Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 244-848-1 | CAS number: 22224-92-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
![](https://echa.europa.eu/o/diss-blank-theme/images/factsheets/A-REACH/factsheet/print_ecotoxicological-information.png)
Toxicity to terrestrial plants
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to terrestrial plants, other
- Remarks:
- Herbicidal screening data on phytotoxic effects after emergence
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 21 days
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Remarks:
- according to Annex 3 of draft OECD 208 (2000), Annex 3 was not adopted in the final OECD 208 (2006).
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 208 (Terrestrial Plants Test: Seedling Emergence and Seedling Growth Test)
- Version / remarks:
- according to draft OECD 208 (2000) document
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Method is described to follow Annex 3 of the draft OECD Guideline 208 (2000): Use of Screening/Efficacy Data: Recommended Minimum Data Requirements. The aim of this method is to record potential phytotoxic effects of the test item on at least six plant species from at least four plant families. The more species information available, the more robust the data set and the greater the ability to demonstrate a lack of effect.
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- The test item is Fenamiphos CS 240
- Analytical monitoring:
- no
- Details on sampling:
- not applicable
- Vehicle:
- no
- Details on preparation and application of test substrate:
- Spray treatments were applied in an automatic spray chamber. The spray chamber was adjusted as follows: pressure 3 bar; height of spray boom 45 cm; nozzle type: 8003E; water application rate to the target area 1000 litres/ha; the material was applied in single applications of 1000, 2000, 5000, 10000 and 15000 g a.i./ha.
For spray treatments the test solutions were briefly shaken and then directly applied through a spraying nozzle. Prior to each application of new test material, the spray nozzle was cleaned at the rinsing station. The adjustments of the spray chamber were recalibrated every six months. - Species:
- Zea mays
- Plant group:
- Monocotyledonae (monocots)
- Species:
- Beta vulgaris
- Plant group:
- Dicotyledonae (dicots)
- Species:
- other: Sinapis alba
- Plant group:
- Monocotyledonae (monocots)
- Species:
- other: Setaria viridis
- Plant group:
- Monocotyledonae (monocots)
- Species:
- other: Ipomoea herderacea
- Plant group:
- Dicotyledonae (dicots)
- Species:
- other: Galium aparine
- Plant group:
- Dicotyledonae (dicots)
- Species:
- other: Echinochloa crus-galli
- Plant group:
- Monocotyledonae (monocots)
- Species:
- other: Avena fatua
- Plant group:
- Monocotyledonae (monocots)
- Species:
- other: Alopecurus myosuroides
- Plant group:
- Monocotyledonae (monocots)
- Species:
- other: Amaranthus retroflexus
- Plant group:
- Dicotyledonae (dicots)
- Species:
- other: Abutilon theophrasti
- Plant group:
- Dicotyledonae (dicots)
- Test type:
- other: Herbicidal screening on phytotoxic effects
- Study type:
- other: Greenhouse study
- Substrate type:
- natural soil
- Remarks:
- A sandy loam with organic matter of 2.5 - 3 %
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 21 d
- Remarks:
- Plants used in the test were sown, sprayed with the test material and directly placed under the growing conditions. The final evaluation was done 21 days after treatment initiation
- Post exposure observation period:
- not applicable
- Test temperature:
- The plants were kept at a day/night cycle of 22 °C/15 °C
- pH:
- not specified
- Moisture:
- Growing plants were watered as needed
- Details on test conditions:
- Typically 10 seeds of each of the 11 species were sown 24 hours prior to application of the test substance. Seeds were planted together in greenhouse pots of 420 cm2 surface (pot T59). The soil allowed good germination.
The relative humidity in the test chamber was set at 50 % and the duration of illumination (8000 lux) was 14 hours to 10 hours in a day/night rhythm. Plants used for the test were sown, sprayed with the test item and directly placed in the test chambers of the greenhouse. The final evaluation was done 21 days after treatment initiation.
Evaluation of phytotoxicity was done by visual observations using a rating scale of 0 to 100 %, where 100 % represented complete destruction of above ground parts and 0 % represented no visual damage (normal growth) as compared to untreated plants. - Nominal and measured concentrations:
- 1000, 2000, 5000, 10000, 15000 g a.i./ha (nominal test rate)
- Reference substance (positive control):
- no
- Key result
- Species:
- other: all tested species
- Duration:
- 21 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- >= 20 mg/kg soil ww
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- act. ingr.
- Basis for effect:
- phytotoxicity
- Remarks on result:
- other: No phytotoxic effects observed at any test rate for any test species. For an application rate of 15000 g/ha, the concentration in soil is 20 mg/kg soil dw. For details see point "any other information on results incl. tables"
- Species:
- other: all tested species
- Duration:
- 21 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- >= 15 000 g/ha
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- act. ingr.
- Basis for effect:
- phytotoxicity
- Remarks on result:
- other: No phytotoxic effects observed at any test rate for any test species
- Details on results:
- All tested plants species showed no phytotoxic effects (0 % = no visual damage, normal growth) up to the highest application rate of 15000 g a.i./ha, corresponding to 20 mg a.i./kg soil dw (please also see "any other information on results incl. tables").
- Results with reference substance (positive control):
- not applicable
- Reported statistics and error estimates:
- not applicable as no effects (0 %) were observed
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- not applicable
- Remarks:
- Method is described to follow Annex 3 of the draft OECD Guideline 208 (2000): Use of Screening/Efficacy Data: Recommended Minimum Data Requirements. No validity criteria are specified.
- Conclusions:
- In a herbicidal screening test a total of 11 mono- and dicotyledonous plant species were tested under controlled greenhouse conditions in natural soil. 21 d after spray treatment of the potted seeds, phytotoxic effects were evaluated by visual observations using a rating scale of 0 to 100 %, where 100 % represented complete destruction of above ground parts and 0 % represented no visual damage (normal growth) as compared to untreated plants.
All tested plants species showed no phytotoxic effects (0 % = no visual damage, normal growth) up to the highest application rate of 15000 g a.i./ha, corresponding to 20 mg a.i./kg soil dw. - Executive summary:
In a herbicidal screening test following Annex 3 of the draft OECD Guideline 208 (2000), a total of 11 mono- and dicotyledonous plant species were tested under controlled greenhouse conditions in natural soil. No validity criteria are set for the screening test.
Spray treatments were applied in an automatic spray chamber to the potted seeds in single applications of 1000, 2000, 5000, 10000 and 15000 g a.i./ha.
21 d after spray treatment of the potted seeds, phytotoxic effects were evaluated by visual observations using a rating scale of 0 to 100 %, where 100 % represented complete destruction of above ground parts and 0 % represented no visual damage (normal growth) as compared to untreated plants.
All tested plants species showed no phytotoxic effects (0 % = no visual damage, normal growth) up to the highest application rate of 15000 g a.i./ha, corresponding to 20 mg a.i./kg soil dw.
Reference
The highest application rate of 15000 g a.i./ha is converted to receive the concentration in soil for the use in the risk assessment based on the FOCUS model:
Concentration in soil = A x ( 1- fint ) / ( 100 x depth x bd )
where
A = application rate (g/ha)
fint = fraction intercepted by crop canopy
depth = mixing depth (cm)
bd = dry soil bulk density (g/cm3 )
In compliance with the FOCUS Guidance a bulk density of 1.5 g/cm3 and a mixing depth of 5cm for applications to the soil surface were considered. No interception is considered.
For an application rate of 15000 g/ha, the concentration in soil is 20 mg/kg soil dw.
Description of key information
In a herbicidal screening test a total of 11 mono- and dicotyledonous plant species were tested under controlled greenhouse conditions in natural soil. 21 d after spray treatment of the potted seeds, phytotoxic effects were evaluated.
All tested plants species showed no phytotoxic effects (0 % = no visual damage, normal growth) up to the highest application rate of 15000 g a.i./ha, corresponding to 20 mg a.i./kg soil dw.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- Long-term EC10, LC10 or NOEC for terrestrial plants:
- 20 mg/kg soil dw
Additional information
In a herbicidal screening test a total of 11 mono- and dicotyledonous plant species were tested under controlled greenhouse conditions in natural soil. 21 d after spray treatment of the potted seeds, phytotoxic effects were evaluated by visual observations using a rating scale of 0 to 100 %, where 100 % represented complete destruction of above ground parts and 0 % represented no visual damage (normal growth) as compared to untreated plants.
All tested plants species showed no phytotoxic effects (0 % = no visual damage, normal growth) up to the highest application rate of 15000 g a.i./ha, corresponding to 20 mg a.i./kg soil dw.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
![ECHA](/o/diss-blank-theme/images/factsheets/A-REACH/factsheet/echa_logo.png)