Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Ecotoxicological information

Endpoint summary

Administrative data

Description of key information

Additional information

No data on terrestrial toxicity are available for the test substance cobalt aluminium oxide. However, there are reliable data available for different structurally analogue substances.

The environmental fate pathways and ecotoxicity effects assessments for cobalt metal and cobalt compounds as well as for aluminium metal and aluminium compounds is based on the observation that adverse effects to aquatic, soil- and sediment-dwelling organisms are a consequence of exposure to the bioavailable ion, released by the parent compound. The result of this assumption is that the ecotoxicological behaviour will be similar for all soluble cobalt and aluminium substances used in the ecotoxicity tests.

As cobalt aluminium oxide has shown to be highly insoluble with regard to the results of the transformation/dissolution test protocol (pH 6, 28 d), it can be assumed that under environmental conditions in aqueous media, the components of the substance will be present in a bioavailable form only in minor amounts, if at all. Within this dossier all available data from cobalt and aluminium substances are pooled and used for the derivation of ecotoxicological and environmental fate endpoints, based on the cobalt ion and aluminium ion. For cobalt, only data from soluble substances were available and for aluminium, both soluble and insoluble substance data were available. All data were pooled and considered as a worst-case assumption for the environment. However, it should be noted that this represents an unrealistic worst-case scenario, as under environmental conditions the concentration of soluble Co2+ and Al3+ ions released is negligible.

Cobalt

Information taken from WHO CICAD (2006):

There is little evidence of cobalt toxicity to plants due to elevated concentrations in soil. Cobalt tolerance, along with tolerance to other metals, has been found in plant populations growing on soils high in particular metals. Exclusion of the metal has been demonstrated in the cobalt tolerance of some species, whereas others growing on cobalt-rich copper clearings are hyperaccumulators of cobalt. Adverse effects on earthworm growth and springtail reproduction have been reported at >=92 -100 mg Co/kg dry weight. Data regarding the toxicity of cobalt to soil microorganisms are limited. In the terrestrial environment, adverse effects of cobalt on birds and wild mammals would appear unlikely, with cobalt deficiency in ruminants more likely than cobalt toxicosis (WHO CICAD, 2006).

References: World Health Organization (2006). Concise International Chemical Assessment Document 69. COBALT AND INORGANIC COBALT COMPOUNDS.

Aluminium
To place a proper perspective on the assessment of aluminium in soils, the Executive Summary of the USEPA EcoSSL (Ecological Soil Screening Level) assessment for aluminium is quoted.

 

SUMMARY OF ECO-SSLs FOR ALUMINUM

"Aluminum (Al) is the most commonly occurring metallic element, comprising eight percent of the earth's crust (Press and Siever, 1974). It is a major component of almost all common inorganic soil particles, with the exceptions of quartz sand, chert fragments, and

ferromanganiferous concretions. The typical range of aluminum in soils is from 1 percent to 30 percent (10,000 to 300,000 mg Al kg-1) (Lindsay, 1979 and Dragun, 1988), with naturally

occurring concentrations varying over several orders of magnitude.

EPA recognizes that due to the ubiquitous nature of aluminum, the natural variability of aluminum soil concentrations and the availability of conservative soil screening benchmarks (Efroymson, 1997a; 1997b), aluminum is often identified as a COPC for ecological risk assessments. The commonly used soil screening benchmarks (Efroymson, 1997a; 1997b) are based on laboratory toxicity testing using an aluminum solution that is added to test soils.

Comparisons of total aluminum concentrations in soil samples to soluble aluminum-based screening values are deemed by EPA to be inappropriate. The standard analytical measurement of aluminum in soils under CERCLA contract laboratory procedures (CLP) is total recoverable metal. The available data on the environmental chemistry and toxicity of aluminum in soil to plants, soil invertebrates, mammals and birds as summarized in this document support the following conclusions:

• Total aluminum in soil is not correlated with toxicity to the tested plants and soil invertebrates.

• Aluminum toxicity is associated with soluble aluminum.

• Soluble aluminum and not total aluminum is associated with the uptake and bioaccumulation of aluminum from soils into plants.

• The oral toxicity of aluminum compounds in soil is dependent upon the chemical form (Storer and Nelson, 1968). Insoluble aluminum compounds such as aluminum oxides are considerably less toxic compared to the soluble forms (aluminum chloride, nitrate, acetate, and sulfate). For example, Storer and Nelson (1968) observed no toxicity to the chick at up to 1.6% of the diet as aluminum oxide compared to 80 to 100% mortality in chicks fed soluble forms at 0.5% of the diet.

 

Because the measurement of total aluminum in soils is not considered suitable or reliable for the prediction of potential toxicity and bioaccumulation, an alternative procedure is recommended for screening aluminum in soils. The procedure is intended as a practical approach for determining if aluminum in site soils could pose a potential risk to ecological receptors. This alternative procedure replaces the derivation of numeric Eco-SSL values for aluminum."

References:

Efroymson, R.A., M.E. Will, and G.W. Suter II, 1997a. Toxicological Benchmarks for Potential Contaminants of Concern for Effects on Soil and Litter Invertebrates and Heterotrophic Process,ES/ER/TM-126/R2, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN.

 

Efroymson, R.A., M.E. Will, G.W. Suter II, and A.C. Wooten, 1997b. Toxicological Benchmarks for Screening Contaminants of Potential Concern for Effects on Terrestrial Plants: 1997 Revision, ES/ER/TM-85/R3, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN.

 

Dragun, 1988.The Soil Chemistry of Hazardous Materials. Hazardous Materials ControlResearch Institute.Silver Spring, MD USA.

 

Lindsay, W.L. 1979. Chemical Equilibria in Soils.John Wiley & Sons.

 

Press, F. and R. Siever. 1974. Earth. W. H. Freeman and Co.

Storer N.L.,Nelson T.S. 1968. The effect of various aluminum compounds on chick performance. Poult Sci.Jan; 47(1):244-7.