of the distribution of the historical positive control database. It was therefore concluded that the test conditions were adequate and that the metabolic activation system (S9-mix) functioned properly.
In the absence of S9-mix, the test item did not induce a biologically relevant increase in the mutation frequency in the first experiment with a 3-hour treatment. This result was confirmed in an independent experiment with modification in the duration of treatment (24 hours).
In the presence of S9-mix, the test item did not induce a biologically relevant increase in the mutation frequency.
In conclusion, 1,6-divinylperfluorohexane is not mutagenic in the mouse lymphoma L5178Y test system under the experimental conditions of this study.
Referenceopen allclose all
Table 1: Test without metabolic activation (1 trial)
1 trial (without S9) | Reversions/plate | Mean | S.D. | (P) | |||
TA1535 | Solvent control | 19 | 28 | 27 | 24.67 | 4.933 | / |
50 µg/plate | 27 | 18 | 26 | 23.67 | 4.933 | 0.816 | |
150 µg/plate | 20 | 23 | 25 | 22.67 | 2.517 | 0.566 | |
500 µg/plate | 29 | 23 | 20 | 24.00 | 4.583 | 0.872 | |
1500 µg/plate | 26 | 23 | 21 | 23;33 | 2.517 | 0.698 | |
5000 µg/plate | 24 | 21 | 27 | 24.00 | 3.00 | 0.851 | |
Positive control | 133 | 115 | 131 | 126.33 | 9.866 | < 0.001*** | |
TA1537 | Solvent control | 9 | 13 | 14 | 12.00 | 2.646 | / |
50 µg/plate | 9 | 12 | 11 | 10.67 | 1.528 | 0.492 | |
150 µg/plate | 12 | 10 | 11 | 11.00 | 1 | 0.573 | |
500 µg/plate | 13 | 8 | 14 | 11.67 | 3.215 | 0.896 | |
1500 µg/plate | 7 | 11 | 12 | 10.00 | 2.646 | 0.407 | |
5000 µg/plate | 11 | 10 | 13 | 11.33 | 1.528 | 0.725 | |
Positive control | 61 | 58 | 59 | 59.33 | 1.528 | < 0.001*** | |
TA98 | Solvent control | 46 | 39 | 47 | 44.00 | 4.359 | / |
50 µg/plate | 37 | 43 | 44 | 41.33 | 3.786 | 0.469 | |
150 µg/plate | 46 | 40 | 38 | 41.33 | 4.163 | 0.486 | |
500 µg/plate | 45 | 43 | 41 | 43.00 | 2 | 0.736 | |
1500 µg/plate | 43 | 42 | 38 | 41.00 | 2.646 | 0.366 | |
5000 µg/plate | 37 | 48 | 41 | 42.00 | 5.568 | 0.650 | |
Positive control | 931 | 1040 | 878 | 949.67 | 82.597 | < 0.001*** | |
TA100 | Solvent control | 181 | 173 | 193 | 182.33 | 10.066 | / |
50 µg/plate | 153 | 184 | 171 | 169.33 | 15.567 | 0.291 | |
150 µg/plate | 185 | 171 | 138 | 164.67 | 24.132 | 0.307 | |
500 µg/plate | 174 | 170 | 152 | 165.33 | 11.719 | 0.129 | |
1500 µg/plate | 146 | 182 | 191 | 173.00 | 23.812 | 0.566 | |
5000 µg/plate | 172 | 160 | 158 | 163.33 | 7.572 | 0.059 | |
Positive control | 600 | 490 | 575 | 555.00 | 57.663 | < 0.001*** | |
TA102 | Solvent control | 215 | 271 | 249 | 245.00 | 28.213 | / |
50 µg/plate | 230 | 280 | 248 | 252.67 | 25.325 | 0.744 | |
150 µg/plate | 260 | 230 | 241 | 243.67 | 15.177 | 0.946 | |
500 µg/plate | 213 | 246 | 250 | 236.33 | 20.306 | 0.688 | |
1500 µg/plate | 265 | 217 | 240 | 240.67 | 24.007 | 0.849 | |
5000 µg/plate | 295 | 210 | 260 | 255.00 | 42.72 | 0.752 | |
Positive control | 1320 | 1074 | 1240 | 1211.33 | 125.48 | < 0.001*** |
* P < 0.05
** P < 0.01
*** P < 0.001
Table 2: Test with metabolic activation (1 trial)
1 trial (with S9) | Reversions/plate | Mean | S.D. | (P) | |||
TA1535 | Solvent control | 26 | 32 | 29 | 29.00 | 3.000 | / |
50 µg/plate | 24 | 31 | 27 | 27.33 | 3.512 | 0.566 | |
150 µg/plate | 30 | 24 | 24 | 26.00 | 3.464 | 0.320 | |
500 µg/plate | 29 | 27 | 24 | 26.67 | 2.517 | 0.360 | |
1500 µg/plate | 21 | 22 | 30 | 24.33 | 4.933 | 0.234 | |
5000 µg/plate | 26 | 21 | 31 | 26.00 | 5.000 | 0.423 | |
Positive control | / | / | / | / | / | / | |
TA1537 | Solvent control | 13 | 8 | 14 | 11.67 | 3.215 | / |
50 µg/plate | 6 | 15 | 13 | 11.33 | 4.726 | 0.924 | |
150 µg/plate | 9 | 8 | 9 | 8.67 | 0.577 | 0.187 | |
500 µg/plate | 7 | 11 | 13 | 10.33 | 3.055 | 0.630 | |
1500 µg/plate | 10 | 7 | 12 | 9.67 | 2.517 | 0.444 | |
5000 µg/plate | 5 | 12 | 8 | 8.33 | 3.512 | 0.292 | |
Positive control | / | / | / | / | / | / | |
TA98 | Solvent control | 41 | 50 | 47 | 46.00 | 4.583 | / |
50 µg/plate | 48 | 46 | 38 | 44.00 | 5.292 | 0.647 | |
150 µg/plate | 49 | 48 | 44 | 47.00 | 2.646 | 0.760 | |
500 µg/plate | 40 | 47 | 38 | 41.67 | 4.726 | 0.318 | |
1500 µg/plate | 50 | 44 | 45 | 46.33 | 3.215 | 0.923 | |
5000 µg/plate | 50 | 42 | 45 | 45.67 | 4.041 | 0.929 | |
Positive control | 960 | 1070 | 966 | 998.67 | 61.849 | < 0.001*** | |
TA100 | Solvent control | 190 | 179 | 183 | 184.00 | 5.568 | / |
50 µg/plate | 180 | 157 | 177 | 171.33 | 12.503 | 0.184 | |
150 µg/plate | 190 | 152 | 184 | 175.33 | 20.429 | 0.517 | |
500 µg/plate | 179 | 194 | 176 | 183.00 | 9.644 | 0.884 | |
1500 µg/plate | 180 | 160 | 171 | 170.33 | 10.017 | 0.108 | |
5000 µg/plate | 164 | 181 | 194 | 179.67 | 15.044 | 0.664 | |
Positive control | 830 | 947 | 950 | 909.00 | 68.432 | < 0.001*** | |
TA102 | Solvent control | 279 | 315 | 281 | 291.67 | 20.232 | / |
50 µg/plate | 290 | 284 | 261 | 278.33 | 15.308 | 0.414 | |
150 µg/plate | 276 | 300 | 240 | 272.00 | 30.199 | 0.402 | |
500 µg/plate | 246 | 280 | 264 | 263.33 | 17.010 | 0.137 | |
1500 µg/plate | 277 | 284 | 290 | 283.61 | 6.506 | 0.550 | |
5000 µg/plate | 303 | 290 | 267 | 286.67 | 18.230 | 0.766 | |
Positive control | 784 | 990 | 870 | 881.33 | 103.467 | < 0.001*** |
* P < 0.05
** P < 0.01
*** P < 0.001
Dose-range finding tests
Table 1 - Dose range-finding test: cytotoxicity following 3-hour treatment
Dose | cell count after 24-h of subculture | cell count after 48-h of subculture | SG(1) | RGS(2) |
(µg/ml) | (cells/ml x 10E5) | (cells/ml x 10E5) | % | |
without metabolic activation | ||||
Solvent control (DMSO) | 4.2 | 9.8 | 21 | 100 |
63 | 3.5 | 7.0 | 12 | 59 |
125 |
2.7 |
8.8 |
12 |
58 |
250 |
3.3 |
9.8 |
16 |
79 |
500 |
1.3 |
12.6 |
8 |
40 |
1000 |
1.4 |
12.7 |
9 |
43 |
2000 |
1.6 |
13.1 |
10 |
51 |
|
with metabolic activation |
|||
Solvent control (DMSO) |
3.1 |
8.4 |
13 |
100 |
63 |
3.5 |
8.1 |
14 |
108 |
125 |
2.7 |
7.6 |
10 |
78 |
250 |
3.5 |
8.1 |
14 |
108 |
500 |
3.5 |
8.2 |
14 |
109 |
1000 |
3.7 |
8.3 |
15 |
118 |
2000 |
3.6 |
8.5 |
15 |
117 |
(1) Suspension growth
(2) Relative Suspension Growth
Table 2 - Dose range-finding test: cytotoxicity following 24-hour treatment
Dose | cell count after 24-h of subculture | cell count after 48-h of subculture | SG(1) | RGS(2) |
(µg/ml) | (cells/ml x 10E5) | (cells/ml x 10E5) | % | |
without metabolic activation (closed flasks) | ||||
Solvent control (DMSO) | 9.2 | 7.6 | 45 | 100 |
63 | 8.2 | 7.5 | 39 | 174 |
125 |
8.2 |
6.6 |
35 |
154 |
250 |
8.5 |
5.6 |
30 |
135 |
500 |
8.0 |
4.0 |
20 |
91 |
1000 |
9.6 |
3.2 |
20 |
88 |
2000 |
9.5 |
4.9 |
30 |
132 |
|
without metabolic activation (open flasks) |
|||
Solvent control (DMSO) |
9.7 |
8.4 |
52 |
100 |
63 |
8.8 |
7.9 |
44 |
85 |
125 |
7.6 |
6.7 |
33 |
62 |
250 |
8.0 |
5.6 |
28 |
54 |
500 |
7.4 |
4.6 |
22 |
41 |
1000 |
8.7 |
3.5 |
20 |
38 |
2000 |
8.3 |
4.6 |
25 |
47 |
(1) Suspension growth
(2) Relative Suspension Growth
MUTATIONS EXPERIMENTS
Table 3 - Mutation Experiment 1 (3-hour treatment)
dose |
RSG |
CE day2 |
RCE |
RTG |
mutation frequency per 10E6 survivors |
||
(µg/ml) |
(%) |
(%) |
(%) |
(%) |
total |
(small |
large) |
|
without metabolic activation |
||||||
|
3-hour treatment |
||||||
SC |
100 |
95 |
100 |
100 |
78 |
(23 |
52) |
15.6 |
98 |
88 |
92 |
90 |
70 |
(16 |
52) |
125 |
86 |
84 |
88 |
75 |
71 |
(21 |
48) |
250 |
102 |
78 |
82 |
84 |
68 |
(20 |
46) |
500 |
90 |
88 |
92 |
82 |
89 |
(28 |
58) |
1000 |
97 |
66 |
69 |
67 |
101 |
(37 |
61) |
2000 |
85 |
98 |
103 |
87 |
54 |
(16 |
36) |
MMS |
72 |
50 |
53 |
38 |
661 |
(301 |
306) |
|
with metabolic activation |
||||||
|
3-hour treatment |
||||||
SC |
100 |
81 |
100 |
100 |
106 |
(23 |
79) |
15.6 |
96 |
88 |
108 |
103 |
89 |
(21 |
65) |
31.3 |
98 |
85 |
105 |
103 |
90 |
(25 |
62) |
62.5 |
90 |
91 |
113 |
101 |
80 |
(32 |
45) |
125 |
79 |
86 |
107 |
84 |
89 |
(30 |
56) |
250 |
71 |
62 |
77 |
54 |
98 |
(10 |
86) |
500 |
62 |
83 |
102 |
63 |
94 |
(32 |
58) |
1000 |
72 |
71 |
88 |
64 |
93 |
(30 |
61) |
2000 |
65 |
69 |
86 |
56 |
93 |
(39 |
51) |
CP |
73 |
68 |
84 | 62 | 520 | (203 | 273) |
Table 4 - Mutation Experiment 2 (24-hour treatment)
dose |
RSG |
CE day2 |
RCE |
RTG |
mutation frequency per 10E6 survivors |
||
(µg/ml) |
(%) |
(%) |
(%) |
(%) |
total |
(small |
large) |
|
without metabolic activation |
||||||
|
24-hour treatment |
||||||
SC1 |
100 |
91 |
100 |
100 |
159 |
(24 |
128) |
SC2 |
|
76 |
|
|
144 |
(20 |
120) |
15.6 |
89 |
127 |
152 |
134 |
164 |
(22 |
132) |
31.3 |
106 |
105 |
126 |
133 |
162 |
(24 |
130) |
62.5 |
94 |
107 |
128 |
120 |
88 |
(28 |
56) |
125 |
76 |
111 |
133 |
101 |
95 |
(29 |
62) |
250 |
74 |
135 |
161 |
119 |
90 |
(26 |
59) |
500 |
68 |
141 |
168 |
114 |
88 |
(23 |
60) |
1000 |
63 |
123 |
147 |
93 |
116 |
(35 |
73) |
2000 |
59 |
116 |
139 |
81 |
125 |
(49 |
67) |
CP |
103 |
91 |
109 | 113 | 667 | (282 | 285) |
HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA
Table 5 - Historical Negative Control Data of the spontaneous Mutation Frequencies of the solvent control for the Mouse Lymphoma Assay
|
Mutation frequency per 10E6 survivors |
||
|
without S9-mix |
with S9-mix |
|
|
3-hr exposure |
24-hr exposure |
3-hr exposure |
mean |
101 |
98 |
100 |
SD |
30 |
31 |
30 |
n |
279 |
262 |
293 |
Upper control limit (95% control limits) |
170 |
162 |
165 |
Lower control limit (95% control limits) |
31 |
34 |
36 |
SD: Standard Deviation
n = Number of observations
Distribution of historical negative control data from experiments performed between September 2015 and September 2018
Table 6 - Historical Control Data of the Mutation Frequencies of the positive controls for the Mouse Lymphoma Assay
Mutation frequency per 10E6 survivors | |||
without S9-mix | with S9-mix | ||
3-hr exposure | 24-hr exposure | 3-hr exposure | |
mean |
803 | 695 | 1545 |
SD | 253 | 223 | 887 |
n | 142 | 132 | 151 |
Upper control limit (95% control limits) |
1533 | 1270 | 3954 |
Lower control limit (95% control limits) |
72 | 119 | -864 |
SD: Standard Deviation
n = Number of observations
Distribution of historical negative control data from experiments performed between September 2015 and September 2018
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Additional information
Genetic toxicity assessment:
In vitro genetic toxicity:
There are two in vitro studies available addressing mutagenicity in bacteria (according to OECD TG 471, EC method B.14, or equivalent methodology in the Japanese standards), and an in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test (according to OECD TG 473, EC method B.10) using peripheral human lymphocyte conducted in compliance with the good laboratory practice standards.
The ability of the test substance 1,6-divinylperfluorohexane to induce gene mutation in strain TA1535, TA1537, TA98, TA100 and TA102 of Salmonella typhimurium was assessed. The test substance, dissolved in ethanol, was tested at five concentrations ranging from 50 to 5 000 µg/plate, both with and without metabolic activation. Two independent experiments were performed. No appreciable increase in the number of reversions in comparison with the negative control was evident in either experiment at any tested doses for any strains, wether in the presence or in the abence of metabolic activation. The reference mutagens induced a number of reverted colonies statistically greater than and at least double the mean number of spontaneous reverted colonies. Therefore, the test substance did not induce any significant increase in the number of reversions, either in the absence or in the presence of metabolic activation, up to the concentration of 5 000 µg/plate on TA1535, TA1537, TA98, TA100 and TA102 Salmonella typhimurium strains.
Negative results were also reported in another good quality study in S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100, at concentrations up to 5000 µg/plate, conducted according to the Japanese standards.
The effect of 1,6-divinylfluorohexane on the number of chromosome aberrations in cultured peripheral human lymphocytes in the presence and absence of a metabolic activation system (phenobarbital and ß-naphthoflavone induced rat liver S9-mix) has been assessed. The possible clastogenicity of 1,6-divinylfluorohexane was tested in two independent experiments.
The study procedures described in this report were based on the most recent OECD and EC guidelines.
1,6-divinylfluorohexane was soluble in dimethyl sulfoxide, at concentrations of 160 mg/ml and below but formed a suspension at a concentration of 354 mg/ml. In the first cytogenetic assay, 1,6-divinylfluorohexane was tested up to the recommended concentration level of 0.01 M (3540 μg/ml) for a 3 h exposure time with a 24 h fixation time in the absence and presence of 1.8% (v/v) S9-fraction. 1,6-divinylfluorohexane precipitated in the culture medium at this concentration level. In the second cytogenetic assay, 1,6-divinylfluorohexane was tested up to 3540 μg/ml for a 24 and 48 h continuous exposure time with a 24 and 48 h fixation time in the absence of S9-mix. 1,6-divinylfluorohexane precipitated in the culture medium at this concentration level. The number of cells with chromosome aberrations found in the solvent control cultures was within the laboratory historical control data range. Positive control chemicals, mitomycin C (without S9) and cyclophosphamide (with S9), both produced a statistically significant increase in the incidence of cells with chromosome aberrations, indicating that the test conditions were adequate and that the metabolic activation system (S9-mix) functioned properly. 1,6-divinylfluorohexane did not induce a statistically significant or biologically relevant increase in the number of cells with chromosome aberrations in the absence and presence of S9-mix, in either of the two independently performed experiments. No effects of 1,6-divinylfluorohexane on the number of polyploid cells and cells with endoreduplicated chromosomes were observed both in the absence and presence of S9-mix. Therefore it can be concluded that 1,6-divinylfluorohexane does not disturb mitotic processes and cell cycle progression and does not induce numerical chromosome aberrations under the experimental conditions described in this report.
Finally, it is concluded that this test is valid and that 1,6-divinylfluorohexane is not clastogenic in human lymphocytes under the experimental conditions described in this report.
The ability of the test substance 1,6-divinylperfluorohexane to induce gene mutation in mammalian cells was nvestigated in mouse lymphoma assay, in the absence of metabolic activation with 3- and 24-hour treatment period, and in the presence of metabolic activation with a 3-hr treatment period. The test substance was tested at the highest recommended dose, and did not produce severe toxicity. The test conditions met the acceptability criteria and no increase in the mutation frequency was observed.
In conclusion, based on available in vitro data, 1,6-divinylperfluorohexane has no mutagenic potential in three types of studies, so no in vivo follow up study is necessary.
Justification for selection of
genetic toxicity endpoint
Studies were performed according to OECD test guidelines and
corresponding EC methods in compliance with GLP.
Justification for classification or non-classification
The test material appears to have no mutagenic potential in vitro. Therefore, 1,6-divinylperfluorohexane does not have to be classified for genetic toxicity according to the criteria of the CLP regulation No. 1272/2008.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.