Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 700-908-3 | CAS number: 19444-21-4
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vivo
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / erythrocyte micronucleus
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Report date:
- 1999
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.12 (Mutagenicity - In Vivo Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 474 (Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.5395 (In Vivo Mammalian Cytogenetics Tests: Erythrocyte Micronucleus Assay)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: MITI (March 31, 1987), No. 303, (Sho-62)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- A mixture of CMC (0.5% v/v) and Tween 80 (0.1% v/v) was used as vehicle for the test substance.
The dose used in the study were 50, 100 and 200 mg/kg body weight.
During husbandry the relative himidity (20 - 49%) fell below the accepted lower limit of 30% for a few hours. - GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- prop-2-en-1-yl 2-hydroxy-2-methylpropanoate
- EC Number:
- 700-908-3
- Cas Number:
- 19444-21-4
- Molecular formula:
- C7H12O3
- IUPAC Name:
- prop-2-en-1-yl 2-hydroxy-2-methylpropanoate
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- CD-1
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Animal Farm of IFFA CREDO, 79592 L'Arbresle, France
- Age at study initiation: 7 - 8 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 23 - 27 g (males), 29 - 34 g (females)
- Assigned to test groups randomly: The animals were randon selected
- Fasting period before study:
- Housing: Animals housed in groups of 5 and marked with colur pens
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Ad libitum (pelleted, certified standard diet)
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): Ad libitum (tap water)
- Acclimation period: 5 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20.5 °C
- Humidity (%): 20-49 % rH
- Air changes (per hr):
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12 hours
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: Carboxymethylcellulose (CMC), 0.5% in water + 0.1% Tween 80.
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: Found to be best suited to yieldng an applicable suspension at the dose level of 200 mg/kg.
- Concentration of test material in vehicle: Sampling time 24 hours: 50mg/kg, 100 mg/kg and 200mg/kg per 10 ml/kg p.o.
Sampling time 48 hours: 200 mg/kg per 10 ml/kg p.o.
- Amount of vehicle (gavage): 10 ml/kg body weight - Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS:
Carboxymethylcellulose (CMC), 0.5% in water + 0.1% Tween 80 was found to be best suited to yieldng an applicable suspension at the dose level of 200 mg/kg. - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Single dose - oral by stomach tube
- Frequency of treatment:
- Single dose
- Post exposure period:
- 24 hour and 48 huurs
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
50mg/kg, 100 mg/kg and 200mg/kg per 10 ml/kg p.o.
Basis:
analytical conc.
24 hour
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
200 mg/kg per 10 ml/kg p.o.
Basis:
analytical conc.
48 hour
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 5
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Positive control(s):
- Positive control: Cyclophospamide, 64 mg/kg (ENDOXAN, Asta, Geramny), dissolved in bidistiled water.
Examinations
- Tissues and cell types examined:
- Bone marrow
- Details of tissue and slide preparation:
- CRITERIA FOR DOSE SELECTION:
Prior to the mutagenicity test the maximum tolerated dose (TD) of the test substance to be applied was determined in a tolerability test. The MTD is defined as the highest dose, which induces significant toxicity but no lethality. The experiments were performed stepwise. The highest dose tested was 200 mg/kg. In each step one male and one female animal were treated. The observation period was three days. The dose, which was finally selected as the MTD, was confirmed by treating an additional pair of mice.
Signs of toxicity were recorded hourly for the first few hours after application and once the following days.
TREATMENT AND SAMPLING TIMES ( in addition to information in specific fields):
The test substance was administered once by gavage to groups of five male and five female mice at doses of 50 mg/kg, 100 mg/kg and 200 mg/kg. Additional groups of animals were treated with the vehicle alone or with the positive control cyclophosphamaide (CPA) at a dose of 64 mg/kg.
From the high dose group and from negative control group animals were sacrificed 24 and 48 hours thereafter. From the intermediate and low dosage group and from the positive control group animals were sacrificed 24 hours after application.
DETAILS OF SLIDE PREPARATION:
The animals were sacrificed by carbon dioxide asphyxiation. Bone marrow was harvested in fetal calf serum from the shafts of both femurs, centrifuged and resuspended in fetal calf serum. Smears prepared from this suspension were stained with May-Grünwald/Giemsa solution and mounted.
METHOD OF ANALYSIS:
Femoral bone marrow cells were prepared and polychromatic erythrocytes were scored for micronuclei. - Evaluation criteria:
- Micronuclei are uniform, darkly stained, more or less round bodies in the cytoplasm of erythrocytes. Inclusions which are reflective, improperly shaped or stained, or which are not in the focal plain of the cells are judged to be artifacts and are not scored as micronuclei. Cells containing more than one micronucleus are only counted once.
Prior to analysis the slides were coded. The slides of five animals/sex/dose, showing good differentiation between mature and polychromatic erythrocytes, were scored by a laboratory technician. The incidences of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes (MNPCE) among at least 2000 polychromatic erythrocytes (PCE), and the ratio of PCE to normochromatic erythroyctes (NCE) among a total of at least 1000 erythrocytes was determined for each slide. - Statistics:
- The significance of differences between control and treated groups was assessed by the Chi-Squared-Contingency-Test (F=1, p<0.05).
Results and discussion
Test results
- Sex:
- male/female
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- no effects
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- RESULTS OF RANGE-FINDING STUDY:
In a first step of the tolerability test, the dose of 2000 mg/kg of CA 2215 A (Intermediate of CGA 276854) was administered to one female and one male animal. Both animals died with two hours after administration, showing hunched posture. In a second step, one female and one male were dosed with 800 mg/kg of the test substance. Again, both animals died within two hours, showing hunched posture. In a third step, one female and one male were treated with 320 mg/kg. The female survived the treatment, the male was found dead the day after treatment; creeping movement was noted some hours after administration. In a fourth step another pair of mice were treated with 200 mg/kg of the test substance. Both animals survived without signs of toxicity. In step five, a female was treated with 500 mg/kg and died within eight hours after administration. Creeping movement and miosis were observed some hours after administration.
In consequence, the confirmatory experiment was carried out by dosing ome male with 200 mg/kg and one female with 320 mg/kg of the test substance. Both animals survived the treatment without showing symptoms of toxicity.
Based on the these results th doses of 200 mg/kg (males) and 320 mg/kg (females) were chosen as he highest doses to be administered in the micronucleus test.
Micronucleus test:
The test was performed with male mice and the doses of 50, 100 and 200 mg/kg at the 24 hour sampling time and the high dose (200 mg/kg) only at the 48 hour sampling time. The female mice initially were treated with 80, 160 and 320 mg/kg at the 24 hour sampling time and the high dose (320 mg/kg) at the 48 hours sampling time. Since in the female groups dosed with 320 mg/kg, ten of thirteen animals were found dead the day after administration, a repeat experiment with female mice was performed with doses of 50, 100, 200 mg/kg (24 hour sampling time) and 200 mg/kg (48 hour sampling time). A negative and a positive control were carried out I addition.
No toxicity symptoms occurred at any dose and sampling time.
At both sampling times (24 and 48 hours) there was no statistically significant increase in the number of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes in the animals treated with the respective doses of CA 2215 A (Intermediate of CGA 276854) as compared with the negative control animals.
Refer to table 1
CA 2215 A (ntermediate of CGA 276854) was devoid of any clastogenic/aneugenic activity in this study.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1
Overall mean percentages of micronucleated PCEs |
|||||
Treatment time |
High dose (HD) 200 mg/kg |
Intermediate dose (ID) 100 mg/kg |
Low dose (LD) 50 mg/kg |
Positive control (CPA) |
Negative control (Vehicle) |
24 hours |
0.04 |
0.03 |
0.02 |
1.96 |
0.02 |
48 hours |
0.02 |
--- |
--- |
--- |
0.02 |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information): negative
It is concluded that under the given experimental conditions no evidence for clastogenic or aneugenic effects was obtained in mice treated with CA 2215 A. - Executive summary:
CA 2215 A (Intermediate of CGA 276854), identified as a liquid, 99.0% purity, batch no. P.608005 was investigated for clastogenic (and/or aneugenic) effects on mouse bone marrow cellsin-vivo. The test substance was administered once by gavage to groups of five male and five female mice at doses of 50 mg/kg, 100 mg/kg and 200 mg/kg. Additional groups of animals were treated with the vehicle alone or with the positive control cyclophosphamaide (CPA) at a dose of 64 mg/kg. From the high dose group and from negative control group animals were sacrificed 24 and 48 hours thereafter. From the intermediate and low dosage group and from the positive control group animals were sacrificed 24 hours after application. Subsequently femoral bone marrow cells were prepared and polychromatic erythrocytes were scored for micronuclei.
No sighs of toxicity were observed with any animal from all dose groups at both sampling times of 24and 48 hours.
In all dosage groups assessed at different periods post treatment, no statistically significant increase in the number of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes was observed when compared with the respective negative control group.
It is concluded that under the given experimental conditions no evidence for clastogenic or aneugenic effects was obtained in mice treated with CA2215 A.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.